Bonanza, my point is that those attorney fees are keeping this in limbo and making it continue as a CDD.
I love the way this place is run. I have no reason to not trust the developers. It is my opinion that the law suit that was brought by that HOA was unnecessary and really screwed things up for the people on the "other" side of 466. I was here "THEN" and saw NO evidence of things that needed to be changed or repaired and no reason to sue the Morses. The developer does not appear to need his feet held to the fire to continue to add new and wonderful things. Yes I have been the observer of several HOA's over time and they have often made dumb decisions. Unqualified and self important people used them for their bully pulpits and did not run them for the "greater good".
Let's agree to disagree.
I think that the homeowner's association that you like so much is simply against the developer mostly because of politics. I would think differently if they held elections and allowed other people to be the head of it. Correct me if I am wrong. In the history of that organization there have only been TWO presidents.
I do not want to be involved with any HOA. I have no desire to captain any ship or direct anything. I just like to type.
I like how things are run here. I think this place is as perfect as it gets.
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
|