The new normal

[Guest]

Are you kidding me? They are giving Jenner a show. New time low America sinking lower and lower. President calls him courageous? What about our military? He doesn't call them courageous. How about people battling cancer? Are they courageous? Trying to shove the gay transgender agenda down our throats. Who cares about this he/she garbage. That is at the bottom of the list of important issues. Isis is the main issue we must focus on and we need to wipe them off the face of the earth. Put Jenner on jerry springer with the other garbage out there

[Guest]

Being tolerated by the silent majority.

Complacency breeds crap!

[Guest]

We control our remotes. Let's not tune in and let the ratings speak for themselves.

[Guest]

America sinks into a new moral crevasse ... where peversity becomes the new normal. America is actually following the path of Rome ... and in the meantime Obama can't find his a** with both hands in order to come up with a strategy to defeat ISIS.

Impeach ...

[Guest]

Caitlyn Jenner, Josh Duggar, Speaker Denny Hastert all monopolizing the news because of sexual issues and all republicans.

[Guest]

Caitlyn Jenner, Josh Duggar, Speaker Denny Hastert all monopolizing the news because of sexual issues and all republicans.

Perfect! :a20:

[Guest]

Caitlyn Jenner, Josh Duggar, Speaker Denny Hastert all monopolizing the news because of sexual issues and all republicans.

Democritic plan to keep everyone from paying attention to Obama's fiascoes and debacles while doing nothing that matters.

[Guest]

Caitlyn Jenner, Josh Duggar, Speaker Denny Hastert all monopolizing the news because of sexual issues and all republicans.

So many things to learn from this post.

1. To discuss politics, simply find out the party if anyone in the news in a negative light; find their party affiliation Ned mention their names to reflect poorly on the opposing party.

2. If you suspect any of your friends, or neighbors might be a sexual predator or someone you should fear, check their voter registration; if Republican, they are obviously someone to fear. If Democratic,breathe easy.

3. If you are looking for someone to tend your grandchildren, check voter registration and in sure they are Democrats to be safe.

4. Ignore those women sexually abused by President Clinton. They are simply saying things as part of a vast right wing conspiracy.

These are simply guidelines to keep you safe.

[Guest]

So many things to learn from this post.

1. To discuss politics, simply find out the party if anyone in the news in a negative light; find their party affiliation Ned mention their names to reflect poorly on the opposing party.

2. If you suspect any of your friends, or neighbors might be a sexual predator or someone you should fear, check their voter registration; if Republican, they are obviously someone to fear. If Democratic,breathe easy.

3. If you are looking for someone to tend your grandchildren, check voter registration and in sure they are Democrats to be safe.

4. Ignore those women sexually abused by President Clinton. They are simply saying things as part of a vast right wing conspiracy.

These are simply guidelines to keep you safe.

This poster seems to be using the tactics described ib Saul Alinski's book. First you mock, then you divert the question, and then turn the question to your own. Sounds like Palin, doesn't it?

[Guest]

Given that Rubio and his wife together have 17 traffic violations over 20 years .... I wonder how may sexual assaults Hillary and her husband totaled together in a similar fashion have?

[Guest]

Topic is transgender/gays being glamorized to our kids to make it appear "normal". Makes no difference if the he/she is black, white, purple, rep or dem. Who gives a dam ? Do what you want in your own bedroom but don't glamorize it to our kids. A two parent household with traditional values and morals is all that can save this country. Because once this is accepted next sex with multiple wives will be or why not marry your dog?? Liberalism is a mental disorder

[Guest]

Given that Rubio and his wife together have 17 traffic violations over 20 years .... I wonder how may sexual assaults Hillary and her husband totaled together in a similar fashion have?

I wonder how many abortions that Rubio's wife had in 20 years.

[Guest]

Dear Guests:

what we are witnessing is the result of a cultural war that began in the 1960's. Liberals from various groups focused on destroying normative America ( middle class traditional values) there is a book just out on this issue.

The feminist wanted to destroy men. The gays ( se Overhaulnig Straight America (circa 1987) set an agenda to make homosexuality the new normal. they feigned a benign pitch essentially stating you like vanilla we like strawberry. Hollywood was their main venue and as you can see today Jenner is described as the new norm .

Companis like Disney Comcast/HBO/NBC Universal Home Depot pushing the
homosexual issue big time.

Look at what all of this free love challenge authority etc has wrought us. The liberals push secularism because he goes hand in hand with government control and let's not forget internationalism aka America is not exceptional

How did liberals prevail because the silent majority believed in civility rational discussion etc. How's that working out for us?

I said it in a previous post and I'll say it again. I miss John Wayne

As to have the remote control what we watch. Pay attention to the number of shows that push the liberal gay anti religious decadent lifestyle and you have eliminated everything but ENCORE WESTERNS.

Traditional must take back America or America will disappear.

Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

Dear Guests:

what we are witnessing is the result of a cultural war that began in the 1960's. Liberals from various groups focused on destroying normative America ( middle class traditional values) there is a book just out on this issue.

The feminist wanted to destroy men. The gays ( se Overhaulnig Straight America (circa 1987) set an agenda to make homosexuality the new normal. they feigned a benign pitch essentially stating you like vanilla we like strawberry. Hollywood was their main venue and as you can see today Jenner is described as the new norm .

Companis like Disney Comcast/HBO/NBC Universal Home Depot pushing the
homosexual issue big time.

Look at what all of this free love challenge authority etc has wrought us. The liberals push secularism because he goes hand in hand with government control and let's not forget internationalism aka America is not exceptional

How did liberals prevail because the silent majority believed in civility rational discussion etc. How's that working out for us?

I said it in a previous post and I'll say it again. I miss John Wayne

As to have the remote control what we watch. Pay attention to the number of shows that push the liberal gay anti religious decadent lifestyle and you have eliminated everything but ENCORE WESTERNS.

Traditional must take back America or America will disappear.

Personal Best Regards:

What you probably mean is that you miss the John Wayne character he played. In reality, he was a philanderer, married and divorced multiple times, chain smoker, and a mean drunk. Google him to find out all.

This is not 1950 anymore. Evolve with the times or become extinct like the dinosaurs.

[Guest]

I wonder how many abortions that Rubio's wife had in 20 years.

WOW...talk about making a case for a new "normal".

I suppose you are allowed to make any kind of implications now on here, no matter what.

At least in the case off President Clinton, there are facts to back things up. Last official count I heard was 7, although I know of only 4 that are certain.

Talk about a new normal "only 4", as if that was complimentary.

[Guest]

This poster seems to be using the tactics described ib Saul Alinski's book. First you mock, then you divert the question, and then turn the question to your own. Sounds like Palin, doesn't it?

Gee....maybe he/she was, but to be honest, I totally missed the "question" you refer to in the post being replied to.

Could you repeat the question...better yet, cut and paste that question, so all can see it and respond to the question.

[Guest]

Gee....maybe he/she was, but to be honest, I totally missed the "question" you refer to in the post being replied to.

Could you repeat the question...better yet, cut and paste that question, so all can see it and respond to the question.

To help out, here is the post that supposedly had a question in it that was ignored and diverted.

"Post
Caitlyn Jenner, Josh Duggar, Speaker Denny Hastert all monopolizing the news because of sexual issues and all republicans.
Reply With Quote"

Need help in finding that diverted question. Thanks

[Guest]

WOW...talk about making a case for a new "normal".

I suppose you are allowed to make any kind of implications now on here, no matter what.

At least in the case off President Clinton, there are facts to back things up. Last official count I heard was 7, although I know of only 4 that are certain.

Talk about a new normal "only 4", as if that was complimentary.

Don't you wonder how many in the Oval Office of the President ?

[Guest]

the degeneration of who and what we have become is very apparent in this thread.

As far as getting with the times or be a dinosauer, I will take the values of yesterday long before I accept the permissive, anything goes, no respect for anything or anybody gutter values of today.

[Guest]

the degeneration of who and what we have become is very apparent in this thread.

As far as getting with the times or be a dinosauer, I will take the values of yesterday long before I accept the permissive, anything goes, no respect for anything or anybody gutter values of today.


How are we supposed to explain to the children why the former Speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert, at one time second in line to be president of the US, was just perp walked into court?

[Guest]

How are we supposed to explain to the children why the former Speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert, at one time second in line to be president of the US, was just perp walked into court?

I would suppose, if they ask, with the same sensitivity we will use explaining a question they WILL ask, that being.....how could an elected sitting President of our country have sex, adulteress sex, with a woman inside that supposedly revered Oval Office. Or how he could be sued while President for having adulteress sex while a sitting Governor with another woman.

I suspect the question on our President will be asked many more times than that about the guy, who appears to be guilty, and what he did before gettin into office.

[Guest]

Of course those children you are concerned about will be tech savvy, so we will need to use that same sensitivity to explain how two members, married, of the House of Representatives...while in office....were engaging in sexual antics on their phone, or even explain how a sitting U.S. Senator, Edwards by name, could engage in an affair while running for President and being touted by his party as the moral example.

