Bloomberg says NO!

[Guest]

Even though Michael Blomberg would make an excellent President, I applaud him for deciding not to join in as a Democratic candidate.

His reasoning was that votes among Democrats would be split and it would give a chance to either Cruz or Trump to win the general election and that would be disasterious for America.

I applaud Michael Bloomberg for putting being an American before his own political ambitions. :bigbow:

[Guest]

Inevitable outcome in November - Hillary wins! The USA wins! :MOJE_whot:

[Guest]

He's got about as good chance as sanders or bush! What would be his first order! Get rid of the big gulp!:1rotfl::1rotfl::clap2::popcorn:

[Guest]

Bloomie figured it was way too much work involved, and he would have to spend too much of his money. He also knows that he wouldn't get a single vote down South, because they don't like yankees telling them what they can or can not eat or drink. They'd probably tar and feather his @ss and send him packing.

[Guest]

Good decision?
Loser makes decision to not enter a race he cannot win!!!

[Guest]

Good decision?
Loser makes decision to not enter a race he cannot win!!!

How about the Republican losers that DID enter without a chance? There is Hucklebucky, Sanitorium, Farina, Walker, Benny Carson, and others who just wanted to grab some PAC money.

Bloomberg would have been an excellent President but his first thought was not to give a chance to Trump or Cruz.

[Guest]

How about the Republican losers that DID enter without a chance? There is Hucklebucky, Sanitorium, Farina, Walker, Benny Carson, and others who just wanted to grab some PAC money.

Bloomberg would have been an excellent President but his first thought was not to give a chance to Trump or Cruz.

Does the comment above mean he knew that if he ran more people would then vote for the opposition, so he decided to not cause that?

It blinks in big letters he knows/knew he did not stand a chance

We are talking about Bloomberg. What anybody else did or not has nothing to do with the current discussion.

[Guest]

It is so hilarious how petrified that Republicans are of Hillary beating Cruz or Trump that they were first playing up O'Malley as a great candidate. When that failed to materialize, they started talking up Sanders. Well, chances are great that Hillary will beat him to the nomination but Sanders is an excellent person. The Republicans began talking up Blomberg saying that te Democrat Party does not wany Hillary to run. Now, Bloomberg says he is not going to run and possibly splinter the party, the Republicans are saying he is a loser and had no chance of winning.

It is the Republicans who are the splintered apart party. They are basically a pulsating sphincter muscle just making unpleasant sounds that no one appreciates.

[Guest]

It is so hilarious how petrified that Republicans are of Hillary beating Cruz or Trump that they were first playing up O'Malley as a great candidate. When that failed to materialize, they started talking up Sanders. Well, chances are great that Hillary will beat him to the nomination but Sanders is an excellent person. The Republicans began talking up Blomberg saying that te Democrat Party does not wany Hillary to run. Now, Bloomberg says he is not going to run and possibly splinter the party, the Republicans are saying he is a loser and had no chance of winning.

It is the Republicans who are the splintered apart party. They are basically a pulsating sphincter muscle just making unpleasant sounds that no one appreciates.

Amazing. We parrot back what Bloomberg said...he cannot win....doesn't want to facilitate a Trump win. Sounds like knowing when not to get in the ring and LOSE! When he says it it is smart party action.
When we say it back (same thing) we are doing something wrong.

Very typical dodge and weave BS.
Your last sentence can only be construed to be a statement of authenticity....takes one to spell it out as crudely and stupidly done.

It is obviously just impossible for you to rise above the BS and let your points made stand to be counted. The name calling adds no value and continues to discredit any worth your comments may have.