Gov. Nikki Haley

[Guest]

Gov. Nikki Haley of South Carolina definitely is one of the best Republican governors in the USA. She gave a good response to the State of The Union and it was done reasonably without anger or hatred filled talk.

Her actions to take the Confederate flag off the SC statehouse grounds after that racist Roof killed the church group was a great feat. :BigApplause:

I understand Gov. Haley is being talked about as a possible VP choice.

[Guest]

Gov. Nikki Haley of South Carolina definitely is one of the best Republican governors in the USA. She gave a good response to the State of The Union and it was done reasonably without anger or hatred filled talk.

Her actions to take the Confederate flag off the SC statehouse grounds after that racist Roof killed the church group was a great feat. :BigApplause:

I understand Gov. Haley is being talked about as a possible VP choice.

She won't get chosen for VP. That's nothing but fantasy. Most Republican voters are swinging to the right. They are tired of RINOS and Nikki is a moderate. Another time maybe, but not today. If they are listening to Trump, then they are mad and willing to go to the extreme to counter Obama's failed agenda. America is tired of this administration apologizing to the rest of the world, and lecturing adult Americans like they are school children. And most of America has more experience than that idiot that's never had real job in his life.

[Guest]

She won't get chosen for VP. That's nothing but fantasy. Most Republican voters are swinging to the right. They are tired of RINOS and Nikki is a moderate. Another time maybe, but not today. If they are listening to Trump, then they are mad and willing to go to the extreme to counter Obama's failed agenda. America is tired of this administration apologizing to the rest of the world, and lecturing adult Americans like they are school children. And most of America has more experience than that idiot that's never had real job in his life.

And there will be enough Americans who will not vote for the self centered, unethical, dishonest, liar Clinton for two reasons. One she represents the threat of more of the same Obama continuation of incompetence.

And secondly enough Americans will not vote for a self centered, unethical, dishonest, liar.

[Guest]

And there will be enough Americans who will not vote for the self centered, unethical, dishonest, liar Clinton for two reasons. One she represents the threat of more of the same Obama continuation of incompetence.

And secondly enough Americans will not vote for a self centered, unethical, dishonest, liar.

:agree:

[Guest]

And secondly enough Americans will not vote for a self centered, unethical, dishonest, liar.

Au contrair. After all, Crapweasel Bush got elected twice. :thumbup:

[Guest]

She won't get chosen for VP. That's nothing but fantasy. Most Republican voters are swinging to the right. They are tired of RINOS and Nikki is a moderate. Another time maybe, but not today. If they are listening to Trump, then they are mad and willing to go to the extreme to counter Obama's failed agenda. America is tired of this administration apologizing to the rest of the world, and lecturing adult Americans like they are school children. And most of America has more experience than that idiot that's never had real job in his life.

Curious, who do you think that Trump would choose as his VP nominee? I don't think it would be any of the other GOP candidates still on the board.

[Guest]

Curious, who do you think that Trump would choose as his VP nominee? I don't think it would be any of the other GOP candidates still on the board.

I have no idea. I have yet to guess at who the candidate would choose for a running mate in past elections. They never seem to choose from the competition, for some reason. If he wants to slam dunk the election, I would think that a minority would be a good choice, either female or Latino, or both. But, his ego may be such that he feels that he doesn't need anyone to share the spotlight with. Obviously, he will have to have someone that is submissive to him, so it won't be anyone on the same stage tomorrow. I still think that he won't be chosen, but I have been surprised before. I was surprised when Obie was elected the second time. I really didn't think that the American voter was that stupid and would have learned from their mistake. We can thank the Independent voter for that disaster. The Independents will always make the difference in a close race.

[Guest]

Au contrair. After all, Crapweasel Bush got elected twice. :thumbup:

You are not denying she is unqualified, self centered, unethical, dishonest liar!!

Thank you. You can go back to your rear view mirror.

[Guest]

You are not denying she is unqualified, self centered, unethical, dishonest liar!!

