Who chooses we the people or the super delegates?

[Guest]

On the subject of super delegates...have the potential to swing the nomination ignoring the democratic popular voters choice completely.

I am surprised the super delegate concept has not come under fire yet.

The following article pretty much states that whatever the people vote turns out some (?) of the super delegates will still back Clinton.

Who chooses, we the people or the super delegates?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/new-york-superdelegates-largely-back-clinton-sanders-article-1.2581729

[Guest]

Of course they will chose Clinton. It's either Clinton the criminal, liar and thief or Sanders, the commie. The old corps Democrat elite are not going to to socialism quietly, even if they are so far left that they make liberal look conservative. Sanders won't sell out to the establishment, but Hillary will/has. She'll do anything for the ego trip. Sander's only reason for being in the campaign is because the democrat party needed a faux competitor for Hillary. They never figured he would garner this many voting age kids that would vote for him. And they didn't figure on how many Dems hate Hillary and would vote Republican before voting for that scumbag.

[Guest]

On the subject of super delegates...have the potential to swing the nomination ignoring the democratic popular voters choice completely.

I am surprised the super delegate concept has not come under fire yet.

The following article pretty much states that whatever the people vote turns out some (?) of the super delegates will still back Clinton.

Who chooses, we the people or the super delegates?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/new-york-superdelegates-largely-back-clinton-sanders-article-1.2581729

We the People is a catch phrase for the right wing.... I don't think they care.

[Guest]

Of course they will chose Clinton. It's either Clinton the criminal, liar and thief or Sanders, the commie. The old corps Democrat elite are not going to to socialism quietly, even if they are so far left that they make liberal look conservative. Sanders won't sell out to the establishment, but Hillary will/has. She'll do anything for the ego trip. Sander's only reason for being in the campaign is because the democrat party needed a faux competitor for Hillary. They never figured he would garner this many voting age kids that would vote for him. And they didn't figure on how many Dems hate Hillary and would vote Republican before voting for that scumbag.

And just when are you all going to realize that you have a scumbag as your standard bearer?

Did you hear the latest attack on women cause I did!!!!

[Guest]

And just when are you all going to realize that you have a scumbag as your standard bearer?

Did you hear the latest attack on women cause I did!!!!

Sure you did. I have heard you say this on several posts, but no direct quotes. Just more trolling.

[Guest]

Super Delegates. Proof that there is no Democratic in the Democrat party. Might as well drop the Democratic part and just come out of the closet as the true Socialists they are. Or, are they afraid they will lose their voter base?

[Guest]

Sure you did. I have heard you say this on several posts, but no direct quotes. Just more trolling.

This just in:

Donald Trump struggles to clarify abortion remarks - CNNPolitics.com (http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/30/politics/donald-trump-abortion-town-hall/index.html)

When you don't know whats going on your only response is

TROLL.......

Please, I know its hard, but try and keep up!

[Guest]

On the subject of super delegates...have the potential to swing the nomination ignoring the democratic popular voters choice completely.

I am surprised the super delegate concept has not come under fire yet.

The following article pretty much states that whatever the people vote turns out some (?) of the super delegates will still back Clinton.

Who chooses, we the people or the super delegates?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/new-york-superdelegates-largely-back-clinton-sanders-article-1.2581729

Super Delegates. Proof that there is no Democratic in the Democrat party. Might as well drop the Democratic part and just come out of the closet as the true Socialists they are. Or, are they afraid they will lose their voter base?

"super delegates" determine who wins the race for president anyway. The Electoral College vote is the ONLY vote that counts. The president is NOT chosen in Nov, they are chosen in Jan. You think the founders were stupid enough to let the ignorant rabble determine ANYTHING of importance? This primary fiasco is just getting people used to the idea that voting doesn't change anything, if it did, they wouldn't let us do it. The R party is rigging their election against Trump, the D party is rigging the election for Hillary. Both parties are completely corrupt and you should vote for anyone but a D or R.

[Guest]

"super delegates" determine who wins the race for president anyway. The Electoral College vote is the ONLY vote that counts. The president is NOT chosen in Nov, they are chosen in Jan. You think the founders were stupid enough to let the ignorant rabble determine ANYTHING of importance? This primary fiasco is just getting people used to the idea that voting doesn't change anything, if it did, they wouldn't let us do it. The R party is rigging their election against Trump, the D party is rigging the election for Hillary. Both parties are completely corrupt and you should vote for anyone but a D or R.
Explain how the Electoral College works or point us to a reliable source, This always confused me.

[Guest]

This just in:

Donald Trump struggles to clarify abortion remarks - CNNPolitics.com (http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/30/politics/donald-trump-abortion-town-hall/index.html)

When you don't know whats going on your only response is

TROLL.......

Please, I know its hard, but try and keep up!

That was his opinion on abortion. That was not an attack on women. You are wrong again. You make blatant statements, attempting to demonize someone that you don't agree with. At least be honest.

[Guest]

This just in:

Donald Trump struggles to clarify abortion remarks - CNNPolitics.com (http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/30/politics/donald-trump-abortion-town-hall/index.html)

When you don't know whats going on your only response is

TROLL.......

Please, I know its hard, but try and keep up!

All the GOP candidates have stated their opposition to abortion. The religious and Christian citizens are also against abortion. That's not a war on women, as you libtards like to indicate. The liberal media attempts to control the conversation by bringing up a dead issue to provoke. Liberals have their war on babies, a real war that murders babies and they want to twist it to reflect a war on women's rights. You liberals are just warped. Remember, you brought it up again, not me. The law is already protecting abortion, so why do you insist on bringing it back up again, if not to provoke?

[Guest]

That was his opinion on abortion. That was not an attack on women. You are wrong again. You make blatant statements, attempting to demonize someone that you don't agree with. At least be honest.
Just another opinion.
Trump does not do well thinking on his feet. He said he is pro choice. That both the woman and the doctor should be punished for an illegal abortion.
Then he released a statement that only the doctor should be punished and his position has not changed.

In the interview he wants to punish the woman. Is punishing woman that are criminals an attack on women?

In the statement he said to not punish woman.

He changed his mind and said he did not change his mind. He can't have it both ways. He will say whatever you him to say to win your vote and hope you don't read everything.

[Guest]

Just another opinion.
Trump does not do well thinking on his feet. He said he is pro choice. That both the woman and the doctor should be punished for an illegal abortion.
Then he released a statement that only the doctor should be punished and his position has not changed.

In the interview he wants to punish the woman. Is punishing woman that are criminals an attack on women?

In the statement he said to not punish woman.

He changed his mind and said he did not change his mind. He can't have it both ways. He will say whatever you him to say to win your vote and hope you don't read everything.

Oh no! He is turning into a politician. The world is doomed!

[Guest]

Oh no! He is turning into a politician. The world is doomed!

And he has not assigned someone to get ahead of controversy by having someone else say,what he meant to say was..... or that is not what he meant to say......or some other cop out commenatry.....

you know what I am talking about....what Obama's cover his a$$ team does all day every day.

[Guest]

And he has not assigned someone to get ahead of controversy by having someone else say,what he meant to say was..... or that is not what he meant to say......or some other cop out commenatry.....

you know what I am talking about....what Obama's cover his a$$ team does all day every day.

:thumbup:

[Guest]

Just another opinion.
Trump does not do well thinking on his feet. He said he is pro choice. That both the woman and the doctor should be punished for an illegal abortion.
Then he released a statement that only the doctor should be punished and his position has not changed.

In the interview he wants to punish the woman. Is punishing woman that are criminals an attack on women?

In the statement he said to not punish woman.

He changed his mind and said he did not change his mind. He can't have it both ways. He will say whatever you him to say to win your vote and hope you don't read everything.

I suggest modifying for accuracy the high lighted sentence above;

Like Obama, Trump does not do well thinking on his feet.

