PDA

View Full Version : Ebola quarantined


DDoug
10-06-2014, 07:11 AM
When we take a pet to another country they are quarantined for up to six months so why can't the people traveling from Africa be quarantined for 21 days. It has to be debated , sorry doesn't make any sense to me.

KayakerNC
10-06-2014, 07:49 AM
From the article.
"So what should you do if you fear Ebola is coming to get you? Kaplan had one idea. "Turn off the TV," he advised."
It’s highly unlikely that you’ll become infected with Ebola. So what are you so afraid of? - The Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2014/10/05/nothing-to-fear-but-ebola-itself/)

graciegirl
10-06-2014, 09:36 AM
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Before immunization was available for the serious kind of measles that could kill, blind or cause deafness in children, the only way to handle it was to quarantine a home. I remember the signs for Measles on neighborhood windows in the late forties in Columbus,Ohio.

This is a very serious illness and could kill my beloved family and everyone's beloved family. I am very worried about it.

Drastic measures have to be put in place now, or there may be no tomorrow for a lot of people.

TexaninVA
10-06-2014, 09:45 AM
When we take a pet to another country they are quarantined for up to six months so why can't the people traveling from Africa be quarantined for 21 days. It has to be debated , sorry doesn't make any sense to me.

Thanks for raising this issue.

Common sense would clearly indicate to restrict travelers from West African countries where Ebola has broken out. Duh.

The people who say "don't worry about it" seem to be detached from reality .... for reasons that I think are literally irrational. They say Ebola is not that contagious ... oh, now that's a comfort for an illness with something close to a 90% fatality rate if one does get it. In addition, it's not clear at what point in the early stages that a definitive medical diagnosis of Ebola can be made vs that of simply the flu for example. It's also not clear when, in the early stages, it actually becomes contagious.

Thus, the safest thing to do is restrict travel. However, I think some people view this to be 'discriminatory.' You know what? That is too d*** bad in this case.

sunnyatlast
10-06-2014, 09:58 AM
Duncan lied on the screening questionnaire at the airport in Liberia, for a reason.

The 911 airplane bombers lied about their reasons for being here in the U.S., too.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/03/world/africa/dallas-ebola-patient-thomas-duncan-airport-screening.html?_r=0

jblum315
10-06-2014, 11:27 AM
I don't know. I had Q fever once (a bacterial infection indigenous to Asia) and all I'd done was pick up my husband at JFK.

keywest
10-06-2014, 12:15 PM
When we take a pet to another country they are quarantined for up to six months so why can't the people traveling from Africa be quarantined for 21 days. It has to be debated , sorry doesn't make any sense to me.

DDoug....This makes sense to me also...Now we are stuck with this Duncan and his illness basically because he was untruthful when coming here.....Cmon U.S. wake up

Villages PL
10-06-2014, 01:18 PM
When we take a pet to another country they are quarantined for up to six months so why can't the people traveling from Africa be quarantined for 21 days. It has to be debated , sorry doesn't make any sense to me.

Who would pay for the 21 days in quarantine?

kansasr
10-06-2014, 01:31 PM
And perhaps Europe should insist on a 21 day quarantine for all people coming from the United States because we have a case in the US.

Just stay in your home and turn off the television if Ebola worries you so much.

Villages PL
10-06-2014, 01:57 PM
Here's another idea: Don't exchange bodily fluids with anyone who has just flown in from Africa.

Chi-Town
10-06-2014, 02:08 PM
Sitting in DFW after a few days in the Big D. People were excited about the Cowboys-Texans game, the State Fair, and a big storm that hit on Thursday. A lot more angst on this thread.

BTW, security was a breeze.

rubicon
10-06-2014, 02:13 PM
I believe that if medical professionals do not take aggressive actions to contain this Ebola outbreak it will soon travel beyond West Africa. Ebola could mutate and once it does contagion could come in the form of being airborne. the flu season is upon us and that will complicate this issue. Keep in mind 43 states already experiencing a enterovirus that killed a young boy

They should restrict travel from West Africa to any place in the world until they have this outbreak under control.

but you won't hear tht from those responsible for containment

dbussone
10-06-2014, 02:35 PM
Who would pay for the 21 days in quarantine?


The same people paying for Duncan's hospitalization - us!

graciegirl
10-06-2014, 02:36 PM
and perhaps europe should insist on a 21 day quarantine for all people coming from the united states because we have a case in the us.

Just stay in your home and turn off the television if ebola worries you so much.


