Hillary squeaky clean

[Guest]

Hillary, staff, and server done great job deleting all her classified emails. Good job it only took them year!

[Guest]

150 Hillary E-Mails released today now considered classified.

[Guest]

But according to Hilary, none of them were "marked" classified. You see, she headed a whole branch of service that deals with classified information, but no one ever told her about classified material, even though her name was on everything that was transmitted. The State Dept must have really gone down hill since I left, because even the newest of newbies was taught the proper procedure for handling of classified material. If she is really that mentally deficient, I wonder who would want her for president. Oops, I forgot about those that voted for Obama.

[Guest]

But according to Hilary, none of them were "marked" classified. You see, she headed a whole branch of service that deals with classified information, but no one ever told her about classified material, even though her name was on everything that was transmitted. The State Dept must have really gone down hill since I left, because even the newest of newbies was taught the proper procedure for handling of classified material. If she is really that mentally deficient, I wonder who would want her for president. Oops, I forgot about those that voted for Obama.

While I served in the Navy I sent and received literally hundreds, if not thousands, of classified messages (that was before the days of email). Every classified message that I sent was marked with the appropriate classification by ME and no one else. It was MY responsibility to make sure that any message that I drafted and/or sent was properly annotated. If the information was later deemed to classified and I had not marked it as such, It would have been viewed as as serious breach of security and not taken lightly. Claiming to be ignorant was not a valid defense them, and it is not now.

I'm quite sure that many of the messages the Hilary drafted and sent contained sensitive information, so why weren't the marked as such? The only reason that I can think of is that she is an IDIOT!

[Guest]

While I served in the Navy I sent and received literally hundreds, if not thousands, of classified messages (that was before the days of email). Every classified message that I sent was marked with the appropriate classification by ME and no one else. It was MY responsibility to make sure that any message that I drafted and/or sent was properly annotated. If the information was later deemed to classified and I had not marked it as such, It would have been viewed as as serious breach of security and not taken lightly. Claiming to be ignorant was not a valid defense them, and it is not now.

I'm quite sure that many of the messages the Hilary drafted and sent contained sensitive information, so why weren't the marked as such? The only reason that I can think of is that she is an IDIOT!

:agree: :thumbup:

[Guest]

Hilary the lawyer. Hilary the Senator. Hilary the SecState. Does anyone REALLY think that Hilary is stupid or ignorant enough not to know when information is worthy of a security classification? Is she really that stupid that she doesn't understand that some sources are classified just by their nature? Come on folks, nobody is that stupid. Is this the best that Democrats can come up with? A blatant liar! Hilary ought to be taken off the street and locked up in solitary confinement, just based on her being a national security threat. How many thousand employees did she have working for her and she couldn't find one that understood the proper procedure for handling of classified material? I can see why NO Democrat politicians will speak up for her now. They are all hiding their heads in shame. It's no wonder that they are attempting to force Biden to run for the position.

[Guest]

Hillary the lawyer, Senator Secretary of State...and don't forget was the the legal team that went after Nixon.

However no one really needs to go much further than to ask oneself "Why would the Secretary of State establish a personal server out of the sight and grasped of anyone? And but for a Hungarian hacker Hillary's private e-mail server would have remained out of view. Once discovered why did Hillary's team select and destroy thousand of e-mails? Huma Abedin still has her e-mails that she has refused to submit for review

There is a valid reason this nation has laws about transparency of its government activities. Anyone attempting to defend Hillary on this one is either ignorant or complicit. Hillary's action and that of her team violate the trust between government and citizen and have not considered the serious breach of security she created because of her hubris.

Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

The fact that she will most likely not be touched legally by any of this will just further erode the public confidence in the government, at least by those who are paying attention. Most people will remain clueless about this. Sad state of affairs.

Hillary the lawyer, Senator Secretary of State...and don't forget was the the legal team that went after Nixon.

However no one really needs to go much further than to ask oneself "Why would the Secretary of State establish a personal server out of the sight and grasped of anyone? And but for a Hungarian hacker Hillary's private e-mail server would have remained out of view. Once discovered why did Hillary's team select and destroy thousand of e-mails? Huma Abedin still has her e-mails that she has refused to submit for review

There is a valid reason this nation has laws about transparency of its government activities. Anyone attempting to defend Hillary on this one is either ignorant or complicit. Hillary's action and that of her team violate the trust between government and citizen and have not considered the serious breach of security she created because of her hubris.

Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

I hate to defend Hillary on anything. However, there isn't any trust between government, and its citizens. She might be complicit in this, but by no means is she the driving force in this mistrust. The Tea Party pushed that snowball down the hill, and it still hasn't hit the bottom of the hill yet.

All these threats to close down the government for very minor reason adds fuel to the fire. If we don't get our way, nothing will get done, and nothing is getting done. How can anyone trust the government, if that is the attitude of both of the parties?

Back to Hillary, she is going to state over and over that this email scandal is nothing but politics. If the Republicans don't start attacking her on policies, she will have a valid argument. Eric Cantor lost his seat partly due to the fact that he went 100% negative. There is a lesson to be learned there. Also, the Republicans in Congress are preaching to the choir. If no Democrats, or very few Independent are being moved by the constant beating of the drum, what are they gaining? Making themselves feel better doesn't get them the White House.

Favorability does play a part in peoples' vote, but political party offsets it. If Republicans don't lighten on race, she will be the next president, if she is the Democratic nominee. Then, the bitching will really start, because now you are really dealing with a bitch. People will be looking back to the good old days of President Obama.

[Guest]

Hillary, staff, and server done great job deleting all her classified emails. Good job it only took them year!

if the idea is to put someone down then at least try to write smarter than a 12 year old.....

[Guest]

While I served in the Navy I sent and received literally hundreds, if not thousands, of classified messages (that was before the days of email). Every classified message that I sent was marked with the appropriate classification by ME and no one else. It was MY responsibility to make sure that any message that I drafted and/or sent was properly annotated. If the information was later deemed to classified and I had not marked it as such, It would have been viewed as as serious breach of security and not taken lightly. Claiming to be ignorant was not a valid defense them, and it is not now.

I'm quite sure that many of the messages the Hilary drafted and sent contained sensitive information, so why weren't the marked as such? The only reason that I can think of is that she is an IDIOT!

Well, aren't you special? :ohdear:

[Guest]

Well, aren't you special? :ohdear:

Well, aren't you just another ill-educated liberal jerk.:1rotfl:

[Guest]

Well, aren't you special? :ohdear:

No not really. I was only trying to make a point, which was obviously far beyond your level of comprehension.

[Guest]

Well, aren't you just another ill-educated liberal jerk.:1rotfl:

I prefer to be called a Social Progressive.

You can refer to yourself as a Regressive. Instead of going forward, you just retreat into the past. You know - to the time of slavery, women barefoot and pregnant, and only white men allowed to vote. :ohdear:

[Guest]

I prefer to be called a Social Progressive.

You can refer to yourself as a Regressive. Instead of going forward, you just retreat into the past. You know - to the time of slavery, women barefoot and pregnant, and only white men allowed to vote. :ohdear:

Regressive? You know nothing about me, Sandtrap.

[Guest]

I prefer to be called a Social Progressive.

You can refer to yourself as a Regressive. Instead of going forward, you just retreat into the past. You know - to the time of slavery, women barefoot and pregnant, and only white men allowed to vote. :ohdear:

If that was true, that would make him a Democrat, since they are the party against abolishing slavery. But, go ahead and prove your ignorance by attacking those that spotlight your weakness.

[Guest]

Well, aren't you special? :ohdear:

Yes, he is. Because thanks to those that served :super:, you get to sit back on your fat behind and criticize. You're welcome.

[Guest]

Well, aren't you just another ill-educated liberal jerk.:1rotfl:

So true....:thumbup:

[Guest]

I prefer to be called a Social Progressive.

You can refer to yourself as a Regressive. Instead of going forward, you just retreat into the past. You know - to the time of slavery, women barefoot and pregnant, and only white men allowed to vote. :ohdear:

A "social progressive"?? Ha! Another Socialist, is the more correct term. A term synonymous with being lazy, and dependent on the government. One that is never satisfied with what is given to them by the government and will ultimately bite the hand that feeds them. That's a "social progressive." One step away from anarchy. One that believes in abolishing all social laws, as long as it enhances their lifestyle, regardless of morals and ethics. A short step from communism, where the government IS the deity and church is banned. Did I get that about right?

[Guest]

No problem Sandtrap328. I'll refer to you as a Social Progressive in the future.

By the way, your screen name appears on my computer whenever you post. Just thought that you'd like to know.:D

[Guest]

I have a problem every time this thread pops up.

The words Clinton and squeaky clean in the same sentence just makes one stop in their tracks.

[Guest]

Which were happier times, 1992-2000 or 2000-2008?

[Guest]

so much for the mission statement!

Chastise them, hoping to embarrass them. You did neither. All you did was stop all conversation on this thread. I addressed the thread with a serious post. There wasn't one response, because the two of you acted both like little children.

This board is a total waste of time. Unless the moderators come in and delete the nonsense, nothing will change. Self policing will not work as long as you have one person that thinks he can out do the other in childish behavior.

[Guest]

so much for the mission statement!

Chastise them, hoping to embarrass them. You did neither. All you did was stop all conversation on this thread. I addressed the thread with a serious post. There wasn't one response, because the two of you acted both like little children.

This board is a total waste of time. Unless the moderators come in and delete the nonsense, nothing will change. Self policing will not work as long as you have one person that thinks he can out do the other in childish behavior.
What mission statement? And stop calling for the Moderators like some kid asking for their mommy. This is a political forum, not Sunday school.

[Guest]

That is right you didn't post on the Mission statement thread. That post was an attempt to self clean this board from the likes of you.

[Guest]

While I served in the Navy I sent and received literally hundreds, if not thousands, of classified messages (that was before the days of email). Every classified message that I sent was marked with the appropriate classification by ME and no one else. It was MY responsibility to make sure that any message that I drafted and/or sent was properly annotated. If the information was later deemed to classified and I had not marked it as such, It would have been viewed as as serious breach of security and not taken lightly. Claiming to be ignorant was not a valid defense them, and it is not now.

I'm quite sure that many of the messages the Hilary drafted and sent contained sensitive information, so why weren't the marked as such? The only reason that I can think of is that she is an IDIOT!

You forget that the rules don't apply to Hilary ... only to the little people whom she dearly loves