All of a Sudden

[Guest]

ALL of A Sudden - - Seven Short Years Have Passed!!!
Before Obamathere was no outlandish presence of Islam in America.
• All of a sudden, Islam is taught in schools. Christianity and the bible are
banned in schools.
• All of a sudden we must allow prayer rugs everywhere and allow for Islamic
prayer in schools, airports and businesses.
• All of a sudden we must stop serving pork in prisons.
• All of a sudden we are inundated with law suits by Muslims who are offended by
American culture.

• All of a sudden we must allow burkas to be worn everywhere even though you haveno idea who or what is covered up under them.
• All of a sudden Muslims are suing employers and refusing to do their jobs if they personally deem it conflicts with Sharia Law.
• All of a sudden the Attorney General of the United States vows to prosecute
anyone who engages in "anti-Muslim speech".
• All of a sudden, Jihadists who engage in terrorism and openly admit they acted in the name of Islam and ISIS, are emphatically declared they are NOT Islamic by our leaders and/or their actions are determined NOT to be terrorism, but other nebulous terms like 'workplace violence."
• All of a sudden, it becomes Policy that Secular Middle East dictators that werebenign or friendly to the West, must be replaced by Islamists
and the Muslim Brotherhood.
• All of a sudden our troops are withdrawn from Iraq and the middle east, giving rise to ISIS.
ALL IN SEVEN SHORT YEARS!
All of a sudden, America has reduced its nuclear stockpiles to 1950 levels, as Obama's stated goal of a nuke-free America by the time he leaves office continues uninterrupted.
• All of a sudden, a deal with Iran must be made at any cost, with a pathway to nuclear weapons and HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of dollars handed over to fund their programs.
• All of a sudden America APOLOGIZES to Muslim states and sponsors of terror worldwide for acts of aggression, war and sabotage THEY perpetrate against our soldiers.

• All of a sudden, the American Navy is diminished to 1917 Pre-World War I levels of only 300 ships. The Army is at pre-1940 levels. The Air Force scraps 500 planes and planned to retire the use of the A-10 Thunderbolt close air support fighter. A further draw down of another 40,000 military personnel is in progress.
• All of a sudden half of our aircraft carriers are recalled for maintenance by Obama rendering the Atlantic unguarded, NONE are in the Middle East.
• All of a sudden Obama has to empty Guantanamo Bay of captured Jihadists and let
them loose in Jihad-friendly Islamic states. He demands to close the facility.
• All of a sudden America will negotiate with terrorists and trade FIVE Taliban
commanders for a deserter and Jihad sympathizer.
• All of a sudden there is no money for American poor, disabled veterans, jobless
Americans, hungry Americans, or displaced Americans but there is endless money for Obama's "Syrian refugee" resettlement programs.
• All of sudden there is an ammunition shortage in the USA.

• All of a sudden, the most important thing for Obama to do after a mass shooting
by two Jihadists, is disarm American Citizens.
• All of a sudden, the President of the United States cannot attend the Christian Funerals of a Supreme Court Justice and a former First Lady because of previous (seemingly unimportant) commitments.
ALL IN SEVEN SHORT YEARS!

[Guest]

You do have a point. That is the consequences of a liberal majority, lead by a Muslim liberal that can't be questioned because of fear of racial riots in the streets. A president that makes his own laws, even though that is prohibited by law. No matter, no one is going to question a black man, because they are afraid of him. He even said his WHITE grandmother was afraid of a black man walking down the street. He has taken advantage of that fear. He doesn't need congress when he has the mighty E.O.

[Guest]

You can make a list like that for ALL the presidents... Bush started most of what O finished.

[Guest]

You can make a list like that for ALL the presidents... Bush started most of what O finished.

Sure, make excuses for the inept.

[Guest]

Sure, make excuses for the inept.I'm anxious to hear Bush and McCain's speeches at the convention.

[Guest]

All of a sudden somebody must have learned how to cut and paste someone else's email.

[Guest]

All of a sudden somebody must have learned how to cut and paste someone else's email.


Which is not allowed on this forum. The rules are perfectly clear. Post a link, no cut and paste allowed, unless these are the poster's words, word for word, he is committing plagiarism.

[Guest]

You can make a list like that for ALL the presidents... Bush started most of what O finished.

hehehe...troll.

