Clinton exit drum roll begins

[Guest]

shades of 2008:

White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™ (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch)

Time for a fabricated health issue.
Or some other trumped up (pun intended) excuse to drop out.

The party will not stand idly by and watch Sanders beat her into the ground....and then the Trump attacks.....can only make her bad performance worse and unacceptable.

The queen has gone from coronation to expulsion in less than 6 months. The party knows the Sanders supporters will not vote for her. She is losing the female vote.
And ya gotta have more than blacks and mexicans to win.

She is not capable of winning the general election.

[Guest]

Trump is looking better every day, but the establishment does not want to fight with a Clinton. I am sure they have someone warming up on the sideline, but they will wait and see if crazy Bernie will finally drop out. He is like the energizer bunny. They are betting billions on attack ads on Trump, so they still have a month or two to make a final decision on a possible replacement. They may finally figure that a compromise run of Hillary and Bernie together might win them the election.

[Guest]

Trump is looking better every day, but the establishment does not want to fight with a Clinton. I am sure they have someone warming up on the sideline, but they will wait and see if crazy Bernie will finally drop out. He is like the energizer bunny. They are betting billions on attack ads on Trump, so they still have a month or two to make a final decision on a possible replacement. They may finally figure that a compromise run of Hillary and Bernie together might win them the election.

Maybe. I don't know if that would satisfy those who truly hate Clinton. I would think not. I don't think anybody voted for Obama because Biden was the VP candidate.

[Guest]

Maybe. I don't know if that would satisfy those who truly hate Clinton. I would think not. I don't think anybody voted for Obama because Biden was the VP candidate.I did. I thought Biden had the beltway and foreign policy experience and was open minded. I hope Biden sticks around. Although if anyone needs a break in life it's Biden.

[Guest]

I did. I thought Biden had the beltway and foreign policy experience and was open minded. I hope Biden sticks around. Although if anyone needs a break in life it's Biden.

Biden is an idiot. That said, if we had to choose a Democrat as the only option for our next president, I would probably pick him. Break? There are a lot of others that have had it worst than Biden.

[Guest]

Maybe. I don't know if that would satisfy those who truly hate Clinton. I would think not. I don't think anybody voted for Obama because Biden was the VP candidate.

That's not quite the point. Half will vote for Clinton and half want to vote for Bernie and will not vote for anyone else. Hillary will lose without Bernies voters, but might have a chance if Bernie was on her team. No, she will not get the Republican vote, and has already lost a big chunk of the voter base to Trump. If Trump keeps chipping away at her, he will win by a landslide in Nov.

[Guest]

Biden is an idiot. That said, if we had to choose a Democrat as the only option for our next president, I would probably pick him. Break? There are a lot of others that have had it worst than Biden.


Not and idiot! Moron! But not idiot, it's his followers that's idiots:):)

[Guest]

That's not quite the point. Half will vote for Clinton and half want to vote for Bernie and will not vote for anyone else. Hillary will lose without Bernies voters, but might have a chance if Bernie was on her team. No, she will not get the Republican vote, and has already lost a big chunk of the voter base to Trump. If Trump keeps chipping away at her, he will win by a landslide in Nov.

I do not think Bernie will ever agree to supporting Clinton. I do not think he is so party loyal that he would set aside his view of the world to make nice-nice with Clinton's cronyism, dishonest slant. I also don't think it is acceptable to him to be on the team of a felon.

And even if by some miracle or starnge political hypocritical happen stance Bernie did so.....there are those of his supporters that just will not vote for her.

[Guest]

I do not think Bernie will ever agree to supporting Clinton. I do not think he is so party loyal that he would set aside his view of the world to make nice-nice with Clinton's cronyism, dishonest slant. I also don't think it is acceptable to him to be on the team of a felon.

And even if by some miracle or starnge political hypocritical happen stance Bernie did so.....there are those of his supporters that just will not vote for her.

Yeah, they all are going to vote for Trump. You sure know a lot about democrats.:bigbow:

[Guest]

I voted for Bernie in the Primary, but IF he don't get the nomination, I will be voting for Trump. I'll never vote for Hillary.

[Guest]

Yeah, they all are going to vote for Trump. You sure know a lot about democrats.:bigbow:

Nobody said that or professed that!
Changing the intent of the post to amuse yourself again.
If you are not careful you will go blind.

[Guest]

Not and idiot! Moron! But not idiot, it's his followers that's idiots:):)

Point taken...:thumbup:

[Guest]

Latest poll shows Trump with a five point lead. Wave bye-bye killary...:wave:

[Guest]

Arguing for any of the mentioned presemptive nominees and /or possible sideline candidates is like arguing for what type of poison you prefer.....pick your poison

Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

Arguing for any of the mentioned presemptive nominees and /or possible sideline candidates is like arguing for what type of poison you prefer.....pick your poison

Personal Best Regards:

NO! It's like picking who you want to rob you. The "kinder, gentler" robber or the "not so polite" robber.

