PDA

View Full Version : Donald Trump is a Big Fat Liar.


Guest
05-21-2016, 08:04 AM
Donald Trump Is Against 'Gun-Free Zones' But Guns Aren't Allowed on Many of His Properties, Staff Says - ABC News (http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-gun-free-zones-guns-allowed-properties/story?id=39266544)

But what is new.

Guest
05-21-2016, 08:19 AM
Donald Trump Is Against 'Gun-Free Zones' But Guns Aren't Allowed on Many of His Properties, Staff Says - ABC News (http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-gun-free-zones-guns-allowed-properties/story?id=39266544)

But what is new.

Who cares? Hillary wants to take ALL guns away.

Guest
05-21-2016, 11:35 AM
And exactly what is the point of the thread?

Guest
05-21-2016, 12:00 PM
And exactly what is the point of the thread?
A question that could be asked on most of the political threads lately. But it makes no difference as they all turn to Obama and Clinton. And it's the same script.

Guest
05-21-2016, 12:21 PM
Donald Trump Is Against 'Gun-Free Zones' But Guns Aren't Allowed on Many of His Properties, Staff Says - ABC News (http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-gun-free-zones-guns-allowed-properties/story?id=39266544)

But what is new.

I see that you are not bright enough to understand that the two can, if you are intelligent enough - be part of a cohesive structure of the 2nd Amd. Ignorant people will try to claim that "He said that middle school students can not carry at school, he is a LIAR about "gun rights". Then again, people with even the smallest bit of intellect will see the reality of the matter at hand...

Guest
05-21-2016, 01:32 PM
Not only is Trump a big fat liar, but he insults your intelligence with his outrageous statements.

He would have us believe that 33 states would vote to repeal the 2nd amendment by a 2/3's margin. How many posters on this forum believe that to be true?

When was the last time a constitutional amendment was repealed? Was it prohibition?

Sadly it seems that Trump doesn't understand the basics of how government works, ( ie how a bill becomes a law or how a constitutional amendment gets repealed) and relies on his audience being stupid enough to believe his gibberish.

The Big and Fat is apparent. One would think that with all his money, Trump could hire a tailor that would make him a suit jacket large enough that he could button.

Guest
05-21-2016, 02:54 PM
So the double speak continues.

As long as it is your candidate like Clinton or Obama...they say and do no wrong (:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:).

Guest
05-21-2016, 03:03 PM
Not only is Trump a big fat liar, but he insults your intelligence with his outrageous statements.

He would have us believe that 33 states would vote to repeal the 2nd amendment by a 2/3's margin. How many posters on this forum believe that to be true?

When was the last time a constitutional amendment was repealed? Was it prohibition?

Sadly it seems that Trump doesn't understand the basics of how government works, ( ie how a bill becomes a law or how a constitutional amendment gets repealed) and relies on his audience being stupid enough to believe his gibberish.

The Big and Fat is apparent. One would think that with all his money, Trump could hire a tailor that would make him a suit jacket large enough that he could button.

And Obie does it with one stroke of the pen. Illegally, mind you but no one will fight it because they don't want race riots.

Guest
05-21-2016, 03:32 PM
And Obie does it with one stroke of the pen. Illegally, mind you but no one will fight it because they don't want race riots.

Oh!!! !OOOOOHhhhhhhhhh....so you want to get all "facty":bigbow:

Guest
05-21-2016, 03:45 PM
And Obie does it with one stroke of the pen. Illegally, mind you but no one will fight it because they don't want race riots.


Who on this forum honestly believes that the president could repeal a constitutional amendment with an executive order? I rest my case.

Guest
05-21-2016, 04:15 PM
A big fat liar. Grown up you pinhead you!

Guest
05-21-2016, 04:19 PM
All of them are liars so what difference does it make.( If you get my drift)

Guest
05-21-2016, 04:45 PM
I still say Trump is a better gamble than any democrat.

Guest
05-22-2016, 05:19 AM
I still say Trump is a better gamble than any democrat.

:agree:

Guest
05-22-2016, 07:32 AM
Vote for Hillary Clinton!!!

Guest
05-22-2016, 07:56 AM
I still say Trump is a better gamble than any democrat.

