Pre-owned homes appreciated 27% in a year

[gomoho]

The Daily Sun reports pre-owned homes have appreciated 27% since the first quarter of 2013 till the first quarter of 2014.

Thoughts or opinions on this number?

I stand corrected - the following explains where the 27% number came from.

•In Q1 2013 the pre-owned ave. selling price was $199,326.
•In Q1 2014 the pre-owned ave. selling price was $253,179

[jnieman]

For us I think about 22 percent. I do like that number though!

[Madelaine Amee]

The Daily Sun reports pre-owned homes have appreciated 27% since the first quarter of 2013 till the first quarter of 2014.

Thoughts or opinions on this number?

I think it may depend on where the house is situated - Village, view, water, golf course, executive or championship. The home next door to me sold recently for 50% more than they paid, 9 years old, had upgrades to the kitchen and bathroom and a huge added sun room with wonderful views on championship golf course.

[justjim]

Prices of both new and resales have gone up. I think on a resale it depends on location and the condition of the house.

There certainly is exuberance on the part of Newbees to purchase new homes before "some" say there will be no more. Of course, the price of new homes have gone up because there is a demand. The sales people are doing a good job with the "final phase."

New homes have gone up about 25% but some resales in a good location have gone up even more. Could there be a "bubble" developing?

[al & jane]

If you have been in your home a while go to Zillow.com and type in your address. You may be very pleasantly surprised at their "zestimate" of your current home value.

[Cedwards38]

Yahooooooo! But I'm still not selling.

[Ohiogirl]

If a resale home has "upgrades" and "additions," then the sale price minus the original purchase price doesn't really show the appreciation. To be accurate, you would need to subtract the cost of the upgrades/additions/replacements you have made and then see how much your home has appreciated.

I think that's why the numbers seem so high - most people have made significant improvements - but not all. A fairer number would be to compare original purchase prices with homes that have resold with little or no improvements. There are some of those around, particularly those that have been used lightly by snowbirds, or bought to be mainly rentals and then sold for various reasons without improvements having been made.

[ilovetv]

Prices of both new and resales have gone up. I think on a resale it depends on location and the condition of the house.

There certainly is exuberance on the part of Newbees to purchase new homes before "some" say there will be no more. Of course, the price of new homes have gone up because there is a demand. The sales people are doing a good job with the "final phase."

New homes have gone up about 25% but some resales in a good location have gone up even more. Could there be a "bubble" developing?

In hopes of all our resale prices going up, I keep hoping that the TV Sales and MLS agents would strongly focus their sellers on what the "new home" shoppers see which makes them want a new construction home instead of a resale.

Newcomers who are flocking in to get a new home are seeing (new) homes with new flooring, decorating that is modern and tasteful (not saved from the 1970s), or a home that is staged neatly and completely clutter free.

Looking at the resale listings, I often stop and rub my eyes at the photos of even million-dollar resale homes having 1970's china cabinets and dining sets, and other furniture brought from northern past homes of the owners.

For everyone's resale sake, it would be better if sellers were told by listing agents to either get professional staging done, or to empty the home completely and show it with fresh neutral paint colors that would make it look more like a new home.

[skyguy79]

The Daily Sun reports pre-owned homes have appreciated 27% since the first quarter of 2013 till the first quarter of 2014I find the reported 27% a little hard to believe. I just randomly checked out 4 properties around TV at different Villages, different sized homes and with and without water and golf course views. Here are my one year findings:

Property 1 = 18% (our home w/o views)
Property 2 = 11% (with views)
Property 3 = 05% (with views)
Property 4 = 20% (Villa w/o views)

My general observations are that the larger the home with the best views had the lowest increase, whereas the villa without any special views had the greatest increase. Interestingly I though before hand that would be just the opposite I would have found.

For those who want to find out their increase and don't know how to do it, here's how:


Enter your address in Google Search
Chose the Zillow link if you find one for your home.
Scroll down where you'll find a time graph of values
Mouse over the end of the graph and using the solid line you'll find the current value in a small box on the left.
Next move you mouse to the point that's at the one year back point to find the starting value, again in that small box. Currently that starting month would be March of 2013.
Next calculate the change % using the following formula:

Current Value {minus} Starting Value {divided by} Starting Value {equals} value change percentage.... or:

Current Value {minus} Starting Value
--------------------------------------- = increase/decrease %
Starting Value

If you successfully carried out that formula, you should now know what your presumably increased value percentage is. :ho:

[dewilson58]

Nice increases, just not back to 2005, 2006, 2007 valuations.

[George Bieniaszek]

Bought my CYV in 2010 for $168K and Zillow is saying it is valued at $208K. I am liking those numbers !!!

[Average Guy]

My experience with Zillow is that their estimates of home values are not always very accurate.

[dewilson58]

My experience with Zillow is that their estimates of home values are not always very accurate.

Agree. It's a calculated estimate. Difficult to value without a walk-thru.

[JMEZARIC3]

The Daily Sun reports pre-owned homes have appreciated 27% since the first quarter of 2013 till the first quarter of 2014.

Thoughts or opinions on this number?

I stand corrected - the following explains where the 27% number came from.

�In Q1 2013 the pre-owned ave. selling price was $199,326.
�In Q1 2014 the pre-owned ave. selling price was $253,179
We purchased a Patio Villa in Lynnhaven during May 2013.Prices on similar Patio Villas are now 15 to 20% higher.Not a bad return for one year.I wish that we purchased in 2011.Our gain would have been 30 to 40%.
But folks who purchased Patio Villas at the market peak(2008?) are now able to sell at a small gain. The housing market goes up and down.In the long run purchasing a home is a good investment.

[jnieman]

We purchased a Patio Villa in Lynnhaven during May 2013.Prices on similar Patio Villas are now 15 to 20% higher.Not a bad return for one year.I wish that we purchased in 2011.Our gain would have been 30 to 40%.
But folks who purchased Patio Villas at the market peak(2008?) are now able to sell at a small gain. The housing market goes up and down.In the long run purchasing a home is a good investment.

I believe the market peaked in 2006.

[janmcn]

Nobody knows what the current value of their house is unless they just sold it today. Your home's value is what somebody will pay for it, not what your neighbor's house just sold for or not what some real estate salesperson just quoted you.

[buggyone]

Okay, my home value has increased 27%. Big deal. I am not moving so what difference does it make to me? Probably just higher property tax.

[tippyclubb]

When we were interviewing real estate agents all 3 of them told us pricing information on Zillows is not accurate. They informed us most of the time Zillows under prices homes and they do not use it in their market analysis. We found this to be true when our home sold for a little over 30 grand more than the Zillows Zestimate.

[skyguy79]

When we were interviewing real estate agents all 3 of them told us pricing information on Zillows is not accurate. They informed us most of the time Zillows under prices homes and they do not use it in their market analysis. We found this to be true when our home sold for a little over 30 grand more than the Zillows Zestimate.
I don't think anyone was saying or implying that Zillow is accurate. I know I wasn't and made it clear that I was using it as a base for my calculations. I'm sure however that the agents claims were accurate as the same has been told to me in the last two homes we sold up north.

Also, as for the real estate agents statement that Zillow under prices, I don't find that unusual. They generally go strictly on accessible sales and tax information, but can't give individual attention to each property like agents can, nor do they have the resources agents do to make more accurate appraisals. These places like Zillow are also affected by the lack of updating for accurate information. i.e. some sites have our pool included and some don't.

At the same time I have seen listings here in TOTV that were higher than a Zestimate from Zillow. Matter of fact, the selling price listed on a TV property I saw within the last few weeks was exactly at the top of Zillows price range estimate for that particular home. So their zestimates are not always underestimated.

In checking the estimates at ten different services like Zillow, I found that our home ranged anywhere from a low of well under $300,000 to a high of over $400,000 at one site. Also Zillow was amongst the highest three (3) estimates I found. I've marked those 3 in the following list with a '*'. The rest were considerably lower:


Zillow.com *
Trulia.com
Spokeo.com
Redfin.com
Realtor.com
Homes.com
Homefacts.com *
Realestateabc.com *
Point2homes.com
Remax.com

[Wiserbud47]

The Daily Sun reports pre-owned homes have appreciated 27% since the first quarter of 2013 till the first quarter of 2014.

Thoughts or opinions on this number?

I stand corrected - the following explains where the 27% number came from.

�In Q1 2013 the pre-owned ave. selling price was $199,326.
�In Q1 2014 the pre-owned ave. selling price was $253,179

The average selling price increase of 27% in one year does not mean that houses have appreciated that much. If more of the larger designer houses were sold during that quarter, it would increase the average selling price in that quarter. You would have to find very similar houses sold in each quarter to find the correct appreciation.

[Cisco Kid]

My dream is Slip Slidin' Away

Add that rate times the years I must still work. :(

I cannot buy now.

My one shot is to pull all my cash out of my 401k and take a shot with the Lotto.

I love it when a plan comes together.

:D

[gomoho]

The average selling price increase of 27% in one year does not mean that houses have appreciated that much. If more of the larger designer houses were sold during that quarter, it would increase the average selling price in that quarter. You would have to find very similar houses sold in each quarter to find the correct appreciation.

Wiserbud - if you read the entire post you would see where I corrected the information to reflect the average selling price on pre-owned went up that amount.

[rockaway]

In 2004 we purchased a new patio villa for $114,000 and sold it 18 months

later for $176,000. The current value increases have a long way to go to

top that.

[2BNTV]

In June/July of2013, brand new patio villas were selling for mid 140's. Now selling in the upper 180's.

27% increase in value is right, for a brand new patio villa.

All pre-owned homes need to calculate what their increased value is, after subtracting monies for upgrades, etc...... IMHO

[skyguy79]

The average selling price increase of 27% in one year does not mean that houses have appreciated that much. This is correct and I believe that some people don't realize that the report given stated that it is the "overall average" that's represented by the 27%. Some sales might be quite higher and some lower, even to the point of a loss. This happened to the people that sold us our home in 2011. They took an11% loss on the sale from what they paid when buying new.If more of the larger designer houses were sold during that quarter, it would increase the average selling price in that quarter.This may not be true. As I indicated in my prior post, what I found in the different types of homes I researched is that larger homes had the smallest appreciation while smaller ones had the highest appreciation. I could be wrong about that though, because I only used a small sampling of properties rather than take hours using more properties.
Not very scientific, but then again I'm not a mad scientist! http://www.mellophant.com/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif

[Rango]

I sold my 18 month old house in Sept 2013 for 25 percent more than I purchased it for.

Your results may vary.

[slipcovers]

In 2004 we purchased a new patio villa for $114,000 and sold it 18 months

later for $176,000. The current value increases have a long way to go to

top that.

In 2006 a new patio villa in Liberty with a better lot( no house behind) was low $130,000. You must have done a lot of upgrades to get that price. In fact there was a lottery on houses in 2006, had 24 or 48 hours to decide.

[gomoho]

[QUOTE=skyguy79;879389]This is correct and I believe that some people don't realize that the report given stated that it is the "overall average" that's represented by the 27%. Some sales might be quite higher and some lower, even to the point of a loss. This happened to the people that sold us our home in 2011. They took an11% loss on the sale from what they paid when buying new.

2011 was a million years ago in the world of real estate.