Tough things to explain you are correct.

NOW, your post was meant to try and slam the Republican Party, and the manner is pretty typical. My responses were trying to show how hypocritical you are being, by playing the lowest, basest kind of politics.

HOWEVER, it does speak to the thread, although not your purpose....The New Normal. I realize you feel it is one sided, but someday we all need to grow up and face issues, not only with character of our leaders, but the issues themselves that far outweigh the importance of party

[Guest]

It is your core values background that has one wondering how to explain, etc.

Not to worry with today's permissive, anything goes environment, they will most likely wonder what YOUR problem is!

[Guest]

I would suppose, if they ask, with the same sensitivity we will use explaining a question they WILL ask, that being.....how could an elected sitting President of our country have sex, adulteress sex, with a woman inside that supposedly revered Oval Office. Or how he could be sued while President for having adulteress sex while a sitting Governor with another woman.

I suspect the question on our President will be asked many more times than that about the guy, who appears to be guilty, and what he did before gettin into office.

Makes one wonder how Bill Clinton had a 66 percent approval rating when he left office. George Weasel was about 34 percent. That is extremely low.

[Guest]

Makes one wonder how Bill Clinton had a 66 percent approval rating when he left office. George Weasel was about 34 percent. That is extremely low.

I am not fan of Ms Clinton, nor President Obama, however I have at least the common respect and ability to be an adult when talking anywhere.

Your reference to President Bush may be cutesy to you but it reminds me of how less than adult this board is becoming. As with the past board, the trolls just never stop the games.

And we wonder why our electorate is a bit slow.

I suppose the is another affirmation of the OPs premise. You equate approval ratings in a political poll to morals, which is even worse than sad

[Guest]

I am not fan of Ms Clinton, nor President Obama, however I have at least the common respect and ability to be an adult when talking anywhere.

Your reference to President Bush may be cutesy to you but it reminds me of how less than adult this board is becoming. As with the past board, the trolls just never stop the games.

And we wonder why our electorate is a bit slow.

I suppose the is another affirmation of the OPs premise. You equate approval ratings in a political poll to morals, which is even worse than sad

...and The Village Curmudgeon comes back with another brainless post.

[Guest]

I would suppose, if they ask, with the same sensitivity we will use explaining a question they WILL ask, that being.....how could an elected sitting President of our country have sex, adulteress sex, with a woman inside that supposedly revered Oval Office. Or how he could be sued while President for having adulteress sex while a sitting Governor with another woman.

I suspect the question on our President will be asked many more times than that about the guy, who appears to be guilty, and what he did before gettin into office.

Makes one wonder how Bill Clinton had a 66 percent approval rating when he left office. George Weasel was about 34 percent. That is extremely low.


Thanks for clarifying. I thought the above post was about JFK, the biggest philanderer of all in recent memory.

[Guest]

Thanks for clarifying. I thought the above post was about JFK, the biggest philanderer of all in recent memory.

Well, I didn't go back too far. The TWO trolls on feverish duty today do not seem to be into history much. They seem to be limited to the websites they have been steered to and any factual history is irrelevant !

Just completed a book, not about JFK but went into his dallying with Judith Campbell. etc. I am not sure he could hold a candle with Clinton as far as IN THE WHITE HOUSE...maybe pre, but President Clinton took philandering IN OFFICE to a higher level than I can think of.

[Guest]

...and The Village Curmudgeon comes back with another brainless post.

The post you refer to hardly sounds like a curmudgeon to me and was far from a brainless post. I don't see how your comment above added to the commentary at all however. If there is one thing I have learned in life, it's that often times what I don't like in another person is often a reflection of something I don't like in myself. You may want to take a look in the mirror.

[Guest]

The post you refer to hardly sounds like a curmudgeon to me and was far from a brainless post. I don't see how your comment above added to the commentary at all however. If there is one thing I have learned in life, it's that often times what I don't like in another person is often a reflection of something I don't like in myself. You may want to take a look in the mirror.

Thank you, Village Curmudgeon. Your posts are always brainless.

[Guest]

I would suppose, if they ask, with the same sensitivity we will use explaining a question they WILL ask, that being.....how could an elected sitting President of our country have sex, adulteress sex, with a woman inside that supposedly revered Oval Office. Or how he could be sued while President for having adulteress sex while a sitting Governor with another woman.

I suspect the question on our President will be asked many more times than that about the guy, who appears to be guilty, and what he did before gettin into office.

More of trying to divert the question.

