When a white POTUS doesn't get his supreme court pick it is called partisan politics.

[Guest]

Now however Obama would have us believe because he is a black POTUS and he doesn't get his pick it is racism.

What else would anybody expect from Obama, Jackson, Sharpton or any other black racist!

CNN's King: If Obama Doesn't Get His SCOTUS Pick Through, He'll Call Republicans Racist - Breitbart (http://googleweblight.com/?lite_url=http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/02/17/cnns-king-if-obama-doesnt-get-his-scotus-pick-through-hell-call-republicans-racist/&s=1&f=1&ts=1455743008&sig=ALL1Aj7z2q8YrktJXcu9w9UtUCp_kNXW6Q)

As a politician he SHOULD know that white or black or any other color when the mix is against you it is politics......but he never disappoints....he is looking to get the black vote in line.....again.

And also as is the case when it is Obama, let there be no mistake it is all about him. He is looking for another check mark on his report card.....the one with all the failing grades as POTUS....an unfortunate turn of events for America's first black POTUS.

Will we ever hear the end of it.

He must also be concerned if he doesn't get his nominee accepted that there might be a republican POTUS following him and another failure!!!

[Guest]

Now however Obama would have us believe because he is a black POTUS and he doesn't get his pick it is racism.

What else would anybody expect from Obama, Jackson, Sharpton or any other black racist!

CNN's King: If Obama Doesn't Get His SCOTUS Pick Through, He'll Call Republicans Racist - Breitbart (http://googleweblight.com/?lite_url=http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/02/17/cnns-king-if-obama-doesnt-get-his-scotus-pick-through-hell-call-republicans-racist/&s=1&f=1&ts=1455743008&sig=ALL1Aj7z2q8YrktJXcu9w9UtUCp_kNXW6Q)

As a politician he SHOULD know that white or black or any other color when the mix is against you it is politics......but he never disappoints....he is looking to get the black vote in line.....again.

And also as is the case when it is Obama, let there be no mistake it is all about him. He is looking for another check mark on his report card.....the one with all the failing grades as POTUS....an unfortunate turn of events for America's first black POTUS.

Will we ever hear the end of it.

He must also be concerned if he doesn't get his nominee accepted that there might be a republican POTUS following him and another failure!!!

I'm confused, did Obama say that if he didn't get his pick that would be racism? I would like to see that link if you don't mind. Cause after that you say HE which indicates Obama said that.

What I have heard is that there has been a similar pick made by Reagan.

So far you reference CNN which my very republican cousin calls the Communist News Network....Repubs hate that channel.

[Guest]

I'm confused, did Obama say that if he didn't get his pick that would be racism? I would like to see that link if you don't mind. Cause after that you say HE which indicates Obama said that.

What I have heard is that there has been a similar pick made by Reagan.

So far you reference CNN which my very republican cousin calls the Communist News Network....Repubs hate that channel.

You are wrong. Reagan NEVER nominated a Supreme Court Judge in an election year. It was the year before. The judge was finally confirmed in the election year, at the beginning of the year.

Do you speak for ALL Republicans when you state that we hate CNN? I watched CNN all the time when I was overseas. As a matter of fact, I found out what was going on when we were being attacked in Baghdad faster than word of mouth, by having CNN on my computer and watched it live. CNN was on all the time, but FOX news was limited to a few hours a day. We didn't have 24/7 FOX cable network over there. So, you are wrong about how we think of CNN. Of course, it is a liberal network though. But, I also watch ABC, NBC and CBS every day. It's always nice to know what the enemy thinks of us. Speaking of liberals, of course. After all, I did hear Obummer call Republicans the enemy. I believe Hillary has said the same thing. But, I have thick skin and more brains then a libtard so it's no big deal.

[Guest]

If I was the President and the other party said their mission was to do everything possible to block all the legislation I wanted, I would consider them the enemy also.

[Guest]

You are wrong. Reagan NEVER nominated a Supreme Court Judge in an election year. It was the year before. The judge was finally confirmed in the election year, at the beginning of the year.

Do you speak for ALL Republicans when you state that we hate CNN? I watched CNN all the time when I was overseas. As a matter of fact, I found out what was going on when we were being attacked in Baghdad faster than word of mouth, by having CNN on my computer and watched it live. CNN was on all the time, but FOX news was limited to a few hours a day. We didn't have 24/7 FOX cable network over there. So, you are wrong about how we think of CNN. Of course, it is a liberal network though. But, I also watch ABC, NBC and CBS every day. It's always nice to know what the enemy thinks of us. Speaking of liberals, of course. After all, I did hear Obummer call Republicans the enemy. I believe Hillary has said the same thing. But, I have thick skin and more brains then a libtard so it's no big deal.

Ok Kennedy was nominated in Nov of 87 after the Bork nomination failed. But he was confirmed in an election year.

I don't watch CNN myself and all the Republicans I know hate that channel. Thank you for your service .... but calling people names indicates your intelligence. I am not a liberal! Nor a socialist!

[Guest]

Ok Kennedy was nominated in Nov of 87 after the Bork nomination failed. But he was confirmed in an election year.

I don't watch CNN myself and all the Republicans I know hate that channel. Thank you for your service .... but calling people names indicates your intelligence. I am not a liberal! Nor a socialist!

Where did you get in that post that someone called you a name?

Kennedy was nominated in 1987 and then confirmed in FEB '88. The point is that one person says something and then everyone wants to pass it around and modify it to suit their argument. Kennedy was NOT nominated in an election year. So, the original comment by Rubio may/MAY be correct in saying there hasn't been one nominated in an election year for about 80 years.

Trying to pervert what one says "indicates YOUR intelligence." Just giving you an example.

[Guest]

Where did you get in that post that someone called you a name?

Kennedy was nominated in 1987 and then confirmed in FEB '88. The point is that one person says something and then everyone wants to pass it around and modify it to suit their argument. Kennedy was NOT nominated in an election year. So, the original comment by Rubio may/MAY be correct in saying there hasn't been one nominated in an election year for about 80 years.

Trying to pervert what one says "indicates YOUR intelligence." Just giving you an example.

LIBTARD.....

In an earlier post I said:

What I have heard is that there has been a similar pick made by Reagan.

Then I looked it up and in the post you are quoting I said:

Ok Kennedy was nominated in Nov of 87 after the Bork nomination failed. But he was confirmed in an election year.


Your claim that I PERVERTED something is clearly uninformed perhaps you should take a little care before you hurl!!!!

[Guest]

LIBTARD.....

In an earlier post I said:

What I have heard is that there has been a similar pick made by Reagan.

Then I looked it up and in the post you are quoting I said:

Ok Kennedy was nominated in Nov of 87 after the Bork nomination failed. But he was confirmed in an election year.


Your claim that I PERVERTED something is clearly uninformed perhaps you should take a little care before you hurl!!!!

Clearly, you have reading comprehension problem. I never called you a libtard, but if the shoe fits, by all means try it on Cinderella.

[Guest]

During Wednesday’s White House press briefing, spokesman Josh Earnest dropped a bit of a bomb, saying President Obama had regrets about his 2006 support for a filibuster to block the nomination of Justice Samuel Alito, a George W. Bush appointee:

“He regrets the vote that he made, because, frankly, as we’ve discussed, Democrats should have been in a position where they were making a public case …. They shouldn’t have looked for a way to just throw sand in the gears of the process. And frankly, looking back on it, the president believes he should have just followed his own advice.”

[Guest]

Clearly, you have reading comprehension problem. I never called you a libtard, but if the shoe fits, by all means try it on Cinderella.

You may not have but the poster I responded to did! Its a insult that was misplaced.

[Guest]

I'm confused, did Obama say that if he didn't get his pick that would be racism? I would like to see that link if you don't mind. Cause after that you say HE which indicates Obama said that.

What I have heard is that there has been a similar pick made by Reagan.

So far you reference CNN which my very republican cousin calls the Communist News Network....Repubs hate that channel.


Your cousin is wrong. CNN is the "Careless News Network". All you have to do is read King's article, and how could you not think that the report is nonsense unless King can read minds? Breitbart repeats it must be so, because King wouldn't lie. That is a line right out of Slap Shot.

Talking about splitting hairs about the Kennedy nomination, November, 1987 that is not even close to an election year. When did the people running for president this year start campaigning? January of this year, sure why not?

The Republicans are playing with fire with the Supreme Court nominee. Obama puts forward a Republican or Democrat moderate, how do you turn the person down, because who nominated him/her? You are going to sit there, and say it wasn't due to politics. Sure, why not?

Here is where the fire could start. Democrats regain control of the Senate. The Senate come in January 2nd. The new President comes on Jan 20th. Between Jan 2nd to 19th, Obama could nominate a far left justice. The Democrat Senate then uses the nuclear option to override the Republican filibuster. The Republicans could then choke on the new Supreme Court Justice, and they would have no one to blame, but themselves.

Republicans don't hate CNN. The majority of them only watch Fox News. They don't even know that CNN exists.

[Guest]

Your cousin is wrong. CNN is the "Careless News Network". All you have to do is read King's article, and how could you not think that the report is nonsense unless King can read minds? Breitbart repeats it must be so, because King wouldn't lie. That is a line right out of Slap Shot.

Talking about splitting hairs about the Kennedy nomination, November, 1987 that is not even close to an election year. When did the people running for president this year start campaigning? January of this year, sure why not?

The Republicans are playing with fire with the Supreme Court nominee. Obama puts forward a Republican or Democrat moderate, how do you turn the person down, because who nominated him/her? You are going to sit there, and say it wasn't due to politics. Sure, why not?

Here is where the fire could start. Democrats regain control of the Senate. The Senate come in January 2nd. The new President comes on Jan 20th. Between Jan 2nd to 19th, Obama could nominate a far left justice. The Democrat Senate then uses the nuclear option to override the Republican filibuster. The Republicans could then choke on the new Supreme Court Justice, and they would have no one to blame, but themselves.

Republicans don't hate CNN. The majority of them only watch Fox News. They don't even know that CNN exists.

Why bother with the small number also ran network, CNN, when you can run with the big dogs?

[Guest]

If I was the President and the other party said their mission was to do everything possible to block all the legislation I wanted, I would consider them the enemy also.

Maybe he was stupid enough (like you) to take the comment out of context. But, everyone knows how liberals are allowed special leeway when it comes to taking statements out of context. Instead of reading (what???) the totality of a statement, they take one line and run with it. Why? Because someone told them to think like that. Liberals are our greatest example of sheeple.

[Guest]

Your cousin is wrong. CNN is the "Careless News Network". All you have to do is read King's article, and how could you not think that the report is nonsense unless King can read minds? Breitbart repeats it must be so, because King wouldn't lie. That is a line right out of Slap Shot.

Talking about splitting hairs about the Kennedy nomination, November, 1987 that is not even close to an election year. When did the people running for president this year start campaigning? January of this year, sure why not?

The Republicans are playing with fire with the Supreme Court nominee. Obama puts forward a Republican or Democrat moderate, how do you turn the person down, because who nominated him/her? You are going to sit there, and say it wasn't due to politics. Sure, why not?

Here is where the fire could start. Democrats regain control of the Senate. The Senate come in January 2nd. The new President comes on Jan 20th. Between Jan 2nd to 19th, Obama could nominate a far left justice. The Democrat Senate then uses the nuclear option to override the Republican filibuster. The Republicans could then choke on the new Supreme Court Justice, and they would have no one to blame, but themselves.

Republicans don't hate CNN. The majority of them only watch Fox News. They don't even know that CNN exists.

You've got it exactly right. Being a liberal, I am praying Democrats regain control of the Senate, however I think their chances are probably 50-50 at best, and maybe that's what Republicans are counting on. They think it is a risk worth taking. Time will tell.