Log in

View Full Version : DOJ Agents Raid Home Of Activist Behind PLANNED PARENTHOOD Videos...


Guest
04-06-2016, 08:41 AM
Is it not amazing the DOJ can move so quickly on the projects that suit the administration's or the party's agenda?

Now if we could just inspire the Clinton investigation with such dispatch.

Planned Parenthood: David Daleiden Speaks out on Home Raid (http://www.breitbart.com/california/2016/04/06/david-daleiden-responds-attorney-generals-raid-home/)

Very appropriate description highlighted....bought and paid for...the AG and the DOJ and we will soon discover FBI!

Guest
04-06-2016, 09:35 AM
Is it not amazing the DOJ can move so quickly on the projects that suit the administration's or the party's agenda?

Now if we could just inspire the Clinton investigation with such dispatch.

Planned Parenthood: David Daleiden Speaks out on Home Raid (http://www.breitbart.com/california/2016/04/06/david-daleiden-responds-attorney-generals-raid-home/)

Very appropriate description highlighted....bought and paid for...the AG and the DOJ and we will soon discover FBI!

:agree:

The radical left wing Nazis are at it again. To cap it off, they will attempt to elect their radical perverted socialist(Nazi) to the number one leadership position in America.

Guest
04-06-2016, 10:58 AM
:agree:

The radical left wing Nazis are at it again. To cap it off, they will attempt to elect their radical perverted socialist(Nazi) to the number one leadership position in America.

No, Nazis were extremist right wing reactionaries. They were against left wing organizations (Communists).

Never mind what they called their group - they were right wing fanatics who blamed other groups for the German problems - such as the Jewish people.

Guest
04-06-2016, 04:09 PM
The Nazi Party destroyed the political apparatus of the working class, broke the trade union movement, and handed the economy over to German capitalist monopolies. "Socialism" in the mind of the NSDAP involved either the SA's street fighting fantasy of a German nation recast in the image of the right wing worker; or, the NSDAP's central apparatus' conception of a pliant breeding nation. "Socialism" was for the NSDAP the forced mobilisation of the ethnic nation.

Many Germans at the time, particularly right wing Germans, associated these values with a Bismarkian right wing policy that had been called "Socialism," in the sense of state provided goods and services. To take political advantage of this feeling, the NSDAP named itself "National Socialist." The NSDAP did not hope for the abolition of capitalism, nor for workers' control.

In addition to this economic position, the NSDAP wished to reunify their imaginary German nation by force; impose a German order on Europe through war; and to eliminate their imaginary racial "other."

These combination of policies are considered "right wing."

Ordinary socialism, in the sense of workers' control of production, was considered left wing at the time.

Guest
04-06-2016, 04:30 PM
:agree:

The radical left wing Nazis are at it again. To cap it off, they will attempt to elect their radical perverted socialist(Nazi) to the number one leadership position in America.
Another right wing genius.:jester:

Guest
04-06-2016, 06:36 PM
Nazi means: The full name of Adolf Hitler's party was Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist German Workers' Party; NSDAP). The shorthand Nazi was formed from the first two syllables of the German pronunciation of the word "national" (IPA: [na-tsi̯-o-ˈnaːl]).

Sorry, but you can say what you will about Nazis being right wing, but they were socialists and NOW our socialists are left wing and the gov of the left wing is acting like socialist Nazis.

I believe it is your party of slavery that says that the Democrat party is no longer the Democrat party of slavery. There seems to be a correlation between your hypocrisy now and then. Make up your minds.

Left wing Nazis of today's government, genius. Now, try to argue with that. brainiac.

Guest
04-06-2016, 06:52 PM
Nazi means: The full name of Adolf Hitler's party was Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist German Workers' Party; NSDAP). The shorthand Nazi was formed from the first two syllables of the German pronunciation of the word "national" (IPA: [na-tsi̯-o-ˈnaːl]).

Sorry, but you can say what you will about Nazis being right wing, but they were socialists and NOW our socialists are left wing and the gov of the left wing is acting like socialist Nazis.

I believe it is your party of slavery that says that the Democrat party is no longer the Democrat party of slavery. There seems to be a correlation between your hypocrisy now and then. Make up your minds.

Left wing Nazis of today's government, genius. Now, try to argue with that. brainiac.
For what's it's worth I didn't call you a right wing genius. I'll let the other guy go down the rabbit hole.

Guest
04-07-2016, 01:48 PM
Nazi means: The full name of Adolf Hitler's party was Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist German Workers' Party; NSDAP). The shorthand Nazi was formed from the first two syllables of the German pronunciation of the word "national" (IPA: [na-tsi̯-o-ˈnaːl]).

Sorry, but you can say what you will about Nazis being right wing, but they were socialists and NOW our socialists are left wing and the gov of the left wing is acting like socialist Nazis.

I believe it is your party of slavery that says that the Democrat party is no longer the Democrat party of slavery. There seems to be a correlation between your hypocrisy now and then. Make up your minds.

Left wing Nazis of today's government, genius. Now, try to argue with that. brainiac.I'll try.

So non-socialists like the Nazis and Communists called themselves socialist to appeal to the political moderates of the interwar period. In the modern day, anyone who equates socialism with either Nazi-brand Fascism or Soviet-brand Communism is a political propagandist, usually affiliated with right-wing US interests.

Guest
04-07-2016, 02:12 PM
I'll try.

So non-socialists like the Nazis and Communists called themselves socialist to appeal to the political moderates of the interwar period. In the modern day, anyone who equates socialism with either Nazi-brand Fascism or Soviet-brand Communism is a political propagandist, usually affiliated with right-wing US interests.

You can't have Communism without also having Socialism. Blame your ideology on the right all you wish, but the truth is staring at you in the mirror. If it quacks like a duck, etc.

Funny how it is NOT the conservatives that are warring on Christians.
Funny how it is NOT the conservatives that are warring on babies' rights.
Funny how it is not the conservatives that want to socialize health care.

I don't really think that conservatives fit the description of socialist or communist, but I do think that someone could easily confuse a Democrat for a Socialist. What did Sanders say he was again? And how long has he been associated with the Democrat party?

Guest
04-07-2016, 02:29 PM
You can't have Communism without also having Socialism. Blame your ideology on the right all you wish, but the truth is staring at you in the mirror. If it quacks like a duck, etc.

Funny how it is NOT the conservatives that are warring on Christians.
Funny how it is NOT the conservatives that are warring on babies' rights.
Funny how it is not the conservatives that want to socialize health care.

I don't really think that conservatives fit the description of socialist or communist, but I do think that someone could easily confuse a Democrat for a Socialist. What did Sanders say he was again? And how long has he been associated with the Democrat party?


The NAZI'S were socialists in name only.
What is Socialism?
Central to the meaning of socialism is common ownership. This means the resources of the world being owned in common by the entire global population.

Did the NAZI's share the wealth?

Democratic control is therefore also essential to the meaning of socialism. -

Did anyone vote for the NAZI's after they seized control?

In socialism, everybody would have free access to the goods and services designed to directly meet their needs and there need be no system of payment for the work that each individual contributes to producing them.

The “normal” work day for most Germans was eight hours, and pay for overtime work was generous. / 10 In addition to higher wages, benefits included markedly improved working conditions, such as better health and safety conditions, canteens with subsidized hot meals, athletic fields, parks, subsidized theater performances and concerts, exhibitions, sports and hiking groups, dances, adult education courses, and subsidized tourism.

In NAZI Germany you were paid to work unless you were forced into a labor camp.

Bernie said from the beginning he was running as a Democrat because that was his only chance of getting elected. That he is a democratic socialist surprises no one. It would be a surprise if now he said he was a NAZI kind of socialist. Is that what concerns you?

Guest
04-07-2016, 02:49 PM
You can't have Communism without also having Socialism. Blame your ideology on the right all you wish, but the truth is staring at you in the mirror. If it quacks like a duck, etc.

Funny how it is NOT the conservatives that are warring on Christians.
Funny how it is NOT the conservatives that are warring on babies' rights.
Funny how it is not the conservatives that want to socialize health care.

I don't really think that conservatives fit the description of socialist or communist, but I do think that someone could easily confuse a Democrat for a Socialist. What did Sanders say he was again? And how long has he been associated with the Democrat party?

Funny how it is the conservatives that are pushing "Christianity" on everyone.
Funny how it is the conservatives that want poor people to not have health care.
Funny how it is the conservatives that are warring on woman's rights.

Guest
04-07-2016, 03:20 PM
Dear Guests: Waste your time with placing any label you wish on what the DOJ is doing but the point is that the DOJ/Obama Administration feels very comfortable harassing any one who they feel is an enemy of their ideology.
These moves are what totalitarian states do.

The moves Obama is making via IRS ObamaCare etc are criminal and he is getting protection from the federal agencies who are suppose to protect our freedoms. People should be up in arms over his affronts but they just blink and deflate.

This corruptions is why Hillary is not in jail yet and will probably be your next president. Welcome to the USSR of America

America is lost.

Personal Best Regards:

Guest
04-07-2016, 04:01 PM
Funny how it is the conservatives that are pushing "Christianity" on everyone.
Funny how it is the conservatives that want poor people to not have health care.
Funny how it is the conservatives that are warring on woman's rights.

Also:

Funny how it is the conservatives that want to eliminate food stamps for the poor.

Funny how it is the conservatives who are ones who want to invade and blow up countries who have done nothing to our country.

Guest
04-07-2016, 05:07 PM
Dear Guests: Waste your time with placing any label you wish on what the DOJ is doing but the point is that the DOJ/Obama Administration feels very comfortable harassing any one who they feel is an enemy of their ideology.
These moves are what totalitarian states do.

The moves Obama is making via IRS ObamaCare etc are criminal and he is getting protection from the federal agencies who are suppose to protect our freedoms. People should be up in arms over his affronts but they just blink and deflate.

This corruptions is why Hillary is not in jail yet and will probably be your next president. :blahblahblah: Welcome to the USSR of America:blahblahblah:

America is lost.:blahblahblah::blahblahblah:

Personal Best Regards:

I am sure the Democratic Club of The Villages would be glad to hold a fund raiser so you could move to Somalia. :1rotfl:

Guest
04-07-2016, 05:55 PM
Also:

Funny how it is the conservatives that want to eliminate food stamps for the poor.

Funny how it is the conservatives who are ones who want to invade and blow up countries who have done nothing to our country.

Dear Guest: In all due respect, your thinking is one dimensional

Personal Best Regards:

Guest
04-07-2016, 07:39 PM
I am sure the Democratic Club of The Villages would be glad to hold a fund raiser so you could move to Somalia. :1rotfl:

Of course they would. Anybody else's money will do nicely, right?

Guest
04-07-2016, 07:44 PM
Also:

Funny how it is the conservatives that want to eliminate food stamps for the poor.

Funny how it is the conservatives who are ones who want to invade and blow up countries who have done nothing to our country.

Please provide a reference to where you obtained your (erroneous) information regarding elimination of food stamps. If you mean, we would like to eliminate the need for food stamps by providing an environment where anyone that wants to work, can work....maybe you are close.

Would you care to put the wars started by Democrats on a scale with those started by Republicans? I think you might be surprised. Also, while you are at it, why not add up the amount of American lives lost in combat during the Democrat started wars, compared to the amount lost in Republican started wars. BIG DIFFERENCE. Just statistics though. But, since you are comparing, I just thought I might give you something to think about. If it's not too difficult. I am sure that you will want me to do the research for you because we all know how needy and helpless you liberals are.

Guest
04-07-2016, 08:35 PM
Please provide a reference to where you obtained your (erroneous) information regarding elimination of food stamps. If you mean, we would like to eliminate the need for food stamps by providing an environment where anyone that wants to work, can work....maybe you are close.

Would you care to put the wars started by Democrats on a scale with those started by Republicans? I think you might be surprised. Also, while you are at it, why not add up the amount of American lives lost in combat during the Democrat started wars, compared to the amount lost in Republican started wars. BIG DIFFERENCE. Just statistics though. But, since you are comparing, I just thought I might give you something to think about. If it's not too difficult. I am sure that you will want me to do the research for you because we all know how needy and helpless you liberals are.

Ask Cheney and Crapweasel about starting an unnecessary war with their lies and explain that to the families of the 4500 Americans killed for nothing.

Now, The Canadian Anchor Baby want more Americans to lose their lives.

Guest
04-07-2016, 08:52 PM
A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system -- ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

Dwight D, Eisenhower

What did he mean? Who made the money on the wars after Korea? Who made the sacrifices?

Guest
04-08-2016, 03:03 AM
Ask Cheney and Crapweasel about starting an unnecessary war with their lies and explain that to the families of the 4500 Americans killed for nothing.

Now, The Canadian Anchor Baby want more Americans to lose their lives.

Sure, sure. More of your ignorant ranting. 4500 lives compared to how many from any previous wars? Would you care to tally up all the millions of lives that Democrat started wars have taken? Vietnam was only 60,000 killed. Would you like to go back further? The further you go back the more the tally is. Go back and learn some new liberal talking points child.

Guest
04-08-2016, 01:16 PM
Sure, sure. More of your ignorant ranting. 4500 lives compared to how many from any previous wars? Would you care to tally up all the millions of lives that Democrat started wars have taken? Vietnam was only 60,000 killed. Would you like to go back further? The further you go back the more the tally is. Go back and learn some new liberal talking points child.

Your asking to have him go beyond the talking points and what is allowed to be discussed?

No way!

Guest
04-08-2016, 01:38 PM
Please provide a reference to where you obtained your (erroneous) information regarding elimination of food stamps. If you mean, we would like to eliminate the need for food stamps by providing an environment where anyone that wants to work, can work....maybe you are close.

Would you care to put the wars started by Democrats on a scale with those started by Republicans? I think you might be surprised. Also, while you are at it, why not add up the amount of American lives lost in combat during the Democrat started wars, compared to the amount lost in Republican started wars. BIG DIFFERENCE. Just statistics though. But, since you are comparing, I just thought I might give you something to think about. If it's not too difficult. I am sure that you will want me to do the research for you because we all know how needy and helpless you liberals are.

I can answer these questions but I have a bias. How would you answer these questions?

Democrats started most of the wars and therefore are responsible for most of the deaths? Is that correct?


Which party ended the wars?


What group [mostly conservative or mostly liberal] or party would you put the War Protesters in?


Is there now a consensus that some wars were unjust?
Which wars?


Does it now mean if someone speaks up, saying they were against the unjust war, they are patriotic?

Guest
04-08-2016, 03:40 PM
I am sure the Democratic Club of The Villages would be glad to hold a fund raiser so you could move to Somalia. :1rotfl:

How would three liberals be able to achieve such a difficult task? That would be the whole club, right? That's kind of like asking how many liberals would it take to screw in a light bulb? Answer: It’s irrelevant; they still don’t know they’re in the dark! .....:1rotfl: