Gallup polls

[Guest]

Gallup Poll shows 51 percent of Americans approve of President Obama's performance.

Gallup Poll shows 80 percent of Americans DISAPPROVE of Congress' performance.

With 51 percent approval rating, you can easily see that the Reactionary Yapsters on TOTV are in the minority (oo, should not use the "m" word around these Reactionary Yapsters). :BigApplause:

[Guest]

I'm waiting to see how the radical republicans will try to downgrade these percentages.

[Guest]

Gallup Poll shows 51 percent of Americans approve of President Obama's performance.

Gallup Poll shows 80 percent of Americans DISAPPROVE of Congress' performance.

With 51 percent approval rating, you can easily see that the Reactionary Yapsters on TOTV are in the minority (oo, should not use the "m" word around these Reactionary Yapsters). :BigApplause:

Wow 51% approve. I certainly wouldn't be proud of myself as a leader if I could get only half of the people to be confident in my accomplishments. Obama had a democratic majority in his first term and now a republican majority, yet his inability to lead and bring both sides together and COMPROMISE, has turned him into an executive order dictator. Political ineffectiveness as usual, with both sides to blame. Time for dramatic CHANGE.

[Guest]

Real Clear gives an average disapproval rating of 49.4 and an approval of 46.6.

The only reason that the average is that high is because the gallop poll is the ONLY one that has an approval rating over 50.

I'd say that your bait is a bit putrid.

[Guest]

Does that mean that Obama will get that job at SNL that he has been auditioning for in the last seven years? Michelle has been working on her line dancing skills to supplement his act.

[Guest]

Using the Gallup poll to compare approval rating during the same period in their Presidencies ....

Obama - 51
W - 34

[Guest]

Using the Gallup poll to compare approval rating during the same period in their Presidencies ....

Obama - 51
W - 34

And your point?

Taken from your Gallop polls:

Gallop Avg:
Jimmy Carter January 1977-January 1981 = 45.5
George H.W. Bush January 1989-January 1993 = 60.9
Obama term average to date = 48%

Job approval high:
George W. Bush September 2001 = 90
Obama three day HIGH average = 69

I guess it is all in how you look at the numbers.

[Guest]

And your point?

Taken from your Gallop polls:

Gallop Avg:
Jimmy Carter January 1977-January 1981 = 45.5
George H.W. Bush January 1989-January 1993 = 60.9
Obama term average to date = 48%

Job approval high:
George W. Bush September 2001 = 90
Obama three day HIGH average = 69

I guess it is all in how you look at the numbers.

I don't mean to demean "W' but his approval rate went down, and never went back up. Presidential Approval Ratings -- George W. Bush | Gallup Historical Trends (http://www.gallup.com/poll/116500/Presidential-Approval-Ratings-George-Bush.aspx)

The line on Obama that appears here is that he is the worse president ever. If that was the case, his approval rate would be in 30's. Congress approval rate in the 20's. That is an approval. If you want to talk about the worse Congress ever in the last 7+ years, you would probably have a good case. Congress is both parties. So, no one gets a pass.

[Guest]

These Reactionary Village Yapsters :cus: just have to realize they do not represent the majority of Americans throughout the USA.

[Guest]

These Reactionary Village Yapsters :cus: just have to realize they do not represent the majority of Americans throughout the USA.

actually, they do. Please remove your head from sand and skip the next serving of Kool-aid

[Guest]

actually, they do. Please remove your head from sand and skip the next serving of Kool-aid

:thumbup:

[Guest]

I don't mean to demean "W' but his approval rate went down, and never went back up. Presidential Approval Ratings -- George W. Bush | Gallup Historical Trends (http://www.gallup.com/poll/116500/Presidential-Approval-Ratings-George-Bush.aspx)

The line on Obama that appears here is that he is the worse president ever. If that was the case, his approval rate would be in 30's. Congress approval rate in the 20's. That is an approval. If you want to talk about the worse Congress ever in the last 7+ years, you would probably have a good case. Congress is both parties. So, no one gets a pass.

Bush now more popular than Obama - CNNPolitics.com (http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/03/politics/obama-approval-rating-cnn-poll/)

Bush now more popular than Obama - CNN Politics

It's all in the numbers, and how you wish to use them.

[Guest]

These Reactionary Village Yapsters :cus: just have to realize they do not represent the majority of Americans throughout the USA.

Talking points issued a new one for the name callers?

[Guest]

actually, they do. Please remove your head from sand and skip the next serving of Kool-aid

Ahem; when it looks like they are sitting on their shoulders it is not sand where the head is located!

[Guest]

And your point?

Taken from your Gallop polls:

Gallop Avg:
Jimmy Carter January 1977-January 1981 = 45.5
George H.W. Bush January 1989-January 1993 = 60.9
Obama term average to date = 48%

Job approval high:
George W. Bush September 2001 = 90
Obama three day HIGH average = 69

I guess it is all in how you look at the numbers.
No point. 51-34 was just a snapshot of this week in 2016 and 2008. But since you mentioned W's 91 high keep in mind that it was 25 at election time in November 2008. Trump is right; W handed Obama the election.

[Guest]

That, and the historical trend that except for Reagan, Reagan, Bush sr., neither party has held the White House for more than 8 years since WWII

[Guest]

These Reactionary Village Yapsters :cus: just have to realize they do not represent the majority of Americans throughout the USA.

Not sure where your majority comes from~
There are currently 31 Republicans, 18 Democrats, and one independent that hold the office of governor in the states. Additionally, two Republicans, two Independents and two Democrats (one is also a member of the PPD) serve as governors of United States Territories and Mayor of the District of Columbia. Republicans hold a majority in Congress and the Senate. This conservative trend has happened during Obama's reign, so obviously the VOTING MAJORITY in our country is trending with "These Reactionary Village Yapsters"

[Guest]

Bush now more popular than Obama - CNNPolitics.com (http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/03/politics/obama-approval-rating-cnn-poll/)

Bush now more popular than Obama - CNN Politics

It's all in the numbers, and how you wish to use them.

I completely hear what you are saying. Obama's performance as president will be judged by time. The poll numbers suggest that he has a better starting point than "W". That is the only thing that you can get from the poll.

As far as numbers are concerned, I was an accountant. My first class in Accounting, the professor asked, "How much is one and one?" His answer was, "whatever you want it to be". The saying goes, figures lie, and liars figure. They probably could balance the budget by just horsing with numbers.

[Guest]

The reason there is no budget is because it is a commitment!

[Guest]

I completely hear what you are saying. Obama's performance as president will be judged by time. The poll numbers suggest that he has a better starting point than "W". That is the only thing that you can get from the poll.

As far as numbers are concerned, I was an accountant. My first class in Accounting, the professor asked, "How much is one and one?" His answer was, "whatever you want it to be". The saying goes, figures lie, and liars figure. They probably could balance the budget by just horsing with numbers.

I doubt Obama's numbers will ever be any lower than 38% I think we need to consider that he has a core base of about 32% that believes he can do no wrong. They consist of far left loons, coastal elitists, university professors, the media, Hollywierdos, and die hard "democrat or nothing" voters, but mostly are those hooked on government freebies. So at 38%, he would only be getting the approval of 6% of the other 68%, or about 1 in 11 normal people.

[Guest]

Wow 51% approve. I certainly wouldn't be proud of myself as a leader if I could get only half of the people to be confident in my accomplishments. Obama had a democratic majority in his first term and now a republican majority, yet his inability to lead and bring both sides together and COMPROMISE, has turned him into an executive order dictator. Political ineffectiveness as usual, with both sides to blame. Time for dramatic CHANGE.

Over 60 times the pub's tried to kill Obamacare, they were shot down. Really a good way to bring the two sides together.

[Guest]

The numbers can appear as you wish. But, how high has Obama's numbers ever been in his two terms? He may not have gone as low as Bush did when the Demcorats advanced the perception that it was his fault (with a democrat majority congress for his last two years) that the economy tanked, but Bush had a high of 90%. Obama has had a high of 69%. Does anyone expect Obama's numbers to ever go any higher? Will they reach 90% ever?

Like I said, Bush has had the highest and the lowest of numbers. Obama has bested the mediocre.

It's just all numbers. Poll numbers can't even predict elections very often. I think that closest numbers in a polling prediction has been Rasmussen, but I am not positive.

[Guest]

Over 60 times the pub's tried to kill Obamacare, they were shot down. Really a good way to bring the two sides together.

Yes, a presidential veto does have that effect on it. Would you expect Obama to NOT veto a repeal of Obamacare? No matter how bad it is for the country, do you think that Obama's giant ego would allow such a thing?

Next year.

[Guest]

Over 60 times the pub's tried to kill Obamacare, they were shot down. Really a good way to bring the two sides together.

If there was a ticking time bomb at the Super Bowl, wouldn't you want the bomb squad to try 60 times to defuse it??

[Guest]

If there was a ticking time bomb at the Super Bowl, wouldn't you want the bomb squad to try 60 times to defuse it??

:thumbup: That's a good analogy. :agree:

[Guest]

I doubt Obama's numbers will ever be any lower than 38% I think we need to consider that he has a core base of about 32% that believes he can do no wrong. They consist of far left loons, coastal elitists, university professors, the media, Hollywierdos, and die hard "democrat or nothing" voters, but mostly are those hooked on government freebies. So at 38%, he would only be getting the approval of 6% of the other 68%, or about 1 in 11 normal people.

So, what you are saying is all Republicans are normal people. Now, that is funny. You sure have a strange definition of the word normal. You are playing with numbers. I can play this game, if you want. If you breakdown the 47%, you will see that your numbers are way off. This tag "freebies" is just plain nonsense.

Obama's numbers aren't going down in 2016 by something that he will do. It is an election year, and nothing is going to get done in government. If the economy takes a deep slid, which is beyond his control, his numbers will gone down. However, time as shown by "W's" numbers will go back again.

[Guest]

If there was a ticking time bomb at the Super Bowl, wouldn't you want the bomb squad to try 60 times to defuse it??

No. I would get the hell out of there, because the bomb squad doesn't have a clue what they are doing. My team is going to the Super Bowl, and going to win it. There won't be the deflated ball nonsense to try to say they had to cheat to win.

[Guest]

No. I would get the hell out of there, because the bomb squad doesn't have a clue what they are doing. My team is going to the Super Bowl, and going to win it. There won't be the deflated ball nonsense to try to say they had to cheat to win.

Great, another Panther fan. You did say your team was going to win it,and we do know that the Panthers are going to win. :pepper2:

[Guest]

If there was a ticking time bomb at the Super Bowl, wouldn't you want the bomb squad to try 60 times to defuse it??
Only a bumbling inefficient bomb squad would take 60 times. You would want one who did it the first time.

[Guest]

So, what you are saying is all Republicans are normal people. Now, that is funny. You sure have a strange definition of the word normal. You are playing with numbers. I can play this game, if you want. If you breakdown the 47%, you will see that your numbers are way off. This tag "freebies" is just plain nonsense.

Obama's numbers aren't going down in 2016 by something that he will do. It is an election year, and nothing is going to get done in government. If the economy takes a deep slid, which is beyond his control, his numbers will gone down. However, time as shown by "W's" numbers will go back again.

Yep, now you get it.
Freebies is a nonsense term---are you suggesting the freeloaders WORK for what they get?
Please, please put that glass of Kool-Aid down

[Guest]

Only a bumbling inefficient bomb squad would take 60 times. You would want one who did it the first time.

Maybe they did it the first time and the second, and the third. But when the fire marshal reconnects the wires, they have to start over.

[Guest]

So, what you are saying is all Republicans are normal people. Now, that is funny. You sure have a strange definition of the word normal. You are playing with numbers. I can play this game, if you want. If you breakdown the 47%, you will see that your numbers are way off. This tag "freebies" is just plain nonsense.

Obama's numbers aren't going down in 2016 by something that he will do. It is an election year, and nothing is going to get done in government. If the economy takes a deep slid, which is beyond his control, his numbers will gone down. However, time as shown by "W's" numbers will go back again.

The economy is "beyond his control"???? Sounds to me like he gets a lot of free passes. But the economy was NOT beyond Bush's control, right?

[Guest]

Daddy always told me the democrats will tax you to death. You know what he was right.