
01-01-2015, 12:32 PM
|
Sage
|
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,695
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1,258 Times in 725 Posts
|
|
I think you are generally better off not saying that it is "unfair". "Unfair" is a relative term and is also a "woe is me" statement designed to elicit an emotional response. Anyone could claim that it would be "unfair" to change the rules and provide 2 IDs for single people because single people would now be getting special treatment. I don't believe you will get very far in pursuing this because we all knew what the restrictions were when we bought. Almost anyone can find some restriction they don't like in a deed restricted community.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2BNTV
Being a single person, I have only one complaint about TV.
You only get one resident I.D. and married couples get two. I know the rules that it goes by the names on the deed, etc. I still think this is unfair.
If a single person meets someone outside of TV and who wants to take their date to a resident function where they need to produce a resident I.D. and or gets into a relationship, the other person does not have access as the resident does, because the single person has one resident I.D.
I know people will respond that "it is what it is", but the singles get screwed. IMHO
It indicates one needs to live with a person, if they want to enjoy their company in TV environment. It seems to be a little far fetch option, as opposed to, getting two resident I.D's. Would it kill everything about TV, if single people got an second or resident/guest I.D? How many extra I.D's. would need to be distributed?
I know it's the developer ballpark and he/she can take his/her bat and ball home, if someone states a different point of view. It seems like a form of discrimination, against the single populace.
This has been discussed before but would like to see if there are any options, to changing this scenario.
Just waiting for the married people to say BOO-HOO!!! 
|
|