View Full Version : WAtch out Clintonites here come O’Malley
Guest
03-21-2015, 03:22 PM
He certainly has significantly better qualifications tha Obama ever hoped to have.
And he certainly is better suited to the task than same old same old insider plitics as usual Clinton.
Sorry to disappoint the ladies who adore Clinton (only because she is a woman) but you will more likely get more for your cause with O'Malley.
All O'Malley has to do is prepare for the ambushes that will most certainly come from the Clinton and O'Bama camps.
He should be able to outshine them both....easily.
Guest
03-21-2015, 03:26 PM
much more impressive credentials than Obamahad/has:
U.S. Official (http://www.livefreeordiealliance.org/ElectionCentral/USOfficial.aspx?cs=/OMalley/Martin///&contest=2016&gclid=CM6_v9qjusQCFUY8gQodBFgAIQ)
Guest
03-22-2015, 04:25 PM
He certainly has significantly better qualifications tha Obama ever hoped to have.
And he certainly is better suited to the task than same old same old insider plitics as usual Clinton.
Sorry to disappoint the ladies who adore Clinton (only because she is a woman) but you will more likely get more for your cause with O'Malley.
All O'Malley has to do is prepare for the ambushes that will most certainly come from the Clinton and O'Bama camps.
He should be able to outshine them both....easily.
Mrs. Clinton sure does scare you folks -
Guest
03-22-2015, 04:32 PM
Unfortunately for Gov O'Malley, he is polling at 1% just under undecided.
Guest
03-22-2015, 07:53 PM
Nothing wrong with the former governor of Maryland. Excellent administrator.
I can envision a ticket of Clinton and O'Malley. It would be a winning combination.
Maybe the Republicans will run Trump :ohdear:and The Chump. :1rotfl:
Guest
03-22-2015, 09:05 PM
Mrs. Clinton sure does scare you folks -
That is exactly why they are putting this stuff on here: in order to try and spread false rumors.
Don't you remember our training books by Alinski and Chairman Mao? Same techniques. :1rotfl:
Guest
04-07-2015, 09:03 AM
NO! NO! NO! We live in Maryland we hate O'Malley. He taxed RAIN in our state and he's one of the reasons we're moving out of this state. Pretty face but that's all.
Guest
04-07-2015, 09:15 AM
NO! NO! NO! We live in Maryland we hate O'Malley. He taxed RAIN in our state and he's one of the reasons we're moving out of this state. Pretty face but that's all.
So the option of a not so pretty face, lying, cheating, mis-representing individual is more acceptable?
You stated what you do not like about the man. Did his actions work to fix the problems in the state?
All too often doing what is needed to be done or said is upsetting to some folks.
Hence the action taken is criticzed and the result is ignored.
Doing or saying the right thing is not a popular concept in our 21st century.
Guest
04-07-2015, 10:24 AM
Another left Wing liberal from the NE (no surprise there) that the fix is always more taxes and more handouts. Amazing I here around here all the NE'ers complain about taxes when they voted the tax cheat raising policktions in office for years and now escape to south. He's going to have hard time winning his party trying to out lie the liars.
Guest
04-07-2015, 10:27 AM
66 percent vs 1 percent? Hmm? What beats what? Hmm?
Cannot undetstand why Republicans bother putting this kind of postp. Do they think it is going to change our vote from Mrs. Clinton to Gov. O'Malley based on a TOTV post?
They are really scared of a progressive person being President instead of a regressive person who would take America backwards.
Guest
04-07-2015, 06:37 PM
66 percent vs 1 percent? Hmm? What beats what? Hmm?
Cannot undetstand why Republicans bother putting this kind of postp. Do they think it is going to change our vote from Mrs. Clinton to Gov. O'Malley based on a TOTV post?
They are really scared of a progressive person being President instead of a regressive person who would take America backwards.
I can't understand why the Clintonites assume pro O'Mally supporters are Repubs. Do they not believe there some Dems out there that really do not like Hillary?
Guest
04-07-2015, 06:55 PM
66 percent vs 1 percent? Hmm? What beats what? Hmm? Obama did it in 2008!!!! Hmmmnnn we will see what the numbers are in 12 months. Hmmnnn!
Cannot undetstand why Republicans bother putting this kind of postp. BS! There are some dems who don't worship theives and crooks!
Do they think it is going to change our vote from Mrs. Clinton to Gov. O'Malley based on a TOTV post? We will just assume you are jesting cause nobody would really think that!
They are really scared of a progressive person being President instead of a regressive person who would take America backwards. Are you saying O'Malley is regressive?
:icon_bored:
Guest
04-07-2015, 07:40 PM
Gov. O'Malley is a progressive leader but does not have the same experience as Sec. Clinton. She has excellent foreign policy experience. O'Malley has not had that in his time as governor of Maryland.
It is time for a strong woman President of the US. Hillary Clinton IS that person!
Guest
04-07-2015, 08:34 PM
much more impressive credentials than Obamahad/has:
U.S. Official (http://www.livefreeordiealliance.org/ElectionCentral/USOfficial.aspx?cs=/OMalley/Martin///&contest=2016&gclid=CM6_v9qjusQCFUY8gQodBFgAIQ)
That's what you said about Mitt
Guest
04-07-2015, 10:42 PM
Gov. O'Malley is a progressive leader but does not have the same experience as Sec. Clinton. She has excellent foreign policy experience. O'Malley has not had that in his time as governor of Maryland.
It is time for a strong woman President of the US. Hillary Clinton IS that person!
Forget the gender or race hyping.
How about a good candidate instead.
Clinton.....excellent foreign policy.......OMG
Guest
04-08-2015, 07:47 AM
Gov. O'Malley is a progressive leader but does not have the same experience as Sec. Clinton. She has excellent foreign policy experience. O'Malley has not had that in his time as governor of Maryland.
It is time for a strong woman President of the US. Hillary Clinton IS that person!
When she ran in 2008 she had no foreighn policy experience. And she was beat out by Obama with no foreign policy experience (or any other experience to qualify for POTUS!).
I don't understand why the Clinton supporters want us to forget that Clinton was the 2008 front runner and was knocked out by a relative unknown with no experience doing anything.
Guest
04-08-2015, 07:51 AM
Forget the gender or race hyping.
How about a good candidate instead.
Clinton.....excellent foreign policy.......OMG
What foreign policy experience do the possible Republicans have such as: Walker (compared ISIS to union workers), Cruz, Paul, Huckabee, Jindahl?
A former Secretary of State trumps them all!
Guest
04-08-2015, 08:01 AM
What foreign policy experience do the possible Republicans have such as: Walker (compared ISIS to union workers), Cruz, Paul, Huckabee, Jindahl?
A former Secretary of State trumps them all!
Talking about Clinton's foreighn policy experience is like boasting that a product is federally inspected and others are not....and then fail to mention that the product was rejected!!!
She gets credit for having the job. The only accomplishments of note are the Russian reset button and Benghazi.
Do you not recall Obama with no foreign experience, or any other experience, beat her in 2008.
Guest
04-08-2015, 08:23 AM
I can't understand why the Clintonites assume pro O'Mally supporters are Repubs. Do they not believe there some Dems out there that really do not like Hillary?
I must have missed the headlines that said 'O'Malley surging in the polls', or 'O'Malley drawing huge crowds of supporters', or 'O'Malley raising tons of money'. The only time I see his name mentioned is on this forum or at the bottom of all the polls, under undecided.
Guest
04-08-2015, 09:15 AM
What foreign policy experience do the possible Republicans have such as: Walker (compared ISIS to union workers), Cruz, Paul, Huckabee, Jindahl?
A former Secretary of State trumps them all!
Yes, you're right. Who can compete or complain about her stellar record, especially as Secretary of State?
(excerpts from another thread)
Hillary has many qualifications… too numerous to list. …
1. People Skills. A President must be able to relate to people, especially the “little people”. Hillary’s skills are unsurpassed. Many examples can be found from people who know her best and as reported in Ron Kessler’s book “First Family Detail.” “She is so nasty to agents that being assigned to her detail is considered a form of punishment,” “She claims to be a champion of the little people, and she's going to help the middle class. And, in fact, she treats these people around her, [who] would lay down their lives for her like sub-humans; and I think voters need to consider that.” She also apparently shouts a lot, throws dishes when angry, and can not stand to see anyone in a military uniform around her.
2. Courage Under Fire. Hillary came under heavy sniper fire as First Lady, but she showed courage and was an inspiration to those who were with her. Here’s a video which captured the moment.
Hillary Clinton dodges sniper fire in Bosnia - raw footage - Video (http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/272252/)
3. Foreign Policy. Any President must be able to defend the Country. As Secretary of State, Hillary excelled. She managed to get an Ambassador killed during a predictable terrorist attack, and then through a series of further bungles, caused the formation of ISIS (with some credit to her boss at the time.) which increasingly dominates the Middle East. In any event, even Rube Republicans will quickly agree the world is a much safer place thanks to her service.
carly hammers hillary travel - Bing Videos (http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=carly+hammers+hillary+travel&qpvt=carly+hammers+hillary+travel&FORM=VDRE#view=detail&mid=0C2D0CB4315386003A160C2D0CB4315386003A16)
Guest
04-08-2015, 09:30 AM
The answer is easy: if you do not think Sec. Clinton is not your choice for President, just vote for someone else in the general election.
FYI, I am voting FOR Ted Cruz in the Republican primary - hopefully to get that Tea------ dolt onto the general election ballot.
Guest
04-08-2015, 09:50 AM
The answer is easy: if you do not think Sec. Clinton is not your choice for President, just vote for someone else in the general election.
FYI, I am voting FOR Ted Cruz in the Republican primary - hopefully to get that Tea------ dolt onto the general election ballot.
Current election track records provide proof positive dolts can and do win.
And even get re-elected.
Guest
04-08-2015, 10:50 AM
Current election track records provide proof positive dolts can and do win.
And even get re-elected.
But enough about George Bush and Dick Cheney.
Guest
04-08-2015, 11:28 AM
But enough about George Bush and Dick Cheney.
Excellent reply!! :BigApplause:
Guest
04-08-2015, 01:42 PM
But enough about George Bush and Dick Cheney.
You conveniently ignored the word "current" to make your point fit in. As usual off topic but hat's fine, minority positions, even the wrong one are acknowledged.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.