![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There are a few villages that only allow one dog per home, very few. |
They do not. A copy of the restrictions was mailed with the letter and I just looked it up online. See section 2.22
https://www.districtgov.org/images/D...%201/S1-11.pdf |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It still goes back to the fact that she moved in with two dogs, and neither one of them has died and been replaced. She should be okay.
|
I don't think any harm will come to your friend or her furry friends. I think she is worried for no good reason. You would be best to call and talk to them saying what you told us.
|
Quote:
|
Hopefully the mods will just shut this thread down. Thank you to all who were truly helpful. I had no idea that a simple post of facts could go so far into debating, doubting, and accusing over which areas allow how many dogs.
The facts were in the first post. Again, thanks to those who wanted to help and not be accusing or doubting. I would post the letter, but some would still go there. I'm glad my friend doesn't have to see this. She would be truly dismayed. |
My point again is that if you want to protect your friend, call them and talk to them. I think you will find them to be supportive and helpful.
I know of several people who have three dogs and there has been no problem. As Chi town pointed out. We had three cats when we moved here. |
This is interesting to me in light of the discussion of the young child living in Country Club Hills. The online news had an interview with CDD supervisers, who said they have no legal standing to get involved with internal deed restrictions, only with external ones. Wouldn't the number of pets be an internal restriction?
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.