[Guest]

Which is not allowed on this forum. The rules are perfectly clear. Post a link, no cut and paste allowed, unless these are the poster's words, word for word, he is committing plagiarism.All of a sudden we are following the rules.

[Guest]

Which is not allowed on this forum. The rules are perfectly clear. Post a link, no cut and paste allowed, unless these are the poster's words, word for word, he is committing plagiarism.

Get over it. Go tell your mommie on him.

[Guest]

It would be a real eye opener to see who authored each post. The stereotypes are all out of whack.

[Guest]

It would be a real eye opener to see who authored each post. The stereotypes are all out of whack.

As the famous evil villain once said "what difference does it make?"

[Guest]

Get over it. Go tell your mommie on him.

The moderators will take care of it by banning the poster. Follow the rules or face expulsion.

[Guest]

All of a sudden somebody must have learned how to cut and paste someone else's email.

Just ignore the content and attack the poster? That is what the libs do when they have no answers. Amazing.

[Guest]

Which is not allowed on this forum. The rules are perfectly clear. Post a link, no cut and paste allowed, unless these are the poster's words, word for word, he is committing plagiarism.

Stealing one line is called plagiarism. Stealing many lines is called research:D

[Guest]

The OP's directs comments only to the damage done by Obama relating to the Muslim issue.

However Obama has allowed a Marxist cultural agenda to flourish which is very divisive. The feminist push for women in combat is going to wreak havoc on our ability to defend ourselves.
This coupled with the demands from the homosexual community. Now he adds transgender who demand that the government pay for their medical sexual reassignment. what will Obama do when transgenders demand the right to march in red high heel shoes?

Obama's also works with those who want to destroy our Christian Judeo beliefs

On Obama's visit to Japan he used is famous speech code to apologize for Truman's decision to drop the bomb. How did he do it "using moral equivalency" Japan raped blundered and muer masses at Naking, dropped bombs on Pearl Harbor. Their treatment of American prisoners was to say the least barbaric. Yet he blamed America for its actions in WWII. apparently history is not his strong point

Obama's agenda was clear before he was first elected. Progressives again did their ready fire aim routine. they wanted to elect the first black president but in their haste they forgot that a president must be qualified , represent all of the people and work for the betterment of this nation. Obama missed the mark by a mile on all counts.

Now progressive believe their mission is to elect the first female president...the logic escapes me. One wonders how does black or female equate to qualified what do you suppose is in this mix that by sheer color or gender makes such a person far superior?

Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

The OP's directs comments only to the damage done by Obama relating to the Muslim issue.

However Obama has allowed a Marxist cultural agenda to flourish which is very divisive. The feminist push for women in combat is going to wreak havoc on our ability to defend ourselves.
This coupled with the demands from the homosexual community. Now he adds transgender who demand that the government pay for their medical sexual reassignment. what will Obama do when transgenders demand the right to march in red high heel shoes?

Obama's also works with those who want to destroy our Christian Judeo beliefs

On Obama's visit to Japan he used is famous speech code to apologize for Truman's decision to drop the bomb. How did he do it "using moral equivalency" Japan raped blundered and muer masses at Naking, dropped bombs on Pearl Harbor. Their treatment of American prisoners was to say the least barbaric. Yet he blamed America for its actions in WWII. apparently history is not his strong point

Obama's agenda was clear before he was first elected. Progressives again did their ready fire aim routine. they wanted to elect the first black president but in their haste they forgot that a president must be qualified , represent all of the people and work for the betterment of this nation. Obama missed the mark by a mile on all counts.

Now progressive believe their mission is to elect the first female president...the logic escapes me. One wonders how does black or female equate to qualified what do you suppose is in this mix that by sheer color or gender makes such a person far superior?

Personal Best Regards:

:thumbup:

[Guest]

The OP's directs comments only to the damage done by Obama relating to the Muslim issue.

However Obama has allowed a Marxist cultural agenda to flourish which is very divisive. The feminist push for women in combat is going to wreak havoc on our ability to defend ourselves.
This coupled with the demands from the homosexual community. Now he adds transgender who demand that the government pay for their medical sexual reassignment. what will Obama do when transgenders demand the right to march in red high heel shoes?

Obama's also works with those who want to destroy our Christian Judeo beliefs

On Obama's visit to Japan he used is famous speech code to apologize for Truman's decision to drop the bomb. How did he do it "using moral equivalency" Japan raped blundered and muer masses at Naking, dropped bombs on Pearl Harbor. Their treatment of American prisoners was to say the least barbaric. Yet he blamed America for its actions in WWII. apparently history is not his strong point

Obama's agenda was clear before he was first elected. Progressives again did their ready fire aim routine. they wanted to elect the first black president but in their haste they forgot that a president must be qualified , represent all of the people and work for the betterment of this nation. Obama missed the mark by a mile on all counts.

Now progressive believe their mission is to elect the first female president...the logic escapes me. One wonders how does black or female equate to qualified what do you suppose is in this mix that by sheer color or gender makes such a person far superior?

Personal Best Regards:

You will have the next eight years to continue your rants and ravings against "progressives".

As for gender or race making for the best person, it does not. However, when compared to Donald Trump, the female presumptive candidate is the better person. Also, when compared to Donald Trump, the current President is a far better human being than Trump.

Now, have a good day.

[Guest]

You will have the next eight years to continue your rants and ravings against "progressives".

As for gender or race making for the best person, it does not. However, when compared to Donald Trump, the female presumptive candidate is the better person. Also, when compared to Donald Trump, the current President is a far better human being than Trump.

Now, have a good day.

Either you are low on your meds, overdosed or are just ignorant if you think that Hillary is a good choice for America or that Obama did a good job. Either way, your credibility is non-existent.

[Guest]

Either you are low on your meds, overdosed or are just ignorant if you think that Hillary is a good choice for America or that Obama did a good job. Either way, your credibility is non-existent.


...and the same right back at you since you are totally out of whack if you would want Trump as the President.

Foreign countries do not respect Trunp. He has already been banned from visiting Scotland. Yes, he would like to go there as he owns some premier golf courses there.

[Guest]

...and the same right back at you since you are totally out of whack if you would want Trump as the President.

Foreign countries do not respect Trunp. He has already been banned from visiting Scotland. Yes, he would like to go there as he owns some premier golf courses there.

I do not like Trump, but will vote for him. His vote is to keep the criminal Clintons out of the White House. Of course, the other countries love the Clintons. She has sold half of America away as SecState. They lover her, especially Russia, since she sold our uranium to them.

Yep, I'll take Trump over any Clinton.
Hillary CLinton is a scumbag liar, tax cheat and national security threat and should be in jail by now. If not for her husband being a former president, she would be in jail.

[Guest]

Foreign countries do not respect Trump. not exactly true--Russia and North Korea are fans
I think he likes Cuba and they like him too.
Trump: I'd open a hotel in Cuba | TheHill (http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/273815-trump-id-open-a-hotel-in-cuba)

[Guest]

There you go...voting for the lesser of two evils again...and again...and again...when there ARE other choices.

YOU choose the president, don't let them do it for you.

[Guest]

There you go...voting for the lesser of two evils again...and again...and again...when there ARE other choices.

YOU choose the president, don't let them do it for you.

It takes a majority to win an election. I would vote for the only person that I totally trust, but other than family, I doubt my vote for myself would mean much.:icon_wink:

Yes, of course I vote for the least of the bad, but I also vote party because it is of MY ideology, or the closest of the two. In my party, I would hope that a felon and threat to national security would not get nominated. I would also hope that we would not invite a socialist into our primaries. But, that is just another reason I won't vote for the other side. We have enough liberals in our party, that I don't need to totally immerse myself with the ultra radicals on the left. In my opinion, the GOP, and Trump are not conservative enough. But, I also realize that our party is always the one that has to compromise in order to get anything done. So, Republicans are required to compromise by moving to the middle-left in order to get any conservative ideas pushed. Americans are a fickle lot, not ever knowing what they really want or what is good for them. They ALL want a Utopia, but there is no such thing.

Which party is closest to giving me these:

Balanced budget, lower national debt
More employed citizens, not working for the government
Freedom of speech without worrying about PC
Freedom to own weapons for hunting,sport and defense
Equal percentage of tax obligation, not some paying all and others paying none.
Strong military presence
Enforced law without handicapping the police
Less regulations/laws restricting our lives
Strong punishment for crimes committed
Strong borders and enforce penalties for hiring illegals
Do not allow illegals to enter into any of our public schools, including colleges.
Do not allow illegals to obtain drivers licenses
Any illegal caught violating a law will be deported if not incarcerated.
Allow states to handle their own social problems, not the Feds.

Between the two parties, only one supports most of that, and it is not the Democratic socialist party.