from the mouth of a republican

[Guest]

"conservatives used to espouse clear and consistent values, one of which was an impatience with the so-called culture of victimization. But in recent years, who has cried “victim” more than they? To hear them tell it, they are a people perennially under siege from a “War on Christmas,” a “War on Whites,” a “War on Males,” political correctness, same-sex marriage and, of course, that old standby, liberal media bias."

[Guest]

bait!!

[Guest]

Great Post!!!!

[Guest]

"conservatives used to espouse clear and consistent values, one of which was an impatience with the so-called culture of victimization. But in recent years, who has cried “victim” more than they? To hear them tell it, they are a people perennially under siege from a “War on Christmas,” a “War on Whites,” a “War on Males,” political correctness, same-sex marriage and, of course, that old standby, liberal media bias."

bait!!

Hard to accept the truth when it doesn't fit your purposes.

[Guest]

Lol...what a bunch of maroons....

[Guest]

Hard to accept the truth when it doesn't fit your purposes.

Hard to accept as a Republican quote when the source was never identified.

[Guest]

It is getting a bit chummy.:wave:

[Guest]

Great Post!!!!

Sybil, is that your comment on your own post? Pretty funny!

[Guest]

"conservatives used to espouse clear and consistent values, one of which was an impatience with the so-called culture of victimization. But in recent years, who has cried “victim” more than they? To hear them tell it, they are a people perennially under siege from a “War on Christmas,” a “War on Whites,” a “War on Males,” political correctness, same-sex marriage and, of course, that old standby, liberal media bias."

No reference, no source. Not a credible thread. I'm outta here..............

[Guest]

"conservatives used to espouse clear and consistent values, one of which was an impatience with the so-called culture of victimization. But in recent years, who has cried “victim” more than they? To hear them tell it, they are a people perennially under siege from a “War on Christmas,” a “War on Whites,” a “War on Males,” political correctness, same-sex marriage and, of course, that old standby, liberal media bias."

Dear Guest:

If I may offer another explanation. The fact is that in this day and age the political terms establishment, conservative liberal libertarian mean bupkus. They have been so abused, misused and ideologically shifted that they have no meaning any longer. Back in the day a liberal Republican was viewed as a moderate Democrat. Back in the day the bell curve applied when it came to the distribution of democrat republicans conservative liberal moderate
what changed? The radical leftist movements race, gender and economic status found on the streets of America and in its universities. Progressive, as I stated many times before do not understand the limits of nature and so in their fantasy Utopian world they pushed manipulated and lied about the definition of "fairness" like trying to place a round peg in a square hole. Well we see today what that has wrought. Its not a pretty picture

Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

Dear Guest:

If I may offer another explanation. The fact is that in this day and age the political terms establishment, conservative liberal libertarian mean bupkus. They have been so abused, misused and ideologically shifted that they have no meaning any longer. Back in the day a liberal Republican was viewed as a moderate Democrat. Back in the day the bell curve applied when it came to the distribution of democrat republicans conservative liberal moderate
what changed? The radical leftist movements race, gender and economic status found on the streets of America and in its universities. Progressive, as I stated many times before do not understand the limits of nature and so in their fantasy Utopian world they pushed manipulated and lied about the definition of "fairness" like trying to place a round peg in a square hole. Well we see today what that has wrought. Its not a pretty picture

Personal Best Regards:

Did the radical leftist movement encourage American businesses to move their production overseas? This was encouraged so the white middle class worker would lose their jobs, and now be on an equal status with the poor minority class. President Obama's mere appearance caused the Republican party to move further right. That is not a movement. That is insanity.

Concerning the current status of the US, there is plenty of blame to go around for both parties. When you stop talking to each, that is a guarantee that nothing will get down, and things will get worse.

Take a look at who is leading the Republican race for their nomination, Donald Trump. The man belittles everybody, and offers no concrete solutions to anything. How, in the name of creation, is he going to accomplish anything, if he wins the election? If you go to DC, and continue to insult representatives, they will get their backs up, and things will get worse. If there is a lesson to learned from Obama's "hope and change" presidency, it is the opposite party will do everything in its power to make you fail. The only principle is to make sure that the current president is considered a failure, so your party will win the next election. The well being of the citizens of the US is the last thing on their minds. This is one of the few things that both parties have in common.

[Guest]

The funniest thing that came from Trump's war on Cruz was making fun of Glenn Beck, because Beck endorsed Cruz. He called Beck a crybaby. Trump stood there and listened to that flying fruitcake, Sarah Palin, endorsing him. Palin read a prepared speech that made sense to the person, who prepared it, and that person alone. I think that Palin should fire her speechwriter, Joe $hit the rag man's son, and hire someone that has a third grade education. In Alaska, that may be hard to find, but if anyone can do it she can.

[Guest]

Did the radical leftist movement encourage American businesses to move their production overseas? This was encouraged so the white middle class worker would lose their jobs, and now be on an equal status with the poor minority class. President Obama's mere appearance caused the Republican party to move further right. That is not a movement. That is insanity.

Concerning the current status of the US, there is plenty of blame to go around for both parties. When you stop talking to each, that is a guarantee that nothing will get down, and things will get worse.

Take a look at who is leading the Republican race for their nomination, Donald Trump. The man belittles everybody, and offers no concrete solutions to anything. How, in the name of creation, is he going to accomplish anything, if he wins the election? If you go to DC, and continue to insult representatives, they will get their backs up, and things will get worse. If there is a lesson to learned from Obama's "hope and change" presidency, it is the opposite party will do everything in its power to make you fail. The only principle is to make sure that the current president is considered a failure, so your party will win the next election. The well being of the citizens of the US is the last thing on their minds. This is one of the few things that both parties have in common.

Dear Guest:

Once again may I offer an alternate explanation. The corporate inversion of which you speak are because 1) the US has the highest corporate tax in the world 2) profits earned overseas would be taxed a second time if brought back stateside. Progressives encourage and in fact pay illegal to come to this country and fight such things as voter ID to buy votes. there selfish interests cost American workers jobs. Unions both private and public make demands not commensurate with increases in production or performance thus reducing America's competitiveness. As to Republicans shift to the right
perhaps you haven't notice but Obama is further left than Bill Ayers making neocon look like moderates.

As to blame frankly I am sick of the blame game its a waste of time and energy. I am looking for leadership that focuses on solutions

I am no fan of Trump but Trump is a zillion times better by any measurements than Obama. Obama the Terrible is a walking disaster. I take no pleasure in making that statement because this nation needs and deserves quality leadership but I am not convinced it exists in America any longer.

finally voters should ignore party politic and unite against cronyism and incompetence we call our government.

Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

Dear Guest:

Once again may I offer an alternate explanation. The corporate inversion of which you speak are because 1) the US has the highest corporate tax in the world 2) profits earned overseas would be taxed a second time if brought back stateside. Progressives encourage and in fact pay illegal to come to this country and fight such things as voter ID to buy votes. there selfish interests cost American workers jobs. Unions both private and public make demands not commensurate with increases in production or performance thus reducing America's competitiveness. As to Republicans shift to the right
perhaps you haven't notice but Obama is further left than Bill Ayers making neocon look like moderates.

As to blame frankly I am sick of the blame game its a waste of time and energy. I am looking for leadership that focuses on solutions

I am no fan of Trump but Trump is a zillion times better by any measurements than Obama. Obama the Terrible is a walking disaster. I take no pleasure in making that statement because this nation needs and deserves quality leadership but I am not convinced it exists in America any longer.

finally voters should ignore party politic and unite against cronyism and incompetence we call our government.

Personal Best Regards:

The effective corporate is up there among the highest. It is about 27.5%. The difference in corporate taxes between countries isn't enough to move production overseas. Concerning the foreign profits being taxed twice, that is not completely right. The second time is not at the full domestic rate. The amount paid overseas is deducted in full. http://taxfoundation.org/article/how-much-do-us-multinational-corporations-pay-foreign-income-taxes

Wages overseas especially in Asia is the reason that US companies are moving their production over there. Wages make a far great portion of costs than the corporate taxes. If the corporate tax rate is lowered, that isn't a guarantee that companies will move their production back to the US.
30% of US corporation are "S" corporation. So, they are taxed at the personal tax rate.

Trump is talking about high tariffs, and sales taxes to make more expensive overseas labor. He hopes that this will force US companies to move production back to the US, because the effective rate of low wages will be offset by the high tariffs. I don't think that he has mentioned lowing the corporate tax rate to bring production jobs back here.

Things haven't entirely changed from what they were during our days in the work force. Companies move to the south, because of lower wages, and energy costs. They are moving out of the country for the same reason.

I really haven't noticed Obama shifting that far to the left. You are right there. On Morning Joe this morning, they called him a moderate Democrat. I guess they are comparing him to Sanders.

All kidding aside without going overboard on your criticism, can you bring me up to date on his far left agenda? Single payer health insurance is far left. Obamacare is a liberal program, but not far left.

[Guest]

Concerning unions, the number of union jobs on private sector is ^.&% in 2013, and it has gone down from there. Unions are the major reason companies are moving overseas. American unions membership declines as public support fluctuates | Pew Research Center (http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/02/20/for-american-unions-membership-trails-far-behind-public-support/)

[Guest]

Concerning unions, the number of union jobs on private sector is ^.&% in 2013, and it has gone down from there. Unions are the major reason companies are moving overseas. American unions membership declines as public support fluctuates | Pew Research Center (http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/02/20/for-american-unions-membership-trails-far-behind-public-support/)

:agree:

[Guest]

:agree:

Did you agree with percentage, because I screw up? That should 6.7%.

[Guest]

Did you agree with percentage, because I screw up? That should 6.7%.

I knew what you meant. I was agreeing with the theory that unions priced labor so high that business moved overseas. I have been saying that for many years.

[Guest]

I knew what you meant. I was agreeing with the theory that unions priced labor so high that business moved overseas. I have been saying that for many years.

This country had its best years financially, employment ect. when the unions had power. Then ronald broke the traffic controllers strike and showed the companies how to "put their employees in place." You can see where that go us.

[Guest]

This country had its best years financially, employment ect. when the unions had power. Then ronald broke the traffic controllers strike and showed the companies how to "put their employees in place." You can see where that go us.

Yes, it proved that unions were no longer necessary. They're not. We have federal laws protecting employees. Unions are just financing the mob. Proof that they are no longer needed is the fact that the percentage of membership is so low compared to the overall employment.

[Guest]

Hard to accept as a Republican quote when the source was never identified.

Who needs a quote??? Bumper sticker in TV this afternoon "Keep GOD in America" and how could you miss all the "Keep Christ in Christmas and "He is the reason for the season."

I'm sure you have seen those.

[Guest]

Who needs a quote??? Bumper sticker in TV this afternoon "Keep GOD in America" and how could you miss all the "Keep Christ in Christmas and "He is the reason for the season."

I'm sure you have seen those.

You don't even make sense. What does this have to do with the unauthored quote of the OP?

Are we to also consider your statement that those bumper stickers are solely the property of Republicans? I have been told many times on here, when I suggested that it is inconceivable that a liberal is a Christian and was told that I am wrong. So, by that reasoning, your comment is wrong also. Those bumper stickers could be the property of liberals...............probably not.

Actually, don't bother answering. I am bored and just wasting time right now. No offense, but I am not even interested in your reply.

[Guest]

"conservatives used to espouse clear and consistent values, one of which was an impatience with the so-called culture of victimization. But in recent years, who has cried “victim” more than they? To hear them tell it, they are a people perennially under siege from a “War on Christmas,” a “War on Whites,” a “War on Males,” political correctness, same-sex marriage and, of course, that old standby, liberal media bias."

So you're saying there is no “War on Christmas,” no “War on Whites,”( white priveledge), no “War on Males,” no such thing as political correctness, same-sex marriage (Hillary endorsed DOMA) and no liberal media bias."?

You be-clown yourself, sir.

[Guest]

Jesus is the Reason for the Season of Christmas. This from a moderate Democrat.

Most Senators and Representatives are church goers. Or temple goers. Or even mosque goers.

[Guest]

From the mouth of democrat: I did not have sexual relations with that person! We have to pass it to see what's in it. You can keep your doctor. I lied a out Romney taxes. So sounds like lots of liars to go around. Name one that not liar? Now that's hard puppy to find?

[Guest]

From the mouth of democrat: I did not have sexual relations with that person! We have to pass it to see what's in it. You can keep your doctor. I lied a out Romney taxes. So sounds like lots of liars to go around. Name one that not liar? Now that's hard puppy to find?

And the not so funny part of it all? We the people keep right on re-electing the same incompetents......Obama in 2012 being the platinum case study in stupidity of American voters.

[Guest]

And the not so funny part of it all? We the people keep right on re-electing the same incompetents......Obama in 2012 being the platinum case study in stupidity of American voters.

:thumbup:.....:thumbup:......:thumbup:

[Guest]

Who needs a quote??? Bumper sticker in TV this afternoon "Keep GOD in America" and how could you miss all the "Keep Christ in Christmas and "He is the reason for the season."

I'm sure you have seen those.


Thank you. Yes, you can always tell a Republican by those bumper stickers. And what really irks me, is that they are usually out on route 466 in the left lane going about 5 miles underneath the speed limit, obviously with their head in the clouds, and everybody else has to drive around them. I don't know if they are just clueless or if they are thoughtless, but they are annoying for sure

[Guest]

Thank you. Yes, you can always tell a Republican by those bumper stickers. And what really irks me, is that they are usually out on route 466 in the left lane going about 5 miles underneath the speed limit, obviously with their head in the clouds, and everybody else has to drive around them. I don't know if they are just clueless or if they are thoughtless, but they are annoying for sure

Yep, unlike the Clintons Republicans generally obey the law. And yet, you have those liberals that think that laws are only for the non-elite. I've seen people like you that blow through stop signs and tell everyone that they are optional or treated the same as yield signs. Have a great day and next time you get behind me, blow your horn to let me know you are there. I have a surprise for you.

[Guest]

Yep, unlike the Clintons Republicans generally obey the law. And yet, you have those liberals that think that laws are only for the non-elite. I've seen people like you that blow through stop signs and tell everyone that they are optional or treated the same as yield signs. Have a great day and next time you get behind me, blow your horn to let me know you are there. I have a surprise for you.

I don't usually make fun of typing errors, because I make them all too often. However, this is a good one. I think that you missed a comma. Are there really Clinton Republicans? If they are, they surely are well hidden.

My guess is you meant to say, "Yep, unlike the Clintons, Republicans generally obey the law."

[Guest]

I don't usually make fun of typing errors, because I make them all too often. However, this is a good one. I think that you missed a comma. Are there really Clinton Republicans? If they are, they surely are well hidden.

My guess is you meant to say, "Yep, unlike the Clintons, Republicans generally obey the law."

Yep, caught me on a typo. The finger must have skipped over it lightly. But, at least you were bright enough to catch the meaning, so it couldn't have been too major of an error. Maybe there is hope for you after all. By the way, if you keep reading, I bet I can make some more mistakes. One mistake that I wont' make is, I won't vote for a felonious criminal like one of the Clintons. Will you?

[Guest]

From the mouth of democrat: I did not have sexual relations with that person! We have to pass it to see what's in it. You can keep your doctor. I lied a out Romney taxes. So sounds like lots of liars to go around. Name one that not liar? Now that's hard puppy to find?

Now to be fair and unbiased, tell me about the republicans that have said "no new taxes" ect.

[Guest]

Yes, it proved that unions were no longer necessary. They're not. We have federal laws protecting employees. Unions are just financing the mob. Proof that they are no longer needed is the fact that the percentage of membership is so low compared to the overall employment.
What a crock. Obviously you are ignorant when it comes to facts. Not all unions are run by the mob. Many jobs pay well because of the threat of unions. Take away that threat and owners will pay less and make more money for shareholders and bosses.

[Guest]

What a crock. Obviously you are ignorant when it comes to facts. Not all unions are run by the mob. Many jobs pay well because of the threat of unions. Take away that threat and owners will pay less and make more money for shareholders and bosses.

You don't know much related to unions, do you? Yes, they are run by the mob. Small unions are members of the larger international unions and they are run by corruption. But, even if they weren't, they are now useless and cost America a lot of jobs. I have also seen contractors hire non-union labor because they know that the job will take less time to complete, with less problems. I have seen how union workers actually work. They must be given a coffee break for every so many hours, a lunch break so long, overtime, weather days, etc. The union takes it's dues and then the money is stolen by the union officials, more times than not. Employees are protected by federal law now. The day of unions should be delegated to the history book. It was useful at one time, but no longer needed. Kind of like rotary dialed phones.

[Guest]

Yep, caught me on a typo. The finger must have skipped over it lightly. But, at least you were bright enough to catch the meaning, so it couldn't have been too major of an error. Maybe there is hope for you after all. By the way, if you keep reading, I bet I can make some more mistakes. One mistake that I wont' make is, I won't vote for a felonious criminal like one of the Clintons. Will you?

No, I will not be voting for Hillary Clinton. I hope is John Kasich will do very well in New Hampshire, and people will start opening their eyes to him. I am not kidding myself. I know that he is long shot. In this political day and age, sanity is trait that is frown upon.

I know that my vote will be wasted. However, if it is Trump against Sanders or Clinton, I will vote for Donald Duck. Someone, that makes me laugh, is much better than someone that upsets me all the time.

[Guest]

No, I will not be voting for Hillary Clinton. I hope is John Kasich will do very well in New Hampshire, and people will start opening their eyes to him. I am not kidding myself. I know that he is long shot. In this political day and age, sanity is trait that is frown upon.

I know that my vote will be wasted. However, if it is Trump against Sanders or Clinton, I will vote for Donald Duck. Someone, that makes me laugh, is much better than someone that upsets me all the time.

Well, if you know that Kasich has no chance at winning the nomination, then why not vote for someone that is more likely to beat the Dems? Trump doesn't have to be the one to run against the Liberals. Rubio is polled as the one GOP candidate that can easiest beat Hillary or Sanders. Instead of knowingly throwing your vote away, you could do some good.

By the way, I also like Kasich, but I am pragmatic about it and will vote for the one that is more likely to win and then go on to beat Hillary or Sanders.

[Guest]

It is all well and good to have favorites. We all do. However, the objective is to nominate and elect the candidate most likely to win the nomination and then the election.

Aside from the favorite aspects all the candidates except perhaps Trump have a core set of values that are meaningful to us and welcome in a new presidency.
Trump shares many of those values as well, however his style is dictated by his independence and sheer fact he is not an insider. And a very big factor missing in most candidates, business and negotiating skills....and the ability to hire to cover his weaknesses (if any I always used to say!) and shore up his strengths.

I feel these atributes of Trump set him far and above the rest of the field as they depending on tenure are, when all gets said and done, business as usual politicians.

All the above being said we should all be looking to support the most likely republican leader.....in my humble opinion.

Isn't it a plus that we have the choice to do so. The democrats are very limited in what they can have.....felon or socialism.

[Guest]

You don't know much related to unions, do you? Yes, they are run by the mob. Small unions are members of the larger international unions and they are run by corruption. But, even if they weren't, they are now useless and cost America a lot of jobs. I have also seen contractors hire non-union labor because they know that the job will take less time to complete, with less problems. I have seen how union workers actually work. They must be given a coffee break for every so many hours, a lunch break so long, overtime, weather days, etc. The union takes it's dues and then the money is stolen by the union officials, more times than not. Employees are protected by federal law now. The day of unions should be delegated to the history book. It was useful at one time, but no longer needed. Kind of like rotary dialed phones.
Wrong. I was in a union the majority of my working life. You obviously were not. You are drinking all the kool aid that management wanted you to believe. Are there crooks in unions, yes, but are there any crooks in management? Like I said before you are just plain ignorant when it comes to all the facts. My union protected me to work under a fair working agreement agreed to by both sides. Thinking like yours will keep unions alive.

[Guest]

Wrong. I was in a union the majority of my working life. You obviously were not. You are drinking all the kool aid that management wanted you to believe. Are there crooks in unions, yes, but are there any crooks in management? Like I said before you are just plain ignorant when it comes to all the facts. My union protected me to work under a fair working agreement agreed to by both sides. Thinking like yours will keep unions alive.

You are right, I was only in the union for a couple of years. I was smart enough to get out of it. You, on the other hand....not so much. No problem, it served you well. I wouldn't expect you to disparage your bread and butter, after putting in that much time. I watched unions sell their members down the river. I have also seen unions donate membership money to the liberals when many of their members were conservative. Unions are antiquated thinking now. We don't need them.

[Guest]

Now to be fair and unbiased, tell me about the republicans that have said "no new taxes" ect.

To quote Dukakis, who said there would be no new taxes. He followed it up by saying I will enhance the ones that are already there.

[Guest]

Well, if you know that Kasich has no chance at winning the nomination, then why not vote for someone that is more likely to beat the Dems? Trump doesn't have to be the one to run against the Liberals. Rubio is polled as the one GOP candidate that can easiest beat Hillary or Sanders. Instead of knowingly throwing your vote away, you could do some good.

By the way, I also like Kasich, but I am pragmatic about it and will vote for the one that is more likely to win and then go on to beat Hillary or Sanders.

My fear is that either Trump or Cruz will be the Republican nominee. If they are things are only going to get worse. I think that Rubio, and Bush have about much chance of winning the nomination as Kasich. I am discussed by the entire group of people running for president.

[Guest]

It is all well and good to have favorites. We all do. However, the objective is to nominate and elect the candidate most likely to win the nomination and then the election.

Aside from the favorite aspects all the candidates except perhaps Trump have a core set of values that are meaningful to us and welcome in a new presidency.
Trump shares many of those values as well, however his style is dictated by his independence and sheer fact he is not an insider. And a very big factor missing in most candidates, business and negotiating skills....and the ability to hire to cover his weaknesses (if any I always used to say!) and shore up his strengths.

I feel these atributes of Trump set him far and above the rest of the field as they depending on tenure are, when all gets said and done, business as usual politicians.

All the above being said we should all be looking to support the most likely republican leader.....in my humble opinion.

Isn't it a plus that we have the choice to do so. The democrats are very limited in what they can have.....felon or socialism.

What values does Trump have? If insulting everyone that doesn't agree with you is a value, he has one hellva a value. How far do you think that will take him in DC? It will take about two minutes for people there to turn a deaf ear to him.

Do you think that high tariffs, and sales taxes are going to fly? You think that the countries, that he attacks in this way, won't fight back. Do you think that you can turn a key, and poof a full function factory will appear in the US? He will do more harm to US companies that he will do good. You bring companies back to the US by offering them incentives, and not by going to economic war with foreign countries.

If China cashes in the over a trillion dollar debt the US owes to them, the US will go into another deep recession. What are you going to tell China if they ask for their money. Nope, we don't owe you anything. We are even.

He has absolutely no interest in foreign affairs at all. Is he going to turn a key, and poof interest and knowledge will appear?

He is the worse kind of politician. He is out there telling people what they want to hear. What they want to hear will not fly.

[Guest]

What values does Trump have? If insulting everyone that doesn't agree with you is a value, he has one hellva a value. How far do you think that will take him in DC? It will take about two minutes for people there to turn a deaf ear to him.

Do you think that high tariffs, and sales taxes are going to fly? You think that the countries, that he attacks in this way, won't fight back. Do you think that you can turn a key, and poof a full function factory will appear in the US? He will do more harm to US companies that he will do good. You bring companies back to the US by offering them incentives, and not by going to economic war with foreign countries.

If China cashes in the over a trillion dollar debt the US owes to them, the US will go into another deep recession. What are you going to tell China if they ask for their money. Nope, we don't owe you anything. We are even.

He has absolutely no interest in foreign affairs at all. Is he going to turn a key, and poof interest and knowledge will appear?

He is the worse kind of politician. He is out there telling people what they want to hear. What they want to hear will not fly.

And then there is Obama. 'Nuff said.

[Guest]

What values does Trump have? If insulting everyone that doesn't agree with you is a value, he has one hellva a value. How far do you think that will take him in DC? It will take about two minutes for people there to turn a deaf ear to him.

Do you think that high tariffs, and sales taxes are going to fly? You think that the countries, that he attacks in this way, won't fight back. Do you think that you can turn a key, and poof a full function factory will appear in the US? He will do more harm to US companies that he will do good. You bring companies back to the US by offering them incentives, and not by going to economic war with foreign countries.

If China cashes in the over a trillion dollar debt the US owes to them, the US will go into another deep recession. What are you going to tell China if they ask for their money. Nope, we don't owe you anything. We are even.

He has absolutely no interest in foreign affairs at all. Is he going to turn a key, and poof interest and knowledge will appear?

He is the worse kind of politician. He is out there telling people what they want to hear. What they want to hear will not fly.

Well said. The Republican slate is just awful. Trump, in particular, scares me. He could be the start of a nuclear war. The only one I might possibly live with, who might run as an independent, is Bloomberg.

[Guest]

Well said. The Republican slate is just awful. Trump, in particular, scares me. He could be the start of a nuclear war. The only one I might possibly live with, who might run as an independent, is Bloomberg.


Bloomberg! Now that really scares me. What in the water in the NE that breeds left wing wacko's?



Answer :

The education system for unions, grants, studies, and 100 % retirement, which boils down to greed.

[Guest]

Well said. The Republican slate is just awful. Trump, in particular, scares me. He could be the start of a nuclear war. The only one I might possibly live with, who might run as an independent, is Bloomberg.

Yes, for socialists, the "Republican slate" is very scary. Bloomberg thinks he is the director of health, and dictates to the people what and what not they may eat and drink. He also wants to ignore and remove the second amendment, as long as he has his personal body guards. Just what we need, another dictator. Liberals, an oxymoron.

[Guest]

Well said. The Republican slate is just awful. Trump, in particular, scares me. He could be the start of a nuclear war. The only one I might possibly live with, who might run as an independent, is Bloomberg.

:22yikes:

Holy :censored: !!!!!

You are hereby cutoff what ever it is you are on.