As we look at the developers ability to plan and develop appropriate facilities to accomodate a certain number of villages with a certain number if villages....they have obviously concluded how many pools would be required to provide adequate access for a given population.
As a result there are many, many pools provided for each village or cluster of villages.
Is it being proposed that one enclosed pool will be sufficient to accomodate all who would want to have access to an indoor pool? Then there would be the discussion of where in the almost 40 square miles to put it.....and that certainly will not make for everybody being happy about how far away it might be.
I think there was a lot more to the developers decision to not pusrsue enclosed pools than many would like to hear. As far as liability for heat stroke and the like for water to warm. It is also known the developer has some of the very best legal council and access to thousands of like scenarios around the USA and they do not do much of anything that exposes them to additional risk...hence they continue with open pools for good reason(s) and not enclosed ones.
I find the subject very interesting and an exercise in watching the cost and legal justification anaysis and results.
I say build as many indoor pools as the user base can afford to support!
|