Democrat Party is anti-religion and anti-Israel

[Guest]

These two clips from the 2012 Democrat National Convention provide a good reminder where the lunatic left Democrat party is these days … anti-religion (except for Islam) and anti-Israel. The petulant, and literally childish, reaction of the Democrat congressional leaders to the Israeli Prime Minister’s speech 3 March 2015 on the Iran nuke issue reminded me of their mentally deranged state, nicely captured on these two short videos.

It’s both sad, and funny, to watch the “voter fraud” when the chair bum rushes the vote thru lest the rubes in flyover country get more insights into the true soul of the soulless party. Dick “the Turban” Durbin is also entertaining whilst frantic to deny the obvious of what just happened.



1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUJE9YfsbNQ



2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KorGpTUVLkw



Disclaimer: since both these videos were shown on the despicable Faux News channel, which as we all know caters to right wing nut job extremist haters sexists racists whack jobs, and thus cannot be relied upon, you can safely ignore what you saw with your own God-given eyeballs on the videos.

[Guest]

Thanks for the really true disclaimer. The rest is just crap, and more of your plagiarism!

[Guest]

It is indeed a shame that all of the people who come to the forum can't read the really good debates on here but a great blessing they miss the idiotic name calling and slams that are uneducated at best and full of hate and jealously at worst.

[Guest]

:mmmm:Thanks for the really true disclaimer. The rest is just crap, and more of your plagiarism!

Thank you for showing us how liberals can be relied on to deny the truth of what anyone who looks at the two links can plainly see

[Guest]

Having been a democrat is the past and having seen the light, it is very evident that the democratic party no longer exists. Back in the day, the democratic party had some down to earth and useful beliefs and platforms which would help this country. The democratic party is now the ultra liberal party and needs to change their name. This party no longer espouses the ideals and beliefs that they once did.

[Guest]

Having been a democrat is the past and having seen the light, it is very evident that the democratic party no longer exists. Back in the day, the democratic party had some down to earth and useful beliefs and platforms which would help this country. The democratic party is now the ultra liberal party and needs to change their name. This party no longer espouses the ideals and beliefs that they once did.

This is so true. Except I'd say it is now "the ultra LEFTIST party"....leftists who want nothing less than communist takeover of everything.

Sen. Jim Webb who's considering a presidential run (Democrat), states it well in the link below.

(And before people claim it's 'racist' to speak for the average white working person now ignored, realize that improving the plight of minorities does NOT mean you have to tear down/destroy the opportunities for caucasians!)

Jim Webb: Dems Must Rediscover 'White Working People' (http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/jim-webb-democrats-white-working/2015/01/30/id/621859/)

[Guest]

Having been a democrat is the past and having seen the light, it is very evident that the democratic party no longer exists. Back in the day, the democratic party had some down to earth and useful beliefs and platforms which would help this country. The democratic party is now the ultra liberal party and needs to change their name. This party no longer espouses the ideals and beliefs that they once did.


How painful for republicans to have to live through the peace and prosperity of the Clinton/Obama/Clinton administrations, when they are pining for the terrorists attacks, endless wars and economic collapses of the Bush/Bush/Bush eras.

[Guest]

Having been a democrat is the past and having seen the light, it is very evident that the democratic party no longer exists. Back in the day, the democratic party had some down to earth and useful beliefs and platforms which would help this country. The democratic party is now the ultra liberal party and needs to change their name. This party no longer espouses the ideals and beliefs that they once did.

Agree the name Democratic party is now a misnomer... Might as well change the name to something more descriptive like the Transgendered Socialist Party

[Guest]

Agree the name Democratic party is now a misnomer... Might as well change the name to something more descriptive like the Transgendered Socialist Party

...and yet they have managed to win the 2008 and 2012 Presidential elections.:rant-rave:

[Guest]

...and yet they have managed to win the 2008 and 2012 Presidential elections.:rant-rave:

It might be indicative of our nation's tipping point into decline where there are now more "takers" than "producers"?

