Quote:
Originally Posted by buggyone
There is absolutely nothing that states a woman is mandated to secure birth control from any source. If she does not want birth control, no one is forcing her to use it.
No, it is not a short step to require only one child or to force abortions. That makes no sense whatsoever.
There are no "freedoms" being taken away one slice at a time.
There are freedoms being formed similar to the civil rights freedoms of the 1960's that show courage.
|
Hi buggyone: past is prologue to the future. From the Civil rights Act of 1964 to The Endangered Act to the Dept of Education, Energy, EPA IRS ad nauseam government has through tax policies and regulations stepped on our freedoms so much so that I find myself singing "Do You Hear The People Sing"?
Powerful forces have said out loud that people are bad at choosing and so we must choose for them.
While HL ended up denying a selected few abortion pills/remedies it left available birth control RX.
From an economic position i don't want to pay for someone's birth control and more importantly I don't want the government to tell anyone it has to be paid/covered under a policy of insurance. Because if the government can do that then in time they will nimble away until they can force someone to abort.
You say no the explain ACA
I want government out of my life and out of my back pocket because everything they touch turns to
Opportunist will paint this HL decision as the war on women. and the unfortunate truth is that the electorate is so divided or so unsophisticated
that they buy in to propaganda .
Freedom is a very delicate balance and far too many Americans take it for granted