Quote:
Originally Posted by B767drvr
snipped
Through my keen powers of observation, I've noticed that PUBLIC unions give an awful lot of money to certain candidates that believe in confiscating and redistributing tax dollars. It's a very "cute" cycle where PUBLIC unions donate to sympathetic candidates, said candidates are elected, and then… wait for it… oh my gosh, they feel an "obligation" to "repay" their donors in the form of ever increasing benefit and pensions for public service employees.
snipped
|
Such donating is not limited to public unions - right? And we still have PACs and Super PACs. Aren't those contributions 'somewhat' responsible for the recent turn of events when it comes to undoing the limits on corporate and individual campaign contributions?
Do we all not contribute in our own way and to the best of our ability, be it cash, stuffing envelopes, manning the phone bank, hosting a candidate meet and greet, etc. in order to promote our favorite candidate - who in one way or another will be redistributing/controlling/limiting whatever resources are within their purview?
__________________
Not sure if I have free time...or if I just forgot everything I was supposed to do!