Last night's Brooklyn brawl?

[Guest]

Who was the guy that was taking Clinton's place at the podium?
:D

[Guest]

It was all staged. They are just going through the paces to make it look like the nomination has not already been fixed. Hillary is just sleep walking through it, waiting for her coronation. There is no way that the Dems would every support Bernie, a blatant socialist. The DNC wishes to keep their lean toward socialism under wraps. They didn't put any real competition up for Hillary because they were afraid she would lose to them. This all just a liberal scam and the voters have fallen for it. Not all of them, because they have the lowest voter turn out in a long time.

[Guest]

http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Hillary+Clinton+Hillary+Clinton+Bernie+Sanders+nxG GwR0br17l.jpg


What did you say the guy on the left's name is?

(Poor Bill!!)

[Guest]

It was all staged. They are just going through the paces to make it look like the nomination has not already been fixed. Hillary is just sleep walking through it, waiting for her coronation. There is no way that the Dems would every support Bernie, a blatant socialist. The DNC wishes to keep their lean toward socialism under wraps. They didn't put any real competition up for Hillary because they were afraid she would lose to them. This all just a liberal scam and the voters have fallen for it. Not all of them, because they have the lowest voter turn out in a long time.

It's ALL a scam, the whole "system" is a scam.

Trump is in this because it would be the "ultimate deal" for him. He thinks he can pull it off and he's going for it. Bucket list.

IF he were to get elected, you can be sure, except for a few burrs in his shoe, things he wants changed, life and the corruption and spending would go on. He wants to show off in front of royalty, that's all. Treated like a king because of HIM and not because his money bought people.

He's slick. He's buddies with the bankers. Buddies with the Clintons. Buddies with a LOT of people in high places. He's NOT going to save the world.

[Guest]

It was all staged. They are just going through the paces to make it look like the nomination has not already been fixed. Hillary is just sleep walking through it, waiting for her coronation. There is no way that the Dems would every support Bernie, a blatant socialist. The DNC wishes to keep their lean toward socialism under wraps. They didn't put any real competition up for Hillary because they were afraid she would lose to them. This all just a liberal scam and the voters have fallen for it. Not all of them, because they have the lowest voter turn out in a long time.

So true. It's all a plot. A conspiracy. They want to turn us all into commies. Run for the hills. :crap2:

[Guest]

So true. It's all a plot. A conspiracy. They want to turn us all into commies. Run for the hills. :crap2:

The horse is all wrong...panicked sheep...that's what you are.

BOTH parties want to re-neg the "rules" to get "their guy" the nomination, the hell with what the public wants...and you laugh? It's not a conspiracy, it's what they're doing.

[Guest]

More of what we will not hear about the debate from the party loyal, puppet media:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/17/opinion/sunday/hillary-is-not-sorry.html

[Guest]

Who was the guy that was taking Clinton's place at the podium?
:D

Another sexist remark......:censored:

[Guest]

More of what we will not hear about the debate from the party loyal, puppet media:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/17/opinion/sunday/hillary-is-not-sorry.htmlthank-you

[Guest]

Another sexist remark......:censored:

You're absolutely right. But, who was that white guy on the left?

[Guest]

Another sexist remark......:censored:

That would imply that the normal measure of gender is applied where in this case it most certainly does not.

Clinton is an anomoly of character, gender or any other normal ASPECT OF SENTIENT BEINGS.

[Guest]

You're absolutely right. But, who was that white guy on the left?

And there they go again!:grumpy:

[Guest]

That would imply that the normal measure of gender is applied where in this case it most certainly does not.

Clinton is an anomoly of character, gender or any other normal ASPECT OF SENTIENT BEINGS.

It's always something with you Republicans.

I can't believe you guys are voting for a Canadian, after the birther issue stink you made.

The 2 guys running who have a change to be nominated:

Trump is married to a Communist
Cruz was raised by a Communist who fought with Castro.

You will never be able to use the Commie thing against the Dems ever again. :1rotfl::1rotfl:

[Guest]

It's always something with you Republicans.

I can't believe you guys are voting for a Canadian, after the birther issue stink you made.

The 2 guys running who have a change to be nominated:

Trump is married to a Communist
Cruz was raised by a Communist who fought with Castro.

You will never be able to use the Commie thing against the Dems ever again. :1rotfl::1rotfl:

Seek help. Or, grow up and quit attempting to bait anyone having a civil conversation. Are you that out of touch with current events that you can't hold up your end of a civil/intelligent conversation?

[Guest]

Seek help. Or, grow up and quit attempting to bait anyone having a civil conversation. Are you that out of touch with current events that you can't hold up your end of a civil/intelligent conversation?

The Republicans have been yelling commie at Obama for 8 years. Even the Donald got into the "BIRTHER" issue. Now we are just supposed to forget about that?

Seriously?

[Guest]

It's always something with you Republicans.

I can't believe you guys are voting for a Canadian, after the birther issue stink you made.

The 2 guys running who have a change to be nominated:

Trump is married to a Communist
Cruz was raised by a Communist who fought with Castro.

You will never be able to use the Commie thing against the Dems ever again. :1rotfl::1rotfl:

Be careful with over indulgence in self gratification it can make you go blind!

[Guest]

Be careful with over indulgence in self gratification it can make you go blind!

:BigApplause:

[Guest]

The Republicans have been yelling commie at Obama for 8 years. Even the Donald got into the "BIRTHER" issue. Now we are just supposed to forget about that?

Seriously?

Quit crying. Obama has been blaming Bush for 8 years also. We have lived with the lies and whining, so just get over yourself and quit crying a river. If you want to discuss an issue, then do it. If you don't want to vote for The Donald or lyin' Ted, then don't. Vote for the criminal or the socialist. Yes, the proof is availible, so I am not just disparaging them.

[Guest]

It's always something with you Republicans....Trump is married to a Communist

Trumps wife is great looking lady, way better than the Dem's "Ugly lady in pants"!:throwtomatoes:

Wow! Fricken slick Willie would be the ugliest first lady...but nobody can beat Hillary on that.:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

STOCK UP ON AMMO!

[Guest]

http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Hillary+Clinton+Hillary+Clinton+Bernie+Sanders+nxG GwR0br17l.jpg


What did you say the guy on the left's name is?

(Poor Bill!!)

" Poor Bill " ? Heck those two haven`t spent a night under the same roof let alone in the same room since The White House and Pre- Monica !

[Guest]

" Poor Bill " ? Heck those two haven`t spent a night under the same roof let alone in the same room since The White House and Pre- Monica !

A marriage of political convenience only. Does America really want such an ugly couple in the White House? Look at what that ugly couple spawned, a mentally challenged duckling, that's worst than her mother in the political field. And Hillary is so outdated that she says she will continue Obama's failures. No ideas of her own, and the only motivation is her hubris.

[Guest]

Why are all of you continuing to defend this list of losers. Democrat and Republican candidates combined still won't equal a genuinely bona fide candidate capable of leading this nation. In golf I do not do do-overs but I want, heck I pray for a do over in this election cycle.

Your fighting over "nothings"


Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

Why are all of you continuing to defend this list of losers. Democrat and Republican candidates combined still won't equal a genuinely bona fide candidate capable of leading this nation. In golf I do not do do-overs but I want, heck I pray for a do over in this election cycle.

Your fighting over "nothings"


Personal Best Regards:

Oh? And you have such a candidate? Where is that candidate on political ads? Where is he on TV? Is he/she being interviewed? Is that person on the ballot? Would one be wasting their vote by voting for someone that is unknown? Has that candidate debated the front runners?

When there is only going to be a viable choice between two candidates, then I will choose the best of the two. There are NO perfect candidates, but that won't make me abstain from voting. And I will definitely not waste my time by voting for someone that no one knows and has no chance of winning. If you have a candidate in mind, then you should be promoting that candidate so everyone knows who he/she is and how they view issues. If not, then your protests are nothing more than wasted effort.

I am not even going to entertain the notion of voting for someone that has no chance at all of winning the general election. No one sees a protest vote. No one cares about the protest vote.

I voted in the primary and my candidate did not win. That does not mean that I will refuse to vote in the General election. It means that I will vote for the best of the two that got nominated. It's the will of the people, not my sole choice.

[Guest]

I am not even going to entertain the notion of voting for someone that has no chance at all of winning the general election...

I voted in the primary and my candidate did not win...
I believe you contradicted yourself...

It's the will of the people, not my sole choice.

It appears it is really the will of the delegates, not the people, that provide the choice.

STOCK UP ON AMMO!

[Guest]

I believe you contradicted yourself...



It appears it is really the will of the delegates, not the people, that provide the choice.

STOCK UP ON AMMO!

Perhaps you did not understand my comment. There is a difference between the primary and the general election. I voted in the Republican primary for one of several qualified candidates. I was not concerned with which candidate had the best chance of winning because in my opinion, ALL of the GOP candidates were better than the Democrat candidates. Now, I will vote for whichever GOP candidate wins the nomination. I vote on a combination of ideology, record and current views on issues. Once all of that is eliminated, I vote for the nominee of my party. My party is closest to my ideology, conservative. It used to be confusing in the long past, when we had a DemocratIC party and some candidates were conservative. The party of my father. Now, it is clear that the Democrat party is the party of liberalism and socialism. The Republican party is really too moderate for my liking, but even though it is middle, it's not yet hard left like the Democrat party. This gives me a clear choice of lesser of evils. Or, if "evil" is a bad choice of words, perhaps then the better of two substandard choices.

Like I have said before, I do not make protest votes. I believe in the process of elimination for the nomination. I don't play the wish-washie game of labeling myself an Independent. I am a Republican and I can still vote Democrat is I ever wished to. I have never wished to vote Democrat. And Independent is either a Democrat or a Republican that is too embarrassed to admit it.

[Guest]

I believe no Preident can do what he or she wants. They say all this BS to get your vote knowing there no way they could or even want to get their fair tales done. We have been hoodwinked. Elections are nothing more that scam to see which DUmb asses control the free tax money. After all, that's what it's about which criminals control the money to line there pockets. I have to laugh when ever on of these dirtbags are addressed. The honorable so and so. What $&&@)! Joke . It should be the lying, sleezebag form the sleezebag state of dumbasses that elect this carpetbaggers year after year.

[Guest]

I believe no Preident can do what he or she wants. They say all this BS to get your vote knowing there no way they could or even want to get their fair tales done. We have been hoodwinked. Elections are nothing more that scam to see which DUmb asses control the free tax money. After all, that's what it's about which criminals control the money to line there pockets. I have to laugh when ever on of these dirtbags are addressed. The honorable so and so. What $&&@)! Joke . It should be the lying, sleezebag form the sleezebag state of dumbasses that elect this carpetbaggers year after year.

Of course the president never gets what he/she wants. Obama however, has been somewhat of an exception in that he pushes the legality of E.O.s. No one wants racial riots in the streets of D.C. like the ones of MLK's assassination, so they have treated Obama with kid gloves. That is why it will be a long time before another black president. His failure will taint any future prospects of a black president.

But, getting back to your statement that the president does not get what he wants, it is still good to know where he stands. If we know where the candidate stands, then we know he will veto or we hope he will anything that comes across his desk that does not coincide with his view on issues. That is the best we can hope for. Therefore, even though we know he can't make law (exception Obama) we know how he feels about our concerns.....or hope so.

[Guest]

Oh? And you have such a candidate? Where is that candidate on political ads? Where is he on TV? Is he/she being interviewed? Is that person on the ballot? Would one be wasting their vote by voting for someone that is unknown? Has that candidate debated the front runners?

When there is only going to be a viable choice between two candidates, then I will choose the best of the two. There are NO perfect candidates, but that won't make me abstain from voting. And I will definitely not waste my time by voting for someone that no one knows and has no chance of winning. If you have a candidate in mind, then you should be promoting that candidate so everyone knows who he/she is and how they view issues. If not, then your protests are nothing more than wasted effort.

I am not even going to entertain the notion of voting for someone that has no chance at all of winning the general election. No one sees a protest vote. No one cares about the protest vote.

I voted in the primary and my candidate did not win. That does not mean that I will refuse to vote in the General election. It means that I will vote for the best of the two that got nominated. It's the will of the people, not my sole choice.

ONLY bought and paid for candidates get "media time". They ignore any REAL competition to their two party corruption. That's why you don't hear about them. I think the whole Trump brouhaha is misdirection.

It's YOUR vote, who YOU want, it's not a contest to choose the winner, it's a contest for you and others to MAKE the winner!

They place their guy, a known liar and thief in front of you and you obligingly say sure. People, they're such strange and stupid creatures!

Perhaps you did not understand my comment. There is a difference between the primary and the general election. I voted in the Republican primary for one of several qualified candidates. I was not concerned with which candidate had the best chance of winning because in my opinion, ALL of the GOP candidates were better than the Democrat candidates. Now, I will vote for whichever GOP candidate wins the nomination. I vote on a combination of ideology, record and current views on issues. Once all of that is eliminated, I vote for the nominee of my party. My party is closest to my ideology, conservative. It used to be confusing in the long past, when we had a DemocratIC party and some candidates were conservative. The party of my father. Now, it is clear that the Democrat party is the party of liberalism and socialism. The Republican party is really too moderate for my liking, but even though it is middle, it's not yet hard left like the Democrat party. This gives me a clear choice of lesser of evils. Or, if "evil" is a bad choice of words, perhaps then the better of two substandard choices.

Like I have said before, I do not make protest votes. I believe in the process of elimination for the nomination. I don't play the wish-washie game of labeling myself an Independent. I am a Republican and I can still vote Democrat is I ever wished to. I have never wished to vote Democrat. And Independent is either a Democrat or a Republican that is too embarrassed to admit it.

ALL the D or R candidates are owned.

No you don't, you vote for the candidate they place in front of you. You think you "know them" because you saw political ads and saw them say a few words? You know what they WANT you to know.

You're voting for evil, not the lesser of two evils. Evil is evil and that's what these psychopaths are, evil.

I believe no Preident can do what he or she wants. They say all this BS to get your vote knowing there no way they could or even want to get their fair tales done. We have been hoodwinked. Elections are nothing more that scam to see which DUmb asses control the free tax money. After all, that's what it's about which criminals control the money to line there pockets. I have to laugh when ever on of these dirtbags are addressed. The honorable so and so. What $&&@)! Joke . It should be the lying, sleezebag form the sleezebag state of dumbasses that elect this carpetbaggers year after year.

There you go, the smartest one in the room. Elections really ARE a joke. We ARE hoodwinked. They ARE dirtbags who need a dirtnap. And yes, dumbasses, called "sheeple" do keep voting for the "lesser of two evils" OVER and OVER and OVER again..

[Guest]

No one wants racial riots in the streets of D.C.

Maybe that's what we need to take care of this racial problem once and for all...

[Guest]

ONLY bought and paid for candidates get "media time". They ignore any REAL competition to their two party corruption. That's why you don't hear about them. I think the whole Trump brouhaha is misdirection.

It's YOUR vote, who YOU want, it's not a contest to choose the winner, it's a contest for you and others to MAKE the winner!

They place their guy, a known liar and thief in front of you and you obligingly say sure. People, they're such strange and stupid creatures!



ALL the D or R candidates are owned.

No you don't, you vote for the candidate they place in front of you. You think you "know them" because you saw political ads and saw them say a few words? You know what they WANT you to know.

You're voting for evil, not the lesser of two evils. Evil is evil and that's what these psychopaths are, evil.



There you go, the smartest one in the room. Elections really ARE a joke. We ARE hoodwinked. They ARE dirtbags who need a dirtnap. And yes, dumbasses, called "sheeple" do keep voting for the "lesser of two evils" OVER and OVER and OVER again..

Thank you.

I do not care how you vote, or even if you do vote. I have expressed my opinion and commented on yours. Personally, I would rather you waste your vote on Mickey Mouse or whatever twerks you, than to have you vote for a liberal/socialist. So, please DO go and waste your vote in protest. And your calling me names just shows how credible you are. To be honest, I am surprised that you understand the principle of typing, let alone how to operate a computer. Your insulting and backward attacks on anyone that does not agree with you, seems to camouflage your ability to put together a somewhat literate, if almost coherent thought. Or, perhaps you are merely a baiting troll? Anyway, it appears that you are the only one in the room that agrees with your comments. You should get together with our pet liberal troll that enjoys having conversations with himself. You could compare self-inflicted wounds. :boxing2:

[Guest]

Thank you.

I do not care how you vote, or even if you do vote. I have expressed my opinion and commented on yours. Personally, I would rather you waste your vote on Mickey Mouse or whatever twerks you, than to have you vote for a liberal/socialist. So, please DO go and waste your vote in protest. And your calling me names just shows how credible you are. To be honest, I am surprised that you understand the principle of typing, let alone how to operate a computer. Your insulting and backward attacks on anyone that does not agree with you, seems to camouflage your ability to put together a somewhat literate, if almost coherent thought. Or, perhaps you are merely a baiting troll? Anyway, it appears that you are the only one in the room that agrees with your comments. You should get together with our pet liberal troll that enjoys having conversations with himself. You could compare self-inflicted wounds. :boxing2:

Blah blah blah...like to hear yourself type? Because there was absolutely nothing of any consequence in that rant.

Do you even READ what the person has written before your canned "I'm so offended" replies?

I don't want a socialist and if you could read, you'd have realized that before your "form letter" reply. I vote Libertarian because I think "I" should decide how my life will be run. I think "you" should decide how your life is run. I'm not responsible for you and you're not for me. But if we decide to work together for common good we should. You leave me alone, I'll leave you alone. If we decide to be friends, great. Issues should be solved locally, among those who will be affected. I guess the Libertarian rule is the golden rule. I think both parties are nothing but corrupt money pits.

The person I complimented as the smartest person in the room isn't the person I'm typing to now. He knows the system is dysfunctional to say the least.

Where is the vitriol in what you highlighted? You're the one with the mouth that needs washing.

[Guest]

Blah blah blah...like to hear yourself type? Because there was absolutely nothing of any consequence in that rant.

Do you even READ what the person has written before your canned "I'm so offended" replies?

I don't want a socialist and if you could read, you'd have realized that before your "form letter" reply. I vote Libertarian because I think "I" should decide how my life will be run. I think "you" should decide how your life is run. I'm not responsible for you and you're not for me. But if we decide to work together for common good we should. You leave me alone, I'll leave you alone. If we decide to be friends, great. Issues should be solved locally, among those who will be affected. I guess the Libertarian rule is the golden rule. I think both parties are nothing but corrupt money pits.

The person I complimented as the smartest person in the room isn't the person I'm typing to now. He knows the system is dysfunctional to say the least.

Where is the vitriol in what you highlighted? You're the one with the mouth that needs washing.

Yes, I know you weren't replying to me. You replied to your OWN comment and you complimented yourself. That was easy enough to figure out. You are the only one on here that writes like that.

Yes, I did read your blather. And I replied civilly to you, even though you act insulted and hurt. Like I said before, vote however you wish. With an attitude like yours, it's good that you waste your vote. My suggestion is that you don't key your own car because you don't like the manufacturer. It doesn't bother the business at all, and only serves to show how irrelevant that gesture was.

[Guest]

Yes, I know you weren't replying to me. You replied to your OWN comment and you complimented yourself. That was easy enough to figure out. You are the only one on here that writes like that.



Ah...no...sorry. I don't reply to myself. I really don't care what anyone here thinks. I'll listen to their opinion and facts. But their personal opinion of me? I could care less.

I'm here to share what I think and what I think I know.

If all you have to say is...you're wrong and you're a racist, sexist, or homophobic, well, don't bother because it's just pointless blabber. Show me/us why that position is wrong. With facts. Real life examples.

You really should start listening and reading more than you type. Judging by your comment, you WILL learn something.

Reading YOUR writing, looks like my writing...how can you claim to be so astute in determining writing styles of anonymous comments yet so obtuse when it comes to the reality that is life on this planet?

[Guest]

Ah...no...sorry. I don't reply to myself. I really don't care what anyone here thinks. I'll listen to their opinion and facts. But their personal opinion of me? I could care less.

I'm here to share what I think and what I think I know.

If all you have to say is...you're wrong and you're a racist, sexist, or homophobic, well, don't bother because it's just pointless blabber. Show me/us why that position is wrong. With facts. Real life examples.

You really should start listening and reading more than you type. Judging by your comment, you WILL learn something.

Reading YOUR writing, looks like my writing...how can you claim to be so astute in determining writing styles of anonymous comments yet so obtuse when it comes to the reality that is life on this planet?

Apparently, you are guilty of your own accusations. I have never called you a name, especially a racist, sexist or homophobic. Unlike the liberals on here, I don't call everyone a bigot if they don't agree with me. And I don't care if anyone is a racist or sexist. That's up to them, and I give them credit for not being PC. I don't believe in PC, but I do believe in manners.

Like I said before, and since I am practically the only person that will respond to you, I don't take your ignorant attacks and name calling personal. And apparently you DO care what others think or you wouldn't have responded to my comment. But take it or leave it, it's of no consequence.

By the way, there are no true Libertarians in politics. Look up the term and then compare it to the view on issues that you will get from self-proclaimed libertarians.

[Guest]

Why are all of you continuing to defend this list of losers. Democrat and Republican candidates combined still won't equal a genuinely bona fide candidate capable of leading this nation. In golf I do not do do-overs but I want, heck I pray for a do over in this election cycle.

Your fighting over "nothings"


Personal Best Regards:

Are you referring to Lyndon Larouche the perpetual presidential candidate ?