Go ahead, pick one.

There ARE choices that aren't robbers. Try the Libertarian, he doesn't want to rob you.

The idiots are voting for who they think will win, not who they want to win. Only "viable", meaning bought off, candidates are worth your vote? Make one viable by voting for him.

[Guest]

Rather be robbed by the one that tells you to your face what he is going to do, not the one that promises to give you something free, while sticking his other hand in your pocket to steal from you.

[Guest]

Latest poll shows Trump with a five point lead. Wave bye-bye killary...:wave:
All of a sudden polls matter. That's rich.

[Guest]

All of a sudden polls matter. That's rich.
Gambling Sites Matter---Their agenda is to make money so the odds they give are skewed to give them the edged. Right now

Tuesday 8th November 2016
2016 Presidential Election Winner - Win Outright
Hillary Clinton 4/11
Donald Trump 9/4
Bernie Sanders 20/1
Joe Biden 40/1


So if you put up $11 you will win $4 if Hillary wins
and put up $4 and win $9 if Trump wins.

Trump supporters should put up $4k and take home $9k. How can you loose?
.

[Guest]

All of a sudden polls matter. That's rich.

It seems that the liberal on here gloated over poll numbers when Killary was leading in the polls. Just wanted to remind our little troll that they do swing both ways and nothing matters until Nov 8th. Apparently, it suddenly bothers you, though.

[Guest]

It seems that the liberal on here gloated over poll numbers when Killary was leading in the polls. Just wanted to remind our little troll that they do swing both ways and nothing matters until Nov 8th. Apparently, it suddenly bothers you, though.
Originally Posted by Chi-Town View Post
All of a sudden polls matter. That's rich.


I don't think she is your troll. That was her post. You are getting everyone mixed up.

I'm not your troll either. I think gambling odds matter. People that are willing to "put their money where their mouth is" are very sure of themselves.

[Guest]

Originally Posted by Chi-Town View Post
All of a sudden polls matter. That's rich.


I don't think she is your troll. That was her post. You are getting everyone mixed up.

I'm not your troll either. I think gambling odds matter. People that are willing to "put their money where their mouth is" are very sure of themselves.

Trump has been fooling the odds makers pretty consistently lately.

[Guest]

Hillary's lies:

Hillary Clinton: 'Serial Liar' - Lying Compilation - YouTube (https://youtu.be/ZMpqImAjel4)

[Guest]

Trump has been fooling the odds makers pretty consistently lately.

Trump and Bernie Sanders have consistently shown/proven the odds makers and the poll takers and the wishful thinkers have no idea what they are talking about.

[Guest]

NO! It's like picking who you want to rob you. The "kinder, gentler" robber or the "not so polite" robber.

Go ahead, pick one.

There ARE choices that aren't robbers. Try the Libertarian, he doesn't want to rob you.

The idiots are voting for who they think will win, not who they want to win. Only "viable", meaning bought off, candidates are worth your vote? Make one viable by voting for him.
Nice thought, but it is about winning. Supreme court, economy and foreign policy. Pick the party that can win that represents your views. Nader and Perot represented people who voted on principle.

[Guest]

I voted for Bernie in the Primary, but IF he don't get the nomination, I will be voting for Trump. I'll never vote for Hillary.

Then you are not a democrat.

[Guest]

Then you are not a democrat.

On the contrary.
That is a democrat that has the ability to reason and conclude on their own what is right for America.

You on the other hand are obviously of the opinion that no matter the horrible, lawbreaking, dishonest background, or mis-representation or untrustworthy or unqualified the candidate it does not matter as long as it is a democrat!!

How very, VERY sad......and histerically funny.

[Guest]

On the contrary.
That is a democrat that has the ability to reason and conclude on their own what is right for America.

You on the other hand are obviously of the opinion that no matter the horrible, lawbreaking, dishonest background, or mis-representation or untrustworthy or unqualified the candidate it does not matter as long as it is a democrat!!

How very, VERY sad......and histerically funny.

That's a bunch of nonsense. If you vote for Trump you are getting a conservative Supreme Court. He told you that. I don't agree with Hillary on everything. I believe in the party as a whole. Why don't you explain what Trump is about? What does he know about foreign policy? He is a con artist. Nobody knows what he stands for. You go ahead and vote for the crook you don't know. I'll vote for the crook I know.

