China, N. Korea, Iran, et al toy with humiliating the USA through Obama

[Guest]

Iran sucks him in and violates the agreement at every turn. No problem.

N. Korea gets warning to not set of a rocket, then goes ahead to do it.

China, puts missles in the area that Obama is meeting with to not militarize the area.

Russia....does what they want anytime they want.

Syria crossed the red line how many times.

ISIS comes and goes, etc.

They must all laugh evrytime Obama starts to preach or lecture and they go right ahead and do what he preaches or lectures them about, KNOWING he will do NOTHING more than preach and lecture.

He has diminished the resolve of America to where even the most inept countries or organizations can kick sand in his/our face and he will come up with a reason why the did what they did is OK......especially if it is race or muslim related.

Even the hard core party die hards have to be offended by his linguine spined absence of leadership.

All he does is TALK< TALK< TALK.

[Guest]

Iran sucks him in and violates the agreement at every turn. No problem.

N. Korea gets warning to not set of a rocket, then goes ahead to do it.

China, puts missles in the area that Obama is meeting with to not militarize the area.

Russia....does what they want anytime they want.

Syria crossed the red line how many times.

ISIS comes and goes, etc.

They must all laugh evrytime Obama starts to preach or lecture and they go right ahead and do what he preaches or lectures them about, KNOWING he will do NOTHING more than preach and lecture.

He has diminished the resolve of America to where even the most inept countries or organizations can kick sand in his/our face and he will come up with a reason why the did what they did is OK......especially if it is race or muslim related.

Even the hard core party die hards have to be offended by his linguine spined absence of leadership.

All he does is TALK< TALK< TALK.

What do you suggest we do, start a nuclear war buffoon. Where is your documentation on each item? Maybe we can invade them, and you and your radicals can lead the charge.

[Guest]

What do you suggest we do, start a nuclear war buffoon. Where is your documentation on each item? Maybe we can invade them, and you and your radicals can lead the charge.

We have a choice. It is called a preemptive strike. Nuke them before they nuke us. But, it really wouldn't have to go that far. Carpet bombing them would suffice and be doing them a favor too. After all, they are always starving and posture and threaten every year until we provide them with food supplies.

Your use of "buffoon" seems to be pretty consistent. Do you have no class, or are you just an ignorant and miserable loner with no one else to talk to? Never mind, the answer is there.

[Guest]

What do you suggest we do, start a nuclear war buffoon. Where is your documentation on each item? Maybe we can invade them, and you and your radicals can lead the charge.

Are you incapable of addressing another person without calling them names?
We know you are not based on the consistency of your disrespectfull responses.

We can also conclude you are only that nasty when hiding behind a keyboard with an anonymous name. Across the table? My money is on you are not so brazen face to face.

I would pay a fee to use this forum if we could have the block feature enabled so we can shut down such annoyances.

[Guest]

Are you incapable of addressing another person without calling them names?
We know you are not based on the consistency of your disrespectfull responses.

We can also conclude you are only that nasty when hiding behind a keyboard with an anonymous name. Across the table? My money is on you are not so brazen face to face.

I would pay a fee to use this forum if we could have the block feature enabled so we can shut down such annoyances.

Amen!

[Guest]

Iran sucks him in and violates the agreement at every turn. No problem.

N. Korea gets warning to not set of a rocket, then goes ahead to do it.

China, puts missles in the area that Obama is meeting with to not militarize the area.

Russia....does what they want anytime they want.

Syria crossed the red line how many times.

ISIS comes and goes, etc.

They must all laugh evrytime Obama starts to preach or lecture and they go right ahead and do what he preaches or lectures them about, KNOWING he will do NOTHING more than preach and lecture.

He has diminished the resolve of America to where even the most inept countries or organizations can kick sand in his/our face and he will come up with a reason why the did what they did is OK......especially if it is race or muslim related.

Even the hard core party die hards have to be offended by his linguine spined absence of leadership.

All he does is TALK< TALK< TALK.

And how did the last President deal with all of this?

He attacked a country that had not attacked us and destabilized the region! Then rode off into the sunset...............................abandoning the troops in the region.

And you say Obama is bad? LOL..........

[Guest]

And how did the last President deal with all of this?

He attacked a country that had not attacked us and destabilized the region! Then rode off into the sunset...............................abandoning the troops in the region.

And you say Obama is bad? LOL..........

Get over it. Blame it on Bush again. Bush had every right and obligation to invade Iraq. So, take your pansy @ss to some other liberal forum. This is not about Bush or Iraq. This is about the world's perception of our coward in chief. Talking points are for chumps, so drop the talking points and express your own thoughts, instead of someone else's.

[Guest]

Get over it. Blame it on Bush again. Bush had every right and obligation to invade Iraq. So, take your pansy @ss to some other liberal forum. This is not about Bush or Iraq. This is about the world's perception of our coward in chief. Talking points are for chumps, so drop the talking points and express your own thoughts, instead of someone else's.

Yep that is the party line.......but he did what he did.

How did he handle North Korea?

And no he did not have an obligation to invade Iraq he and his administration lied about the intel or did you forget about that?

Your nastiness is an indication of your intelligence!!!!

[Guest]

And how did the last President deal with all of this?

He attacked a country that had not attacked us and destabilized the region! Then rode off into the sunset...............................abandoning the troops in the region.

And you say Obama is bad? LOL..........

And what is it that you think of the dated, partisan gibberish above has to do with Obamas ongoung failures?

Nothing. He did it all by himself...consistently....throughout his term.

Thank GOD he is a short timer!

[Guest]

Yep that is the party line.......but he did what he did.

How did he handle North Korea?

And no he did not have an obligation to invade Iraq he and his administration lied about the intel or did you forget about that?

Your nastiness is an indication of your intelligence!!!!

You are very funny. You know nothing of military intelligence. How did he handle Korea? Since I have first hand knowledge of intelligence on Korea, I will tell you that he kept the world safe. Don't you even remember anything about history, even as late as the last administration? Look it up, because I have to be careful what I say on that subject.

However, he was NOT lied to regarding Iraq. Sadaam violated the No Fly Zone and we had every right to attack. Your Clinton, Kerry and many other libtard senators voted FOR the invasion. And if you don't think that there was WMD's then you are a fool. Hundreds of thousands of dead bodies in mass graves prove that, and I was in Iraq when they discovered them. So, just remember that when you listen to pundits make false statements, when they know better, it might have something to do with intelligence source material that they are required to protect. Unlike what Hillary does, of course.

But, this is not about Bush, even though you libtards insist on that being the only defense for this administration, or any argument that you can't win. Just blame Bush.

N. Korea has no respect for Obama, Iran is laughing at him, and ISIS hides with civilians because they know that Obie won't bomb them. It won't be like that next year. Like Iran with the hostages when Reagan was elected, ISIS will be retreating when the next president is elected from the GOP.

[Guest]

We have a choice. It is called a preemptive strike. Nuke them before they nuke us. But, it really wouldn't have to go that far. Carpet bombing them would suffice and be doing them a favor too. After all, they are always starving and posture and threaten every year until we provide them with food supplies.

Your use of "buffoon" seems to be pretty consistent. Do you have no class, or are you just an ignorant and miserable loner with no one else to talk to? Never mind, the answer is there.

"Carpet bombing" what a great strategy, very unique, from the mouth of a buffoon.

[Guest]

We have a choice. It is called a preemptive strike. Nuke them before they nuke us. But, it really wouldn't have to go that far. Carpet bombing them would suffice and be doing them a favor too. After all, they are always starving and posture and threaten every year until we provide them with food supplies.

Your use of "buffoon" seems to be pretty consistent. Do you have no class, or are you just an ignorant and miserable loner with no one else to talk to? Never mind, the answer is there.

You do know that carpet bombing is a war crime!

http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/17414/carpet-bombing-isis-the-u-s-air-force-won-t-do-war-crimes

Tells us how intelligent your Presidential candidates are......

[Guest]

You do know that carpet bombing is a war crime!

http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/17414/carpet-bombing-isis-the-u-s-air-force-won-t-do-war-crimes

Tells us how intelligent your Presidential candidates are......

Better link

Crimes of War – Carpet or Area Bombing (http://www.crimesofwar.org/a-z-guide/carpet-or-area-bombing/)

[Guest]

"Carpet bombing" what a great strategy, very unique, from the mouth of a buffoon.

Only an idiot would use the same term for name calling of any poster he doesn't agree with. Get a life and grow up.

[Guest]

First off, ISIS does not recognize the Geneva Convention.

Second, carpet bombing is only illegal when there is the "indiscriminate" bombing of areas which have no specific military target, or the indiscriminate bombing of innocent civilians.

We have used carpet bombing in every war until 1977, but the only "indiscriminate" use of bombing was during WWII in Japan when we used atomic bombs.

In every war there will be collateral damage. The Britts lost to us because they wanted to fight an honorable war against us, and we used guerrilla warfare against them. In Vietnam we had firing sectors where we were allowed to shoot in one direction but not in another direction. Then we had areas where we could only fire if fired upon. And some areas where we could not even fire back when fired upon. You can't fight a war like that. Vietnam was lost because of politicians running the war, not the generals. Pacifists believe that you can win wars with words. ISIS does not respect anything but power. They do not respect words and will laugh at what they perceive as weakness when we bore them with words. They are fanatics and would just as soon cut the heads off anyone that doesn't believe as they do. Similar to liberals, only liberals believe in talking one to death if you don't believe as they do.

The reason we will continue to lose wars is because our military are constantly scrutinized by the media and controlled by politicians. Take the media out of the war zone, allow the military to do their job and we will win with less casualties. American citizens do not need to know how the sausage is made.

[Guest]

Get over it. Blame it on Bush again. Bush had every right and obligation to invade Iraq. So, take your pansy @ss to some other liberal forum. This is not about Bush or Iraq. This is about the world's perception of our coward in chief. Talking points are for chumps, so drop the talking points and express your own thoughts, instead of someone else's.

"Bush had every right and obligation to invade Iraq." I think you better read the constitution before making a statement like that.

[Guest]

"Bush had every right and obligation to invade Iraq." I think you better read the constitution before making a statement like that.

The main reason I think many of the Obama loyalists here always bash Bush is because Bush is a man of action, purpose and devotion to America.

And it is very disturbing to them who only have a limp wristed, linguine spined, permissive, take no action, cowardly collaborator to follow, who only has one agenda....that which is good for Obama.

[Guest]

And what is it that you think of the dated, partisan gibberish above has to do with Obamas ongoung failures?

Nothing. He did it all by himself...consistently....throughout his term.

Thank GOD he is a short timer!

You defund Bush....so whats the difference.

How did Bush handle North Korea?

[Guest]

You defund Bush....so whats the difference.

How did Bush handle North Korea?

Gave up trying to pretend a time machine works and just looking back and telling stories with no proof is nothing more than a partisan diversion and waste of time.
There are times when one has to look forward and not just in the rear view mirror.

We all know the challenge of the here and now is difficult especially with a non starter, non event, nothing happening, racist POTUS Obama. It is somewhat understandable why some of you prefer to thrive on any era prior to him.

[Guest]

The main reason I think many of the Obama loyalists here always bash Bush is because Bush is a man of action, purpose and devotion to America.

And it is very disturbing to them who only have a limp wristed, linguine spined, permissive, take no action, cowardly collaborator to follow, who only has one agenda....that which is good for Obama.

OMG....you have to be kidding. Bush is a LIAR. Went to war by misleading the public. A CHICKEN HAWK! Somehow got into the reserves during Vietnam, didn't show up for work and somehow his records vanished.

He stood on a carrier basking in the limelight and declared:

Admiral Kelly, Captain Card, officers and sailors of the USS Abraham Lincoln, my fellow Americans, major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed.

He never even tried to get Bin Laden and after telling us the war would be short he left office without bringing the troops home.

He should be where he is at home in Texas doing paint by numbers!

[Guest]

"Bush had every right and obligation to invade Iraq." I think you better read the constitution before making a statement like that.

Why don't you heed your own words? Bush got the approval of congress. If Bush was wrong then so was Kerry, Hillary and a multitude of other liberals and conservatives. SO, get over it and move on.

[Guest]

"Carpet bombing" what a great strategy, very unique, from the mouth of a buffoon.

And from your mouth, a mouth of a coward.

[Guest]

OMG....you have to be kidding. Bush is a LIAR. Went to war by misleading the public. A CHICKEN HAWK! Somehow got into the reserves during Vietnam, didn't show up for work and somehow his records vanished.

He stood on a carrier basking in the limelight and declared:

Admiral Kelly, Captain Card, officers and sailors of the USS Abraham Lincoln, my fellow Americans, major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed.

He never even tried to get Bin Laden and after telling us the war would be short he left office without bringing the troops home.

He should be where he is at home in Texas doing paint by numbers!

Yeah we all know y'all would much more prefer a person like Obama and how he handles terrorst threats:

Exclusive: Obama Refuses to Hit ISIS (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/18/exclusive-obama-refuses-to-hit-isis-s-libyan-capital.html)

In the future we will most unfortunately look back on Obama as we seek originating causes for the future death to and of Americans. We will look back and see a record of protecting the enemy.

Bush loves America and did and will do what ever it takes to protect it's peoples.

Obama coddles and protects the enemy. So we will look back and say he did not hurt any enemy in the war against radical islam.....and will look forward and count the American bodies as a result.

Obama working very diligently to be labeled the traitor president.

[Guest]

Yeah we all know y'all would much more prefer a person like Obama and how he handles terrorst threats:

Exclusive: Obama Refuses to Hit ISIS (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/18/exclusive-obama-refuses-to-hit-isis-s-libyan-capital.html)

In the future we will most unfortunately look back on Obama as we seek originating causes for the future death to and of Americans. We will look back and see a record of protecting the enemy.

Bush loves America and did and will do what ever it takes to protect it's peoples.

Obama coddles and protects the enemy. So we will look back and say he did not hurt any enemy in the war against radical islam.....and will look forward and count the American bodies as a result.

Obama working very diligently to be labeled the traitor president.

:thumbup:....Wouldn't surprise me at all if they found out that he was ISIS.

[Guest]

Why don't you heed your own words? Bush got the approval of congress. If Bush was wrong then so was Kerry, Hillary and a multitude of other liberals and conservatives. SO, get over it and move on.

On intelligence withheld and manipulated, they made a fool of Secretary of State Colin Powell telling him lies. Remember the portable germ warfare trucks, manufacturing it as they drove around? lol

[Guest]

And from your mouth, a mouth of a coward.

Babble on. Your comment is very original.

[Guest]

On intelligence withheld and manipulated, they made a fool of Secretary of State Colin Powell telling him lies. Remember the portable germ warfare trucks, manufacturing it as they drove around? lol

That wasn't false intelligence. And Powell knew more about the intel than Bush, so if it was anyone's problem, it would have started there first. So, you are a fool.

[Guest]

Powell took responsibility for it and then Bush took it from him, because he was always man enough to take the blame on his watch. He was man enough not to blame someone else. Unlike the coward presently in the White House.

But, as much as our pet liberal wishes to blame Bush for Obama's failure, that dog don't hunt. Obama owns his own failed policies.

[Guest]

You are very funny. You know nothing of military intelligence. How did he handle Korea? Since I have first hand knowledge of intelligence on Korea, I will tell you that he kept the world safe. Don't you even remember anything about history, even as late as the last administration? Look it up, because I have to be careful what I say on that subject.

However, he was NOT lied to regarding Iraq. Sadaam violated the No Fly Zone and we had every right to attack. Your Clinton, Kerry and many other libtard senators voted FOR the invasion. And if you don't think that there was WMD's then you are a fool. Hundreds of thousands of dead bodies in mass graves prove that, and I was in Iraq when they discovered them. So, just remember that when you listen to pundits make false statements, when they know better, it might have something to do with intelligence source material that they are required to protect. Unlike what Hillary does, of course.

But, this is not about Bush, even though you libtards insist on that being the only defense for this administration, or any argument that you can't win. Just blame Bush.

N. Korea has no respect for Obama, Iran is laughing at him, and ISIS hides with civilians because they know that Obie won't bomb them. It won't be like that next year. Like Iran with the hostages when Reagan was elected, ISIS will be retreating when the next president is elected from the GOP.

"Since I have first hand knowledge of intelligence on Korea" Talk is cheap, you were probably playing with dolls when the Korean war was taking place.

[Guest]

On intelligence withheld and manipulated, they made a fool of Secretary of State Colin Powell telling him lies. Remember the portable germ warfare trucks, manufacturing it as they drove around? lol

More conspiracy theory. So, you are indicating that you feel that Powell is stupid. And, you are saying that his intelligence, that he passed on to the president was flawed and he was too stupid to know any better. And that it is all a conspiracy to get us into a war. Remember that he also passed it on to congress. I watched it on TV. So, the blame for the conspiracy has to be either Powell, or you are saying he was too stupid to know any better. If that is the case, then I can understand why he endorsed Obummer twice.

[Guest]

"Since I have first hand knowledge of intelligence on Korea" Talk is cheap, you were probably playing with dolls when the Korean war was taking place.

No, dolls are for you gays. I was not talking about that far back. Have you ever heard of JICPAC? It's headquarters is in Hawaii, but I was with a detachment of it called JDET in Japan. I am not current with the capabilities of N.Korea, but did know quite a bit about it, mostly classified in the '90's. This is not the forum for indepth details about Korea, but suffice it to say that N.Korea is a tyrant run poverty stricken country that goes through harsh winters and if not for other countries, including the U.S. would starve to death. Every year for decades, they threaten to invade the South until we pay them with ships of rice, and food stuffs. To keep their people from knowing where the supplies are coming from, the ship is commanded to lower it's flags of origin before entering port to unload. The only reason they still exist is solely on the whim and protection of China.

[Guest]

"Since I have first hand knowledge of intelligence on Korea" Talk is cheap, you were probably playing with dolls when the Korean war was taking place.

So, somehow you came up with "dolls" as your argument on the subject. Is that your thing, dolls? Are you playing with one right now. Perhaps one of Barbie, or would it be dressing GI Joe up in Barbie's clothes? It seems to be your fetish, not that poster's. Hey, different strokes, as they say. :boom: