Paul Ryan Does Not Endorse Donald Trump Just Yet.

[Guest]

The Highest Ranking Republican Just Refused to Endorse Donald Trump–For Now | Mother Jones (http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/05/paul-ryan-donald-trump-endorse-yet)

Unless the clown act which is Donald Trump abandons many of the positions he took to obtain so many votes, he will probably not get the backing of many of the Establishment Republicans.

Let's see how Donald Trump can lie his way out of this.

[Guest]

The Highest Ranking Republican Just Refused to Endorse Donald Trump–For Now | Mother Jones (http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/05/paul-ryan-donald-trump-endorse-yet)

Unless the clown act which is Donald Trump abandons many of the positions he took to obtain so many votes, he will probably not get the backing of many of the Establishment Republicans.

Let's see how Donald Trump can lie his way out of this.

I would rather have no support from the Establishment than ANY...are you so ignorant that you can not comprehend that the "establishment" is what we are collectively sick of? You think that ignorant jag Sanders supporters give a tip about the "establishment"? The fact is, with out the "establishment's" Super Delegates Clinton would be getting her ass handed to her....but then again, libs almost never let the facts get in the way of their failures in life - starting typically with their education and comprehension.

[Guest]

The Highest Ranking Republican Just Refused to Endorse Donald Trump–For Now | Mother Jones (http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/05/paul-ryan-donald-trump-endorse-yet)

Unless the clown act which is Donald Trump abandons many of the positions he took to obtain so many votes, he will probably not get the backing of many of the Establishment Republicans.

Let's see how Donald Trump can lie his way out of this.


Republicans who have to run for reelection are keeping their distance from Trump, for instance Ryan, John McCain, Kelly Ayotte, Susan Collins. Those endorsing him are not running and/or looking for a job; ie Mike Huckabee.

More and more establishment GOP are declining to attend the convention like Bush 41 and Bush 43, Mitt Romney, and John McCain.

[Guest]

Republicans who have to run for reelection are keeping their distance from Trump, for instance Ryan, John McCain, Kelly Ayotte, Susan Collins. Those endorsing him are not running and/or looking for a job; ie Mike Huckabee.

More and more establishment GOP are declining to attend the convention like Bush 41 and Bush 43, Mitt Romney, and John McCain.

You seem to fail to have a valid point. Though he made it past the "recall", Ryan - as of today is DONE...Madison, Milwaukee and Green Bay will be certain of that...rural WI cant save him after his actions today, and no not about Trump ...the following DESTROYS him (thanks to the lazy left)

Gov. Scott Walker has approved a rule implementing drug screening requirements for unemployment benefits.

The rule implements provisions in the state budget. Under the rule, those who fail an employer drug test or refuse to take one can be denied unemployment benefits. Those who fail would get taxpayer-funded treatment.

Walker announced the new rule Wednesday, saying it brings the state one step closer to moving residents from government dependence to independence.

The rule will take effect later this week.

[Guest]

Republicans who have to run for reelection are keeping their distance from Trump, for instance Ryan, John McCain, Kelly Ayotte, Susan Collins. Those endorsing him are not running and/or looking for a job; ie Mike Huckabee.

More and more establishment GOP are declining to attend the convention like Bush 41 and Bush 43, Mitt Romney, and John McCain.

Donald Trump will need Establishment Republicans on his side if he plans to do much of anything if he gets elected President. He can do very little through Executive Orders working along unless he wants an Impeachment Trial soon after getting in office which might happen anyway if any fair result comes out of the Trump University massive fraud.

[Guest]

Donald Trump will need Establishment Republicans on his side if he plans to do much of anything if he gets elected President. He can do very little through Executive Orders working along unless he wants an Impeachment Trial soon after getting in office which might happen anyway if any fair result comes out of the Trump University massive fraud.


Seems to work for the pathological liar, constitutionally ignorant racist idiot who is in the Grey House currently...

[Guest]

Seems to work for the pathological liar, constitutionally ignorant racist idiot who is in the Grey House currently...

Very well put!

[Guest]

Republicans who have to run for reelection are keeping their distance from Trump, for instance Ryan, John McCain, Kelly Ayotte, Susan Collins. Those endorsing him are not running and/or looking for a job; ie Mike Huckabee.

More and more establishment GOP are declining to attend the convention like Bush 41 and Bush 43, Mitt Romney, and John McCain.

Another goal met. "Establishment GOP's" as noted are where the problem is, and why the Republican Party of the politically correct and corrupt is on the way out. The entire political system needs detoxification, so establishment Republicans better get on board cause the train is leaving the station.

[Guest]

The Highest Ranking Republican Just Refused to Endorse Donald Trump–For Now | Mother Jones (http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/05/paul-ryan-donald-trump-endorse-yet)

Unless the clown act which is Donald Trump abandons many of the positions he took to obtain so many votes, he will probably not get the backing of many of the Establishment Republicans.

Let's see how Donald Trump can lie his way out of this.


This is awkward to say the least, since Paul Ryan is chairman of the convention that will nominate a candidate he can't support.

[Guest]

This is awkward to say the least, since Paul Ryan is chairman of the convention that will nominate a candidate he can't support.

According to "Mother Jones" of course....and they were making jokes about the Enquirer...(not that it is not true, as it seems most thing in the Enquirer turn out to be true...)

[Guest]

According to "Mother Jones" of course....and they were making jokes about the Enquirer...(not that it is not true, as it seems most thing in the Enquirer turn out to be true...)

Don't they run headline like...

"The Pope fathered my baby"?
"Aliens ate my brain"?

Or am I thinking of another publication?

[Guest]

The Highest Ranking Republican Just Refused to Endorse Donald Trump–For Now | Mother Jones (http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/05/paul-ryan-donald-trump-endorse-yet)

Unless the clown act which is Donald Trump abandons many of the positions he took to obtain so many votes, he will probably not get the backing of many of the Establishment Republicans.

Let's see how Donald Trump can lie his way out of this.

To his credit, Trump said he doesn't endorse Ryan's positions. Which is why I'm a Trump fan. Great rally in West Virginia BTW.

[Guest]

Chump is just working on a new television reality show to be called....drum roll please...."Presidential Apprentice." :a20: :a20: :a20:

[Guest]

Is it supposed to be a big deal if the members of the establishment do not support Trump.

The big deal is that Trumps success is founded on the fact he is a threat to the establishment!!!

Some may not like how he may say things but most of us like what he says!

The silent majority has a candidate.

And we are not impressed with the establishments reactions.
How do you expect a threatened species to behave?

[Guest]

Don't they run headline like...

"The Pope fathered my baby"?
"Aliens ate my brain"?

Or am I thinking of another publication?

They were also the first that broke the John Edwards scandal
No I am not endorsing Enquirer

[Guest]

Tell me what is the truth about the Trump v Republican Establishment debate?

Tell me why this is about all these politicians and their threats of loss of power money and prestige?

Tell me why so called savvy politicians have little foresight or seem to care that they risk not only losing the presidential slot but many governor senate and congressional races because they prefer throwing a tantrum?

I am disappointed in Ryan, Bush Bush Koch brothers etc and wondering why they are acting so irresponsibly?

Why would any Republican state that they would vote for Hillary Clinton: that's like the pope saying he is embracing satan.

Tell me what is true about Trump? He can take 7 different positions on one issue in one answer?

There is room at the table for every Republican. My hope is that Ryan and Trump are smart enough to work out a policy agenda that works for the American people.

My hope is that Trump makes some smart choices about his cabinet picks and he let's the GOP people know who they are before the convention.

The only thing I can say is thank God we are talking about a presidential race and not an enemy attack on our soil because this country's leadership is AWOL

Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

Don't they run headline like...

"The Pope fathered my baby"?
"Aliens ate my brain"?

Or am I thinking of another publication?


Yew Kant Proove Nuthin!!!:boom:

[Guest]

Chump is just working on a new television reality show to be called....drum roll please...."Presidential Apprentice." :a20: :a20: :a20:


Must be the second season right? Chitbird Obama and his minions of apathetic losers in life, oh, and the "coloreds" got season one in the (douche) bag. :BigApplause:

[Guest]

Is it supposed to be a big deal if the members of the establishment do not support Trump.

The big deal is that Trumps success is founded on the fact he is a threat to the establishment!!!

Some may not like how he may say things but most of us like what he says!

The silent majority has a candidate.

And we are not impressed with the establishments reactions.
How do you expect a threatened species to behave?

:BigApplause::BigApplause::BigApplause:

[Guest]

To his credit, Trump said he doesn't endorse Ryan's positions. Which is why I'm a Trump fan. Great rally in West Virginia BTW.


Someone needs to take Donald Trump aside and explain to him how our government works. Speaker of the House Ryan sets the agenda. It is the Ryan budget, not the president's budget.

Trump relies on his low-information voters to elect him. Turns out, he is a low-information voter himself.

[Guest]

Ryan is a full fledged establishment insider.
His not supporting Trump is nothing more than a political tactic allowing for him to be drafted as a potential candidate.

Remember how loudly he claimed he was not interested in the speakers job!!

[Guest]

So if I understand many of the posters on this thread they do want to throw the baby out with the bath water.

Let's just blow it all up because were "mad as hell and we ain't goin take it anymore".

Let's follow the logic that hotter head prevail.

Let's stir up angry protests .

Let's argue about the leading Democrat and Republican presidential nominees who both have registered as the most unfavorable candidates ever to run for office.

What a country!

Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

You can be ticked off as much as you want, but, don't forget, there is much, much more at stake. i.e., THE SUPREME COURT!!! OBAMACARE!!! TRADE!!! IMMIGRATION!!! FREE SPEECH!!! ETC. You may be at odds with Trump but the alternative of a BHO third term is so much worse.

[Guest]

So if I understand many of the posters on this thread they do want to throw the baby out with the bath water.

Let's just blow it all up because were "mad as hell and we ain't goin take it anymore".

Let's follow the logic that hotter head prevail.

Let's stir up angry protests .

Let's argue about the leading Democrat and Republican presidential nominees who both have registered as the most unfavorable candidates ever to run for office.

What a country!

Personal Best Regards:

Actually, we should and eventually will have to blow it all up because the system is unsustainable. 50 million on food stamps? The "minority poor" baby boom, they're the majority now from 1st grade on down. They can't run it and we can't keep supporting them.

What do you suggest? Kick the can for 4 more years?

[Guest]

You can be ticked off as much as you want, but, don't forget, there is much, much more at stake. i.e., THE SUPREME COURT!!! OBAMACARE!!! TRADE!!! IMMIGRATION!!! FREE SPEECH!!! ETC. You may be at odds with Trump but the alternative of a BHO third term is so much worse.

They took it all away, put us under their thumb, in the name of safety and security.

[Guest]

So Eddie Munster doesn't endorse Donald. SO WHAT! WE DON'T NEED HIM!

[Guest]

Now we can add Jeb Bush to the growing list. That makes Trump 0-3 for the Bush family, but Dick Cheney is supporting him.

The list of GOP senators not supporting Trump is growing. It now includes Lindsey Graham, Jeff Flake and the senator from NE.

[Guest]

Now we can add Jeb Bush to the growing list. That makes Trump 0-3 for the Bush family, but Dick Cheney is supporting him.

The list of GOP senators not supporting Trump is growing. It now includes Lindsey Graham, Jeff Flake and the senator from NE.

The hell with the peoples' wants...

[Guest]

Now we can add Jeb Bush to the growing list. That makes Trump 0-3 for the Bush family, but Dick Cheney is supporting him.

The list of GOP senators not supporting Trump is growing. It now includes Lindsey Graham, Jeff Flake and the senator from NE.

They are the establishment!!
Big deal. There are only a couple of hundred or so.

[Guest]

What part of - WE DONT CARE is hard to capture? Enough Bush, and Clinton...enough already. Their system failed...you sound like a new Internet version of the folks before 1980...

[Guest]

What part of - WE DONT CARE is hard to capture? Enough Bush, and Clinton...enough already. Their system failed...you sound like a new Internet version of the folks before 1980...

Donald Trump is no Ronald Reagan.

[Guest]

I would rather have no support from the Establishment than ANY...are you so ignorant that you can not comprehend that the "establishment" is what we are collectively sick of? You think that ignorant jag Sanders supporters give a tip about the "establishment"? The fact is, with out the "establishment's" Super Delegates Clinton would be getting her ass handed to her....but then again, libs almost never let the facts get in the way of their failures in life - starting typically with their education and comprehension.

:agree:....:thumbup:

[Guest]

you can be ticked off as much as you want, but, don't forget, there is much, much more at stake. I.e., the supreme court!!! Obamacare!!! Trade!!! Immigration!!! Free speech!!! Etc. You may be at odds with trump but the alternative of a bho third term is so much worse.

exactly!!!

[Guest]

Now we can add Jeb Bush to the growing list. That makes Trump 0-3 for the Bush family, but Dick Cheney is supporting him.

The list of GOP senators not supporting Trump is growing. It now includes Lindsey Graham, Jeff Flake and the senator from NE.

Funny thing is, that they didn't support Cruz either. That is until it was just Cruz against Trump. So, they will get on board once it is just Trump against Killary. It is just their egos because of what he said about them that is getting in their way right now. If someone called you a loser, would you kiss his ring? The only losers are the GOP that fail to support their Republican candidate in the general election, regardless of their dislike for him personally. If they can't see beyond their dislike to support their party candidate, then they do not deserve future consideration on any issue.

[Guest]

Donald Trump is no Ronald Reagan.

No, he is Donald Trump. Folks can complain all they wish, but the majority want him to represent them as a GOP candidate. If he gets elected president, then the majority of voters want his to be president. I don't like Obama and never voted for him, but he got the majority of votes.

Everyone hates congress and hates the government, but when we have an anti-establishment candidate, they suddenly want the "old establishment" guys' endorsement. Sorry, but he got his shot fair and square, and now deserves just as much respect as anyone else shooting for the position. You can hate him all you wish but he is better equipped to work with both parties than any other candidate, other than perhaps Kasich.

[Guest]

Donald Trump is no Ronald Reagan.


We dont know that - yet.

[Guest]

I don't like Obama and never voted for him, but he got the majority of votes.



I think I invented this...maybe. Maybe it is plagiarism.

I never met anyone who voted for Obama. I have met people who voted for "the black guy", I have met people who voted for "Not Bush" and I have met people who voted for "the Democrat", however, I have never met anyone who voted for Obama.

The majority of the US voters are ignorant voters...that is a fact.

[Guest]

No, he is Donald Trump. Folks can complain all they wish, but the majority want him to represent them as a GOP candidate. If he gets elected president, then the majority of voters want his to be president. I don't like Obama and never voted for him, but he got the majority of votes.

Everyone hates congress and hates the government, but when we have an anti-establishment candidate, they suddenly want the "old establishment" guys' endorsement. Sorry, but he got his shot fair and square, and now deserves just as much respect as anyone else shooting for the position. You can hate him all you wish but he is better equipped to work with both parties than any other candidate, other than perhaps Kasich.

Liars and thieves never deserve respect.

I think I invented this...maybe. Maybe it is plagiarism.

I never met anyone who voted for Obama. I have met people who voted for "the black guy", I have met people who voted for "Not Bush" and I have met people who voted for "the Democrat", however, I have never met anyone who voted for Obama.

The majority of the US voters are ignorant voters...that is a fact.

The majority of the US is ignorant...period.

[Guest]

Liars and thieves never deserve respect.



The majority of the US is ignorant...period.

We're not talking about the Clintons.

[Guest]

Donald Trump is no Ronald Reagan.

The only similarity is they were both democrats who became republicans. Reagan wanted to tear down walls, while Trump wants to build walls.

[Guest]

The only similarity is they were both democrats who became republicans. Reagan wanted to tear down walls, while Trump wants to build walls.
Reagan was the first president who had been divorced. President Trump would be the second. Reagan divorced Jane Wyman before marrying Nancy Davis in 1952. Donald and Ivana Trump divorced and he went on to wed Marla Maples in 1993 and Melania Knauss in 2004.

They both have good hair.

[Guest]

Reagan was the first president who had been divorced. President Trump would be the second. Reagan divorced Jane Wyman before marrying Nancy Davis in 1952. Donald and Ivana Trump divorced and he went on to wed Marla Maples in 1993 and Melania Knauss in 2004.

They both have good hair.

And they both hosted TV shows.

And the "hair" thing is probably left to the beholder...:1rotfl:

[Guest]

And they both hosted TV shows.

And the "hair" thing is probably left to the beholder...:1rotfl:Did Reagan host "Death Valley Days"? There's got to be a joke there someplace.

[Guest]

Did Reagan host "Death Valley Days"? There's got to be a joke there someplace.

That was a good show! How dare you disparage it!

[Guest]

That was a good show! How dare you disparage it!No disrespect intended. My grandfather loved that show. He loved all the old cowboy black and white shows. Some might have been in color but not on his TV.

[Guest]

No disrespect intended. My grandfather loved that show. He loved all the old cowboy black and white shows. Some might have been in color but not on his TV.

:thumbup:....

We were the first home in our community to own a TV set. It is because my father worked in a lab that developed them. He also invented the mail sorting machine and quite a few other inventions, but I digress. But, I do remember the old Black and White shows. I also remember the "black" show, Amos and Andy. The Superman series was first in black and white and later in color. I remember how my uncle said that the new color TVs would destroy your eyes. In those days, if you wanted color you went the theater to see a movie, IF they were showing one in "Technicolor. "

[Guest]

:thumbup:....

We were the first home in our community to own a TV set. It is because my father worked in a lab that developed them. He also invented the mail sorting machine and quite a few other inventions, but I digress. But, I do remember the old Black and White shows. I also remember the "black" show, Amos and Andy. The Superman series was first in black and white and later in color. I remember how my uncle said that the new color TVs would destroy your eyes. In those days, if you wanted color you went the theater to see a movie, IF they were showing one in "Technicolor. "Nope--I lied a little.

My grandfather had a piece of transparent vinyl that stuck to the b&w tv screen using static electricity. The top of the screen was shaded in sky blue, the middle was grass green and the bottom was dirt brown. When Little Joe, his brothers and father were sitting on their horses, as the credits rolled, Papa had a color tv.

[Guest]

The only similarity is they were both democrats who became republicans. Reagan wanted to tear down walls, while Trump wants to build walls.

Can I bid to lay the first brick?

[Guest]

Can I bid to lay the first brick?That means you will need to get off the couch. Are you sure you are ready?

[Guest]

The only similarity is they were both democrats who became republicans. Reagan wanted to tear down walls, while Trump wants to build walls.

One to keep people IN the other to keep them OUT...big difference.

[Guest]

One to keep people IN the other to keep them OUT...big difference.

Berlin wall and Mexico wall...to some, I guess the same thing....(well, to ignorant people)

[Guest]

Berlin wall and Mexico wall...to some, I guess the same thing....(well, to ignorant people)

It's always the same...ignorant people...with really loud mouths. Always shouting down the truth. Blissfully ignorant, the ignorant rabble. They "know" and don't want to hear anything else.

Are they ignorant because they're lied to and they're naive? Are they ignorant because they ARE idiots to begin with and lying is so easy to control them?

Look at all the "great lies"...the various religions...the different political systems...equality...no wonder half of them are on psychotropic drugs. The world has become one big con, one big lie. We're living in The Matrix. We're "plugged in" via the media. It tells the people WHAT to think.

The idioticizing, the 3rd worlding, why is it happing/being allowed to happen? Others realize it. Is it ALL for the growth in population that governments need? I can't see how a nation full of needy idiots is good.

[Guest]

Berlin wall and Mexico wall...to some, I guess the same thing....(well, to ignorant people)


Reagan also offered amnesty to over three million undocumented residents during his tenure. Is this the same as keeping them out, or keeping them in?

[Guest]

Reagan also offered amnesty to over three million undocumented residents during his tenure. Is this the same as keeping them out, or keeping them in?

And maybe you were speeding in a school zone yesterday.
What does that have to do with what needs to be done in the here and now.

I personally feel people who always quote or blame the past are ill equipped to deal with, take a position on, or make a proposal on the CURRENT problem.

They either belittle, diss, call names or refer to something in the past. Pretty shallow basis for discussion.

[Guest]

Reagan also offered amnesty to over three million undocumented residents during his tenure. Is this the same as keeping them out, or keeping them in?

Hey ####, they are ILLEGAL ALIENS, CRIMINALS, INVADERS, LEACHES, but NOT "undocumented residents"

LIBERALS!!!!!

[Guest]

And maybe you were speeding in a school zone yesterday.
What does that have to do with what needs to be done in the here and now.

I personally feel people who always quote or blame the past are ill equipped to deal with, take a position on, or make a proposal on the CURRENT problem.

They either belittle, diss, call names or refer to something in the past. Pretty shallow basis for discussion.

What do you expect from the protected, the weak?

[Guest]

Not to worry, Sarah Palin has stepped forward to single-handedly take down Paul Ryan by supporting his primary opponent. Say hello to Secretary of State Palin.

[Guest]

Not to worry, Sarah Palin has stepped forward to single-handedly take down Paul Ryan by supporting his primary opponent. Say hello to Secretary of State Palin.

Funny, but it would still be an advancement up from Sec. Killary. Of course, that is not saying much. Anyone is a step up from Clinton.

[Guest]

What do you expect from the protected, the weak?Still having problems with self expression? The villages have a lot of learning to learn courses to build up self confidence so you don't need to rely on other people's posters and thoughts. It would be a better use of your time.

[Guest]

Funny, but it would still be an advancement up from Sec. Killary. Of course, that is not saying much. Anyone is a step up from Clinton.If Palin is making sense to you it's time for a check-up. I don't mean that to be funny. Ask your children if you still have the good sense to trust them.

[Guest]

Actually, we should and eventually will have to blow it all up because the system is unsustainable. 50 million on food stamps? The "minority poor" baby boom, they're the majority now from 1st grade on down. They can't run it and we can't keep supporting them.

What do you suggest? Kick the can for 4 more years?

Dear Guest:

No actually what I am intimating is that there seems to be few adults left in America because right now too many people are acting as emotional and selfish children

If you read the history concerning our founders you would see that they had numerous philosophical differences concerning the U S Constitution and our form of government. Its why the Bill of Rights Amendments 1-10 came into being. Its why the Federal Papers were published. The founders disagreed adamantly but they never lost sight of the bigger picture and cooler head prevailed and compromise was sought.

This battle between the Trump people and the GOP Establishment is destructive and they better have a sit down and begin making some constructive compromises so that we stay united. there is room at the table for everyone if they can act adult.

Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

Still having problems with self expression? The villages have a lot of learning to learn courses to build up self confidence so you don't need to rely on other people's posters and thoughts. It would be a better use of your time.

Did you say something?

[Guest]

Dear Guest:

No actually what I am intimating is that there seems to be few adults left in America because right now too many people are acting as emotional and selfish children

If you read the history concerning our founders you would see that they had numerous philosophical differences concerning the U S Constitution and our form of government. Its why the Bill of Rights Amendments 1-10 came into being. Its why the Federal Papers were published. The founders disagreed adamantly but they never lost sight of the bigger picture and cooler head prevailed and compromise was sought.

This battle between the Trump people and the GOP Establishment is destructive and they better have a sit down and begin making some constructive compromises so that we stay united. there is room at the table for everyone if they can act adult.

Personal Best Regards:


This is going to be hard. It is like trying to make a deal with a long term troll on TOTV. You never know what he/she will do because of his/her past history. We have no assurance that Donald Trump will do anything he has promised. And he has been the most dishonesty campaigner if you look at the Fact Checkers.

[Guest]

If Palin is making sense to you it's time for a check-up. I don't mean that to be funny. Ask your children if you still have the good sense to trust them.

It seems to me, the ones whom everyone said made the least sense...ended up being the most right. Take the kkk for example. They have always fought to keep the Jews and Negros out. To keep America "pure" with European blood.

Well, the Negros do destroy everywhere they amass in great numbers. It's a fact that as their numbers increase, quality of life and all standards go down. It can't be argued and no one here has disputed it. What did we do? We ridiculed them and now brown children outnumber white children. From the age of 6 down, whites are the minority. Think about that and think of the changes a "dark majority" will bring. Look at the news today, minorities want this changed, that changed, this taken down, that destroyed. We're done people. I pray for the grandchildren.

The Jews DO run the media who everyone agrees isn't entirely truthful all the time. There is a slant to the news. What's seen is determined by the highest bidder. It's undeniable.

The Jews also run the big banks, the central banks, which control...well everything. I'm not saying it's necessarily a bad thing, but it is true. Jews are pretty much in charge of the world.

Are his kids naive, believing the mainstream version of things? I wouldn't listen to them either.

This is going to be hard. It is like trying to make a deal with a long term troll on TOTV. You never know what he/she will do because of his/her past history. We have no assurance that Donald Trump will do anything he has promised. And he has been the most dishonesty campaigner if you look at the Fact Checkers.

He'll do what he's told to do, just like Hillary will if she's elected. They're paid to be the front man, convince, and take the heat for things done behind the scenes. Just like in business, the real deals are made at a bar over drinks. NOT in the boardroom.

Don't always trust "fact checkers" unless you're doing the checking.

[Guest]

Donald Trump said over the week-end that he had a nice conversation with Paul Ryan right after the NY primary. Ryan's spokesperson said this conversation never took place.

Now Trump is calling for Ryan to be removed as chairman of the convention. Could make for an awkward meeting between the two later this week.

[Guest]

This is going to be hard. It is like trying to make a deal with a long term troll on TOTV. You never know what he/she will do because of his/her past history. We have no assurance that Donald Trump will do anything he has promised. And he has been the most dishonesty campaigner if you look at the Fact Checkers.

Forget fact checkers!!!
How does he compare to the expert liar, denier, felon, phony, chameleon, run down shreiking hag Clinton?

[Guest]

Morning Joe Scarborough told Donald Trump today on his show that he should go back to realty TV if he can't deal with Speaker Paul Ryan. MJ said how would he deal with world leaders if he can't deal with Ryan (paraphrasing).

Of course Trump went ballistic and tweeted that he would never watch or appear on Morning Joe, ever again.

[Guest]

:icon_bored:

[Guest]

Morning Joe Scarborough told Donald Trump today on his show that he should go back to realty TV if he can't deal with Speaker Paul Ryan. MJ said how would he deal with world leaders if he can't deal with Ryan (paraphrasing).

Of course Trump went ballistic and tweeted that he would never watch or appear on Morning Joe, ever again.

I am sure that Trump will backpedal on that tweet as he does several times on each tweet that he does.

Anyhow, Sarah (The Joke) Palin is calling on Ryan to be replaced by some other zealot who is a rabid conservative. Why would anyone listen to Palin who has been nothing but the punchline of jokes since she was named as McCain's ill fated running mate?

[Guest]

I am sure that Trump will backpedal on that tweet as he does several times on each tweet that he does.

Anyhow, Sarah (The Joke) Palin is calling on Ryan to be replaced by some other zealot who is a rabid conservative. Why would anyone listen to Palin who has been nothing but the punchline of jokes since she was named as McCain's ill fated running mate?

Now if your oh so accurate measuring mind could be so open when reviewing the felon, liar, untrustworthy, self centered, run down past her prime hag, Clinton.

So narrow minded!!

[Guest]

Forget fact checkers!!!
How does he compare to the expert liar, denier, felon, phony, chameleon, run down shreiking hag Clinton?

:thumbup:

[Guest]

I don't like Trump, but he will get my vote. When you only have two choices (viable choices) and one of them is a CLINTON, then it is a no brainer. Trump over Chillary any day.

After all, Chillary herself said she would continue Obama's failed policies. And our GDP has never been more stagnant in history. We have record numbers of families on food stamps and only two out of three work in our country, with only one paying income taxes. So, basically we have one out of three subsidizing our government while one works and doesn't pay and one plays and doesn't work. No thanks, if Trump says he will do something different to put people back to work, I guess he has the record. How many has he employed? How many has Killary employed? After all, Chillary promised to put coal mines out of business and put thousands of coal miners out of work. I would rather listen to someone that promises to create work, not increase unemployment.

So yes, it will be Trump that gets my vote. It certainly won't be the traitorous liar and thief from the Clinton clan.

[Guest]

I meant to add that Ryan is just posturing to save face. If it comes to voting for Trump or Hillary, Ryan will vote for Trump. Why would he go against the RNC and vote for someone of the DNC?

[Guest]

I meant to add that Ryan is just posturing to save face. If it comes to voting for Trump or Hillary, Ryan will vote for Trump. Why would he go against the RNC and vote for someone of the DNC?


Paul Ryan is trying to hold on to his republican majority in the house which he has a good chance of losing with Donald Trump at the top of the ticket. If that majority loses, there goes his speakership along with his chance to run for president in 2020.

[Guest]

Chump exemplifies the characteristics of his most ardent supporters (all 1/2 million or so).

Loud mouthed, white racist bullies with thin skins.

I can hardly wait for the whining, excuses and lashing out from him and his minions after losing in a landslide in the general election.

Maybe then, those who support him will realize what fools they are and that they do not reflect the common sense of real Americans.

Or maybe not. :a20:

[Guest]

Forget fact checkers!!!


The rallying cry for Chump foamers.