YOU will lose with either. Vote Libertarian. Get back your sovereignty.

Guest
05-22-2016, 08:59 AM
YOU will lose with either. Vote Libertarian. Get back your sovereignty.

More like give up "your sovereignty."

If a libertarian wished to run for this office, he/she had better attach themselves to a major party, like the socialist that is beating up on Hillary in the Democrat party. But, we have had Libertarian candidates in the past and they never get any votes, which means the majority are not interested. As far as my vote is concerned, Libertarians are too liberal for me.

Guest
05-22-2016, 09:28 AM
YOU will lose with either. Vote Libertarian. Get back your sovereignty.

Unfortunately you will then be standing by the wayside, while one of the other two are destined to win no matter what the libertarians do or not.

Not many will opt to pursue a candidate with zero chance of winning.

Guest
05-22-2016, 09:33 AM
Who cares? Hillary wants to take ALL guns away.

REALLY! You guys have been ranting about Obama taking your guns away for 8 years and NOTHING!

It's just another NRA lie!!!!!!!!

Where will the armament stop? Do we have to allow missile batteries in our neighbors back yards because you have the right to bear arms. Missiles are arms!

My summer home is in an open carry state, this year we had 2 multiple death shootings in the span of 1 week. Before the first shooting 911 was called to report a guy walking around with a rifle....911 responded with that is HIS right! 10 minutes later the bodies began to fall.

It is a myth that a good guy with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun.

Guest
05-22-2016, 09:37 AM
I have to laugh...

Apparently lying only counts when a Democrat does it!


Remember the BIG fat Bush/Cheney LIE!

If Donald Trump's lips are moving he is lying...

He was going to release his tax returns LIE!
He is self funding his campaign LIE!
He raised millions for vets LIE!

I could go on but why?

Guest
05-22-2016, 09:52 AM
I have to laugh...

Apparently lying only counts when a Democrat does it!


Remember the BIG fat Bush/Cheney LIE!

If Donald Trump's lips are moving he is lying...

He was going to release his tax returns LIE!
He is self funding his campaign LIE!
He raised millions for vets LIE!

I could go on but why?

Because you delusion is amusing, that's why.

Gotta love the kettle calling the pot black. Hillary doesn't lie, cheat, steal or turn her back on her fellow American. Nope, she is much better than...........???????...........Bill?

Hillary is a scumbag, so if you wish to vote for her, do it. But, don't try to convince us that Trump is worst, because it would take him years of TRYING in order to become as despicable as the Clintons.

Guest
05-22-2016, 09:56 AM
REALLY! You guys have been ranting about Obama taking your guns away for 8 years and NOTHING!

It's just another NRA lie!!!!!!!!

Where will the armament stop? Do we have to allow missile batteries in our neighbors back yards because you have the right to bear arms. Missiles are arms!

My summer home is in an open carry state, this year we had 2 multiple death shootings in the span of 1 week. Before the first shooting 911 was called to report a guy walking around with a rifle....911 responded with that is HIS right! 10 minutes later the bodies began to fall.

It is a myth that a good guy with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun.

A lie? Hillary said she wanted to take the guns away just like Australia. Google is your friend, friend.

A myth? No so. Statistics show that those states that have incorporated concealed carry laws have noticed a decrease in gun related crimes. A good guy with a gun can't stop a bad guy? Do some research before babbling. It is reported all the time where a good guy shoots a bad guy. It just doesn't get as much publicity by the liberal media. Google is your friend, friend.

Guest
05-22-2016, 10:00 AM
More like give up "your sovereignty."

If a libertarian wished to run for this office, he/she had better attach themselves to a major party, like the socialist that is beating up on Hillary in the Democrat party. But, we have had Libertarian candidates in the past and they never get any votes, which means the majority are not interested. As far as my vote is concerned, Libertarians are too liberal for me.

You've given up more than you realize already.

It's the parties that are corrupt. They're middle men between the corporations and the government. They're the facilitators. The parties put the right people in the right places to wrest control.

They don't get any votes because most people are brainwashed by the media to vote for ONLY the D or R party. People vote for who they think will be the winner instead of voting for who they want to BE the winner.

Libertarians leave your life up to you.

Unfortunately you will then be standing by the wayside, while one of the other two are destined to win no matter what the libertarians do or not.

Not many will opt to pursue a candidate with zero chance of winning.

The ONLY reason they have zero chance is because everyone is acting like sheep following the D and R candidates. The lying, cheating, corrupt candidates.

I didn't waste my vote, I used it to vote for who "I" wanted as president, not who "they" the corporate elite WANT me to vote for. What choice is it when someone else decides your choices?



It is a myth that a good guy with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun.

No it's not. SOMEBODY shot him...right? Maybe no citizen could get a shot at him? A guy holed up with a rifle isn't someone I'd mess with.

So you're advocating taking away rifles too? That is the example you chose.

Guest
05-22-2016, 10:04 AM
Because you delusion is amusing, that's why.

Gotta love the kettle calling the pot black. Hillary doesn't lie, cheat, steal or turn her back on her fellow American. Nope, she is much better than...........???????...........Bill?

Hillary is a scumbag, so if you wish to vote for her, do it. But, don't try to convince us that Trump is worst, because it would take him years of TRYING in order to become as despicable as the Clintons.

I see you didn't respond to the Bush/Cheney lie! We are all still paying for that whooper.

Guest
05-22-2016, 10:08 AM
Because you delusion is amusing, that's why.

Gotta love the kettle calling the pot black. Hillary doesn't lie, cheat, steal or turn her back on her fellow American. Nope, she is much better than...........???????...........Bill?

Hillary is a scumbag, so if you wish to vote for her, do it. But, don't try to convince us that Trump is worst, because it would take him years of TRYING in order to become as despicable as the Clintons.


The big difference between the Clintons and Trump is the Clintons have never lost an election, and Donald Trump has never been elected anything.

Hilary's campaign is up and running in all 50 states and she has been fundraising for two years. Trump is just now thinking about fundraising, and finding that the GOP mega-donors are saying thanks, but no thanks, not interested, Donald.

Trump also refuses to follow the Obama playbook by using all the mega-data (which even republicans have to admit allowed Obama to coast to two landslide victories). Instead, Trump will trust his gut instinct (the guy who has never been elected anything).

Guest
05-22-2016, 10:15 AM
I see you didn't respond to the Bush/Cheney lie! We are all still paying for that whooper.

That's because it wasn't a lie. Sometimes, when you are in on the classified data collected, some libtard's ignorant statement about something they know nothing about, is just not worth arguing. It's a moot point now. I saw the intelligence collected regarding Saddam's WMDs and I was in Iraq when they uncovered those mass graves. Of course, liberals assure us that the Twin Towers were all a Bush conspiracy too. Liberals are easily directed in a certain direction and told to run with it. Liberals feel all warm and fuzzy being able to distance themselves from the war in Iraq, taking no responsibility for it. Making excuses for their support, etc. Personally, I would rather fight my wars overseas instead of here. But, that's just me, I guess.

Go ahead liberals, invite some more refugees over. Then, blame the Republicans for allowing it to happen and not stopping it when they turn out to be terrorists. It won't bother me, because I have plenty of ammo and my CCW paperwork up to date. And I live in the Villages bubble...:)

Guest
05-22-2016, 10:17 AM
The big difference between the Clintons and Trump is the Clintons have never lost an election, and Donald Trump has never been elected anything.

Hilary's campaign is up and running in all 50 states and she has been fundraising for two years. Trump is just now thinking about fundraising, and finding that the GOP mega-donors are saying thanks, but no thanks, not interested, Donald.

Trump also refuses to follow the Obama playbook by using all the mega-data (which even republicans have to admit allowed Obama to coast to two landslide victories). Instead, Trump will trust his gut instinct (the guy who has never been elected anything).

And yes with all the so called credentials you are assigning to the felons, liars and self serving Clintons you forgot a couple of small, but significant details.

One and almost unknown, Bernie Sanders has managed to kick her a$$ up one side and down the other of the democratic party.

Second, Trump who you arbitrarily assign has not been elected to anything and has started late in the game is also kicking her a$$ nation wide.

All the Clinton and her sheep bellowing about who and what they are has lost all the double digit leads in most states. She has lost the double digit lead in all the Trump VS Clinton general election forecasts.

She is a felon.
A loser.
A party liability.
That most of America dislikes and distrusts.

So just keep on drinking the Clinton kool aid and prepare to get sidelined again either before the election or after.

She is an incompetent, worn out, hagaard loser throwing bread crumbs to the sheep!!

Guest
05-22-2016, 10:23 AM
That's because it wasn't a lie. Sometimes, when you are in on the classified data collected, some libtard's ignorant statement about something they know nothing about, is just not worth arguing. It's a moot point now. I saw the intelligence collected regarding Saddam's WMDs and I was in Iraq when they uncovered those mass graves. Of course, liberals assure us that the Twin Towers were all a Bush conspiracy too. Liberals are easily directed in a certain direction and told to run with it. Liberals feel all warm and fuzzy being able to distance themselves from the war in Iraq, taking no responsibility for it. Making excuses for their support, etc. Personally, I would rather fight my wars overseas instead of here. But, that's just me, I guess.

Go ahead liberals, invite some more refugees over. Then, blame the Republicans for allowing it to happen and not stopping it when they turn out to be terrorists. It won't bother me, because I have plenty of ammo and my CCW paperwork up to date. And I live in the Villages bubble...:)

I highly doubt that... The whole WMD thing was a lie to get us into war.

I agree that the minorities coming here are a problem. 3rd worlding the US.

Guest
05-22-2016, 10:39 AM
A lie? Hillary said she wanted to take the guns away just like Australia. Google is your friend, friend.

A myth? No so. Statistics show that those states that have incorporated concealed carry laws have noticed a decrease in gun related crimes. A good guy with a gun can't stop a bad guy? Do some research before babbling. It is reported all the time where a good guy shoots a bad guy. It just doesn't get as much publicity by the liberal media. Google is your friend, friend.
"Clinton, Oct. 16, 2015: Now communities have done … gun buyback programs. But I think it would be worth considering doing it on the national level if that could be arranged. Remember I know after the terrible ’08 financial crisis, one of the programs that President Obama was able to get in place was cash for clunkers. Remember that? Getting them off the road. It was partly a way to get people to buy new cars, ’cause we want more economic activity, it was partly a way to get old models, that were polluting too much, sort of off the road. So I think that is worth considering. I do not know enough detail to tell you how we would do it, or how it would work, but certainly the Australian example is worth looking at."

She can look all she wants. Or Can't she?

Guest
05-22-2016, 01:03 PM
And yes with all the so called credentials you are assigning to the felons, liars and self serving Clintons you forgot a couple of small, but significant details.

One and almost unknown, Bernie Sanders has managed to kick her a$$ up one side and down the other of the democratic party.

Second, Trump who you arbitrarily assign has not been elected to anything and has started late in the game is also kicking her a$$ nation wide.

All the Clinton and her sheep bellowing about who and what they are has lost all the double digit leads in most states. She has lost the double digit lead in all the Trump VS Clinton general election forecasts.

She is a felon.
A loser.
A party liability.
That most of America dislikes and distrusts.

So just keep on drinking the Clinton kool aid and prepare to get sidelined again either before the election or after.

She is an incompetent, worn out, hagaard loser throwing bread crumbs to the sheep!!


Hillary Clinton has gotten three million more votes than Bernie Sanders, has more delegates and more money for the long haul, so not sure exactly how Sanders is kicking her a$$.

Donald Trump got the nomination with 15% of the total electorate vote, mostly from white, older voters. Please, please, please tell us how he gets an additional 36% of voters without the women's vote, African-American vote, Hispanic vote, LGBT votes?

Guest
05-22-2016, 01:16 PM
We will end up with the first woman president, or the first Jew, or the first clown. Unbelievable that it has taken 240 years to get to this point.

Guest
05-22-2016, 01:28 PM
Hillary Clinton has gotten three million more votes than Bernie Sanders, has more delegates and more money for the long haul, so not sure exactly how Sanders is kicking her a$$.

Donald Trump got the nomination with 15% of the total electorate vote, mostly from white, older voters. Please, please, please tell us how he gets an additional 36% of voters without the women's vote, African-American vote, Hispanic vote, LGBT votes?

You have the party talking points and numbers down pat.

Is she the presumptive nominee yet? NO!
Why is that?
Because she is feeling the Bern and the dems who do not like her (the dems who do not subscribe to the party no matter what doctine).

Trumps validation is no less than felony Clinton.

You forgot the liability she presents to the party...oops....not in talking points.

I do not think your assumption that he will not get women or hispanics or blacks. As ridiculous as assuming felony Clinton will pull all the women, the blacks and hispanics (maybe she has the illegal aliens locked up).

I guess we all have to have something to be commited to in this election.....right or wrong/left!

Guest
05-22-2016, 01:34 PM
We will end up with the first woman president, or the first Jew, or the first clown. Unbelievable that it has taken 240 years to get to this point.

The kool aide has truly :censored: up your ability to think.

We currently have a world class clown of color in office right now, orchestrating the most unintegrated :censored: up three ring WH circus in history.

And look at the liberty you have taken by erroneously classifying the candidates as clowns or woman!!!

Guest
05-22-2016, 02:08 PM
We will end up with the first woman president, or the first Jew, or the first clown. Unbelievable that it has taken 240 years to get to this point.

If you don't elect a woman, a jew or a clown (whatever that gender or ethnicity might be) then what choice do you have?

The first white atheist or the first gender confused?

Besides, prove that Hillary is really a woman. And just because Chelsea is ugly doesn't mean she is Hillary's and not adopted.

Guest
05-22-2016, 03:18 PM
If you don't elect a woman, a jew or a clown (whatever that gender or ethnicity might be) then what choice do you have?

The first white atheist or the first gender confused?

Besides, prove that Hillary is really a woman. And just because Chelsea is ugly doesn't mean she is Hillary's and not adopted.

:boom:

:boom::boom:

Guest
05-22-2016, 03:45 PM
If you don't elect a woman, a jew or a clown (whatever that gender or ethnicity might be) then what choice do you have?

The first white atheist or the first gender confused?

Besides, prove that Hillary is really a woman. And just because Chelsea is ugly doesn't mean she is Hillary's and not adopted.
OK. Time to post pictures of the kids.

Guest
05-22-2016, 04:20 PM
You have the party talking points and numbers down pat.

Is she the presumptive nominee yet? NO!
Why is that?
Because she is feeling the Bern and the dems who do not like her (the dems who do not subscribe to the party no matter what doctine).

Trumps validation is no less than felony Clinton.

You forgot the liability she presents to the party...oops....not in talking points.

I do not think your assumption that he will not get women or hispanics or blacks. As ridiculous as assuming felony Clinton will pull all the women, the blacks and hispanics (maybe she has the illegal aliens locked up).

I guess we all have to have something to be commited to in this election.....right or wrong/left!


Nothing attracts voters more than calling them dogs and fat pigs and boob jobs. Try it on your wife as a term of endearment and see how well it goes over.

Guest
05-22-2016, 04:43 PM
What would you rather see in the White House?

Guest
05-22-2016, 04:51 PM
What would you rather see in the White House?


Preferably an American, not some foreigner.

Besides the foreigner's expiration date is rapidly approaching, time to trade her in for a newer model.

Guest
05-22-2016, 05:41 PM
A big fat liar. Grown up you pinhead you!

:agree:

Guest
05-22-2016, 05:44 PM
Vote for Hillary Clinton!!!

If you want a nanny state and free stuff,
that others work hard to pay for!

Guest
05-22-2016, 06:05 PM
Preferably an American, not some foreigner.

Besides the foreigner's expiration date is rapidly approaching, time to trade her in for a newer model.

She is probably a better representative of a good American than you. But, we should forgive your jealousy. Get used to seeing her in the White House and in your daily news.

Of course, you can vote for Hillary the star of American Horror Story. But, will it really do any good? She keeps falling and falling. Pretty soon, she will be begging Benie for a chicken leg.

Guest
05-22-2016, 06:20 PM
We will end up with the first woman president, or the first Jew, or the first clown. Unbelievable that it has taken 240 years to get to this point.

How about the first BLACK woman president? Here's a photo of Hillary with a black face. Now, that's what I call giving the blacks her white respect she has been talking about lately. Yes, that is Bill standing next to her. He was hitting on her, not realizing it was Hillary and not some new stuff to add to his belt. :)