There have been a few instances (and one most recently) where someone has lit into a poster for his/her position, and when that someone's former posts were read, it could be proven that this person was contradicting himself.
The "person being attacked", if you will, who read the "attacker's," if you also will, prior posts and quoted both contradictory posts, was only defending herself. I see nothing wrong with that.
If you're going to go after someone for his or her opinion, better be sure you are not making a fool out of yourself.
__________________
It's harder to hate close up.
|