Thank you. You can go back to your rear view mirror.






You must be talking about Nimrata Randhawa

She sure blasted The Donald last night

[Guest]

You are not denying she is unqualified, self centered, unethical, dishonest liar!!

Thank you. You can go back to your rear view mirror.

I would eliminate "unqualified". All the candidates - both R and D - fit all the other groups, too.:thumbup:

[Guest]

You must be talking about Nimrata Randhawa

She sure blasted The Donald last night

What the :censored: does this have to do with anything posted?

If you go any further out in left field you will be across from home plate.

[Guest]

What the :censored: does this have to do with anything posted?

If you go any further out in left field you will be across from home plate.

Showing your ignorance? Nimrata Randhawa is Gov Haley's birth name and this thread is about her. And she absolutely blasted Mr Trump last evening and perhaps you were unable to understand her comment, but this thread is about Gov Haley and the speech she made, so other than your automatic need to fling curse words as a evidence of your poor self control and lack of vocabulary.. Here for your further education is what Gov Haley said today about her words last evening.

"He was one of them, yes. He was one," Haley told Matt Lauer on NBC's "Today." "There's other people in the media, there's people in my state. I think we're seeing it across the country. But yes, Mr. Trump has definitely contributed to what I think is just irresponsible talk.
During her response to President Barack Obama's address, Haley remarked that during "anxious times" like these, "it can be tempting to follow the siren call of the angriest voices."

"We must resist that temptation," she said.


Read more: Nikki Haley: Yes, I was talking about Trump - POLITICO (http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/nikki-haley-trump-state-of-the-union-2016-217704#ixzz3x9IbO6Tb)

[Guest]

Ya missed/avoided it again!

[Guest]

Showing your ignorance? Nimrata Randhawa is Gov Haley's birth name and this thread is about her. And she absolutely blasted Mr Trump last evening and perhaps you were unable to understand her comment, but this thread is about Gov Haley and the speech she made, so other than your automatic need to fling curse words as a evidence of your poor self control and lack of vocabulary.. Here for your further education is what Gov Haley said today about her words last evening.

"He was one of them, yes. He was one," Haley told Matt Lauer on NBC's "Today." "There's other people in the media, there's people in my state. I think we're seeing it across the country. But yes, Mr. Trump has definitely contributed to what I think is just irresponsible talk.
During her response to President Barack Obama's address, Haley remarked that during "anxious times" like these, "it can be tempting to follow the siren call of the angriest voices."

"We must resist that temptation," she said.


Read more: Nikki Haley: Yes, I was talking about Trump - POLITICO (http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/nikki-haley-trump-state-of-the-union-2016-217704#ixzz3x9IbO6Tb)

So, other than your attempt to cover your ethnicity bias, what is the point of your comment? Most of us that keep current with the latest events, heard her speak. Do you have a point, or are you trying to keep this dead thread alive?

[Guest]

Au contrair. After all, Crapweasel Bush got elected twice. :thumbup:

Good one!!! But really it was only once.....the last time.

[Guest]

Wow! Nikki Haley definitely is a rising star in politics. A Republican would have to be brain damaged not to want her as the VP nominee. She would bring votes!

[Guest]

Any repub form the northeast closet liberal anyway.:thumbup::D

[Guest]

Showing your ignorance? Nimrata Randhawa is Gov Haley's birth name and this thread is about her. And she absolutely blasted Mr Trump last evening and perhaps you were unable to understand her comment, but this thread is about Gov Haley and the speech she made, so other than your automatic need to fling curse words as a evidence of your poor self control and lack of vocabulary.. Here for your further education is what Gov Haley said today about her words last evening.

"He was one of them, yes. He was one," Haley told Matt Lauer on NBC's "Today." "There's other people in the media, there's people in my state. I think we're seeing it across the country. But yes, Mr. Trump has definitely contributed to what I think is just irresponsible talk.
During her response to President Barack Obama's address, Haley remarked that during "anxious times" like these, "it can be tempting to follow the siren call of the angriest voices."

"We must resist that temptation," she said.


Read more: Nikki Haley: Yes, I was talking about Trump - POLITICO (http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/nikki-haley-trump-state-of-the-union-2016-217704#ixzz3x9IbO6Tb)

Dear Guest: Yes she did blast Trump and it was inappropriate because her role was to support the Republican side of the State of the Union and the RNC was not happy about that move. Trump did Trump and told the media she just disqualified herself as his VP pick. Republicans didn't need that fight her role was to point aim fire at Obama not Trump

The liberal media meantime foolishly stated that the only reason she was picked to do the rebuttal to Obama SOTU address was because she is a minority woman. Progressives are on record stating Republicans are old white men who hate minorities and women and they chide Haley because she is a minority woman. DUH! Why was Obama picked twice by progressives? Two guesses and the first doesn't count

I know who Haley is and I know that she is well regarded but their are other Republican women as well who would qualify Ernest (Iowa) Martinez ( New Mexico) are two.

As to Haley's decision to move the Confederate flag..well it was popular among some but in my view this debate was just to placate minorities.

The war between the states is a fact. Southerns proudly carried their flag into battle. Southerns carried on with their pride generation after generation. Confederate soldiers were concerned American veterans and as such entitled To my way of thinking this discussion ought to have been along these lines. However progressives did their usual damage, were short sighted again and made this a divisive issue instead of how this nation has the ability to come together time after time after time. despite our differences

The problem with America today is that we do not have a sufficient number of deep thinkers and that we lean on the heavy side of collectivism..what happen to the concept and the importance of the individual

Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

Dear Guest: Yes she did blast Trump and it was inappropriate because her role was to support the Republican side of the State of the Union and the RNC was not happy about that move. Trump did Trump and told the media she just disqualified herself as his VP pick. Republicans didn't need that fight her role was to point aim fire at Obama not Trump

The liberal media meantime foolishly stated that the only reason she was picked to do the rebuttal to Obama SOTU address was because she is a minority woman. Progressives are on record stating Republicans are old white men who hate minorities and women and they chide Haley because she is a minority woman. DUH! Why was Obama picked twice by progressives? Two guesses and the first doesn't count

I know who Haley is and I know that she is well regarded but their are other Republican women as well who would qualify Ernest (Iowa) Martinez ( New Mexico) are two.

As to Haley's decision to move the Confederate flag..well it was popular among some but in my view this debate was just to placate minorities.

The war between the states is a fact. Southerns proudly carried their flag into battle. Southerns carried on with their pride generation after generation. Confederate soldiers were concerned American veterans and as such entitled To my way of thinking this discussion ought to have been along these lines. However progressives did their usual damage, were short sighted again and made this a divisive issue instead of how this nation has the ability to come together time after time after time. despite our differences

The problem with America today is that we do not have a sufficient number of deep thinkers and that we lean on the heavy side of collectivism..what happen to the concept and the importance of the individual

Personal Best Regards:

Truly, one of the most ridiculous and laughable posts ever written by on of the Gang of Three! :thumbup:

[Guest]

Truly, one of the most ridiculous and laughable posts ever written by on of the Gang of Three! :thumbup:

Your juvenile opinion is noted......no, not really. Who cares what you think of his post. At least his comment is coherent. You can go away now.

[Guest]

Truly, one of the most ridiculous and laughable posts ever written by on of the Gang of Three! :thumbup:

Sybil speaks again. Other than your multiple personalities, you must be pretty lonely.

[Guest]

I have no idea. I have yet to guess at who the candidate would choose for a running mate in past elections. They never seem to choose from the competition, for some reason. If he wants to slam dunk the election, I would think that a minority would be a good choice, either female or Latino, or both. But, his ego may be such that he feels that he doesn't need anyone to share the spotlight with. Obviously, he will have to have someone that is submissive to him, so it won't be anyone on the same stage tomorrow. I still think that he won't be chosen, but I have been surprised before. I was surprised when Obie was elected the second time. I really didn't think that the American voter was that stupid and would have learned from their mistake. We can thank the Independent voter for that disaster. The Independents will always make the difference in a close race.

I think he will pick Bob Cosby, same thinking and personality.

[Guest]

I think he will pick Bob Cosby, same thinking and personality.

Don't know him.

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;1171417]Don't know him.

intentional,jack!

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;1171417]Don't know him.

intentional,jack!

Don't know him either. Jack Kennedy?

[Guest]

Mr. "Personal Best Regards" of the Gang of (now) Three says that congresswoman Ernst (although he did notknow the correct spelling of her name) would be a good VP pick for the GOP nominee to choose.

Joni Ernst would be a bigger liability and laughingstock than Sarah Palin was for John McCain and the Republicans would truly be looked at as out of touch with reality.

[Guest]

Mr. "Personal Best Regards" of the Gang of (now) Three says that congresswoman Ernst (although he did notknow the correct spelling of her name) would be a good VP pick for the GOP nominee to choose.

Joni Ernst would be a bigger liability and laughingstock than Sarah Palin was for John McCain and the Republicans would truly be looked at as out of touch with reality.

I guess you are entitled to your opinion. It appears that correct spelling is not a mandated requirement, and we all seem to think faster than we type. You think that "Ernst" is a bad choice for VP. I think Clinton is a bad choice for president, a VERY bad choice. So, if if Republicans are out of touch with reality, as you suggest, then I would suggest that liberals are either ignorant of Clinton's criminality or mentally retarded. And that is my opinion, which I am entitled to.

[Guest]

I guess you are entitled to your opinion. It appears that correct spelling is not a mandated requirement, and we all seem to think faster than we type. You think that "Ernst" is a bad choice for VP. I think Clinton is a bad choice for president, a VERY bad choice. So, if if Republicans are out of touch with reality, as you suggest, then I would suggest that liberals are either ignorant of Clinton's criminality or mentally retarded. And that is my opinion, which I am entitled to.

Just like a typical Republican - thinking he is entitled to something! :BigApplause:

[Guest]

Just like a typical Republican - thinking he is entitled to something! :BigApplause:

Hmmm, I stand chagrined. You're right, and that would make me a liberal. I take back my statement regarding my entitlement to my opinion. My opinion will be dictated by our tyrannical comrade leader, comrade Obamakov.

[Guest]

Just like a typical Republican - thinking he is entitled to something! :BigApplause:

He musta errored as we all know that outlook is reserved for too many democrats!

[Guest]

Dear Guest: Yes she did blast Trump and it was inappropriate because her role was to support the Republican side of the State of the Union and the RNC was not happy about that move. Trump did Trump and told the media she just disqualified herself as his VP pick. Republicans didn't need that fight her role was to point aim fire at Obama not Trump

The liberal media meantime foolishly stated that the only reason she was picked to do the rebuttal to Obama SOTU address was because she is a minority woman. Progressives are on record stating Republicans are old white men who hate minorities and women and they chide Haley because she is a minority woman. DUH! Why was Obama picked twice by progressives? Two guesses and the first doesn't count

I know who Haley is and I know that she is well regarded but their are other Republican women as well who would qualify Ernest (Iowa) Martinez ( New Mexico) are two.

As to Haley's decision to move the Confederate flag..well it was popular among some but in my view this debate was just to placate minorities.

The war between the states is a fact. Southerns proudly carried their flag into battle. Southerns carried on with their pride generation after generation. Confederate soldiers were concerned American veterans and as such entitled To my way of thinking this discussion ought to have been along these lines. However progressives did their usual damage, were short sighted again and made this a divisive issue instead of how this nation has the ability to come together time after time after time. despite our differences

The problem with America today is that we do not have a sufficient number of deep thinkers and that we lean on the heavy side of collectivism..what happen to the concept and the importance of the individual

Personal Best Regards:

"As to Haley's decision to move the Confederate flag..well it was popular among some but in my view this debate was just to placate minorities" So it was done to placate republicans, you do realize you are a minority!

[Guest]

"As to Haley's decision to move the Confederate flag..well it was popular among some but in my view this debate was just to placate minorities" So it was done to placate republicans, you do realize you are a minority!

A stupid comment, but expected coming from a troll.

[Guest]

Check Haley's closet, there are skeletons. Moral republicans should be appalled.

[Guest]

Check Haley's closet, there are skeletons. Moral republicans should be appalled.

I'm glad you stipulated "moral Republicans" because it is a given that with your support of Hillary, we know that you have no scruples when it comes to morals or ethics.

[Guest]

A stupid comment, but expected coming from a troll.

Truth hurts, doesn't it?

[Guest]

I'm glad you stipulated "moral Republicans" because it is a given that with your support of Hillary, we know that you have no scruples when it comes to morals or ethics.

You republicans are always ranting about how others are immoral, so if the shoe fits wear it!

[Guest]

You republicans are always ranting about how others are immoral, so if the shoe fits wear it!

Unlike liberals, I consider the labeling of me being "moral" to be a good thing. It says a lot for liberals to think that being moral is a negative.

[Guest]

Truth hurts, doesn't it?

Only the truth that our education system has failed you. But, don't worry by the time you are old enough to vote, you may have achieved a grade school education.

[Guest]

Ah yes, the loud and noisy Gang of Three Plus One continues to yammer among themselves.

These are some of those types that Republican governor Haley said are damaging the Republican party.

Here in The Villages, The Gang of Three Plus One are a running joke annd laughing stock at City Fire and at Starbucks where we gather to solve the problems of the country. (We can give names there)

Keep it up! Not only do you keep us amused, your types are also fodder for late night comedy shows and especially Bill Mahr - who just began his new season on HBO.
:BigApplause:

[Guest]

Ah yes, the loud and noisy Gang of Three Plus One continues to yammer among themselves.

These are some of those types that Republican governor Haley said are damaging the Republican party.

Here in The Villages, The Gang of Three Plus One are a running joke annd laughing stock at City Fire and at Starbucks where we gather to solve the problems of the country. (We can give names there)

Keep it up! Not only do you keep us amused, your types are also fodder for late night comedy shows and especially Bill Mahr - who just began his new season on HBO.
:BigApplause:

the self gratification fable continues.

[Guest]

Ah yes, the loud and noisy Gang of Three Plus One continues to yammer among themselves.

These are some of those types that Republican governor Haley said are damaging the Republican party.

Here in The Villages, The Gang of Three Plus One are a running joke annd laughing stock at City Fire and at Starbucks where we gather to solve the problems of the country. (We can give names there)

Keep it up! Not only do you keep us amused, your types are also fodder for late night comedy shows and especially Bill Mahr - who just began his new season on HBO.
:BigApplause:

It really bothers you, doesn't it? I'll pray for your enlightenment. Speaking of the City Fire, I was wondering who that guy was that sits by himself. talking to the air. Next time I am there, I will introduce myself so that you will have a real person to converse with. Just remind me of which one of you I am talking to.

[Guest]

I guess you are entitled to your opinion. It appears that correct spelling is not a mandated requirement, and we all seem to think faster than we type. You think that "Ernst" is a bad choice for VP. I think Clinton is a bad choice for president, a VERY bad choice. So, if if Republicans are out of touch with reality, as you suggest, then I would suggest that liberals are either ignorant of Clinton's criminality or mentally retarded. And that is my opinion, which I am entitled to.

Are you a christian?

[Guest]

Are you a christian?

That's a personal question. Are you a Christian?

[Guest]

Gov. Haley definitely is a rising star for Republicans. She has so much more to offer than Fiorina - and is a heck of a lot better looking!

I bet the Republican nominee picks her as a VP candidate.

No, it will not be Trump. Remember, the RNC will not allow his nomination.

Trump goes rogue, runs as a third party, and Hillary wins! :BigApplause:

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;1172472]It really bothers you, doesn't it? I'll pray for your enlightenment.QUOTE]

What really bothers me? Three or four reactionary dudes yapping on this forum? No, as I said, we all enjoy the comments as we solve big issues.

Your little gang provides much laughter for us. Thanks. :thumbup:

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;1172472]It really bothers you, doesn't it? I'll pray for your enlightenment.QUOTE]

What really bothers me? Three or four reactionary dudes yapping on this forum? No, as I said, we all enjoy the comments as we solve big issues.

Your little gang provides much laughter for us. Thanks. :thumbup:

And the one or two liberals on here get upset and start calling names, and act all indignant when someone they called names, puts them in their place. Tip: if you don't like it, leave. Don't ask for more.

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;1172622]

And the one or two liberals on here get upset and start calling names, and act all indignant when someone they called names, puts them in their place. Tip: if you don't like it, leave. Don't ask for more.

Yep, we have some liberals in the City Fire and Starbucks discussion group as well as some conservatives. Some friendly jabbing back and forth but everyone stays friendly with each other.

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;1172624]

Yep, we have some liberals in the City Fire and Starbucks discussion group as well as some conservatives. Some friendly jabbing back and forth but everyone stays friendly with each other.

Yes, but this forum is anonymous so the liberal knows he can get nasty and get away with it. Not so much when you are face to face.

[Guest]

That's a personal question. Are you a Christian?

Your post shows you do not follow the teachings

[Guest]

That's a personal question. Are you a Christian?

You must be ashamed to admit it.

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;1172622]

And the one or two liberals on here get upset and start calling names, and act all indignant when someone they called names, puts them in their place. Tip: if you don't like it, leave. Don't ask for more.


I thought radical republicans like you, beat their chests and yell about freedom of speech.

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;1172624]


I thought radical republicans like you, beat their chests and yell about freedom of speech.

I have no problem with it at all. I enjoy it when the liberal starts running amok when he doesn't get his way. I just think it pathetic when he/you start crying about not getting any respect after having a tantrum of name calling. Like I said, if you can't interact with the adults, go back to the high school face book with people of like maturity. Just saying.

We have conversations on subjects and current events. If you don't like it, you divert by name calling. If that doesn't work because someone comes back and puts you in your place, then you start crying about not getting the respect you require. You get your freedom of speech, but remember we do also. I realize that liberals wish to shut down conversation by stipulating that anything that doesn't agree with them is considered "hate speech."

You should feel good that some of us don't ignore you and actually respond to your comments. Personally, I welcome your input and try to ignore your ill manners. But, I am not going to clap at rude remarks.

I may use the terms Liberals and Socialists because they are terms to describe ideology. I don't consider labels of "Tea b..ger" to be a term of ideology. That is a term of deviant behavior that is most likely something that the left would be more familiar with than the right. The term "conservative" or "Tea Party member" or right wing even, is an ideology label. You seem to consider the descriptors of "liberal" and "socialist" to be a slur for some reason and refuse to own it. WE consider "conservative, TP member" and even "right wing" to be compliments. At least, I do.

So, once again we left the subject of the thread.

Nikki Haley is a pretty good example of a Republican, in my opinion. I agree and I disagree with her on occasion. I do not expect to agree with any politician all the time. What she said about Trump was accurate and she should not apologize.

A good politician listens and acts on the voters' wishes, not making his own personal choices of what he believes is good for the people. Obama is one that thinks he knows better what is good for us than we do. I guess based on his great record of life experience........not. He doesn't listen to the majority. He thinks he knows better than the majority what the majority needs.

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;1172709]

I have no problem with it at all. I enjoy it when the liberal starts running amok when he doesn't get his way. I just think it pathetic when he/you start crying about not getting any respect after having a tantrum of name calling. Like I said, if you can't interact with the adults, go back to the high school face book with people of like maturity. Just saying.

We have conversations on subjects and current events. If you don't like it, you divert by name calling. If that doesn't work because someone comes back and puts you in your place, then you start crying about not getting the respect you require. You get your freedom of speech, but remember we do also. I realize that liberals wish to shut down conversation by stipulating that anything that doesn't agree with them is considered "hate speech."

You should feel good that some of us don't ignore you and actually respond to your comments. Personally, I welcome your input and try to ignore your ill manners. But, I am not going to clap at rude remarks.

I may use the terms Liberals and Socialists because they are terms to describe ideology. I don't consider labels of "Tea b..ger" to be a term of ideology. That is a term of deviant behavior that is most likely something that the left would be more familiar with than the right. The term "conservative" or "Tea Party member" or right wing even, is an ideology label. You seem to consider the descriptors of "liberal" and "socialist" to be a slur for some reason and refuse to own it. WE consider "conservative, TP member" and even "right wing" to be compliments. At least, I do.

So, once again we left the subject of the thread.

Nikki Haley is a pretty good example of a Republican, in my opinion. I agree and I disagree with her on occasion. I do not expect to agree with any politician all the time. What she said about Trump was accurate and she should not apologize.

A good politician listens and acts on the voters' wishes, not making his own personal choices of what he believes is good for the people. Obama is one that thinks he knows better what is good for us than we do. I guess based on his great record of life experience........not. He doesn't listen to the majority. He thinks he knows better than the majority what the majority needs.

Obama has shown/proven time and time again that he thinks he knows better than the majority of Americans, that he in no way represents the wants/needs of Americans, that he has an agenda that he will accomplish by using, abusing or hiding behind the letter of the law.

A disappointment to the office of POTUS;
a disappointment to America;
a disappointment to his race;
an ally and supporter of all that is muslim;
proving time and again he was and remains unqualified as POTUS;

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;1172721]

Obama has shown/proven time and time again that he thinks he knows better than the majority of Americans, that he in no way represents the wants/needs of Americans, that he has an agenda that he will accomplish by using, abusing or hiding behind the letter of the law.

A disappointment to the office of POTUS;
a disappointment to America;
a disappointment to his race;
an ally and supporter of all that is muslim;
proving time and again he was and remains unqualified as POTUS;

I agree, but too late to do anything about it now. The only thing that can be done now is damage control. The only way to do damage control is to stop the leaking ship first and then conduct repairs. The only way to stop the leaking ship in this case, is to keep Hillary and Sanders from getting the White House. We already have the stigma of a failed "first black president" America doesn't need the added disgrace of having a "failed first female president." America can do a lot better than allowing Hillary to represent the first female in the position. I have no problem with a Black, Female, Indian or any other minority group representing the Presidency. I just want a good or best subject to fill the position. PC is over rated and doesn't contribute to getting the job done. It's just camouflage on truth. You can put perfume on manure, and it doesn't make it a rose. It's still manure.

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;1172777][QUOTE=Guest;1172764]

I agree, but too late to do anything about it now. The only thing that can be done now is damage control. The only way to do damage control is to stop the leaking ship first and then conduct repairs. The only way to stop the leaking ship in this case, is to keep Hillary and Sanders from getting the White House. We already have the stigma of a failed "first black president" America doesn't need the added disgrace of having a "failed first female president." America can do a lot better than allowing Hillary to represent the first female in the position. I have no problem with a Black, Female, Indian or any other minority group representing the Presidency. I just want a good or best subject to fill the position. PC is over rated and doesn't contribute to getting the job done. It's just camouflage on truth. You can put perfume on manure, and it doesn't make it a rose. It's still manure.

The donald and the Canadian are the answer lol

[Guest]

The donald and the Canadian are the answer lol

Against the left's options of a criminal and a socialist....that's correct.

[Guest]

Against the left's options of a criminal and a socialist....that's correct.

:boom: