ISIS the "JV" player looking to nukes in the future

[Guest]

Remember the "JV" player that Obama tried to pooh pooh.
The one that recently took control of half of Syria and is on the march in spite of all the bombings.....that controls a major portion of middle east oil production....they are now bragging about the pursuit of nuclear weapons:

Isis claims it could buy its first nuclear weapon from Pakistan within 12 months - Middle East - World - The Independent (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/isis-claims-it-could-buy-its-first-nuclear-weapon-from-pakistan-within-12-months-10270525.html)

Based on their track record since their "JV" days....somebody needs to be very afraid and oncerned of these killers.

[Guest]

Remember the "JV" player that Obama tried to pooh pooh.
The one that recently took control of half of Syria and is on the march in spite of all the bombings.....that controls a major portion of middle east oil production....they are now bragging about the pursuit of nuclear weapons:

Isis claims it could buy its first nuclear weapon from Pakistan within 12 months - Middle East - World - The Independent (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/isis-claims-it-could-buy-its-first-nuclear-weapon-from-pakistan-within-12-months-10270525.html)

Based on their track record since their "JV" days....somebody needs to be very afraid and oncerned of these killers.

My guess on this is that they ALREADY HAVE IT...or they would not have said this.

Problem is for them how to deliver it here. That is what they need to work on and then just pick the target.

The religious group that gassed the subway in Tokyo, with sarin were working on getting nukes and had a seller but they had trouble also with the delivery system. This attack took place in 1995 and many books written on that subject have validated how close that was.

I do not think this threat is made unless they already have it, and simply need to deliver it

[Guest]

My guess on this is that they ALREADY HAVE IT...or they would not have said this.

Problem is for them how to deliver it here. That is what they need to work on and then just pick the target.

The religious group that gassed the subway in Tokyo, with sarin were working on getting nukes and had a seller but they had trouble also with the delivery system. This attack took place in 1995 and many books written on that subject have validated how close that was.

I do not think this threat is made unless they already have it, and simply need to deliver it

They may already have nukes, or not ... no one knows for sure at this point and, IMO, that includes the Intel Community. Very hard to penetrate ISIS with human assets.

However, either way, it tells you what they are aiming at. Pakistan is always teetering on the edge and they have about 80 nukes according to public sources.

For everyone who thinks we should not send ground troops to finish off Syria ... ask yourself this question. When ISIS finally gets their hands on a nuke, do you think they would have ANY hesitation to use it on whatever American city they could get access to? (hint: these are the same animals who burned a Jordanian pilot alive in a cage)

Ask yourself another question: in the wake of a nuclear terror attack on America, what impact do you think that would have on you, your family and your future?

[Guest]

Interesting......

On Monday Iran called for Israel to give up their nuclear program or it may not sign an agreement.

On Thursday of the same week, an Asst Us secy of state was in talks in Israel to have Israel disarm

I Hear a Strange Echo: Iran Tells Israel to Give Up The Nukes, Then Obama Tells Israel Give up Nukes | www.independentsentinel.com (http://www.independentsentinel.com/i-hear-a-strange-echo-iran-tells-israel-to-give-up-the-nukes-then-obama-tells-israel-give-up-nukes/)

Ok....we expect countries we call allies, and who do not threaten to lay down their arms because we want an agreement wit the known chief supporter of terrorism in the region, and while ISIS who is expanding to other continents (not countries...CONTINENTS) is touting their movement toward nukes.

Is there something wrong with this ?

[Guest]

Interesting......

On Monday Iran called for Israel to give up their nuclear program or it may not sign an agreement.

On Thursday of the same week, an Asst Us secy of state was in talks in Israel to have Israel disarm

I Hear a Strange Echo: Iran Tells Israel to Give Up The Nukes, Then Obama Tells Israel Give up Nukes | www.independentsentinel.com (http://www.independentsentinel.com/i-hear-a-strange-echo-iran-tells-israel-to-give-up-the-nukes-then-obama-tells-israel-give-up-nukes/)

Ok....we expect countries we call allies, and who do not threaten to lay down their arms because we want an agreement wit the known chief supporter of terrorism in the region, and while ISIS who is expanding to other continents (not countries...CONTINENTS) is touting their movement toward nukes.

Is there something wrong with this ?

Of course it is wrong according to what we all have been raised to expect.
It is another incident proving there is an agenda being advanced right under our noses with no concern at all about what the rest of the world thinks.