Quote:
Originally Posted by njbchbum
But I have not heard that any one of them declared to be a victim of human trafficking! The key word 'abuse' is apparently being used by our government rather than those crossing the border!
A read through the law is fascinating and a great revelation as to how we have been DUPED!
|
Well, what I have read is that they are required to show up for a hearing and that only about 10% have actually shown up, so I suppose they are roaming the streets somewhere.
And few, if any, are refused at the border when they declare this law; Just told they have to show up for a hearing, which then they do not attend.
At the risk of being political which is not my intent, I will share a note from an article and if admin finds it political, please simply delete that portion. My intent is to simply share information on a very important issue.
So...here is the quote and the link which discusses the law...
"As I listened on CSPAN radio, an infuriating Mark H. Greenberg, acting assistant secretary at HHS, finally had to admit that it was a deliberate administration policy not to ask the immigration status of parents with whom they were placing illegal immigrant children. Are you kidding me? If the President was dead serious about stopping illegal immigration, and if all departments of government were, in turn, working in consort to solve this epidemic, immigration status would be the first thing that HHS checked. No wonder illegal immigrant children don't show up for deportation hearings. Their illegal immigrant parents and guardians don't want to be busted themselves!"
Dear President Obama: Secure The Border Now Or Risk Civil War*|*James Marshall Crotty
This from the Huffington Post also spends time in layman language discussing the law itself.
I am still infuriated about a discussion of voting blocs that someone brought up earlier. What kind of a nation are we that our security, the fiber of our country takes second or third place to voting blocs ? If this is involved in anyway....well...