Quote:
Originally Posted by manaboutown
Thank you for bringing this up Joe. There must be a readily implementable, satisfactory and workable solution out there.
The demographic reality is more and more 55 and over people are single/divorced/widowed and remaining so (another baby boomer trend?).
This pass issue has been and continues to be a primary concern for me as a potential single Villager. As it stands, singles are subsidizing the two or more folks households because the amenities fees are paid on a per household basis rather than a per person basis.
I like the previously proposed idea of having a pass that allows single resident Villagers to bring outside dates to Villagers only facilities and events. These passes could be restricted to "only when accompanies by the identified single Villager".
|
Yes Joe, thank you for bringing this issue up since I was not aware of which will very much change my TV retirement plans
I was widowed in my 40s and have been in a 12 year live in relationship with my partner, and for financial reasons we likely will not legally marry. I own my current home outright, and my plan when the time came was to sell it and purchase a home in TV with only my name on the deed for which my partner does not want to be on it anyway. I am not here to debate the TV rules, but glad to be made aware of this rule so now we can focus on alternate retirement plans.