And the same for the second highlight;

Like Obama, He will say whatever you him to say to win your vote and hope you don't read everything.

Just Trump pretending to be a politician.

[Guest]

Trump does not do well thinking on his feet.

we agree

He will say whatever you him to say to win your vote and hope you don't read everything.

we agree

Just Trump pretending to be a politician.
Here's a clip of Trump, maybe the next president pretending to be a wrestler:
v=T_gwoGMnwNk

[Guest]

I suggest modifying for accuracy the high lighted sentence above;

Like Obama, Trump does not do well thinking on his feet.

And the same for the second highlight;

Like Obama, He will say whatever you him to say to win your vote and hope you don't read everything.

Just Trump pretending to be a politician.

How many times has Obama had to do a 180 on one of his statement the very next day? Trump does it all the time. I'm just saying. I heard this, but I don't know if it true. I think that someone should check it out.

When all you want to do is make a lot of noise, thinking is the last thing on your mind.

Trump's view on abortion aren't an attack on women. When is the last time a man got pregnant?

[Guest]

Who chooses, we the people or the super delegates?

"we the people" are three words that are the exclusive domain of the Republican party. Since the Republicans don't have super delegates, why do you care what the Democratic party does?

Sanders is an Independent. He should thank the Democrat party for letting him run as their presidential nominee. In Florida Independents have to change to either Democrat, or Republican, to vote in the primary. Sanders should have to declare himself a Democrat, if he hasn't done it already.

If Sanders wasn't in the race, Biden might have run against Hillary. If Hillary is brought up on charges, Biden may come in through the back door at the Democratic convention via super delegates.

Anybody but Hillary for president. Since the Democrats have kind of accepted Sanders, I hope he is their nominee. He is a social democrat, or socialist(if you like); but his programs won't get off the ground in DC. Therefore, he will do a lot less harm than either Trump, Cruz, or Clinton. If there were only the three candidates on the Republican side from the get go, "we the people" would have done the sane thing, and voted for Kasich. That assumes that "we the people" are sane, and that is very questionable now.

[Guest]

How many times has Obama had to do a 180 on one of his statement the very next day? Trump does it all the time. I'm just saying. I heard this, but I don't know if it true. ??????????? I think that someone should check it out.

When all you want to do is make a lot of noise, thinking is the last thing on your mind.

Trump's view on abortion aren't an attack on women. When is the last time a man got pregnant?

When we state something that elicits a response as above it is always amusing and most of the times laughable.

You all have it easy. If anything you hear or see does not match up with what you are allowed to say or believe, the first thing y'all do is throw stones.

You don't have to think about anything if it does not mach...bingo....page 6 paragraph 3 tell them ......................

Talk about not thinking!

[Guest]

When we state something that elicits a response as above it is always amusing and most of the times laughable.

You all have it easy. If anything you hear or see does not match up with what you are allowed to say or believe, the first thing y'all do is throw stones.

You don't have to think about anything if it does not mach...bingo....page 6 paragraph 3 tell them ......................

Talk about not thinking!

You underlined a sentence in my post, and put a bunch of question marks after it. Too funny! I went completely went over y'alls head. That sentence that you underlined Trump uses it all the time. When he wants to throw something out there, but doesn't have the courage to pass it off as his, it is always something that I heard. I am not saying that is true. Who the hell knows what Trump believes? Every time he gets called on some stupid that he says, the next day he tones down his statement, or completely pivots to the complete opposite of what he just said. The man is totally morally corrupt, and that makes him a perfect politician.

Let me guess you really do believe a man can get pregnant. Your evidence is Arnold Schwarzenegger. Arnold takes his roles in movies very seriously. When he played a pregnant man in the movie Junior, he really went out and got himself pregnant that made is part in the movie very believable.

Did I just say something that I wasn't suppose too? The cat had my tongue, but he like it go. I will have the cat review my post the next time, because he knows much better what I am allowed to say than I do.

Talk about not thinking! Not thinking is your strong suit. I don't think that I can come close with you on "not thinking".