[KeepingItReal]

Originally Posted by shcisamax

Gosh, got Monsanto stock?

No just because GE has a guy working in the administration doesn't mean the GE products are bad. That said, if you actually take a look at the chart in the link, you will see it isn't one or two people. It is a rather looooong list.
What it means is IF GMOs were not safe, but lucrative, they would have no problem ensuring the business.
I think you can find quite a bit of serious research that provides for the concern people are expressing as to the toxicity of GMOs.

No stock but wish I did. If you look at the money spent by all companies and especially the large companies on lobbyist you can see they all want to have regulations and tax treatment to favor their position whatever it is. Why would we expect anything different right or wrong from Monsanto?

What is your plan or do you have a plan to fix it all?

There would not be near enough crop production to feed and meet the needs of world without them so what is the plan to fix it all say all GMO's were outlawed today?

Unless you have raised Corn, Wheat, Oats, Rye, Barley, Soybeans, Alfalfa, and Milo it is no doubt difficult to understand but the sky is not falling. Some have been modified for many years already and farmers would never go back to the yields and production issues of the past.

Maybe we can discuss Irradiated food next after GMOs. Here is an interesting link....http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/33/3/375.full