Log in

View Full Version : Biden says no go.....too bad for the democrats.


Guest
10-21-2015, 11:47 AM
News from The Associated Press (http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_DEM_2016_BIDEN?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-10-21-12-28-43)

The powers that be have obviously over whelmed Joe Biden....what a shame for the party. The excuse that it is too late is about as lame an excuse that they could come up with!! Really? Thirteen months to go.....BS!

So now the democrats are left with

Clinton.....liar, unethical, untruthful and dishonest.

Sanders.....special interest socialist.

Choose not to vote...remember that is how republicans helped Obama to win.

Vote for the republican candidate.

Guest
10-21-2015, 12:49 PM
News from The Associated Press (http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_DEM_2016_BIDEN?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-10-21-12-28-43)

The powers that be have obviously over whelmed Joe Biden....what a shame for the party. The excuse that it is too late is about as lame an excuse that they could come up with!! Really? Thirteen months to go.....BS!

So now the democrats are left with

Clinton.....liar, unethical, untruthful and dishonest.

Sanders.....special interest socialist.

Choose not to vote...remember that is how republicans helped Obama to win.

Vote for the republican candidate.

Go for the last choice listed

Guest
10-21-2015, 01:52 PM
Good news for Trump!

Go Donald!!!

Guest
10-21-2015, 06:23 PM
Biden was told that Hilary will NOT be indicted, so he has been let off the hook.

Guest
10-21-2015, 08:17 PM
As my lawyer friends often said back North when there was a pending legal issue or Case which had its roots deeply in politics : " The cookies are already in the oven ".

In this case it would appear that there will be no stopping the Clinton Machine .
Hard to accept but I believe that it`s over .

Guest
10-21-2015, 08:21 PM
Bernie isn`t even a registered " D " so why are they letting him participate in their Primaries and Debates ? Just for show ?

Guest
10-21-2015, 09:13 PM
Most Republicans believe that Trump is unstoppable and will be their nominee.

He is WAY in front of Carson and even further in front of Bush. Fiorina is polling around 7 percent and the rest of the pack - Santorum, Huckie, and the rest at embarassingly low numbers.

Will Hillary be able to stop Donnie?

Yes!:MOJE_whot:

Guest
10-22-2015, 04:25 AM
Bernie isn`t even a registered " D " so why are they letting him participate in their Primaries and Debates ? Just for show ?

He's just there to reinforce/support Hilary. He's no threat and won't get any votes other than the young that don't know any better and think that socialism is the real Obama Utopia.

Guest
10-22-2015, 06:35 AM
Just another example of those in control closing ranks, circling the wagons and protecting their ow (a$$e$).

Just wait until the Benghazi circus fires up today. The Clinton BS machine will be in full offensive....and I bet there will be no shreiking of "what difference does it make" this time.

Guest
10-22-2015, 07:30 AM
Just another example of those in control closing ranks, circling the wagons and protecting their ow (a$$e$).

Just wait until the Benghazi circus fires up today. The Clinton BS machine will be in full offensive....and I bet there will be no shreiking of "what difference does it make" this time.

Don't worry, the Regressives will find some phrase and take it completely out of context AGAIN to make it their new catchphrase.

Over FOUR million dollars wasted by Gowdy and his fools. Americans are tired of this!

Guest
10-22-2015, 09:53 AM
Don't worry, the Regressives will find some phrase and take it completely out of context AGAIN to make it their new catchphrase.

Over FOUR million dollars wasted by Gowdy and his fools. Americans are tired of this!

You still have a retention problem regarding vocabulary. Please Google the definition of "Regressive" so you will understand the term when you use it.

Here, let me give you an example of "regressive." Socialism is an old, failed ideology that you liberals wish to push on America. This is "regressive" thinking, and therefore YOU are a "regressive."

You're welcome. Since you liberals enjoy free things, consider this to be a free lesson.

Guest
10-22-2015, 10:03 AM
Don't worry, the Regressives will find some phrase and take it completely out of context AGAIN to make it their new catchphrase.

Over FOUR million dollars wasted by Gowdy and his fools. Americans are tired of this!

Americans are tired of waiting for Hilary to answer for her crimes. They want her put in jail and will be dancing in the streets when/if it happens. That woman that lost her son in Benghazi, should punch Billary in the face and say "video that, you bi...h!"

Guest
10-22-2015, 10:38 AM
Don't worry, the Regressives will find some phrase and take it completely out of context AGAIN to make it their new catchphrase.

Over FOUR million dollars wasted by Gowdy and his fools. Americans are tired of this!

I suppose it depends on perspective, and I am sure you give no credence to this but...

"Republicans, meanwhile, pointed the blame squarely at the Obama administration. If Clinton and other current and former officials had merely responded to their requests in a timely manner, they say, the investigation would have ended long ago.

House Democrats “are right back where they have always been—complaining about process and procedure rather than lifting a finger to help complete the task,” committee spokesman Jamal Ware said in an emailed statement.

“Maybe if committee Democrats had sent one request to the executive branch, or signed onto a letter, instead of running a rearguard action for the Clinton campaign, perhaps the administration would have hastened its cooperation,” he added.

“Instead, the Democrats do what they always do, issue a press release citing some arbitrary milestone and claiming some Democrat strawman has not been proven.”"

Benghazi panel now longer than Watergate probe | TheHill (http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/255138-benghazi-panel-now-longest-congressional-investigation)

Neither party has comported themselves well, but I am sure based on your juvenile choice of words, and general lack of knowledge beyond talking points of the issues involved, you will disagree.

The mantle and way of our New Democratic Party to to attack by name and party, and let me be clear I am not speaking of forums like this, but of the leaders of that party right to the Oval Office.

While I, and many others see the errors on both sides, you will not be swayed which really makes me feel sad for you.....ignorance is NOT bliss.

Guest
10-22-2015, 10:47 AM
I suppose it depends on perspective, and I am sure you give no credence to this but...

"Republicans, meanwhile, pointed the blame squarely at the Obama administration. If Clinton and other current and former officials had merely responded to their requests in a timely manner, they say, the investigation would have ended long ago.

House Democrats “are right back where they have always been—complaining about process and procedure rather than lifting a finger to help complete the task,” committee spokesman Jamal Ware said in an emailed statement.

“Maybe if committee Democrats had sent one request to the executive branch, or signed onto a letter, instead of running a rearguard action for the Clinton campaign, perhaps the administration would have hastened its cooperation,” he added.

“Instead, the Democrats do what they always do, issue a press release citing some arbitrary milestone and claiming some Democrat strawman has not been proven.”"

Benghazi panel now longer than Watergate probe | TheHill (http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/255138-benghazi-panel-now-longest-congressional-investigation)

Neither party has comported themselves well, but I am sure based on your juvenile choice of words, and general lack of knowledge beyond talking points of the issues involved, you will disagree.

The mantle and way of our New Democratic Party to to attack by name and party, and let me be clear I am not speaking of forums like this, but of the leaders of that party right to the Oval Office.

While I, and many others see the errors on both sides, you will not be swayed which really makes me feel sad for you.....ignorance is NOT bliss.

So, obviously you are far from blissful. :boom:

Guest
10-22-2015, 10:48 AM
So, obviously you are far from blissful. :boom:

As is often said....

I REST MY CASE.

Thank you for taking the time to do that for me.

Guest
10-22-2015, 11:39 AM
You still have a retention problem regarding vocabulary. Please Google the definition of "Regressive" so you will understand the term when you use it.

Here, let me give you an example of "regressive." Socialism is an old, failed ideology that you liberals wish to push on America. This is "regressive" thinking, and therefore YOU are a "regressive."

You're welcome. Since you liberals enjoy free things, consider this to be a free lesson.

Since you seem to enjoy Google, look up Christian Socialism. Was Jesus a Socialist?

Personally, I consider myself a Progressive - one who looks forward but have no problem with the Socialist nomenclature either.

Guest
10-22-2015, 11:48 AM
Since you seem to enjoy Google, look up Christian Socialism. Was Jesus a Socialist?

Personally, I consider myself a Progressive - one who looks forward but have no problem with the Socialist nomenclature either.

I took your advice and did in fact google that term because it is new to me.

I bring you this quote from the Wiki write up on what you proclaim yourself to be.


"Capitalism is the way of the devil and exploitation. If you really want to look at things through the eyes of Jesus Christ—who I think was the first socialist—only socialism can really create a genuine society. Hugo Chávez[50]"


I assume based on your profession of beliefs that you agree with this Christian Socialist.

Guest
10-22-2015, 12:00 PM
What a sad state of affairs when voters last hope on a gaffer like Biden.
Apparently America has a brain drain not only for presidential candidates but voters as well.

There is not one candidate running that has excited me.

Personal Best Regards:

Guest
10-22-2015, 12:01 PM
As always, there is a group that invariably gets every single thing down to 2 choices. Iran or war is a current example.

This is ALWAYS the ploy of those who wish to stop any dialogue and proclaim themselves as the all knowing.

They show utter disrespect for anyone who does not see things as they do. To them, it is either how they think or you are wrong.

To me, it is the heighth of political back talk. It shows laziness in not hearing all sides.

I surely hope in their real life they see more dimensions in life than 2.

I am a conservative Republican. I find socialism repugnent and a failed policy.
yet, believe it or not, I live a Christian life. I may, or may not, give of my money and time for those less fortunate than I.

I marched with MLK in Philadelphia, spent my 30"s running an organization for and 100% populated by blacks.

I began and managed a group to allow for greater input for Spanish immigrants in my home town.

YET, those who profess to be progressive and "Jesus like" have called me and others racist, bigoted and insensitive.

You embarrass yourself by allowing your politics to totally twist your thinking and it begins to sound as if you really believe yourself to be "Jesus like"

Guest
10-22-2015, 12:02 PM
Since you seem to enjoy Google, look up Christian Socialism. Was Jesus a Socialist?

Personally, I consider myself a Progressive - one who looks forward but have no problem with the Socialist nomenclature either.

Interesting that a liberal (most are atheist) would try to use Jesus in his argument. What is really interesting is the fact that you proved the point that you are in fact a "regressive." You are finally starting to see the light in two things; Christianity and Socialist regression. Who said liberals don't have the capacity to learn?

Guest
10-22-2015, 12:10 PM
No, Jesus was not a socialist. He believed in voluntary giving (charity). The gov doesn't ask you to donate. They demand that you donate.

If what you said was true, that socialism is that old, then you proved that you are a regressive.

Please give me some examples of where socialism allows for a better lifestyle than Capitalism.

Guest
10-22-2015, 12:25 PM
Since you seem to enjoy Google, look up Christian Socialism. Was Jesus a Socialist?

Personally, I consider myself a Progressive - one who looks forward but have no problem with the Socialist nomenclature either.

Maybe you should take a minute and research the meaning of "Progressive." I will leave that up to you, but to summarize; a Progressive is one that believes in a fictional Utopia, where he has no responsibility and the gov provides for his safety, security, housing, food, welfare, and deviant lifestyle without interference in these. Progressives believe that no one should have more than another, no matter how hard they work. Basically, a Progressive believes in a comic book fantasy, filled with LSD hallucinogenic colors and Metallica music. Progressives are Anti-American.

Progressive is camouflage for ancient socialism.

Guest
10-22-2015, 12:56 PM
interesting that a liberal (most are atheist) would try to use jesus in his argument. What is really interesting is the fact that you proved the point that you are in fact a "regressive." you are finally starting to see the light in two things; christianity and socialist regression. Who said liberals don't have the capacity to learn?
55687

Guest
10-22-2015, 01:00 PM
55687

Awww chi, you are going to hello for that

Guest
10-22-2015, 03:34 PM
In the scope of the Federal Gvt. $4 Million is like a grain of sand in Lake Sumter .

How about $500 Million to train about a dozen anti-ISIS fighters ? Now that`s real money .

Guest
10-22-2015, 04:17 PM
In the scope of the Federal Gvt. $4 Million is like a grain of sand in Lake Sumter .

How about $500 Million to train about a dozen anti-ISIS fighters ? Now that`s real money .

The news report at the time said it was only 5.

Does it make anybody but me wonder what direction was given to the folks who were responsible and accountable for the training?

Do you think someone would say/think or what ever...hey....look what we are spending and what we are not getting? Like maybe when they spent $50 0r $100 million?

To expend $500 million dollars and nody saking hey what's up?

Just think about it. How many people who had to be involved knowing it was failing and NO ONE responsible?

Now multiply that by the hundreds of thousands of projects spending more money that nobody is responsible or accountable to say how we are doing or getting our moneys worth.

And doing really stupid stuff, spending/throwing away billions of dollars with no alarms going off.

I don't care what your party affiliation is was or what ever. If that does not resonate as not what responsible do....then there most certainly is no hope.