[Guest]

That's a bunch of nonsense. If you vote for Trump you are getting a conservative Supreme Court. He told you that. I don't agree with Hillary on everything. I believe in the party as a whole. Why don't you explain what Trump is about? What does he know about foreign policy? He is a con artist. Nobody knows what he stands for. You go ahead and vote for the crook you don't know. I'll vote for the crook I know.

After 8 years of this administration and of course, Hillary as Secstate, why would it matter if one knows anything about "foreign policy?" It didn't seem to be a prerequisite before.

[Guest]

yada, yada, yada

[Guest]

Nice thought, but it is about winning. Supreme court, economy and foreign policy. Pick the party that can win that represents your views. Nader and Perot represented people who voted on principle.

SCOTUS are all bought off, they rule on social issue BS. They help the parties to stay in power.

The FED, the bankers control the economy.

Foreign policy? What's changed in the last 40 years? We're constantly at "war" somewhere with someone.

None of the parties "that can win" represent my views, hope not yours either. That's why it's called "voting for the lesser of two evils". I can't do that...on principle. I voted for both of them because they WERE the best choice. Perot was right about the big sucking of jobs out of America.

You should have listened.

Trump IS one of them, the R party outrage is theater. Hillary is one of them. I'll vote Libertarian, what I always do, because that's who I want to win. I can't do anything about the fools who waste their vote on a lesser, but still evil, bought and paid for, liar. Just can't and won't do it. Wish the rest of you felt the same way.

[Guest]

SCOTUS are all bought off, they rule on social issue BS. They help the parties to stay in power.

The FED, the bankers control the economy.

Foreign policy? What's changed in the last 40 years? We're constantly at "war" somewhere with someone.

None of the parties "that can win" represent my views, hope not yours either. That's why it's called "voting for the lesser of two evils". I can't do that...on principle. I voted for both of them because they WERE the best choice. Perot was right about the big sucking of jobs out of America.

You should have listened.

Trump IS one of them, the R party outrage is theater. Hillary is one of them. I'll vote Libertarian, what I always do, because that's who I want to win. I can't do anything about the fools who waste their vote on a lesser, but still evil, bought and paid for, liar. Just can't and won't do it. Wish the rest of you felt the same way.

Libertarian don't get no electoral college votes, so your vote wasted:eclipsee_gold_cup: like other votes aren't :shrug: the whole system corrupt. Only when the get rid of electrol college have term limits, and ban political science as major will then system may have chance? Notice I said may have chance

[Guest]

SCOTUS are all bought off, they rule on social issue BS. They help the parties to stay in power.

The FED, the bankers control the economy.

Foreign policy? What's changed in the last 40 years? We're constantly at "war" somewhere with someone.

None of the parties "that can win" represent my views, hope not yours either. That's why it's called "voting for the lesser of two evils". I can't do that...on principle. I voted for both of them because they WERE the best choice. Perot was right about the big sucking of jobs out of America.

You should have listened.

Trump IS one of them, the R party outrage is theater. Hillary is one of them. I'll vote Libertarian, what I always do, because that's who I want to win. I can't do anything about the fools who waste their vote on a lesser, but still evil, bought and paid for, liar. Just can't and won't do it. Wish the rest of you felt the same way.

Thank you for wasting your vote. Better that than vote for the socialist. Why bother admitting it to us, because it means nothing and won't make a bit of difference. It's your waste of time and effort and nobody will even care. Perot was a loonie that was there to change the outcome of the election, and he did. Libertarians are hardly different than Democrats, they are both liberals.

[Guest]

Libertarian don't get no electoral college votes, so your vote wasted:eclipsee_gold_cup: like other votes aren't :shrug: the whole system corrupt. Only when the get rid of electrol college have term limits, and ban political science as major will then system may have chance? Notice I said may have chance

Libertarian party has it's own electors.

Do you think there is one set of electors and they vote for whomever wins the state? Au contraire, my ignorant one who dares to mock me and is dead wrong.

Each party has their own electors. If Dems get the majority, their electors are used. If the Reps win the majority, their electors are used. If the Libs were to win, then their electors would be voting.

You're right, it is corrupt, it's the political parties that have to go. There is where the power and corruption is brought together.

Thank you for wasting your vote. Better that than vote for the socialist. Why bother admitting it to us, because it means nothing and won't make a bit of difference. It's your waste of time and effort and nobody will even care. Perot was a loonie that was there to change the outcome of the election, and he did. Libertarians are hardly different than Democrats, they are both liberals.

Perot was hardly a loonie, he told you what would happen when Bill C signed NAFTA. The good jobs went away.

I'm the one NOT wasting MY vote. I vote for who I want to win, not the lesser evil to keep the bigger evil out. They're BOTH evil and I won't choose EITHER of THEIR evil and corrupt "candidates".