Clinton strategy to "stuff" the ballot box??

[Guest]

I defy any honest person to read the following and find it to be indicative of dis-honest politics.

Not illegal mind you because lawyer Clinton and her band of lawyers know exactly how to use, abuse or hide behind the law:

Hillary’s plans to stuff the ballot box (http://www.wnd.com/2015/06/hillarys-plans-to-stuff-the-ballot-box/)

Anybody who objects to voter ID verification is up to no good. If you cannoshow that you are registered and that you are who you say you are.....just exactly what is wrong with that concept.

Forget the partisan BS.

[Guest]

In 2012, President Obama won 95% of the black vote, 75% of the Hispanic vote, and beat Mitt Romney by 20 points with women. Because of the increase in the Hispanic population, Hillary Clinton only needs to win 65% of the Hispanic vote to win.

Clinton will also probably win more of the women's vote than Obama.

As long as Clinton holds the Obama coalition together, it looks like another landslide victory. The 2016 election will be all about issues, not personalities.

[Guest]

I defy any honest person to read the following and find it to be indicative of dis-honest politics.

Not illegal mind you because lawyer Clinton and her band of lawyers know exactly how to use, abuse or hide behind the law:

Hillary’s plans to stuff the ballot box (http://www.wnd.com/2015/06/hillarys-plans-to-stuff-the-ballot-box/)

Anybody who objects to voter ID verification is up to no good. If you cannoshow that you are registered and that you are who you say you are.....just exactly what is wrong with that concept.

Forget the partisan BS.


Each state gets to write and enforce its own voting rules, unless of course they violate the Voting Rights Act, then the Department of Justice would get involved. It is difficult to see how any campaign could interfere with state laws.

[Guest]

In 2012, President Obama won 95% of the black vote, 75% of the Hispanic vote, and beat Mitt Romney by 20 points with women. Because of the increase in the Hispanic population, Hillary Clinton only needs to win 65% of the Hispanic vote to win.

Clinton will also probably win more of the women's vote than Obama.

As long as Clinton holds the Obama coalition together, it looks like another landslide victory. The 2016 election will be all about issues, not personalities.

Sounds quite a bit like pandering to groups and sans issues. But since we are being told that certain groups will vote as told, you might be right.

[Guest]

Each state gets to write and enforce its own voting rules, unless of course they violate the Voting Rights Act, then the Department of Justice would get involved. It is difficult to see how any campaign could interfere with state laws.

Did you read the link ?

Especially the use of her legal team trying to overturn as many voter id laws as possible, but then again, why read it.

And does she not want the Federal Govrnmnt to handle registration ?

[Guest]

Unfortunately what you say is probably true. The American people will probably get exactly what they deserve because they are too uniformed to make decisions in their own best interests.

In 2012, President Obama won 95% of the black vote, 75% of the Hispanic vote, and beat Mitt Romney by 20 points with women. Because of the increase in the Hispanic population, Hillary Clinton only needs to win 65% of the Hispanic vote to win.

Clinton will also probably win more of the women's vote than Obama.

As long as Clinton holds the Obama coalition together, it looks like another landslide victory. The 2016 election will be all about issues, not personalities.

[Guest]

In 2012, President Obama won 95% of the black vote, 75% of the Hispanic vote, and beat Mitt Romney by 20 points with women. Because of the increase in the Hispanic population, Hillary Clinton only needs to win 65% of the Hispanic vote to win.

Clinton will also probably win more of the women's vote than Obama.

As long as Clinton holds the Obama coalition together, it looks like another landslide victory. The 2016 election will be all about issues, not personalities.

Speaking of issues, I am wondering how she will handle the questions on Libya and the forcing out of Gadhafi. This is not about Benghazi, although that is another issue, especially on where the heck this emails went.

But on Gadhafi...we militarily forced him out, and Ms. Clinton made herself the face of this. It has been a disaster, and Libya has just fallen apart. ISIS is becoming the power there because we ousted Gadhafi. Fact is that ISIS just captured almost 100 Christians to behead.

Just wondering....does she blame President Obama or how does she defend ? Even democrats were not sold on this action.

[Guest]

She will keep tabs on the votes on hER private server and when she hits the number she wants will let us know how much she won by.

[Guest]

I am not so sure she has a lock on the Obama coalition.
Those who are illegal or illegal related or getting government freebies of course will vote for her......as well as any others who get government welfare of some sort.

Those not dependent and are capable of evaluating what they want can not be assumed to be a sure thing.

And of course the party purists will vote for who ever or what ever represents their party.

The strategy? Keep them poor....keep them dependent.....keep them procreating.....keep them coming across the border.....and by all means let them vote, entitled or not!

[Guest]

I am not so sure she has a lock on the Obama coalition.
Those who are illegal or illegal related or getting government freebies of course will vote for her......as well as any others who get government welfare of some sort.

Those not dependent and are capable of evaluating what they want can not be assumed to be a sure thing.

And of course the party purists will vote for who ever or what ever represents their party.

The strategy? Keep them poor....keep them dependent.....keep them procreating.....keep them coming across the border.....and by all means let them vote, entitled or not!

First, Phyllis Schafly is a worn out person who is on the senile side.

66 million people cast more than one ballot for Obama in 2012 and not a single double vote for Romney? Yeah, right.

If Mrs. Clinton is going to get all these felons and illegals the right to vote, why don't the Republicans try to get them to come to the Republican side with promises of more free entitlements than Democrats are offering? Wouldn't be the first time people were lied to by Republicans, would it?

As for keeping them procreating, I thought it was the Regressives that were not in favor of abortion. Seems to be the illegals would be on your side automatically.

[Guest]

First, Phyllis Schafly is a worn out person who is on the senile side.

66 million people cast more than one ballot for Obama in 2012 and not a single double vote for Romney? Yeah, right.

If Mrs. Clinton is going to get all these felons and illegals the right to vote, why don't the Republicans try to get them to come to the Republican side with promises of more free entitlements than Democrats are offering? Wouldn't be the first time people were lied to by Republicans, would it?

As for keeping them procreating, I thought it was the Regressives that were not in favor of abortion. Seems to be the illegals would be on your side automatically.

:icon_bored: