Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon
...
Again the Developer jettisoned the indoor pool because it was too expensive to maintain. If a multi-billionaire sees this as a liability rather than an asset then how does the AAC believe it should proceed with this albatross?
|
I question if that is really the reason they did away with the indoor pool. Why would an indoor pool be more expensive to maintain than any other pool? Its all about maintaining the level of chemicals and keeping the pumps and filters running. If anything it would be easier. The pumps and filters are inside in a temperature controlled environment and not subject to the temperature extremes that the outdoor pools encounter.
Is it possible they had a use for the space that the indoor pool occupied that would generate more income?