[eweissenbach]

Originally Posted by Rags123

This is your post in total...

" Originally Posted by eweissenbach View Post
I would agree IF you were talKing strictly about entrepreneur CEOs, however the CEOs of most Fortune 500 companies have little or no skin in the game aside from the value of their stock options. Responsibilility, yes, but often the underlings answer for poor performance, while the CEO, convinces the shareholders that it was their fault rather than his/hers, or decides that a massive layoff to cut payroll will make the bottom line look better. Now some CEOs are worth every penny, but I am not convinced most are. On the other hand, entrepreneurs, such as Morse, are worth all they accumulate because they did take all the risk and created a stellar product out of dirt."

I highlighted in red those aspects I chose to respond to.

If you felt I did not understand your post, I am sorry, but I think I understood it totally.

And there I thought I posted as RAGS123, and you used BUCCO again...well, so be it I guess.

I am out of here...the OP did not like the direction of the thread and this is becoming personal posts which is against the rules of TOTV.

It s convenient I suppose, or fits your agenda, to respond ONLY to the part of my post that you pull out of context. The preceding sentence CLEARLY stated that I was not including entrepreneurs in my statement.