View Full Version : Is this a precursor to Trumps choice for VP?
Guest
03-02-2016, 07:41 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlD4hwzGhdY&feature=youtu.be
That would be an interesting ticket.
Guest
03-03-2016, 09:42 AM
since Romney is scheduled to come out today and call Trump a con man and a fraud and a phoney, i don't see that happening. i think this was when Romney was running and Trump endorsed him....this is the thanks he gets!
Guest
03-03-2016, 09:45 AM
Mitt Romney to Eviscerate Donald Trump as '''Phony''' and '''Fraud''' - NBC News (http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/mitt-romney-eviscerate-donald-trump-phony-fraud-n530877)
Speech has not happened yet.
Guest
03-03-2016, 09:50 AM
Isn't there a saying that goes something like _ _ _ _ _ and politics make strange bedfellows.
Maybe an obsolete statement as in this day and age of permissiveness there are no starnge bedfellows anymore.
Guest
03-03-2016, 09:59 AM
Who can argue with Trump's take on Romney's upcoming speech.
“Looks like two-time failed candidate Mitt Romney is going to be telling Republicans how to get elected. Not a good messenger!”
Guest
03-03-2016, 10:25 AM
Mitt Romney to Eviscerate Donald Trump as '''Phony''' and '''Fraud''' - NBC News (http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/mitt-romney-eviscerate-donald-trump-phony-fraud-n530877)
Speech has not happened yet.
No need to watch.......
"In 1964, days before the presidential election, Ronald Reagan went on national television and challenged America that it was a "Time for Choosing." He saw two paths for America, one that embraced conservative principles dedicated to lifting people out of poverty and helping create opportunity for all, and the other, an oppressive government that would lead America down a darker, less free path. I'm no Ronald Reagan and this is a different moment but I believe with my heart and soul that we face another time for choosing, one that will have profound consequences for the Republican Party and more importantly, for the country. …
At home, poverty persists and wages are stagnant. The horrific massacres of Paris and San Bernardino, the aggressions of Putin, the growing assertiveness of China and the nuclear tests of North Korea confirm that we live in troubled and dangerous times. …
But if we make the right choices, America's future will be even better than our past and better than our present. …
Of the remaining candidates, the only serious policy proposals that deal with the broad range of national challenges we confront have come from Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and John Kasich. …
Donald Trump says he admires Vladimir Putin, while has called George W Bush a liar. That is a twisted example of evil trumping good. …
The president of the United States has long been the leader of the free world. The president and yes the nominees of the country's great parties help define America to billions of people. All of them bear the responsibility of being an example for our children and grandchildren. …
Trump relishes any poll that reflects what he thinks of himself. But polls are also saying that he will lose to Hillary Clinton. …
On Hillary Clinton's watch at the State Department, America's interests were diminished in every corner of the world. She compromised our national secrets, dissembled to the families of the slain, and jettisoned her most profound beliefs to gain presidential power. …
A person so untrustworthy and dishonest as Hillary Clinton must not become president. But a Trump nomination enables her victory. …
I understand the anger Americans feel today. In the past, our presidents have channeled that anger, and forged it into resolve, into endurance and high purpose and into the will to defeat the enemies of freedom. Our anger was transformed into energy directed for good. …
Here's what I know. Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud. His promises are as worthless as a degree from Trump University. He's playing the American public for suckers: He gets a free ride to the White House and all we get is a lousy hat. …
His domestic policies would lead to recession. His foreign policies would make America and the world less safe. He has neither the temperament nor the judgment to be president. And his personal qualities would mean that America would cease to be a shining city on a hill."
Guest
03-03-2016, 10:27 AM
Who can argue with Trump's take on Romney's upcoming speech.
“Looks like two-time failed candidate Mitt Romney is going to be telling Republicans how to get elected. Not a good messenger!”
And the 2008 failure Clinton is a better messenger?
Much more liability than back then. Just as big a liar with the added accomplishments of American blood on her hands and felon.
Great messenger!!
Guest
03-03-2016, 10:29 AM
No need to watch.......
"In 1964, days before the presidential election, Ronald Reagan went on national television and challenged America that it was a "Time for Choosing." He saw two paths for America, one that embraced conservative principles dedicated to lifting people out of poverty and helping create opportunity for all, and the other, an oppressive government that would lead America down a darker, less free path. I'm no Ronald Reagan and this is a different moment but I believe with my heart and soul that we face another time for choosing, one that will have profound consequences for the Republican Party and more importantly, for the country. …
At home, poverty persists and wages are stagnant. The horrific massacres of Paris and San Bernardino, the aggressions of Putin, the growing assertiveness of China and the nuclear tests of North Korea confirm that we live in troubled and dangerous times. …
But if we make the right choices, America's future will be even better than our past and better than our present. …
Of the remaining candidates, the only serious policy proposals that deal with the broad range of national challenges we confront have come from Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and John Kasich. …
Donald Trump says he admires Vladimir Putin, while has called George W Bush a liar. That is a twisted example of evil trumping good. …
The president of the United States has long been the leader of the free world. The president and yes the nominees of the country's great parties help define America to billions of people. All of them bear the responsibility of being an example for our children and grandchildren. …
Trump relishes any poll that reflects what he thinks of himself. But polls are also saying that he will lose to Hillary Clinton. …
On Hillary Clinton's watch at the State Department, America's interests were diminished in every corner of the world. She compromised our national secrets, dissembled to the families of the slain, and jettisoned her most profound beliefs to gain presidential power. …
A person so untrustworthy and dishonest as Hillary Clinton must not become president. But a Trump nomination enables her victory. …
I understand the anger Americans feel today. In the past, our presidents have channeled that anger, and forged it into resolve, into endurance and high purpose and into the will to defeat the enemies of freedom. Our anger was transformed into energy directed for good. …
Here's what I know. Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud. His promises are as worthless as a degree from Trump University. He's playing the American public for suckers: He gets a free ride to the White House and all we get is a lousy hat. …
His domestic policies would lead to recession. His foreign policies would make America and the world less safe. He has neither the temperament nor the judgment to be president. And his personal qualities would mean that America would cease to be a shining city on a hill."
I'll be darned if Chi didn't finally participate instead of sniping with one liners. Way to go, Chi....:thumbup: Even if you are a liberal
Guest
03-03-2016, 10:31 AM
So, if Hillary is taken out by the Feds and Trump is taken out by EVERYONE, then who do we have left to go to the general? Sanders is a reject and not a serious contender, so I guess Bloomie will step in. On the GOP side, which will it be, Cruz or Rubio? So, hypothetically, it will either be Bloomie and Rubio, or Bloomie and Cruz. A whole new game. Still better than what we have now.
Guest
03-03-2016, 10:32 AM
Point out Secretary Clinton's lies. Much of it just sounds like the Republican machine that has hounded the Clintons. Show some evidence that would hold up under investigation.
Guest
03-03-2016, 10:41 AM
Point out Secretary Clinton's lies. Much of it just sounds like the Republican machine that has hounded the Clintons. Show some evidence that would hold up under investigation.
Easiest lie to prove is "there was no classified information on my server." Proven false. Even an ignorant of current events liberal should know this by now.
Does that answer your question? Are you going to go hide now that you made your little baseless comment?
Guest
03-03-2016, 12:54 PM
So, if Hillary is taken out by the Feds and Trump is taken out by EVERYONE, then who do we have left to go to the general? Sanders is a reject and not a serious contender, so I guess Bloomie will step in. On the GOP side, which will it be, Cruz or Rubio? So, hypothetically, it will either be Bloomie and Rubio, or Bloomie and Cruz. A whole new game. Still better than what we have now.
I would not rule out Romney. He isn't coming out of the shadows for no reason at all at this stage of the race.
And the dems always have Joe that they could easily press in at the convention.
No different than 2008....do not think the answer is obvious any time before the month of June. Ask Clinton? She probably does not recall the unkown black that ran over and past her......a controversial black unkown with a past that begged many questions......blew right past her.....a definite precursor to June 2016. She just cannot keep going forward as though she is clean and pure (oh my GOD did I use those adjectives in a sentence with the name Clinton).
Guest
03-03-2016, 01:30 PM
Easiest lie to prove is "there was no classified information on my server." Proven false. Even an ignorant of current events liberal should know this by now.
Does that answer your question? Are you going to go hide now that you made your little baseless comment?
No, your Fox News verbatim reports proves nothing.
Show us what she did was illegal - not what you or Fox News thinks is illegal,
Now, Trump standing trial on fraud charges - that's a whole different story
Guest
03-03-2016, 02:15 PM
No, your Fox News verbatim reports proves nothing.
Show us what she did was illegal - not what you or Fox News thinks is illegal,
Now, Trump standing trial on fraud charges - that's a whole different story
Are you really that slow? IT's proven. She lied. And that is all you asked. Now, you are going to say that it's FOX's fault? Are you stupid or just retarded?
Who cares about Trump? The discussion was about Hillary and her lies. Now, like a typical troll that's been called out, you divert. You are a failure to your profession.....a wannabe troll.
I could care less about Trump. I do not plan to vote for him UNLESS he gets the nomination and the only other choice is Hillary or Sanders. So, your throwing that out to divert is just as lame as you.
Guest
03-03-2016, 02:29 PM
Are you really that slow? IT's proven. She lied. And that is all you asked. Now, you are going to say that it's FOX's fault? Are you stupid or just retarded?
Who cares about Trump? The discussion was about Hillary and her lies. Now, like a typical troll that's been called out, you divert. You are a failure to your profession.....a wannabe troll.
I could care less about Trump. I do not plan to vote for him UNLESS he gets the nomination and the only other choice is Hillary or Sanders. So, your throwing that out to divert is just as lame as you.
Actually the thread is about Trump and a running mate. How did Hillary get into it?
Slow, lame, failure, stupid, retarded. That's hardly how to influence people much less win friends. Think Dale Carnegie
Guest
03-03-2016, 03:31 PM
Actually the thread is about Trump and a running mate. How did Hillary get into it?
Slow, lame, failure, stupid, retarded. That's hardly how to influence people much less win friends. Think Dale Carnegie
Excellent point. The reply was to a statement made by the poster regarding Hillary.
The adjectives used were applied in an affectionate manner, not mean to hurt....:angel:
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.