OH for a second or two there, I didn't know you were just kidding until I read your post below.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kansasr quote:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that vaccinations prevented 79,000 flu hospitalizations and 6.6 million flu-associated illnesses during the 2012-13 influenza season. Complications from the flu can be serious and result in hospitalization, and even death, for some patients. The best way to prevent the flu is to get vaccinated. unquotte

dbussone
10-06-2014, 02:39 PM
I believe that if medical professionals do not take aggressive actions to contain this Ebola outbreak it will soon travel beyond West Africa. Ebola could mutate and once it does contagion could come in the form of being airborne. the flu season is upon us and that will complicate this issue. Keep in mind 43 states already experiencing a enterovirus that killed a young boy

They should restrict travel from West Africa to any place in the world until they have this outbreak under control.

but you won't hear tht from those responsible for containment


We have a serious issue in this country when our leaders and medical authorities won't tell the truth or take appropriate action in order to remain PC.

TexaninVA
10-06-2014, 02:43 PM
And perhaps Europe should insist on a 21 day quarantine for all people coming from the United States because we have a case in the US.

Just stay in your home and turn off the television if Ebola worries you so much.

I'm curious about your response ... why the lapse into sarcasm?

Can you address the issues that others have raised? Do you, for example, know when the symptoms definitely indicate Ebola, as opposed to the flu? Or, can you tell us with certainty when it becomes infectious? Please enlighten us.

And finally, do you follow your own advice about turning off the TV when it comes to other current events topics such as ISIS?

graciegirl
10-06-2014, 02:43 PM
Now is the time to stand up for your belief in the germ theory.

TexaninVA
10-06-2014, 02:44 PM
The same people paying for Duncan's hospitalization - us!

Assuming Duncan survives, he should then be prosecuted and deported.

KayakerNC
10-06-2014, 03:03 PM
We have a serious issue in this country when our leaders and medical authorities won't tell the truth or take appropriate action in order to remain PC.
Speaking of medical authorities and truth.
Did Thomas Duncan get dumped back on the street by the for-profit hospital because he's a Liberian national on a US visa and probably didn't have insurance?

graciegirl
10-06-2014, 03:22 PM
Speaking of medical authorities and truth.
Did Thomas Duncan get dumped back on the street by the for-profit hospital because he's a Liberian national on a US visa and probably didn't have insurance?

Profit or not for profit is another issue entirely. Both kinds of hospitals take people without insurance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charity_care

That is what Rubicon taught me is a red herring. A change of subject in the face of a serious issue.

What do you think is the answer here? The answer to how we should handle the risk of Ebola spreading? What would you do if you had the power to do it?

DDoug
10-06-2014, 03:28 PM
Who would pay for the 21 days the person being quarantined if they cant pay back to Africa

DDoug
10-06-2014, 03:29 PM
Just remember HIV and that was only on a select few

gomoho
10-06-2014, 04:32 PM
First case has now been documented in Spain. Someone today said other African countries were restricting movement, but we can't??? Please - the first step would be if your passport says Liberia you will not enter this country until further notice. It's a start. Oh yeah, I just remembered we forgot how to say no!

Barefoot
10-06-2014, 04:42 PM
What do you think is the answer here? The answer to how we should handle the risk of Ebola spreading? What would you do if you had the power to do it?


They should restrict travel from West Africa to any place in the world until they have this outbreak under control.

I think that Rubicon already stated the answer.

graciegirl
10-06-2014, 04:48 PM
I think that Rubicon already stated the answer.

I agree. I was asking those who think it is no big deal.

Barefoot
10-06-2014, 05:13 PM
I agree. I was asking those who think it is no big deal.

I believe that if medical professionals do not take aggressive actions to contain this Ebola outbreak it will soon travel beyond West Africa. Ebola could mutate and once it does contagion could come in the form of being airborne.

Oh Graciegirl, I'm not sure that anyone thinks that Ebola is "no big deal", even those who say so.
I don't think we can live in fear, but certainly restricting travel from West Africa would be a step in the right direction.
If Ebola can mutate into an airborne virus (and I have no idea if that is even possible), then I'd probably stay inside under my bed. :eek:

TexaninVA
10-06-2014, 06:49 PM
Who would pay for the 21 days in quarantine?

The country of origin should foot the bill

dbussone
10-06-2014, 07:08 PM
Speaking of medical authorities and truth.

Did Thomas Duncan get dumped back on the street by the for-profit hospital because he's a Liberian national on a US visa and probably didn't have insurance?


Actually Dallas-Presbyterian is a not for profit hospital. From what I read, he was released the first time due to a communications mess-up.

dbussone
10-06-2014, 07:12 PM
"If Ebola can mutate into an airborne virus (and I have no idea if that is even possible), then I'd probably stay inside under my bed."

It is very possible for mutation to an airborne virus version to develop. That is just about the worst possible thing that could happen. Containment would become as difficult as containing a flu outbreak...only much more deadly.

janmcn
10-06-2014, 07:21 PM
"If Ebola can mutate into an airborne virus (and I have no idea if that is even possible), then I'd probably stay inside under my bed."

It is very possible for mutation to an airborne virus version to develop. That is just about the worst possible thing that could happen. Containment would become as difficult as containing a flu outbreak...only much more deadly.


Ebola has been around since the 1970's. Why is it that it has not mutated to an airborne virus version before this?

dbussone
10-06-2014, 07:31 PM
Ebola has been around since the 1970's. Why is it that it has not mutated to an airborne virus version before this?


Because it has not developed the volume of recipients necessary to allow mutation to reach a critical level. As of today it is projected that the number of infected in W Africa could reach 1.5 million. That is a scary critical mass that might easily support conversion to an airborne version. I truly pray I am incorrect.

Aandjmassage
10-06-2014, 07:35 PM
I think we got to stop sending reporters to go see it. Flying back in forth trying to creat there own news by get it.

Barefoot
10-06-2014, 09:31 PM
Because it has not developed the volume of recipients necessary to allow mutation to reach a critical level. As of today it is projected that the number of infected in W Africa could reach 1.5 million. That is a scary critical mass that might easily support conversion to an airborne version. I truly pray I am incorrect.

I also pray that you are incorrect.

Loudoll
10-06-2014, 10:16 PM
Who would pay for the 21 days in quarantine?

The traveler

Villages PL
10-07-2014, 02:12 PM
Oh Graciegirl, I'm not sure that anyone thinks that Ebola is "no big deal", even those who say so.
I don't think we can live in fear, but certainly restricting travel from West Africa would be a step in the right direction.
If Ebola can mutate into an airborne virus (and I have no idea if that is even possible), then I'd probably stay inside under my bed. :eek:

What about HIV? Could that mutate into an airborne virus? Remember how frightened everyone was when HIV was first discovered? Should we quarantine those with HIV?

KayakerNC
10-07-2014, 02:19 PM
Madrid to Kill Dog of Nursing Aide Who Got Ebola.
"Madrid's regional government says it's going to kill the pet dog of a Spanish woman who became infected with Ebola.
Authorities said in a statement Tuesday that available scientific knowledge indicates there's a risk the dog could transmit the deadly virus to humans."

Madrid to Kill Dog of Nursing Aide Who Got Ebola - ABC News (http://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/madrid-kill-dog-nursing-aide-ebola-26022672)

Barefoot
10-07-2014, 02:22 PM
Madrid to Kill Dog of Nursing Aide Who Got Ebola.
"Madrid's regional government says it's going to kill the pet dog of a Spanish woman who became infected with Ebola.
Authorities said in a statement Tuesday that available scientific knowledge indicates there's a risk the dog could transmit the deadly virus to humans."

Madrid to Kill Dog of Nursing Aide Who Got Ebola - ABC News (http://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/madrid-kill-dog-nursing-aide-ebola-26022672)

The headline could have used the word euthanize. But obviously no-one would want to take an unnecessary chance with such a deadly virus.

rubicon
10-07-2014, 02:32 PM
What about HIV? Could that mutate into an airborne virus? Remember how frightened everyone was when HIV was first discovered? Should we quarantine those with HIV?

Hi VillagesPL: I certainly can't explain why HIV hasn't mutated into an airbone virus yet but then I do not understand virus. However, I do know that combinations and permutations apply to the process of mutation and that alone would leave me very guarded. The question posed and never addressed by the medical authorities centers around the issue of mutation. Most of us know that virus mutate.

I believe this mutation issue is being avoided because the medical community has their hands full now.

In my view a well run effort to eradicate this epidemic is not to rule out any possible scenario's and the manner in which to deal with it should it come to fruition.

Barefoot
10-07-2014, 02:46 PM
Should we quarantine those with HIV?

HIV and AIDS are not curable, but they can be held in check. Antiretroviral medication prevents the virus from multiplying in the body.
Antiretroviral therapy consists of three or more drugs that the patient has to take for the rest of their lives.
Such treatment has reduced the death rate from HIV by around 80 percent.

gomoho
10-07-2014, 06:05 PM
Barefoot - not sure the fella in the Dallas hospital would agree with you about Ebola. We don't really have a cure - experimental drugs maybe, but not a cure.

sunnyatlast
10-07-2014, 06:46 PM
The writer's excellent credentials are at the end of the article linked in NYTimes....

"The second possibility is one that virologists are loath to discuss openly but are definitely considering in private: that an Ebola virus could mutate to become transmissible through the air. You can now get Ebola only through direct contact with bodily fluids. But viruses like Ebola are notoriously sloppy in replicating, meaning the virus entering one person may be genetically different from the virus entering the next. The current Ebola virus’s hyper-evolution is unprecedented; there has been more human-to-human transmission in the past four months than most likely occurred in the last 500 to 1,000 years. Each new infection represents trillions of throws of the genetic dice.

If certain mutations occurred, it would mean that just breathing would put one at risk of contracting Ebola. Infections could spread quickly to every part of the globe, as the H1N1 influenza virus did in 2009, after its birth in Mexico.

Why are public officials afraid to discuss this? They don’t want to be accused of screaming “Fire!” in a crowded theater — as I’m sure some will accuse me of doing. But the risk is real, and until we consider it, the world will not be prepared to do what is necessary to end the epidemic......

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/12/opinion/what-were-afraid-to-say-about-ebola.html

Patty55
10-07-2014, 07:30 PM
What's with Duncan? Perhaps a little OT, but I have heard him described as having a wife and child in Dallas. Saw pictures of his home, it looks like a motel. Yet he was able to travel to W Africa via VA and Brussels? That's an expensive fare, where did the money come from? Is he employed? Is he a resident of the USA?

janmcn
10-07-2014, 07:38 PM
The writer's excellent credentials are at the end of the article linked in NYTimes....

"The second possibility is one that virologists are loath to discuss openly but are definitely considering in private: that an Ebola virus could mutate to become transmissible through the air. You can now get Ebola only through direct contact with bodily fluids. But viruses like Ebola are notoriously sloppy in replicating, meaning the virus entering one person may be genetically different from the virus entering the next. The current Ebola virus’s hyper-evolution is unprecedented; there has been more human-to-human transmission in the past four months than most likely occurred in the last 500 to 1,000 years. Each new infection represents trillions of throws of the genetic dice.

If certain mutations occurred, it would mean that just breathing would put one at risk of contracting Ebola. Infections could spread quickly to every part of the globe, as the H1N1 influenza virus did in 2009, after its birth in Mexico.

Why are public officials afraid to discuss this? They don’t want to be accused of screaming “Fire!” in a crowded theater — as I’m sure some will accuse me of doing. But the risk is real, and until we consider it, the world will not be prepared to do what is necessary to end the epidemic......

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/12/opinion/what-were-afraid-to-say-about-ebola.html


All people can do is take responsibility for their own health. Cancel any plane reservations, any cruise reservations, stay away from crowds, do not use public restrooms, etc etc etc.

If you take all precautions and still get the virus, you can go out knowing you did all the right things for you and your family.

Barefoot
10-07-2014, 11:26 PM
Barefoot - not sure the fella in the Dallas hospital would agree with you about Ebola. We don't really have a cure - experimental drugs maybe, but not a cure.

I absolutely agree. I posted information about HIV, not Ebola.
I remember the SARS epidemic in Canada in 2004, and everyone wearing masks in public places.
The thought that Ebola could mutate into an airborne virus absolutely terrifies me.

Schaumburger
10-08-2014, 10:48 AM
Mr. Duncan has died at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, the hospital said this morning.

Villages PL
10-08-2014, 01:34 PM
HIV and AIDS are not curable, but they can be held in check. Antiretroviral medication prevents the virus from multiplying in the body.
Antiretroviral therapy consists of three or more drugs that the patient has to take for the rest of their lives.
Such treatment has reduced the death rate from HIV by around 80 percent.

Yes, but we depend on the good will of those who have it not to spread it. If someone decides to spread it, it can make another person's life miserable. They might not know they have it for a long time and then they might spread it too. 473,000 people in the U.S. now have HIV/AIDS, according to online statistics. Medicine or no medicine, I don't think it's a very nice thing to have. And the medicine may not be inexpensive.

Villages PL
10-08-2014, 01:54 PM
In the United States Of America, freedom is more important than worrying about the possibility of premature death. We don't limit our freedom to risk premature death due to living a poor lifestyle. We tell people they need to take personal responsibility. So how is this any different?

It's important for people to be free to travel, uninterrupted, to and from Africa. Think of all the many reasons for traveling like business, recreation, weddings and funerals etc.. This comes under the heading of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

It's up to people to control their intake of bodily fluids from others. In other words, they need to take personal responsibility. We don't need government telling us what we can and cannot do.

Anyone disagree? :)

graciegirl
10-08-2014, 01:56 PM
Mr. Duncan has died at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, the hospital said this morning.


I wish for now that someone in Washington would do some kind of stopping people from traveling here from infected countries.. Now is when it is time to throw out political correctness and call some definitive shots.

AND please don't say the United States is infected...or say is again.

You know who you are.

Villages PL
10-08-2014, 02:02 PM
In the United States Of America, freedom is more important than worrying about the possibility of premature death. We don't limit our freedom to risk premature death due to living a poor lifestyle. We tell people they need to take personal responsibility. So how is this any different?

It's important for people to be free to travel, uninterrupted, to and from Africa. Think of all the many reasons for traveling like business, recreation, weddings and funerals etc.. This comes under the heading of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

It's up to people to control their intake of bodily fluids from others. In other words, they need to take personal responsibility. We don't need government telling us what we can and cannot do.

Anyone disagree? :)

What about freedom? Not important?

kittygilchrist
10-08-2014, 02:03 PM
In the United States Of America, freedom is more important than worrying about the possibility of premature death. We don't limit our freedom to risk premature death due to living a poor lifestyle. We tell people they need to take personal responsibility. So how is this any different?

It's important for people to be free to travel, uninterrupted, to and from Africa. Think of all the many reasons for traveling like business, recreation, weddings and funerals etc.. This comes under the heading of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

It's up to people to control their intake of bodily fluids from others. In other words, they need to take personal responsibility. We don't need government telling us what we can and cannot do.

Anyone disagree? :)

I do.

Villages PL
10-08-2014, 02:16 PM
I do.

Okay, now we're getting somewhere. ;) I brought this up because of the many people who are always so protective about the food supply. We have an epidemic of overweight and obese people and many of them die prematurely from diabetes, cancer and heart disease etc. But no one wants the government to ban, tax or regulate junk food. We tell people they need to take personal responsibility, even though we know that most won't.

It seems that death from living a poor lifestyle is okay as long as it's a slow death, compared to Ebola which is a relatively quick death.

I'm just trying to find some consistency.

keywest
10-08-2014, 03:46 PM
In the United States Of America, freedom is more important than worrying about the possibility of premature death. We don't limit our freedom to risk premature death due to living a poor lifestyle. We tell people they need to take personal responsibility. So how is this any different?

It's important for people to be free to travel, uninterrupted, to and from Africa. Think of all the many reasons for traveling like business, recreation, weddings and funerals etc.. This comes under the heading of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

It's up to people to control their intake of bodily fluids from others. In other words, they need to take personal responsibility. We don't need government telling us what we can and cannot do.


Anyone disagree? :)
I disagree!

rubicon
10-08-2014, 04:03 PM
Okay, now we're getting somewhere. ;) I brought this up because of the many people who are always so protective about the food supply. We have an epidemic of overweight and obese people and many of them die prematurely from diabetes, cancer and heart disease etc. But no one wants the government to ban, tax or regulate junk food. We tell people they need to take personal responsibility, even though we know that most won't.

It seems that death from living a poor lifestyle is okay as long as it's a slow death, compared to Ebola which is a relatively quick death.

I'm just trying to find some consistency.

Villages PL As the boys in Iowa say that dog won't hunt. Your comparison is trailing you elsewhere.

You also discuss freedoms and that is not the issue.

the issue is simply containing something that can easily get out of hand. do you recall the spanish flu , some called it the swine flu that killed millions of people world wide. Experts pointed out in an article in WSJ that Ebola could mutate to be airborne. it can be passed from animals to humans.

graciegirl
10-08-2014, 04:12 PM
Okay, now we're getting somewhere. ;) I brought this up because of the many people who are always so protective about the food supply. We have an epidemic of overweight and obese people and many of them die prematurely from diabetes, cancer and heart disease etc. But no one wants the government to ban, tax or regulate junk food. We tell people they need to take personal responsibility, even though we know that most won't.

It seems that death from living a poor lifestyle is okay as long as it's a slow death, compared to Ebola which is a relatively quick death.

I'm just trying to find some consistency.

You are proceeding from an illogical premise based on inadequate information that is causing you to inaccuratly assess the situation and thus come to an incorrect conclusion.

Some people will die sooner due to heart disease and diabetes perhaps caused by poor diet, but 90 percent of people infected with the ebola virus will die.

Now the news is reporting that another person has come forward with symptoms of ebola who had been with Mr. Duncan.

AND I call on the administration in the WhiteHouse to do something more drastic than to monitor people for symptoms arriving from the three known countries with outbreaks of ebola. What if they spike a fever after they picked their nose and left it on your airplane seat.

This is serious stuff here and we have the opportunity if we act now to slow down the threat of an epidemic here..

old moe
10-08-2014, 04:22 PM
Here's another idea: Don't exchange bodily fluids with anyone who has just flown in from Africa.

:Screen_of_Death: I dont think this issue should become a joking matter,:spoken: That person died in Texzs, BUT HOW MANY PEOPLE DID HE COME IN CONTACT WITH?

Patty55
10-08-2014, 06:13 PM
Okay, now we're getting somewhere. ;) I brought this up because of the many people who are always so protective about the food supply. We have an epidemic of overweight and obese people and many of them die prematurely from diabetes, cancer and heart disease etc. But no one wants the government to ban, tax or regulate junk food. We tell people they need to take personal responsibility, even though we know that most won't.

It seems that death from living a poor lifestyle is okay as long as it's a slow death, compared to Ebola which is a relatively quick death.

I'm just trying to find some consistency.

Maybe we should quarantine them to a fat farm.

rubicon
10-08-2014, 06:29 PM
Maybe we should quarantine them to a fat farm.

:1rotfl:

gomoho
10-08-2014, 06:30 PM
The problem with the government's plan is, as evidenced by Mr. Duncan, it will only work if people are truthful. If I was exposed to ebola you better believe I would try to get to the US and tell any lie I need to hoping for a chance for treatment and to live.
Also if symptoms don't show up for 8-21 days after you have been exposed how many folks could come in not knowing they are infected - once again you have to depend on them being truthful - seems like pretty shaky ground to base a plan on. Mr. Duncan has shown us in real life if just one person gets in that is infected what the fall out is. The hospitalization, quarantine of those he came into contact with, monitoring of those he may have come into contact with, decontaminating his apartment and his bedding and towels and what to do with the highly infectious body? Too many consequences to simply say we need to allow freedom of travel - nothing is so important it can't wait till this is over. As far as aid workers coming and going to help that is easily monitored to allow these people to safely enter and exit the country.

rubicon
10-08-2014, 06:58 PM
The government's lack of urgency, immediacy and aggressive plan has resulted in many loss opportunities.

Barefoot
10-08-2014, 07:02 PM
===

dbussone
10-08-2014, 07:32 PM
The government's lack of urgency, immediacy and aggressive plan has resulted in many loss opportunities.


You forgot lack of honesty.

janmcn
10-08-2014, 07:36 PM
You forgot lack of honesty.


This is why it is so important to take responsibility for your own health. Stay away from air travel, cruise ships, public restrooms, any event with large crowds, and public swimming pools. This way of life may become the new normal.

Barefoot
10-08-2014, 08:39 PM
I'm not sure if we're allowed to copy an article from the online newspaper and post it here.
If not, the Mods will make it disappear.
I thought this was an interesting article .....
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Marion County Fire Rescue initiates Ebola Virus preparedness meeting
October 8, 2014

Marion County Fire Rescue this week held a meeting with representatives from the local medical community to discuss preparing and protecting citizens in the event that Marion County experiences a case of the Ebola virus.

“As of right now, Marion County is not at heightened risk for Ebola cases. However, it is our job as medical professionals to plan and prepare for worst case scenarios,” said Dr. Frank Fraunfelter, Marion County Medical Director.

In addition to MCFR officials and the medical director, representatives from Ocala Regional Medical Center, Munroe Regional Medical Center, the Florida Department of Health in Marion County and the Marion County Public Safety Communications Department attended the meeting.

As a result, dispatchers at the Marion County Public Safety Communications Center will be asking callers if they have traveled outside the country in the past 30 days. Rescue crews will be notified if a patient who is experiencing Ebola-like symptoms has also recently traveled to West Africa. This notification will trigger crews to wear additional protective gear at the scene and while treating the patient.

Currently there are no reported Ebola cases, or potential Ebola cases, in Marion County. However, with international touch-points such as Orlando, Tampa and Miami nearby, officials felt it prudent to be proactive in developing a “what-if plan” for working together should a local case arise.

MCFR and all Marion County hospitals will follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) guidelines for infection control policies and procedures, which include, but are not limited to, familiarizing staff with the appropriate personal protection equipment (PPE), what to do if staff becomes at increased risk for contracting the virus due to direct contact with bodily fluids from an infected person and what procedures should not be performed on an infected patient.

Attached you will find additional information from the Florida Department of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. More information is available at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s website.

Here are a few facts about the Ebola virus:

· Ebola symptoms include fever, headache, joint and muscle aches, weakness, fatigue, diarrhea, vomiting, stomach pain and lack of appetite, and in some cases bleeding.

· Those who have not traveled to West Africa in the past 30 days, and/or have not had contact with a person who has visited this area, are unlikely to contract Ebola.

· Ebola is spread through direct contact with an infected person’s bodily fluids (blood, vomit, sweat or semen).

· Ebola is not transmitted through water or food.

Skybo
10-08-2014, 09:51 PM
In the United States Of America, freedom is more important than worrying about the possibility of premature death. We don't limit our freedom to risk premature death due to living a poor lifestyle. We tell people they need to take personal responsibility. So how is this any different?

It's important for people to be free to travel, uninterrupted, to and from Africa. Think of all the many reasons for traveling like business, recreation, weddings and funerals etc.. This comes under the heading of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

It's up to people to control their intake of bodily fluids from others. In other words, they need to take personal responsibility. We don't need government telling us what we can and cannot do.

Anyone disagree? :)


Okay, now we're getting somewhere. ;) I brought this up because of the many people who are always so protective about the food supply. We have an epidemic of overweight and obese people and many of them die prematurely from diabetes, cancer and heart disease etc. But no one wants the government to ban, tax or regulate junk food. We tell people they need to take personal responsibility, even though we know that most won't.