[Guest]

It might be indicative of our nation's tipping point into decline where there are now more "takers" than "producers"?

You're correct ...

[Guest]

It might be indicative of our nation's tipping point into decline where there are now more "takers" than "producers"?

Didn't Mitt Romney point that out in his infamous 47% remarks to donors in Boca Raton?

[Guest]

Didn't Mitt Romney point that out in his infamous 47% remarks to donors in Boca Raton?

That 47% included about 90% of Villagers who are on "entitlements".

[Guest]

Sorry...wrong term. Entitlements are handouts that people get for contributing nothing to society. If you are referring to Social Security or pensions that 90% of Villagers receive, those are NOT entitlements.

Social Security and pensions are returns (very poor, I might add) on "investments" we all made through working our whole lives and CONTIBUTING to a socialized program that was supposed to supplement our retirements.

"Entitlements" are given to people who usually have contributed nothing to the system and are too lazy to work, yet still manage to collect something from that same system.

Big difference!!

[Guest]

Sorry...wrong term. Entitlements are handouts that people get for contributing nothing to society. If you are referring to Social Security or pensions that 90% of Villagers receive, those are NOT entitlements.

Social Security and pensions are returns (very poor, I might add) on "investments" we all made through working our whole lives and CONTIBUTING to a socialized program that was supposed to supplement our retirements.

"Entitlements" are given to people who usually have contributed nothing to the system and are too lazy to work, yet still manage to collect something from that same system.

Big difference!!

You make some excellent points and common sense distinctions.

Liberals, as exemplified by the poster you responded to, always seem to struggle with these straightforward points

We can only conclude the reason is ... liberals lack common sense

[Guest]

You make some excellent points and common sense distinctions.

Liberals, as exemplified by the poster you responded to, always seem to struggle with these straightforward points

We can only conclude the reason is ... liberals lack common sense

I believe we all know what an entitlement is.

By labeling any opposing view as a lack of common sense, it makes it very difficult to have any sort of meaningful debate. But, I think this might have been the objective. Such a typical response.

[Guest]

You make some excellent points and common sense distinctions.

Liberals, as exemplified by the poster you responded to, always seem to struggle with these straightforward points

We can only conclude the reason is ... liberals lack common sense






That might explain why the Party that, according to your analysis, has won the popular vote in 5 of the last 6 POTUS elections.

And it might also help to explain why the current frontrunner of the Party that lacks common sense polls ahead of any and all potential R candidates.

[Guest]

It might be indicative of our nation's tipping point into decline where there are now more "takers" than "producers"?







That would make a great bumper sticker for the 2016 R nominee - I am sure he would go far with that bit of wisdom.

[Guest]

"Democrat Party is anti-religion and anti-Israel"


So, why is that bad?

[Guest]

"Democrat Party is anti-religion and anti-Israel"


So, why is that bad?


I genuinely want to thank you for being honest. You’re free to believe what you want of course, but the point of this entire thread is most Democrats tend to hide the fact that they are anti-religion and anti-Israel. That’s what the two video links that started this thread clearly showed for all who bothered to look at them But, Democrat leaders especially want to deny this because, not surprisingly, they still want to get as many votes in rube flyover land as possible. In other words, they have to be deceitful about their message. This is true of liberalism in general, but particularly so regarding religion and Israel. It hasn’t always been like this, but has been trending this way since the 1960s.

I would simply like to see Democrats be fully honest about their message regarding religion and Israel. Most of them won’t but you were so thanks again.

[Guest]

I wish more voters were reflective and gave some thought to what made this country great. But instead far too many voters act like their on one of those reality shows. It has been said that far too many people believe name calling is their argument and we can see where it gets people on reality shows and we can see where it gets voters. It simply is unexplainable how some voters seem to react with a rally cry for issues that have both either social economic or international consequences. It obviously has to do with the inadequate educational system we have come to accept in America.