View Full Version : Raise the fence
Guest
05-17-2016, 11:30 AM
The White House wants to raise the height of the security fence around the White House property by five more feet.
‘Tougher, taller and stronger’ fence proposed for White House - The Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/new-tougher-taller-and-stronger-fence-proposed-for-the-white-house/2016/04/28/ffad7d22-0d40-11e6-bfa1-4efa856caf2a_story.html)
If Trump's wall at the border won't work, what makes anyone believe that raising the height of the White House fence will work any better?
Guest
05-17-2016, 11:42 AM
The White House wants to raise the height of the security fence around the White House property by five more feet.
‘Tougher, taller and stronger’ fence proposed for White House - The Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/new-tougher-taller-and-stronger-fence-proposed-for-the-white-house/2016/04/28/ffad7d22-0d40-11e6-bfa1-4efa856caf2a_story.html)
If Trump's wall at the border won't work, what makes anyone believe that raising the height of the White House fence will work any better?
He just stated in his speech at Rutgers graduation this weekend that walls don`t work and that we needed to be taking down walls .
There was a time when the lower area of the White House was open to the general public . People who wanted something from the Gvt. hung out in the lobby and tried to " button-hole " the president when he came down the stairs from his living quarters to " lobby " him for their cause .
I think it would be a real shoe of solidarity with her people if Hillary were to go back to that practice and also " tear down the wall " .
Guest
05-17-2016, 11:48 AM
He just stated in his speech at Rutgers graduation this weekend that walls don`t work and that we needed to be taking down walls .
There was a time when the lower area of the White House was open to the general public . People who wanted something from the Gvt. hung out in the lobby and tried to " button-hole " the president when he came down the stairs from his living quarters to " lobby " him for their cause .
I think it would be a real shoe of solidarity with her people if Hillary were to go back to that practice and also " tear down the wall " .
Not to change the subject, but I wonder if the Clintons will be renting out the Lincoln room again. And I wonder if GSO will put some of those little security labels on all the gov property so that when the Clintons leave this time, they won't be able to take thousands of dollars worth of gov property, like they did last time. Of course, they were dirt poor when they left last time. Now, they have that very lucrative charity.
Guest
05-17-2016, 11:49 AM
Oh yeah -- The Lincoln will be for rent again for a nice donations to the " Bill / Hill / Cheal Foundation .
Guest
05-17-2016, 01:20 PM
Viral image claims Clintons stole $200k in furniture, china and artwork from White House | PunditFact (http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/oct/01/viral-image/viral-image-wrongly-accuses-clinton-stealing/)
This as been posted before. Mud is not going to stick if you stop slinging, so keep up the work. It's a good use of time.
Guest
05-17-2016, 01:43 PM
Viral image claims Clintons stole $200k in furniture, china and artwork from White House | PunditFact (http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/oct/01/viral-image/viral-image-wrongly-accuses-clinton-stealing/)
This as been posted before. Mud is not going to stick if you stop slinging, so keep up the work. It's a good use of time.
I wonder if you actually read the article you supplied, or correct me if I am wrong, you are just adding mud?
"The Clintons returned about $48,000 in furniture, and they paid the government about $86,000 for other items." This was a direct cut and paste from your article, and it confirmed the statement above that they stole thousands of dollars worth of property. They were allowed to pay most of it back, but giving back someone's car that you stole and joy rode in, doesn't make it NOT a theft.
Guest
05-17-2016, 01:56 PM
I wonder if you actually read the article you supplied, or correct me if I am wrong, you are just adding mud?
"The Clintons returned about $48,000 in furniture, and they paid the government about $86,000 for other items." This was a direct cut and paste from your article, and it confirmed the statement above that they stole thousands of dollars worth of property. They were allowed to pay most of it back, but giving back someone's car that you stole and joy rode in, doesn't make it NOT a theft.Our ruling
A viral graphic said that Hillary Clinton was forced to return about $200,000 worth of furniture, artwork and china that she had stolen from the White House. The statement contains several inaccuracies.
The Clintons returned about $48,000 in furniture, and they paid the government about $86,000 for other items. Any way you count it, the $200,000 figure is too high.
According to top ethics lawyers, it’s at least debatable -- and at worst hyperbolic -- to say the Clintons "stole" the items. A congressional investigation found poor tracking of ownership and final disposition of gifts, which makes it hard to speak definitively of wrongdoing. In fact, two items the Clintons returned were ultimately sent back to them. Finally, it’s worth making clear that the "force" they responded to was political pressure, not legal jeopardy.