It seems that death from living a poor lifestyle is okay as long as it's a slow death, compared to Ebola which is a relatively quick death.

I'm just trying to find some consistency.

You know VPL, if you want to "find some consistency", perhaps you should stick to topics regarding nutrition.

This isn't about "lifestyle choices" and it isn't about personal freedom. It is about controlling a potential deadly health crisis, not only in this country, but in all countries. And I KNOW that you know this. But yet you to compare it to, and use it as a platform to discuss your favorite topic (food and obesity). WTH is wrong with you?

People are contracting and dying from this virus. I seriously think you need to keep your food and obesity phobias out of these discussions. It is not relevant and it is most certainly not appropriate.

Barefoot
10-08-2014, 11:57 PM
You know VPL, if you want to "find some consistency", perhaps you should stick to topics regarding nutrition.

This isn't about "lifestyle choices" and it isn't about personal freedom. It is about controlling a potential deadly health crisis, not only in this country, but in all countries. And I KNOW that you know this. But yet you to compare it to, and use it as a platform to discuss your favorite topic (food and obesity). WTH is wrong with you?

People are contracting and dying from this virus. I seriously think you need to keep your food and obesity phobias out of these discussions. It is not relevant and it is most certainly not appropriate.

:agree:

Bonanza
10-09-2014, 04:38 AM
You know VPL, if you want to "find some consistency", perhaps you should stick to topics regarding nutrition.

This isn't about "lifestyle choices" and it isn't about personal freedom. It is about controlling a potential deadly health crisis, not only in this country, but in all countries. And I KNOW that you know this. But yet you to compare it to, and use it as a platform to discuss your favorite topic (food and obesity). WTH is wrong with you?

People are contracting and dying from this virus. I seriously think you need to keep your food and obesity phobias out of these discussions. It is not relevant and it is most certainly not appropriate.

:agree:

Skybo and Barefoot -- you are absolutely correct. Enough of food, obesity and nutrition. The subjects have been beaten to death and have become boring. VillagesPL needs to get his priorities squared away Ebola is a terrible thing and has the potential of being worse than the AIDS epidemic. Right now it's an uncontrolable virus and there's no telling where it has gone and where it will show up.

gomoho
10-09-2014, 07:45 AM
The airplane cleaners at LaGuardia are on strike - say they will not clean the planes till they are giving the training and equipment to protect them from a possible infection. Hello administration - are you listening to the people??? Stop this nonsense already.

gomoho
10-09-2014, 07:46 AM
This is why it is so important to take responsibility for your own health. Stay away from air travel, cruise ships, public restrooms, any event with large crowds, and public swimming pools. This way of life may become the new normal.

Not sure everyone in the US should change their plans or lifestyle just because our government refuses to take action that could stop the flow of this disease into our country. Their first priority is to protect the homeland - be it from terrorists or disease.

Villages PL
10-09-2014, 02:11 PM
Villages PL As the boys in Iowa say that dog won't hunt. Your comparison is trailing you elsewhere.

You also discuss freedoms and that is not the issue.

the issue is simply containing something that can easily get out of hand. do you recall the spanish flu , some called it the swine flu that killed millions of people world wide. Experts pointed out in an article in WSJ that Ebola could mutate to be airborne. it can be passed from animals to humans.

Speaking of experts, I trust Doctor Frieden, head of CDC, and Dr. Fauci to keep a lid on this. We don't need other experts speculating that it might go airborne with the result of causing a panic. Who's running the show?

The last I heard they were thinking of checking people arriving from Africa, asking questions and taking their temperature. Let's give it some time and see how it plays out. Even if it does become airborne, it can still be contained.

In the mean time, all we can do is be mindful of our intake of bodily fluids from others. That's a lifestyle choice, the same as for HIV/AIDS.

Villages PL
10-09-2014, 02:30 PM
You are proceeding from an illogical premise based on inadequate information that is causing you to inaccuratly assess the situation and thus come to an incorrect conclusion.

Some people will die sooner due to heart disease and diabetes perhaps caused by poor diet, but 90 percent of people infected with the ebola virus will die.

Now the news is reporting that another person has come forward with symptoms of ebola who had been with Mr. Duncan.

AND I call on the administration in the WhiteHouse to do something more drastic than to monitor people for symptoms arriving from the three known countries with outbreaks of ebola. What if they spike a fever after they picked their nose and left it on your airplane seat.

This is serious stuff here and we have the opportunity if we act now to slow down the threat of an epidemic here..

I don't think it's inadequate information:

Yearly deaths due to heart disease: 596,577

Yearly deaths due to cancer: 576,691

That's only the two major (yearly) causes of death in the U.S.

So 90% of people infected with Ebola will die. How many have died so far?
I don't recall even one. Has there been one death yet?

