Carly Fiorina steps closer to the plate!

[Guest]

Carly Fiorina is starting to oncrease visibility.
Interesting article posing what the contest would be like if the "only" woman for president were neutralized:

This Is Carly, Hear Her Roar - The Daily Beast (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/04/22/as-a-woman-fiorina-slams-identity-politics.html)

A refreshing not from Washington and not an ingrown part of politics as usual. A major plus for any candidate.

A very interesting possibility to keep on the radar.

[Guest]

Oh Please Please Carly run.

[Guest]

Carly Fiorina is starting to oncrease visibility.
Interesting article posing what the contest would be like if the "only" woman for president were neutralized:

This Is Carly, Hear Her Roar - The Daily Beast (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/04/22/as-a-woman-fiorina-slams-identity-politics.html)

A refreshing not from Washington and not an ingrown part of politics as usual. A major plus for any candidate.

A very interesting possibility to keep on the radar.

I would pay a considerable sum of money to see Carly debate Hillary ... wow that would be cool!

[Guest]

More about WHO she is:

http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Carly_Fiorina.aspx

[Guest]

The long shot candidate.

Who wants Carly Fiorina? - Jonathan Topaz - POLITICO (http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/carly-fiorina-in-2016-114354.html)

Last paragraph compares her being unknown to the "long shot come lately candidates for the democrats who won the presidency......Carter and Obama.

She certainly is more qualified than either or Clinton.

[Guest]

More about WHO she is:

http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Carly_Fiorina.aspx

That is an incredible resume and long history of accomplishments ... as in no s*** for real ... I would vote for her in a heartbeat.

There is still one very important question we need answered however so our liberal friends can decide who is truly more accomplisheded

Who has the most frequent flyer miles ... Hillary or Carly 😀

[Guest]

Now one just has to wonder why this thread is so quiet.
Up to this point totally devoid of the usual bashing snap back.

[Guest]

Now one just has to wonder why this thread is so quiet.
Up to this point totally devoid of the usual bashing snap back.


It's difficult to debate a candidate whose positions are not very well known. If anyone knows what they are, please elaborate.

[Guest]

Now one just has to wonder why this thread is so quiet.
Up to this point totally devoid of the usual bashing snap back.






why bother bashing - she is polling at 1% in her own Party. She's in Palin and Trump territory

Is this even a serious thread?

[Guest]

why bother bashing - she is polling at 1% in her own Party. She's in Palin and Trump territory

Is this even a serious thread?


It's almost getting embarrassing, isn't it, as the GOP turns over every rock looking for a candidate to run against Hillary Clinton?

[Guest]

The gang of six can't come up with anything other than what they find under rocks for a favorite son/ daughter for prez. They haven't figured out how to gerrymander the national election and are scared. You outta be.

[Guest]

Carly Fiorina may be extremely qualified to be President - but she will not get on the Presidential ticket. Can anyone believe that the old white men who run the Republican Party would nominate a woman for President when the Democrats also have a woman candidate - thus guaranteeing a FEMALE President?

They are scared enough of a woman President after a black President that they (old white men) could not have anyone but a rich white man (Romney) run. Cruz is Hispanic and they could not take that. Rubio is Hispanic and they could not take that. J.Bush is married to a Hispanic and they could not take that.

Well, old dudes, belly up to the bar for your Geritol. Looks like Mr. 47% is your candidate again and will lose again.

[Guest]

Carly Fiorina may be extremely qualified to be President - but she will not get on the Presidential ticket. Can anyone believe that the old white men who run the Republican Party would nominate a woman for President when the Democrats also have a woman candidate - thus guaranteeing a FEMALE President?

They are scared enough of a woman President after a black President that they (old white men) could not have anyone but a rich white man (Romney) run. Cruz is Hispanic and they could not take that. Rubio is Hispanic and they could not take that. J.Bush is married to a Hispanic and they could not take that.

Well, old dudes, belly up to the bar for your Geritol. Looks like Mr. 47% is your candidate again and will lose again.

Did not take long for the standard replies, including the racist and feminist crap.
Never discuss the point of any thread. Just pull the string in the neck and get the same robo responses from the same players grinding their ax......no value added.......again

[Guest]

Did not take long for the standard replies, including the racist and feminist crap.
Never discuss the point of any thread. Just pull the string in the neck and get the same robo responses from the same players grinding their ax......no value added.......again

You may say racist and feminist crap from now until the cows come home - but you know the poster was 100 percent right.

Men - and not usually young men - do make the core of the Republican National Party. They would not make it a guarantee win for a female to be President even if for their own party. This goes against many of the ideals of the party.

[Guest]

Did not take long for the standard replies, including the racist and feminist crap.
Never discuss the point of any thread. Just pull the string in the neck and get the same robo responses from the same players grinding their ax......no value added.......again

Enjoy your Geritol and prune smoothie as you begin your daily rants on TOTV. :loco:

[Guest]

You may say racist and feminist crap from now until the cows come home - but you know the poster was 100 percent right.

Men - and not usually young men - do make the core of the Republican National Party. They would not make it a guarantee win for a female to be President even if for their own party. This goes against many of the ideals of the party.

How very omnipotent and all knowing. So the democratic party is the only party for women?
Your opinion; be happy in your dated thoughts that just happen to be dated.

[Guest]

You may say racist and feminist crap from now until the cows come home - but you know the poster was 100 percent right.

Men - and not usually young men - do make the core of the Republican National Party. They would not make it a guarantee win for a female to be President even if for their own party. This goes against many of the ideals of the party.

Do you mean the ability of guranteeing a woman to become POTUS like the party started out to do in 2008 and DID NOT?
Selective memory to make a point perhaps.

[Guest]

Carly Fiorina may be extremely qualified to be President - but she will not get on the Presidential ticket. Can anyone believe that the old white men who run the Republican Party would nominate a woman for President when the Democrats also have a woman candidate - thus guaranteeing a FEMALE President?

They are scared enough of a woman President after a black President that they (old white men) could not have anyone but a rich white man (Romney) run. Cruz is Hispanic and they could not take that. Rubio is Hispanic and they could not take that. J.Bush is married to a Hispanic and they could not take that.

Well, old dudes, belly up to the bar for your Geritol. Looks like Mr. 47% is your candidate again and will lose again.


Same old racist garbage and anti white male animus ... at some point, you are going to offend enough of us such that we stop being so tolerant of the continued assaults and PC tripe

At the same time, it serves to continually illustrate the pure rage and often unstable emotional condition so many liberals seem to have in common.

The clear implication by the way, is Carly is running for VP and she will probably get it.

[Guest]

Do you mean the ability of guranteeing a woman to become POTUS like the party started out to do in 2008 and DID NOT?
Selective memory to make a point perhaps.

Yes, apparently the Democrat party ... at least in 2008 ... was highly prejudiced against saggy old white women, and especially one who is so dishonest and non-genuine that even the village idiot could figure it out

[Guest]

The gang of six can't come up with anything other than what they find under rocks for a favorite son/ daughter for prez. They haven't figured out how to gerrymander the national election and are scared. You outta be.

You sound like you've just been released from the mental ward ...

[Guest]

More about WHO she is:

http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Carly_Fiorina.aspx

Here's a challenge for all Hillary supporters

1. Let's all agree to a mutual and temporary cease fire on the snarky comments

2. But, you guys/gals then need to write up something reasonable wherein you cite Hillary's accomplishments in a manner similar to the Carly link above so that we can all read, learn and compare

3. Is this something you can or are willing to do?

[Guest]

Maybe I'm missing something, what makes Carly a reasonable candidate for POTUS. She is clearly bright and articulate. She rose thru the glass ceiling to reach CEO of HP. In that job she created so much animosity within the corporation that she was ousted by HP's board of directors and upon her firing wall street responded with a big jump in HP's stock price reflected the investor view that she was bad for the business. Since then she ran a bad campaign against Sen. Boxer replete with demon sheep. She has no governmental experience, no legislative experience, no politically successful experience. She didn't even vote in most elections which tells me she didn't much care who won. She did explain in 2008 that Palin was not qualified to run a business but that didn't make her unqualified to run the USA. How is that if Carly was qualified to poorly run HP, that translates into successfully managing the USA?

[Guest]

It's almost getting embarrassing, isn't it, as the GOP turns over every rock looking for a candidate to run against Hillary Clinton?

What's embarrassing is that Hilary Clinton is the best that the Democrats can come up with.

[Guest]

Maybe I'm missing something, what makes Carly a reasonable candidate for POTUS. She is clearly bright and articulate. She rose thru the glass ceiling to reach CEO of HP. In that job she created so much animosity within the corporation that she was ousted by HP's board of directors and upon her firing wall street responded with a big jump in HP's stock price reflected the investor view that she was bad for the business. Since then she ran a bad campaign against Sen. Boxer replete with demon sheep. She has no governmental experience, no legislative experience, no politically successful experience. She didn't even vote in most elections which tells me she didn't much care who won. She did explain in 2008 that Palin was not qualified to run a business but that didn't make her unqualified to run the USA. How is that if Carly was qualified to poorly run HP, that translates into successfully managing the USA?


I must have missed something ... what was it again by way of accomplishment and qualifications that enabled Obama to manage things?

[Guest]

They haven't figured out how to gerrymander the national election.

Interesting and worthy of its own thread. Actually our national elections are very much gerrymandered in its own way. The vote value of a person in a small state is hugely more important than one in a large state. Gerrymandering is done to create safe districts. We have at least 40 of our 50 states as safe districts for one party or the other. There are a few swing states. If we instead went to a truly national election by abolishing the electoral college, then every voter in every state would have an equal say in the outcome. In its most extreme, a person could win the Presidency with 22% of the votes cast. The Orbital: Electoral college shenanigans, ctd: lose the Presidency with 78.05% of the vote (http://www.ryanlouiscooper.com/2011/05/electoral-college-shenanigans-ctd-lose.html)
As of 2008 a voter in Wyoming had over 3 times the effective vote of one in Pennsylvania.

[Guest]

Interesting and worthy of its own thread. Actually our national elections are very much gerrymandered in its own way. The vote value of a person in a small state is hugely more important than one in a large state. Gerrymandering is done to create safe districts. We have at least 40 of our 50 states as safe districts for one party or the other. There are a few swing states. If we instead went to a truly national election by abolishing the electoral college, then every voter in every state would have an equal say in the outcome. In its most extreme, a person could win the Presidency with 22% of the votes cast. The Orbital: Electoral college shenanigans, ctd: lose the Presidency with 78.05% of the vote (http://www.ryanlouiscooper.com/2011/05/electoral-college-shenanigans-ctd-lose.html)
As of 2008 a voter in Wyoming had over 3 times the effective vote of one in Pennsylvania.

Yes, interesting. Why don't you start a thread to give this topic what it's due while at the same time not getting this one off course

[Guest]

Maybe I'm missing something, what makes Carly a reasonable candidate for POTUS. She is clearly bright and articulate. She rose thru the glass ceiling to reach CEO of HP. In that job she created so much animosity within the corporation that she was ousted by HP's board of directors and upon her firing wall street responded with a big jump in HP's stock price reflected the investor view that she was bad for the business. Since then she ran a bad campaign against Sen. Boxer replete with demon sheep. She has no governmental experience, no legislative experience, no politically successful experience. She didn't even vote in most elections which tells me she didn't much care who won. She did explain in 2008 that Palin was not qualified to run a business but that didn't make her unqualified to run the USA. How is that if Carly was qualified to poorly run HP, that translates into successfully managing the USA?


Here we have a case of genuine female achievement with Carly Fiorina ... rising from the ranks of secretary to CEO. And you start harping and criticizing??.

I can only conclude you must be one of those old, white Republican males who hates women and other minorities. I find your comments offensive. Therefore, and in accordance with current day PC protocols, I must respectfully ask you to suppress your free speech.

[Guest]

Maybe I'm missing something, what makes Carly a reasonable candidate for POTUS. She is clearly bright and articulate. She rose thru the glass ceiling to reach CEO of HP. In that job she created so much animosity within the corporation that she was ousted by HP's board of directors and upon her firing wall street responded with a big jump in HP's stock price reflected the investor view that she was bad for the business. Since then she ran a bad campaign against Sen. Boxer replete with demon sheep. She has no governmental experience, no legislative experience, no politically successful experience. She didn't even vote in most elections which tells me she didn't much care who won. She did explain in 2008 that Palin was not qualified to run a business but that didn't make her unqualified to run the USA. How is that if Carly was qualified to poorly run HP, that translates into successfully managing the USA?

All one has to do is look at the encmbent and that should end what kinds of qualifications it takes to run and be elected! A good (supposedly according to some) talker...PROMISER.

And instead of questioning Fiorina, how about answering the very good request above....how about a Clinton resume' and accomplishments.

[Guest]

You are a troll. Do us all a favor and don't post again as you have nothing intelligent to add to the discussion.

Carly Fiorina may be extremely qualified to be President - but she will not get on the Presidential ticket. Can anyone believe that the old white men who run the Republican Party would nominate a woman for President when the Democrats also have a woman candidate - thus guaranteeing a FEMALE President?

They are scared enough of a woman President after a black President that they (old white men) could not have anyone but a rich white man (Romney) run. Cruz is Hispanic and they could not take that. Rubio is Hispanic and they could not take that. J.Bush is married to a Hispanic and they could not take that.

Well, old dudes, belly up to the bar for your Geritol. Looks like Mr. 47% is your candidate again and will lose again.

[Guest]

What's embarrassing is that Hilary Clinton is the best that the Democrats can come up with.

That she's a winner!

[Guest]

I must have missed something ... what was it again by way of accomplishment and qualifications that enabled Obama to manage things?

There goes the Saul Alenski tactic of deflecting the question instead of giving an answer. Seems as though Republicans like to use Alenski tactics when they work in their favor, don't you, Comrade?

[Guest]

You are a troll. Do us all a favor and don't post again as you have nothing intelligent to add to the discussion.


You and your fellow useful idiots should just accept the fact you are outdated and not part of the current market share.

[Guest]

All one has to do is look at the encmbent and that should end what kinds of qualifications it takes to run and be elected! A good (supposedly according to some) talker...PROMISER.

And instead of questioning Fiorina, how about answering the very good request above....how about a Clinton resume' and accomplishments.

I am so sorry. I didn't realize that a thread about Fiorina and her possible aptitude for POTUS was an improper place to review her accomplishments. Instead as I understand your new rule, the proper protocol in all threads is to use whatever topic is presented and twist it into an attack on someone else. Thank you for your guidance in this matter. And just so you don't miss the snide tone to my post, your spelling is as poor as your rhetorical skill.

[Guest]

There goes the Saul Alenski tactic of deflecting the question instead of giving an answer. Seems as though Republicans like to use Alenski tactics when they work in their favor, don't you, Comrade?

As least Republicans can spell Saul Alinsky's name correctly.

[Guest]

I am so sorry. I didn't realize that a thread about Fiorina and her possible aptitude for POTUS was an improper place to review her accomplishments. Instead as I understand your new rule, the proper protocol in all threads is to use whatever topic is presented and twist it into an attack on someone else. Thank you for your guidance in this matter. And just so you don't miss the snide tone to my post, your spelling is as poor as your rhetorical skill.

Must be problematical for such beings that are all knowing.....you would like others to believe.
The mode of operation is divert, delay, deny, name call, categorize anything not in alignment with what you prefer to support.

Your options are:
>don't bother answering my posts
>if you don't agree just say so instead of being nasty all the time
>if there were an emoticon for flipping the bird I would show it and offer you to sit on it

The :censored: BS responses used to be at best entertaining. That has worn off.

If you don't like the rhetoric....don't respond.
I put mis-spelled words in by design to give those who enjoy picking fly specs out of pepper something to do since they cannot communicate with decency.

Oh do I ever miss the :censored: ignore button.

[Guest]

You are clearly a bitter and narrow minded fool.

You and your fellow useful idiots should just accept the fact you are outdated and not part of the current market share.

[Guest]

You are clearly a bitter and narrow minded fool.

No, I am not the:loco: Republican.

[Guest]

No, I am not the:loco: Republican.

No but your a clearly a genuine idiot and, to be blunt, not that bright

[Guest]

No but your a clearly a genuine idiot and, to be blunt, not that bright

It's a good thing he's not a republican, can you imagine how dumb he would be then. It could be worse he could be the village idiots, the villages tea party, so far to the right the tricounty tea party wants nothing to do with them! Duuuuummmmmmb

[Guest]

No but your a clearly a genuine idiot and, to be blunt, not that bright

Go back to grade school and see the the contraction of "you are" is "you're", so by making a very basic mistake like that in your "official language", you have shown you are a dim bulb.:wave:

Personal best regards.

[Guest]

I really do not think we have to even talk about Carly anymore.

In the latest Fox News Poll, she did not get even 1 percent of the respondents saying they would vote for her as President.

She is now as newsworthy as the newspaper on the bottom of a birdcage.

[Guest]

I really do not think we have to even talk about Carly anymore.

In the latest Fox News Poll, she did not get even 1 percent of the respondents saying they would vote for her as President.

She is now as newsworthy as the newspaper on the bottom of a birdcage.

Some keep hoping she won't.
Living by the poll numbers is a losing game is it not.

This time of year in the 2008 race Clinton was viewd as the parties choice. She got knocked out of first place by a relatively unknown. I am sure it was not because the party need a black candidate before a female candidate.
And so for 2016 she has even more negative baggage and controversy and you all think she is invulnerable.

Why is that?

I do believe some dems greatest fear is that Fiorina runs. Defeats all the first woman POTUS BS.

[Guest]

I really do not think we have to even talk about Carly anymore.

In the latest Fox News Poll, she did not get even 1 percent of the respondents saying they would vote for her as President.

She is now as newsworthy as the newspaper on the bottom of a birdcage.

Since you talk about a woman candidate in such a disrespectful way (ie birdcage comment) I can only assume you are an incorrigible woman-hating sexist pig. I'm offended.

Besides, you don't understand the basic strategy she is employing. She's running for VP not Presidential nod. And, I think she has an excellent chance of getting it for a lot of reasons. She's accomplished, smart and apparently fearless.

[Guest]

Since you talk about a woman candidate in such a disrespectful way (ie birdcage comment) I can only assume you are an incorrigible woman-hating sexist pig. I'm offended.

Besides, you don't understand the basic strategy she is employing. She's running for VP not Presidential nod. And, I think she has an excellent chance of getting it for a lot of reasons. She's accomplished, smart and apparently fearless.

Seems like these are attributes of rarity in politics. It is hard to tell as we NEVER get to hear about the good stuff done by the good politicians.

[Guest]

Since you talk about a woman candidate in such a disrespectful way (ie birdcage comment) I can only assume you are an incorrigible woman-hating sexist pig. I'm offended.

Besides, you don't understand the basic strategy she is employing. She's running for VP not Presidential nod. And, I think she has an excellent chance of getting it for a lot of reasons. She's accomplished, smart and apparently fearless.


The GOP must have a pretty low bar if they think a woman that lost her senate race by 10% points and got fired from her job at Hewitt-Packard is accomplished, smart and fearless. Sarah Palin at least got elected governor once in her life.

Where does Carly stand on the TPA? Where does Carly stand on the XXE? Where does Carly stand on the IUD? Let's hear her positions before we cast our votes.

[Guest]

The GOP must have a pretty low bar if they think a woman that lost her senate race by 10% points and got fired from her job at Hewitt-Packard is accomplished, smart and fearless. Sarah Palin at least got elected governor once in her life.

Where does Carly stand on the TPA? Where does Carly stand on the XXE? Where does Carly stand on the IUD? Let's hear her positions before we cast our votes.

I'm still waiting for you to give us a list of comparative accomplishments ...ie side by side, mano-a-mano between Hillary and Carly.

But, no liberal has yet accepted the challenge, and after multiple requests. I'm beginning to think that's because you can't.

[Guest]

I'm still waiting for you to give us a list of comparative accomplishments ...ie side by side, mano-a-mano between Hillary and Carly.

But, no liberal has yet accepted the challenge, and after multiple requests. I'm beginning to think that's because you can't.

I'm beginning to think you're in charge here. This is a thread about whether Carly is presidential material as in "Carly Fiorina steps closer to the plate" There already is a thread with a couple hundred posts about Mrs. Clinton's qualifications.

[Guest]

Since you talk about a woman candidate in such a disrespectful way (ie birdcage comment) I can only assume you are an incorrigible woman-hating sexist pig. I'm offended.

Besides, you don't understand the basic strategy she is employing. She's running for VP not Presidential nod. And, I think she has an excellent chance of getting it for a lot of reasons. She's accomplished, smart and apparently fearless.

Read the Fox News Poll and you will that Carly also got the less than 1 percent for VP choice.

[Guest]

Read the Fox News Poll and you will that Carly also got the less than 1 percent for VP choice.

We've already discussed this ... the polls at this point are largely irrelevant. Try to get back to topic please.

[Guest]

Some keep hoping she won't.
Living by the poll numbers is a losing game is it not.

This time of year in the 2008 race Clinton was viewd as the parties choice. She got knocked out of first place by a relatively unknown. I am sure it was not because the party need a black candidate before a female candidate.
And so for 2016 she has even more negative baggage and controversy and you all think she is invulnerable.

Why is that?

I do believe some dems greatest fear is that Fiorina runs. Defeats all the first woman POTUS BS.

We've already discussed this ... the polls at this point are largely irrelevant. Try to get back to topic please.



At this point in 2008, there were only a handful of primary races remaining, and Barack Obama was well on his way to winning 30 states, while Hillary Clinton won 20 states. Clinton won all the big states like CA, FL, PA, OH, NY, but Obama just kept plugging away especially in the caucus states and came out the winner. Hopefully, the republican primary season will be as much fun to watch as that 2008 race was, which came right down to the wire.

It's funny how the polls are 'largely irrelevant', especially when the GOP's flavor of the day is polling at less than 1%. Pardon us if we don't pay too much attention to the group that assured us Romney would win in a landslide in 2012.

[Guest]

At this point in 2008, there were only a handful of primary races remaining, and Barack Obama was well on his way to winning 30 states, while Hillary Clinton won 20 states. Clinton won all the big states like CA, FL, PA, OH, NY, but Obama just kept plugging away especially in the caucus states and came out the winner. Hopefully, the republican primary season will be as much fun to watch as that 2008 race was, which came right down to the wire.

It's funny how the polls are 'largely irrelevant', especially when the GOP's flavor of the day is polling at less than 1%. Pardon us if we don't pay too much attention to the group that assured us Romney would win in a landslide in 2012.

:icon_bored:

[Guest]

:icon_bored:

You simply are unable to compare accomplishments for Carly and Hillary ... we get it.

[Guest]

Did Obama overtake and pass the frontrunner (Clinton)?

[Guest]

...and the candidate polling LESS than 1 percent is going to win nomination for President or VP. :loco:

[Guest]

You simply are unable to compare accomplishments for Carly and Hillary ... we get it.


When Carly wins 20 primary states (like Hillary did in 2008), come back and we can talk.

[Guest]

When Carly wins 20 primary states (like Hillary did in 2008), come back and we can talk.

You don't want to talk because you KNOW you can't reasonably compare accomplishments between Carly and Hillary. What a wuss.

[Guest]

You don't want to talk because you KNOW you can't reasonably compare accomplishments between Carly and Hillary. What a wuss.

How about Hillary won two, count them two, elections to the senate compared to Carly's ten % point loss in her race for the senate.

[Guest]

How about Hillary won two, count them two, elections to the senate compared to Carly's ten % point loss in her race for the senate.

Don't forget Hillary's greatest accomplishment to date ... she went from being "dead broke" to having an estimated net worth of $150-200M by virtue of running a charity. !! WTF??

Who could have guessed that running a charity would be enough to put her into the top 1%, of the top 1%?? That's pretty darn impressive, even by Clintonian standards of crime and theft.

[Guest]

Don't forget Hillary's greatest accomplishment to date ... she went from being "dead broke" to having an estimated net worth of $150-200M by virtue of running a charity. !! WTF??

Who could have guessed that running a charity would be enough to put her into the top 1%, of the top 1%?? That's pretty darn impressive, even by Clintonian standards of crime and theft.





Heck, the failed 1/2 governor of Alaska went from nothing to being worth $12 million by virtue of being able to see Russia from her house and, of course, by making a fool of herself on Faux News..

That right there is pretty impressive for someone who had to go to 6 different colleges in five years

[Guest]

Heck, the failed 1/2 governor of Alaska went from nothing to being worth $12 million by virtue of being able to see Russia from her house and, of course, by making a fool of herself on Faux News..

That right there is pretty impressive for someone who had to go to 6 different colleges in five years

So what is your point other than the usual badmouthing?
And if it was your daughter who accomplished that what would you have to say?
It is so easy to diss and snarl where there is no personal investment.

[Guest]

Heck, the failed 1/2 governor of Alaska went from nothing to being worth $12 million by virtue of being able to see Russia from her house and, of course, by making a fool of herself on Faux News..

That right there is pretty impressive for someone who had to go to 6 different colleges in five years


Is that the same Sarah Palin that republicans thought was capable of carrying around the nuclear codes which could blow up the world? Pardon me if I don't cheer for their recommendations.

[Guest]

Is that the same Sarah Palin that republicans thought was capable of carrying around the nuclear codes which could blow up the world? Pardon me if I don't cheer for their recommendations.

And you know oh so much about her don't you.
All you need is one fact....she is the opposition.
Another fact? You are comfortable with Obama with the nuclear codes....because he is of your party...most certainly not because he is capable of such responsiblity. His military decision making process would have us all exterminated from the surface of the planet by the enemy long before the threat would become a priority for him.

[Guest]

Heck, the failed 1/2 governor of Alaska went from nothing to being worth $12 million by virtue of being able to see Russia from her house and, of course, by making a fool of herself on Faux News..

That right there is pretty impressive for someone who had to go to 6 different colleges in five years

An admirable, if somewhat lame, attempt to change the focus from Hillary's influence peddling and criminality. Sarah Palin (of whom I'm no fan btw) made her money by working at Fox News and other companies. Note, the key word here is "working."

Hillary, by contrast, made $150-200 million while running what's supposed to be a CHARITY. Even true believers and committed kool aid drinkers, such as yourself, can't sweep that under the rug, although we all know you will continue trying.

Bottom line: Hillary Clinton has probably broken Federal RICO statutes and, at some point after the Democrats figure out a way to give the nomination to Warren instead of her, she will likely end up on the wrong end of a prosecutorial table. You can donate to her defense fund though.

[Guest]

An admirable, if somewhat lame, attempt to change the focus from Hillary's influence peddling and criminality. Sarah Palin (of whom I'm no fan btw) made her money by working at Fox News and other companies. Note, the key word here is "working."

Hillary, by contrast, made $150-200 million while running what's supposed to be a CHARITY. Even true believers and committed kool aid drinkers, such as yourself, can't sweep that under the rug, although we all know you will continue trying.

Bottom line: Hillary Clinton has probably broken Federal RICO statutes and, at some point after the Democrats figure out a way to give the nomination to Warren instead of her, she will likely end up on the wrong end of a prosecutorial table. You can donate to her defense fund though.

All in your deranged dreams. You will be having heartburn for 16 more years cause when Hillary is done, Liz will step up. You and your dillusional tea party cronies couldn't win a national election even if it was fixed, and there is no doubt your crooked backers will try, just as they got w elected the first time. Your politics are disgusting and you have the stones to come on here and talk nastily of the Clinton foundation that has raised millions for charity. Like I said, you are disgusting as a human being, that term being used very loosely!

[Guest]

All in your deranged dreams. You will be having heartburn for 16 more years cause when Hillary is done, Liz will step up. You and your dillusional tea party cronies couldn't win a national election even if it was fixed, and there is no doubt your crooked backers will try, just as they got w elected the first time. Your politics are disgusting and you have the stones to come on here and talk nastily of the Clinton foundation that has raised millions for charity. Like I said, you are disgusting as a human being, that term being used very loosely!

I think you are about as perfect a gullible, Kool-Aid drinking stooge for the Clintons as we have yet encountered on this board. None are as blind as those who ... cover their eyes with duct tape, and stuff their ears with wax, like you have just done with your ranting, and literally insane, post.

[Guest]

Carly can do the U.S. like she did HP.

[Guest]

Please enlighten us and tell us exactly what it is she did or did not do.

Far too mant people have absolutely no understanding of cororate America and why it does what it does.

So instead of parroting what the media and others that do not understand have to say, enlighten us what YOU know about her.

And then contrast what you believe to be wrong or unaccepatble and compare to the Clinton list of what is wrong or unacceptable, including the fact she is not qualified.

[Guest]

And you know oh so much about her don't you.
All you need is one fact....she is the opposition.
Another fact? You are comfortable with Obama with the nuclear codes....because he is of your party...most certainly not because he is capable of such responsiblity. His military decision making process would have us all exterminated from the surface of the planet by the enemy long before the threat would become a priority for him.





Much more comfortable with Obama than the Bush kid.

[Guest]

Much more comfortable with Obama than the Bush kid.

Sure hope your grandkids see it that way when they get to deal with a nuclear Iran because Obama allowed them to acquire it

[Guest]

This is just another angry rant and people will wonder if you have some issues that require medication. Don't you realize how name calling reflects badly on you. By the way, you might want to check some unbiased news sources about the Clinton foundation.

All in your deranged dreams. You will be having heartburn for 16 more years cause when Hillary is done, Liz will step up. You and your dillusional tea party cronies couldn't win a national election even if it was fixed, and there is no doubt your crooked backers will try, just as they got w elected the first time. Your politics are disgusting and you have the stones to come on here and talk nastily of the Clinton foundation that has raised millions for charity. Like I said, you are disgusting as a human being, that term being used very loosely!

[Guest]

This is just another angry rant and people will wonder if you have some issues that require medication. Don't you realize how name calling reflects badly on you. By the way, you might want to check some unbiased news sources about the Clinton foundation.


Would you mind sharing the unbiased news sources to which you are referring?

I really would like to find out the truth. Thanks.

[Guest]

Your a big boy (or girl) - google it yourself. It's not my job to provide your news sources. However, if you plan on relying on MSNBC for your news then you can pretty much forget about the truth (unless they provide your flavour of truth - haha ).

Would you mind sharing the unbiased news sources to which you are referring?

I really would like to find out the truth. Thanks.

[Guest]

Your a big boy (or girl) - google it yourself. It's not my job to provide your news sources. However, if you plan on relying on MSNBC for your news then you can pretty much forget about the truth (unless they provide your flavour of truth - haha ).

Very mature post. Obviously, the poster uses right wing nut job "news" sites as his sources since he is ashamed to reveal them.. Posts like his are worthless and just reflect ignorance.

[Guest]

Very mature post. Obviously, the poster uses right wing nut job "news" sites as his sources since he is ashamed to reveal them.. Posts like his are worthless and just reflect ignorance.

No, if you read it, he told the other poster to do his/her own homework.

Like a good Democrat, the other poster is probably used to asking others to do their work for them. It's called being lazy.

[Guest]

What exactly is your problem? Forget to take your meds today? As I said, get your own information. I am not your parent - grow up and try to act like an adult. Jerk.

Very mature post. Obviously, the poster uses right wing nut job "news" sites as his sources since he is ashamed to reveal them.. Posts like his are worthless and just reflect ignorance.