Accusations of stealing are serious and require a high threshold of evidence, unmet by the charges in this over-the-top graphic. We rate the claim Mostly False.
Guest
05-17-2016, 02:07 PM
Our ruling
A viral graphic said that Hillary Clinton was forced to return about $200,000 worth of furniture, artwork and china that she had stolen from the White House. The statement contains several inaccuracies.
The Clintons returned about $48,000 in furniture, and they paid the government about $86,000 for other items. Any way you count it, the $200,000 figure is too high.
According to top ethics lawyers, it’s at least debatable -- and at worst hyperbolic -- to say the Clintons "stole" the items. A congressional investigation found poor tracking of ownership and final disposition of gifts, which makes it hard to speak definitively of wrongdoing. In fact, two items the Clintons returned were ultimately sent back to them. Finally, it’s worth making clear that the "force" they responded to was political pressure, not legal jeopardy.
Accusations of stealing are serious and require a high threshold of evidence, unmet by the charges in this over-the-top graphic. We rate the claim Mostly False.
Duhhhh! THOUSANDS, as in more than one. Did I say anything about how many thousand? Are you going to stubbornly sit there and try to claim that my statement was wrong when your article proves me right? Only a woman would be this stubborn. And I am not normally prone to sexist remarks, but no man thinks like you.
And as far as the media defending the CLintons, what would you expect? Taking something that does not belong to you, without permission is considered theft. Whether or not they were charged means nothing. You liberals are so out of touch with reality, I am surprised that you can get people to pay your way. It must be due to their sympathy for you.
Guest
05-17-2016, 02:23 PM
Duhhhh! THOUSANDS, as in more than one. Did I say anything about how many thousand? Are you going to stubbornly sit there and try to claim that my statement was wrong when your article proves me right? Only a woman would be this stubborn. And I am not normally prone to sexist remarks, but no man thinks like you.
And as far as the media defending the CLintons, what would you expect? Taking something that does not belong to you, without permission is considered theft. Whether or not they were charged means nothing. You liberals are so out of touch with reality, I am surprised that you can get people to pay your way. It must be due to their sympathy for you.If it was only 3 dollars you would call them thieves. Is that correct?
Guest
05-17-2016, 02:33 PM
I wonder what information and data the intellectual wanna bes in the WH had to reach a conclusion that a 5 foot increase in height at a cost of many millions of dollars will reduce the already isolated incidents to less than isolated.
Another testimony to the flawed thinking with very frivilous conclusions and reckless spending.
MArk your calendar for the day it is finished and the challenge is not only accepted but will be suceded by some adventerous person.
Guest
05-17-2016, 02:48 PM
I wonder what information and data the intellectual wanna bes in the WH had to reach a conclusion that a 5 foot increase in height at a cost of many millions of dollars will reduce the already isolated incidents to less than isolated.If the wall separating us from Mexico was big enough we wouldn't need another 5 feet around the white house. How many millions of dollars will the wall across Mexixo cost? The wanna bes ought to look into that.
Guest
05-17-2016, 02:50 PM
I think that Obie wants the fences raised to keep his daughters inside so that they can't sneak out to any more Frat parties. He already told us that walls and fences won't keep illegals out of our country.
Guest
05-17-2016, 02:59 PM
If it was only 3 dollars you would call them thieves. Is that correct?
Is that a real question? They stole thousands of dollars worth of gov property. Everyone that works for the gov knows how much you are allowed to keep in gifts and it isn't thousands of dollars. YES, you may keep a three dollar gift. I believe you are even able to keep a fifteen dollar gift but I don't know if the gift limit has changed since I was there. But, I do know that NO ONE is allowed to keep a hundred thousand dollars worth of property. Personally, I only thought it was about twenty thousand dollars worth of property until I read that article and saw how they stole over a hundred thousand.
The Clintons are thieves and they have thieves for friends. And they are stealing from their charity, and the IRS is investigating them for tax fraud because they are not claiming the money they are stealing.
Guest
05-17-2016, 03:01 PM
Is that a real question? They stole thousands of dollars worth of gov property. Everyone that works for the gov knows how much you are allowed to keep in gifts and it isn't thousands of dollars. YES, you may keep a three dollar gift. I believe you are even able to keep a fifteen dollar gift but I don't know if the gift limit has changed since I was there. But, I do know that NO ONE is allowed to keep a hundred thousand dollars worth of property. Personally, I only thought it was about twenty thousand dollars worth of property until I read that article and saw how they stole over a hundred thousand.
The Clintons are thieves and they have thieves for friends. And they are stealing from their charity, and the IRS is investigating them for tax fraud because they are not claiming the money they are stealing.too long
Guest
05-17-2016, 03:03 PM
Viral image claims Clintons stole $200k in furniture, china and artwork from White House | PunditFact (http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/oct/01/viral-image/viral-image-wrongly-accuses-clinton-stealing/)
This as been posted before. Mud is not going to stick if you stop slinging, so keep up the work. It's a good use of time.
One thing the Clintons well understand . The Nation is full of foolish Apologists who will always hush others who might find their thievery repugnant .
Guest
05-17-2016, 03:10 PM
too long
And so long to you too.
Guest
05-17-2016, 03:15 PM
Duhhhh! THOUSANDS, as in more than one. Did I say anything about how many thousand? Are you going to stubbornly sit there and try to claim that my statement was wrong when your article proves me right? Only a woman would be this stubborn. And I am not normally prone to sexist remarks, but no man thinks like you.
And as far as the media defending the CLintons, what would you expect? Taking something that does not belong to you, without permission is considered theft. Whether or not they were charged means nothing. You liberals are so out of touch with reality, I am surprised that you can get people to pay your way. It must be due to their sympathy for you.
Just another Clinton Apologist at work . Their work just never ends . And to think that they do it for free !
Guest
05-17-2016, 06:29 PM
Viral image claims Clintons stole $200k in furniture, china and artwork from White House | PunditFact (http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/oct/01/viral-image/viral-image-wrongly-accuses-clinton-stealing/)
This as been posted before. Mud is not going to stick if you stop slinging, so keep up the work. It's a good use of time.
Read the article all the way to the end and you will find that politifact rates this story 'mostly false'. So keep slinging mud and don't let the truth get in the way.
Guest
05-17-2016, 06:34 PM
Read the article all the way to the end and you will find that politifact rates this story 'mostly false'. So keep slinging mud and don't let the truth get in the way.
You do realize that the Clintons pay their official Apologists a great deal of money so why are you working for them for free ? :evil6:
Guest
05-17-2016, 06:34 PM
The White House wants to raise the height of the security fence around the White House property by five more feet.
‘Tougher, taller and stronger’ fence proposed for White House - The Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/new-tougher-taller-and-stronger-fence-proposed-for-the-white-house/2016/04/28/ffad7d22-0d40-11e6-bfa1-4efa856caf2a_story.html)
If Trump's wall at the border won't work, what makes anyone believe that raising the height of the White House fence will work any better?
The Secret Service is now part of the Department of Homeland Security and entirely funded by congress. Any complaints about expenditures should be directed to your congress person.
Guest
05-17-2016, 06:37 PM
Read the article all the way to the end and you will find that politifact rates this story 'mostly false'. So keep slinging mud and don't let the truth get in the way.
Just as I thought, you have a reading comprehension problem. It was mostly false ONLY because it was not quite $200K that they stole. It was slightly less. Find one part of my comment that was wrong. Go ahead, do it. You can't because you are so wrapped up in your know it all hype that you can't see the truth for the big nose on your face. A Pinocchio nose. I cut and pasted the part of the article, your article that proved my post to be accurate and correct. SO, go about your business knowing that you were wrong and still can't admit it. It takes a mature person to concede. Apparently, you do not have that trait. I know you won't but you might want to go back and read the post again. I never said they stole two hundred grand. I said they stole thousands. Although it was close to two hundred thousand, so thanks for providing that proof.
Guest
05-17-2016, 06:40 PM
The Secret Service is now part of the Department of Homeland Security and entirely funded by congress. Any complaints about expenditures should be directed to your congress person.
Yes they are. I believe they were part of the Dept of Treasury until around 2003.
Guest
05-17-2016, 06:43 PM
You do realize that the Clintons pay their official Apologists a great deal of money so why are you working for them for free ? :evil6:
And this is why Mark Morse has announced that Hillary Clinton's name will not even appear on any ballot in The Villages. He said that the elderly cannot be trusted to make the correct decision, so he will make it for you.
We can't take a chance that the black panthers will show up at Laurel Manor like they did back in 2008, according to our gang of six. (Of course, they were the only ones that saw them)
Guest
05-17-2016, 07:39 PM
You are avoiding my question . The Clintons pay a large number of people to be their Apologists and spin mavens . Why do you work for them for free ?
Guest
05-17-2016, 09:41 PM
Read the article all the way to the end and you will find that politifact rates this story 'mostly false'. So keep slinging mud and don't let the truth get in the way.
The story is so old it has whiskers. There are a lot of people clinging to old stories, true or false. They should start with "once upon a time".
Guest
05-17-2016, 11:26 PM
Chi-Town --- what a lovely racist place you hail from otherwise you would care about all of the Black Lives that get snuffed out each weekend . It`s been going on for years and no one in the leftist GVt there seems to be willing to do anything about that .
But they will turn out for Hill and Bill !
Guest
05-18-2016, 04:05 AM
He just stated in his speech at Rutgers graduation this weekend that walls don`t work and that we needed to be taking down walls .
There was a time when the lower area of the White House was open to the general public . People who wanted something from the Gvt. hung out in the lobby and tried to " button-hole " the president when he came down the stairs from his living quarters to " lobby " him for their cause .
I think it would be a real shoe of solidarity with her people if Hillary were to go back to that practice and also " tear down the wall " .
Dear Guest: There was a time not long ago when most people were civil and generally genteel. I doubt its a safe practice any longer. I believe it is more so with Obama and any president that will follow him. I'm genuinely relieved but somewhat surprised that a serious attempt has not been made to Obama,Clinton or Trump because whether such an attempt were successful or not all it would do is raise their value and in my political view none of the aforementioned have value. Better to defeat them with a lack of votes or support
Personal Best Regards:
Guest
05-18-2016, 04:16 AM
Just as I thought, you have a reading comprehension problem. It was mostly false ONLY because it was not quite $200K that they stole. It was slightly less. Find one part of my comment that was wrong. Go ahead, do it. You can't because you are so wrapped up in your know it all hype that you can't see the truth for the big nose on your face. A Pinocchio nose. I cut and pasted the part of the article, your article that proved my post to be accurate and correct. SO, go about your business knowing that you were wrong and still can't admit it. It takes a mature person to concede. Apparently, you do not have that trait. I know you won't but you might want to go back and read the post again. I never said they stole two hundred grand. I said they stole thousands. Although it was close to two hundred thousand, so thanks for providing that proof.
Dear Guest:
I understand the need to be accurate and accountable when making a declaration. However another way of looking at it all is that a voter would expect his/her political leaders would act with the highest of competency, sound judgment ,integrity and moral dealing . Can one be only be slight a crook? its like being slightly pregnant. The Clintons have had bad dealing as far back as their Arkansas days. Its sad to see that America voters don't seem to mind and keep voting them back. Perhaps its because voters have seen so much of it its become normal. an abnormality that become normal...that's scary
Personal Best Regards:
Guest
05-18-2016, 05:24 AM
Dear Guest:
I understand the need to be accurate and accountable when making a declaration. However another way of looking at it all is that a voter would expect his/her political leaders would act with the highest of competency, sound judgment ,integrity and moral dealing . Can one be only be slight a crook? its like being slightly pregnant. The Clintons have had bad dealing as far back as their Arkansas days. Its sad to see that America voters don't seem to mind and keep voting them back. Perhaps its because voters have seen so much of it its become normal. an abnormality that become normal...that's scary
Personal Best Regards:
:agree:
Guest
05-18-2016, 06:51 AM
And this is why Mark Morse has announced that Hillary Clinton's name will not even appear on any ballot in The Villages. He said that the elderly cannot be trusted to make the correct decision, so he will make it for you.
We can't take a chance that the black panthers will show up at Laurel Manor like they did back in 2008, according to our gang of six. (Of course, they were the only ones that saw them)
Seek help. A good doctor will prescribe the proper medicine that can help you with your problem. You are talking like a child. Does your momma know that you are playing on her computer again?
Guest
05-18-2016, 08:03 AM
Dear Guest:
I understand the need to be accurate and accountable when making a declaration. However another way of looking at it all is that a voter would expect his/her political leaders would act with the highest of competency, sound judgment ,integrity and moral dealing . Can one be only be slight a crook? its like being slightly pregnant. The Clintons have had bad dealing as far back as their Arkansas days. Its sad to see that America voters don't seem to mind and keep voting them back. Perhaps its because voters have seen so much of it its become normal. an abnormality that become normal...that's scary
Personal Best Regards:
You can't be a little pregnant you can be a little dishonest. "Let any one of you who is without ........
[this is the "too long" response probably not worth reading]
You can be a slight crook. Everything in life is not in black or white or can be compared to pregnancy. There are shades of grade.
Take lying. If someone lies just one time, does that tag them a liar for life? Is Cruz's career over?
Good luck finding an honorable person who makes no mistakes and never apologies because they are always honest.
"Cooper followed up asking Trump if "asking for forgiveness" is a central tenet in his faith life.
"Why do I have to repent or ask for forgiveness, if I am not making mistakes?" asked Trump. "I work hard, I'm an honorable person.""
Read more at Trump: 'Why Do I Have to Repent or Ask for Forgiveness If I Am Not Making Mistakes?' (Video) (http://www.christianpost.com/news/trump-why-do-i-have-to-repent-or-ask-for-forgiveness-if-i-am-not-making-mistakes-video-141856/#CxdwYKhw23BRSeHI.99)
Read more at Trump: 'Why Do I Have to Repent or Ask for Forgiveness If I Am Not Making Mistakes?' (Video) (http://www.christianpost.com/news/trump-why-do-i-have-to-repent-or-ask-for-forgiveness-if-i-am-not-making-mistakes-video-141856/#ZYDKpo3VYY3LjpE2.99)
Bernie does seem like an honorable man to me. If he wasn't actively engaged in the Civil Rights movement as a young man his answer would be less credible.
"An American president has yet to muster up the courage to formally apologize for the 400 heinous years of rape, death and inhumanity that occurred during the enslavement of black people in this country that still impacts million of slave descendants," an audience member told Sanders before asking whether he'd apologize for it.
"Want the short answer?" Sanders asked in response. "Yes.
Sanders: I would apologize for slavery as president | TheHill (http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/275443-sanders-i-would-apologize-for-slavery)
Guest
05-18-2016, 08:05 AM
I wonder what information and data the intellectual wanna bes in the WH had to reach a conclusion that a 5 foot increase in height at a cost of many millions of dollars will reduce the already isolated incidents to less than isolated.
Another testimony to the flawed thinking with very frivilous conclusions and reckless spending.
MArk your calendar for the day it is finished and the challenge is not only accepted but will be suceded by some adventerous person.
Look at any military base or fenced in government facility. They redone the entry gated entries several times since 911. Wasting billions of dollars. I personally seen one gate done over 4 times. The government is flawed period due to mostly highly educated liberal in charge. They read books, go to classes, passed up the chain, majority have no management, supervision, or common sense. The house of cards will collapse. Lord help use when it does.
Guest
05-18-2016, 08:24 AM
The government is flawed period due to mostly highly educated liberal in charge. They read books, go to classes, passed up the chain, majority have no management, supervision, or common sense.
The existing fence is 2 ft higher than a pool fence. That didn't make sense 50 years ago.
History of the White House Fence - White House Historical Association (https://www.whitehousehistory.org/press-room/history-of-the-white-house-fence)
Guest
05-18-2016, 08:26 AM
Look at any military base or fenced in government facility. They redone the entry gated entries several times since 911. Wasting billions of dollars. I personally seen one gate done over 4 times. The government is flawed period due to mostly highly educated liberal in charge. They read books, go to classes, passed up the chain, majority have no management, supervision, or common sense. The house of cards will collapse. Lord help use when it does.
In a nutshell!!
Guest
05-18-2016, 08:33 AM
The White House wants to raise the height of the security fence around the White House property by five more feet.
‘Tougher, taller and stronger’ fence proposed for White House - The Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/new-tougher-taller-and-stronger-fence-proposed-for-the-white-house/2016/04/28/ffad7d22-0d40-11e6-bfa1-4efa856caf2a_story.html)
If Trump's wall at the border won't work, what makes anyone believe that raising the height of the White House fence will work any better?
They have numerous guards, dogs, snipers and many other security measures as well. A higher fence will slow people down.
And the border of Mexico and the US covers a vast distance with many terrains and problems with who controls what properties along it.
Guest
05-18-2016, 08:59 AM
They have numerous guards, dogs, snipers and many other security measures as well. A higher fence will slow people down.
And the border of Mexico and the US covers a vast distance with many terrains and problems with who controls what properties along it.
Yes, of course. Always the liberal excuse. So pathetic and pitiful. If a conservative says or suggests something, "it can't be done" but when a libtard says something, exactly the same, "it's different." Wow!
Guest
05-18-2016, 09:25 AM
Donald Trump’s Mexico border wall will be as high as 55 feet, according to Donald Trump - The Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/02/26/so-how-high-will-donald-trumps-wall-be-an-investigation/)
‘Tougher, taller and stronger’ fence proposed for White House - The Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/new-tougher-taller-and-stronger-fence-proposed-for-the-white-house/2016/04/28/ffad7d22-0d40-11e6-bfa1-4efa856caf2a_story.html)
exactly the same?
Guest
05-18-2016, 10:40 AM
Since the Trump wall won't be able to keep illegal aliens out of the U.S. I guess we better hope that Illegals don't try to climb over the White House fence, because it will still be smaller than the Trump wall. But, it will never happen because liberals assure us that Trump wall is impossible, just can't be done. And as everyone knows, if a liberal says it can't be done, what they really mean is that it wasn't their idea.
Guest
05-18-2016, 11:02 AM
If I say it can't be done what I really mean is that the experts say it can't be done and I believe them. Therefore I must not be a liberal.
Trump’s dubious claim that his border wall would cost $8 billion - The Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/02/11/trumps-dubious-claim-that-his-border-wall-would-cost-8-billion/)
Trump wants to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border. Can it be done? - Chicago Tribune (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-trump-wall-mexico-20160308-story.html)
An Engineer Explains Why Trump's Wall Is So Implausible (http://www.nationalmemo.com/an-engineer-explains-why-trumps-wall-is-so-implausible/)
Guest
05-18-2016, 11:13 AM
If I say it can't be done what I really mean is that the experts say it can't be done and I believe them. Therefore I must not be a liberal.
Trump’s dubious claim that his border wall would cost $8 billion - The Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/02/11/trumps-dubious-claim-that-his-border-wall-would-cost-8-billion/)
Trump wants to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border. Can it be done? - Chicago Tribune (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-trump-wall-mexico-20160308-story.html)
An Engineer Explains Why Trump's Wall Is So Implausible (http://www.nationalmemo.com/an-engineer-explains-why-trumps-wall-is-so-implausible/)
Yep, and experts said the railway could not be built from one coast to the other. And of course, there were a lot of experts that said airplanes were a myth. Liberals think that the great pyramids of Egypt are a myth.
Nope, can't be done. Moving earth and pouring concrete is a massive job that can't be done.
Not to change the subject back to the thread, but I think that it is a good idea to build the White House fence higher. I think they should build a cage over the White House, made of iron bars. It would not be completed before the Obummers moved, but it could be used to keep the Obummers and Clintons out. I am sure that either or both could do more damage to our country than a few disgruntled trespassers.
Guest
05-18-2016, 11:23 AM
Yep, and experts said the railway could not be built from one coast to the other. And of course, there were a lot of experts that said airplanes were a myth. Liberals think that the great pyramids of Egypt are a myth.
Nope, can't be done. Moving earth and pouring concrete is a massive job that can't be done.
Not to change the subject back to the thread, but I think that it is a good idea to build the White House fence higher. I think they should build a cage over the White House, made of iron bars. It would not be completed before the Obummers moved, but it could be used to keep the Obummers and Clintons out. I am sure that either or both could do more damage to our country than a few disgruntled trespassers.I guess we need to take your word that all that's true.
Guest
05-18-2016, 12:19 PM
I guess we need to take your word that all that's true.
Nope, just that like everyone else, I have an opinion also. :)
Guest
05-18-2016, 01:22 PM
Holly shyt, how did they build the GREAT WALL OF CHINA with simple had tools? "O" I forgot Aliens Done it!
Guest
05-18-2016, 02:14 PM
Holly shyt, how did they build the GREAT WALL OF CHINA with simple had tools? "O" I forgot Aliens Done it!
Great Wall Built By
Warring States 445–222 BC
Qin Dynasty 221–206 BC
Han Dynasty 206 BC – 220 AD
N. Wei Dynasty 385–584
N. Qi / Sui Dynasty 550
Liao / Jin Dynasty 1066–1234
Ming Dynasty 1368–1644
Total years building the wall 1,400 -
40,000 laborers each year
Some were captured enemies, some slaves and some soldiers ordered to build. China owned the land and didn't build where there were rivers. They said it was built for psychological reasons, to scare the enemy. It didn't stop anyone from crossing it. It was too long to man.
The wall was just another Trump suggestion. That's why it's difficult to find any experts say it can be built. He doen't talk about it much now that he's on the way to get elected. Bait and Switch
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.