In the mean time, it's a lifestyle issue. Watch your intake of bodily fluids, the same as you would for HIV/AIDS.

Villages PL
10-09-2014, 02:42 PM
You know VPL, if you want to "find some consistency", perhaps you should stick to topics regarding nutrition.

This isn't about "lifestyle choices" and it isn't about personal freedom. It is about controlling a potential deadly health crisis, not only in this country, but in all countries. And I KNOW that you know this. But yet you to compare it to, and use it as a platform to discuss your favorite topic (food and obesity). WTH is wrong with you?

People are contracting and dying from this virus. I seriously think you need to keep your food and obesity phobias out of these discussions. It is not relevant and it is most certainly not appropriate.

I didn't know that you are in charge of setting the rules for this discussion. And you say the rule is: Base the discussion on emotion!!!! Ebola is coming to kill us all!!!

Right now it does boil down to a lifestyle choice. As someone has already said, watch what you do. Don't do anything to put yourself at risk. And I have said: Watch your intake of bodily fluids from others, the same as you would for HIV/AIDS.

Nobody cares about the 596,577 yearly deaths from heart disease and the 576,691 yearly deaths from cancer. It's just a matter of getting used to it.

Villages PL
10-09-2014, 02:44 PM
Skybo and Barefoot -- you are absolutely correct. Enough of food, obesity and nutrition. The subjects have been beaten to death and have become boring. VillagesPL needs to get his priorities squared away Ebola is a terrible thing and has the potential of being worse than the AIDS epidemic. Right now it's an uncontrolable virus and there's no telling where it has gone and where it will show up.

Ebola has been beaten to death!

Nightengale212
10-09-2014, 02:55 PM
[QUOTE=Villages PL;950541
So 90% of people infected with Ebola will die. How many have died so far?
I don't recall even one. Has there been one death yet?[/QUOTE]

In addition to Mr. Duncan, the WHO is reporting 3,439 deaths caused by Ebola.

Shimpy
10-09-2014, 03:04 PM
PLEASE MR. OBAMA, do something NOW.


I would suggest sending all Ebola cases to Syria and Isis and let Allah worry about it.

rubicon
10-09-2014, 03:18 PM
Ebola is the deadliest virus in the world.
Our government is playing Russian roulette by allowing people from Western Africa to enter this country and then checking them AND THE QUESTION IS NOT IF SOMEONE ENTERS WITH THE DISEASE BUT WHEN SOMEONE WITH THE DISEASE EVADES GOVERNMENTS CHECK WHAT WILL BE THE DEPTH OF THE CONSEQUENCES.

In fact you may find that someone Ebola will intentionally make an attempt to come to America to get what they deem is better care. The government has proven time and time again that they are highly subjected to human error ( I am being kind here).

I would believe that prudence would dictate that travel from West Africa to anywhere be placed on hold until health officials contain this disease. The human and economic cost associated with allowing travelers here is a real problem. why should medical people in this country have to deal with the potential with someone coming here with Ebola whether they are discovered or not and in the latter instance only creates more concern and heavier costs

the Spanish flu of 1918 affected 500 million people worldwide killing millions and this Ebola outbreak has that potential if not contained.

gomoho
10-09-2014, 05:24 PM
Rubicon - the problem is you are dealing with common sense - something I'm afraid the current administration is seriously lacking. Seems like a no brainer to most of us - contain the virus where it is.

old moe
10-09-2014, 05:50 PM
I would suggest sending all Ebola cases to Syria and Isis and let Allah worry about it.

:mademyday::mademyday: Best answer yet, solve two problems at once! :bigbow::bigbow:

TexaninVA
10-09-2014, 06:56 PM
Rubicon - the problem is you are dealing with common sense - something I'm afraid the current administration is seriously lacking. Seems like a no brainer to most of us - contain the virus where it is.

That's what gets me about this topic and discussion ... the obvious thing to do (as in screamingly obvious) is to err on the side of caution. That's because the disease, if caught, has a 90% fatality rate. Thus, closing down travel from West Africa makes sense. Keep sending medical teams etc into Africa to fight it ... that also makes sense.

But getting wrapped around the axle because no one had died yet and saying no big deal, or comparing it to heart disease and so forth ... I will withhold comment and simply shake my head. I just hope common sense remains in the majority ... sometimes I wonder.

manaboutown
10-09-2014, 07:23 PM
I have no faith whatsoever in the current government's ability or desire to contain Ebola.

Sandtrap328
10-09-2014, 11:30 PM
I have no faith whatsoever in the current government's ability or desire to contain Ebola.

What do you believe previous administrations would have done? What evidence based on historical events can you offer?

Thank you.

kansasr
10-10-2014, 02:51 AM
Ronald Reagan was the poster child for the government's ability to deal with epidemics, taking over 4 years before even mentioning the AIDS crisis.