Quote:
Originally Posted by bimmertl
You have been beating this dead horse on this site for years and all you have proven is your lack of understanding of the litigation process and your extreme bias towards the developer. And, as usual, any factual statements which, despite being 100% factual, which reflect negatively on the wonderful developer, are considered "negative". Better not read the latest POA and read how Morse feels about pond maintenance costs and who should pay.
This settlement included a confidentiality agreement. Normally that covers the amount of the settlement but that is well known. No doubt during the discovery process things were brought to light that were less than favorable to Morse which prompted him caving in and offering to settle. So none of the parties, including the attorney can discuss anything they may have discovered.
In addition, it's not easy being a named plaintiff against one of the most powerful developers in the state.
The settlements were approved by a judge so any thoughts such as yours regarding some unjust enrichment are simply incorrect.
To put things in the most understandable terms, Morse bought their silence. Doubt many of them even made the minimum wage if you ever added up the hours they spent on this multi million dollar settlement.
|
Thank you for bringing this sentence to my attention. I had "read" through the paper and missed that little bomb completely. So as a resident of CCD3 I will be liable for restoration to two ponds on two golf courses. Two of our representatives voted against signing the agreement to make the residents pay for their maintenance, while three of our representatives left us hanging out to dry. Very interesting and completely overlooked by many of us! Thanks for the heads up ................ See page 6 of the POA November Bulletin.