Stick to the question of having the former Speaker of the House perp walked into court. How dignified is that? Another Mark Foley after underage boys while preaching the moral highground?

[Guest]

More of trying to divert the question.

Stick to the question of having the former Speaker of the House perp walked into court. How dignified is that? Another Mark Foley after underage boys while preaching the moral highground?

You genuine homophobe, evil, uncarding monster.

Sniff, sniff ... boo hoo !!!

Denny, just like Mark, was simply looking for love and here you go being judgmental. Who are we to say grown men can't prey upon younger men? What could possibly be wrong with that?

For that matter, if the President of the US wants to assault and overpower a young intern in the Oval Orifice, why do you have to be so mean and old fashioned about a sex pervert no matter what his/her/it's gender?

[Guest]

You genuine homophobe, evil, uncarding monster.

Sniff, sniff ... boo hoo !!!

Denny, just like Mark, was simply looking for love and here you go being judgmental. Who are we to say grown men can't prey upon younger men? What could possibly be wrong with that?

For that matter, if the President of the US wants to assault and overpower a young intern in the Oval Orifice, why do you have to be so mean and old fashioned about a sex pervert no matter what his/her/it's gender?


It's rather ironical that the person who led the impeachment of the former president is now looking at five years in prison for each offense.

Most of the old impeachment gang got thrown out of office including Rep Newt Gingrich (R-GA), Rep Bill McCollum (R-FL), Rep Bob Barr (R-GA), Rep Mary Bono (R-CA), all resigned or lost elections. And the former president is measuring the White House for drapes once again. There is a god.

[Guest]

It's rather ironical that the person who led the impeachment of the former president is now looking at five years in prison for each offense.

Most of the old impeachment gang got thrown out of office including Rep Newt Gingrich (R-GA), Rep Bill McCollum (R-FL), Rep Bob Barr (R-GA), Rep Mary Bono (R-CA), all resigned or lost elections. And the former president is measuring the White House for drapes once again. There is a god.

Excellent post!

[Guest]

Back to the original post where the Guest suggests that it was not courageous for Jenner to transition and having full ODS attacks the President for not calling members of the military courageous.

I won't bother to link the hundreds of speeches given over the President's administration where he uses the exact word courage or courageous in reference to the military. You Guest are an unabashed liar to attempt to have that allegation pass as truthful. However to suggest that Jenner was not courageous in her decision is equally foolish. If I recall, you spouted a stream of bile at her with the "trying to shove down our throats" line that so often appears in Leviticans' opinions. And "who cares about he/she garbage" It is that hate that make Jenner's choice to come out of the closet courageous, to be an example for others facing similar issues, to do it with grace. If you think this was easy for her to do, and face the backlash of uninformed distain and revulsion coming from people like Guest then perhaps I don't understand the meaning of courage.
If courage means not accepting publicity for being brave, not writing a book, or not allowing a movie dramatization, or a TV show, then we are into new definitions.

[Guest]

It's rather ironical that the person who led the impeachment of the former president is now looking at five years in prison for each offense.

Most of the old impeachment gang got thrown out of office including Rep Newt Gingrich (R-GA), Rep Bill McCollum (R-FL), Rep Bob Barr (R-GA), Rep Mary Bono (R-CA), all resigned or lost elections. And the former president is measuring the White House for drapes once again. There is a god.

This is what is commonly called taking select pieces of different puzzles and taping them together and calling for all to see the picture that fits the objective they INVENTED/HALLUCINATED.

[Guest]

It's rather ironical that the person who led the impeachment of the former president is now looking at five years in prison for each offense.

Most of the old impeachment gang got thrown out of office including Rep Newt Gingrich (R-GA), Rep Bill McCollum (R-FL), Rep Bob Barr (R-GA), Rep Mary Bono (R-CA), all resigned or lost elections. And the former president is measuring the White House for drapes once again. There is a god.

Remember, you cannot be a liberal and believe in God ... unless you mean Gaia or some other pagan concept. That would work for you

[Guest]

Back to the original post where the Guest suggests that it was not courageous for Jenner to transition and having full ODS attacks the President for not calling members of the military courageous.

I won't bother to link the hundreds of speeches given over the President's administration where he uses the exact word courage or courageous in reference to the military. You Guest are an unabashed liar to attempt to have that allegation pass as truthful. However to suggest that Jenner was not courageous in her decision is equally foolish. If I recall, you spouted a stream of bile at her with the "trying to shove down our throats" line that so often appears in Leviticans' opinions. And "who cares about he/she garbage" It is that hate that make Jenner's choice to come out of the closet courageous, to be an example for others facing similar issues, to do it with grace. If you think this was easy for her to do, and face the backlash of uninformed distain and revulsion coming from people like Guest then perhaps I don't understand the meaning of courage.
If courage means not accepting publicity for being brave, not writing a book, or not allowing a movie dramatization, or a TV show, then we are into new definitions.

That was an exceptional post!

[Guest]

Back to the original post where the Guest suggests that it was not courageous for Jenner to transition and having full ODS attacks the President for not calling members of the military courageous.

I won't bother to link the hundreds of speeches given over the President's administration where he uses the exact word courage or courageous in reference to the military. You Guest are an unabashed liar to attempt to have that allegation pass as truthful. However to suggest that Jenner was not courageous in her decision is equally foolish. If I recall, you spouted a stream of bile at her with the "trying to shove down our throats" line that so often appears in Leviticans' opinions. And "who cares about he/she garbage" It is that hate that make Jenner's choice to come out of the closet courageous, to be an example for others facing similar issues, to do it with grace. If you think this was easy for her to do, and face the backlash of uninformed distain and revulsion coming from people like Guest then perhaps I don't understand the meaning of courage.
If courage means not accepting publicity for being brave, not writing a book, or not allowing a movie dramatization, or a TV show, then we are into new definitions.


Yawn .... Jenner is NOT courageous and the reaction is not about hate yadda.

It's about being fed up with this garbage being paraded on TV 24x7 in an attempt to make perversion the new normal.

Now, be honest, you really knew that before you posted all the trendy bs you just did correct?

[Guest]

Yawn .... Jenner is NOT courageous and the reaction is not about hate yadda.

It's about being fed up with this garbage being paraded on TV 24x7 in an attempt to make perversion the new normal.

Now, be honest, you really knew that before you posted all the trendy bs you just did correct?

Excellent post. Fed up with the new normal as being considered transgender. Normal are men and women as God created hence Adam and Eve

[Guest]

Back to the original post where the Guest suggests that it was not courageous for Jenner to transition and having full ODS attacks the President for not calling members of the military courageous.

I won't bother to link the hundreds of speeches given over the President's administration where he uses the exact word courage or courageous in reference to the military. You Guest are an unabashed liar to attempt to have that allegation pass as truthful. However to suggest that Jenner was not courageous in her decision is equally foolish. If I recall, you spouted a stream of bile at her with the "trying to shove down our throats" line that so often appears in Leviticans' opinions. And "who cares about he/she garbage" It is that hate that make Jenner's choice to come out of the closet courageous, to be an example for others facing similar issues, to do it with grace. If you think this was easy for her to do, and face the backlash of uninformed distain and revulsion coming from people like Guest then perhaps I don't understand the meaning of courage.
If courage means not accepting publicity for being brave, not writing a book, or not allowing a movie dramatization, or a TV show, then we are into new definitions.

Very good post!

It is amazing how many bigots are present in our community. I just wonder how many of these regressives would say their hateful comments to Caitlyn Jenner face-to-face. It would be a great YouTube video to see her kick their sorry ass, wouldn't it?

[Guest]

new normal is a BS term/concept like political correctness term/concept....nothing but a liscence to do or say what is not true or correct but provides a phony/false comfort level.

[Guest]

Very good post!

It is amazing how many bigots are present in our community. I just wonder how many of these regressives would say their hateful comments to Caitlyn Jenner face-to-face. It would be a great YouTube video to see her kick their sorry ass, wouldn't it?

The use of name calling ... ie bigots ... etc is no longer going to work. You call people names when they disagree with your genuinely twisted and abnormal views ...

The fact that Bruce Jenner could still kick your ass or mine also clearly indicate his chromosomes dictate that he is a male. Rather ironic hypothetical you cite actually

[Guest]

The use of name calling ... ie bigots ... etc is no longer going to work. You call people names when they disagree with your genuinely twisted and abnormal views ...

The fact that Bruce Jenner could still kick your ass or mine also clearly indicate his chromosomes dictate that he is a male. Rather ironic hypothetical you cite actually

I have seen plenty of women in The Villages who could do that and I doubt that they are all transgender - just big and strong! :a20:

[Guest]

I have seen plenty of women in The Villages who could do that and I doubt that they are all transgender - just big and strong! :a20:

Yes, that's true ... some beefy gals here in TV. However, even though this seems to be a challenging concept for you, they still can't beat men in the decathlon nor could they for example play in the NFL.

Men are stronger in general ...wow, I know you must think that's bigoted but tough you know what :)