Log in

View Full Version : The failure in chief lashes out


Guest
06-15-2016, 08:06 AM
Obama’s tantrum a striking display of failed leadership | New York Post (http://nypost.com/2016/06/15/obamas-tantrum-a-striking-display-of-failed-leadership/)

:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

Guest
06-15-2016, 08:17 AM
Do you mean the 'failure in chief' whose approval rating is currently at 55%? BTW what was G W Bush's rating at this point in his presidency, just for comparison, hint in the 20%.

It's no wonder the president says "we're not giving them back the keys to the car'.

Guest
06-15-2016, 08:23 AM
Do you mean the 'failure in chief' whose approval rating is currently at 55%? BTW what was G W Bush's rating at this point in his presidency, just for comparison, hint in the 20%.

It's no wonder the president says "we're not giving them back the keys to the car'.

Maybe among inner city minorities... After all he borrowed $10 trillion and gave them a bunch of it.

We have 20-30 years tops before we become 3rd world. Glad we got ours eh?

Liberalism/socialism only works when you get to select the people in your group. When you have JUST white people, it works great. Look at Sweden, Norway, many European countries. Diversity is what destroys a once prosperous system. Always has...always will.

The utopia is a dream that won't work in the real world.

Guest
06-15-2016, 08:33 AM
Do you mean the 'failure in chief' whose approval rating is currently at 55%? BTW what was G W Bush's rating at this point in his presidency, just for comparison, hint in the 20%.

It's no wonder the president says "we're not giving them back the keys to the car'.

What the :censored: does any of the above have to do with the current situation where we have a failure for a president?

Popularity? That is what you are content in boasting.
OK.

We will give you that among the blacks and muslims and sheeple he provides hand ous to or those who benefit from not enforcing the laws of the land and those who benefit from his knock the USA policies and positions, he could be popular.

Has not one :censored: thing to do with his complete and utter failure honoring and executing his duties as the president of the strongest country in the world.

By the way measuring popularity is as accurate a measure as measuring a fart in a wind storm!!!

Guest
06-15-2016, 08:35 AM
Obama goes on tirade against Donald Trump over 'dangerous' Muslim ban, 'radical Islam' - CNNPolitics.com (http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/14/politics/obama-pushes-back-against-criticism-over-terrorism-rhetoric/)

He said what needed to be said about that pompous ass Donald Trump.

Guest
06-15-2016, 09:12 AM
What the :censored: does any of the above have to do with the current situation where we have a failure for a president?

Popularity? That is what you are content in boasting.
OK.

We will give you that among the blacks and muslims and sheeple he provides hand ous to or those who benefit from not enforcing the laws of the land and those who benefit from his knock the USA policies and positions, he could be popular.

Has not one :censored: thing to do with his complete and utter failure honoring and executing his duties as the president of the strongest country in the world.

By the way measuring popularity is as accurate a measure as measuring a fart in a wind storm!!!

The hilarious FACT about the approval rating of President Obama is that it was a Fox News Poll. Can you imagine how many itterations they ran - and STILL got the high approval ratings?

Yes, Crapweasel Bush was only in the mid-20's approval at the same time in office. He finished at 22 percent approval, which is lower than Jimmy Carter!

The previous poster has a problem with race. This is the 21st century, Cupcake. Get over it.

Guest
06-15-2016, 09:18 AM
Trump's loss in November will be America's win!

If the Republicans thought Romney was a big loss - just get ready for the numbers on this one. It will be a landslide for COLOR="Blue"][/COLOR][/COLOR]HILLARY..

Guest
06-15-2016, 09:27 AM
The professional odds makers are putting Hillary Clinton at a 73.3 percent chance of being our next President. Donald Trump is coming in at 21.1 percent. :mademyday:


Anyone want to place a bet (even money) on Trump? :1rotfl:

Guest
06-15-2016, 09:33 AM
Oblundbutt sounded like a petulant child on TV. He is always lowering his position to the local level and just has to micromanage. What a fool!

Guest
06-15-2016, 09:57 AM
The professional odds makers are putting Hillary Clinton at a 73.3 percent chance of being our next President. Donald Trump is coming in at 21.1 percent. :mademyday:


Anyone want to place a bet (even money) on Trump? :1rotfl:

Are these the same odds makers that do horse race odds making?
Are they wealthy beyond anyone's dreams?
Are we sure winners if we bet on the horses they say will win?

Nothing but self gratifying BS!

Guest
06-15-2016, 10:33 AM
Are these the same odds makers that do horse race odds making?
Are they wealthy beyond anyone's dreams?
Are we sure winners if we bet on the horses they say will win?

Nothing but self gratifying BS!

Would YOU place a bet on a horse that has a 73 percent chance of winning or on a horse that has a 21 percent chance of winning?

Of course, the $2 bet on a long shot is always fun but for the real money, normal people bet on an almost sure thing.

Guest
06-15-2016, 01:43 PM
Would YOU place a bet on a horse that has a 73 percent chance of winning or on a horse that has a 21 percent chance of winning?

Of course, the $2 bet on a long shot is always fun but for the real money, normal people bet on an almost sure thing.

This is a political forum, not a racing forum.

We are already betting our future on this election. This is probably the most important election in over a century and you libtards want to make light of it. You don't care who is elected, only WHAT is elected.

Guest
06-15-2016, 02:11 PM
This is a political forum, not a racing forum.

We are already betting our future on this election. This is probably the most important election in over a century and you libtards want to make light of it. You don't care who is elected, only WHAT is elected.:blahblahblah:

Yes, we LIBERALS do care about WHO is elected. That WHO is Hillary Clinton. By the way, Mrs. Clinton has a 73 percent chance of being the next President! :MOJE_whot::clap2:

Guest
06-15-2016, 02:16 PM
Would YOU place a bet on a horse that has a 73 percent chance of winning or on a horse that has a 21 percent chance of winning?

Of course, the $2 bet on a long shot is always fun but for the real money, normal people bet on an almost sure thing.

The real issue is not being addressed. How many of the 75% winners did actually win?

Since nobody gets rich with the horse race odds makers, what makes anybody think a 75% sure thing real is.

Remember Michigan. Clinton to win by double digits....right up to the night before the MI primary. She lost by double digits.

I agree we cannot compare horses to politicians.....as she is definitely a nag!

Guest
06-15-2016, 02:43 PM
The professional odds makers are putting Hillary Clinton at a 73.3 percent chance of being our next President. Donald Trump is coming in at 21.1 percent. :mademyday:


Anyone want to place a bet (even money) on Trump? :1rotfl:

When Hillary becomes Madame President - (What is the silent majority going to talk about??}

Guest
06-15-2016, 02:54 PM
When Hillary becomes Madame President - (What is the silent majority going to talk about??}

Well, at least the CLintons won't find it necessary to purchase a presidential dog. The dog will already be there and she IS the dog...:1rotfl:

What will we talk about? About the lazy bit** in the White House. Do you really think she will change her ways? Her staff hates her so there will be a big turnover there. Her husband hates her, so.......... And her daughter is too stupid to care, and married a Convict's son. Great examples for our youth, proving ANYONE can be elected with George Soros' help.

Guest
06-15-2016, 02:56 PM
When Hillary becomes Madame President - (What is the silent majority going to talk about??}

About how short her term of office was.............:1rotfl:

Guest
06-15-2016, 02:58 PM
The Petulant child in chief lashes out. Did you see his big ears wagging in his excitement? He did not know which way to go, support his gay brethren or support his radical Muslim terrorist friends.

Guest
06-15-2016, 06:12 PM
The Petulant child in chief lashes out. Did you see his big ears wagging in his excitement? He did not know which way to go, support his gay brethren or support his radical Muslim terrorist friends.I didn't.

Guest
06-15-2016, 06:18 PM
The real issue is not being addressed. How many of the 75% winners did actually win?

Since nobody gets rich with the horse race odds makers, what makes anybody think a 75% sure thing real is.

Remember Michigan. Clinton to win by double digits....right up to the night before the MI primary. She lost by double digits.

I agree we cannot compare horses to politicians.....as she is definitely a nag!
Applies to the winning candidate.
Hillary Clinton 1/3
Donald Trump 12/5
Bernie Sanders 25/1
Joe Biden 40/1

So if you bet on Trump you would put up $5 and win $12. That's what you should do.

US Presidential Election 2016 - US Politics Betting Odds - Paddy Power (http://www.paddypower.com/bet/politics/other-politics/us-politics?ev_oc_grp_ids=791149)

Guest
06-15-2016, 06:41 PM
Bottom line is this...if Hillary wins we all lose...every man woman and child. No matter what your political leaning!
Isn't it true in every socialist country, there are just more people at the bottom, and a few elitists at the top!

Guest
06-15-2016, 07:08 PM
Bottom line is this...if Hillary wins we all lose...every man woman and child. No matter what your political leaning!
Isn't it true in every socialist country, there are just more people at the bottom, and a few elitists at the top!If you really want to know it's easy to find online.

Guest
06-16-2016, 06:44 AM
Bottom line is this...if Hillary wins we all lose...every man woman and child. No matter what your political leaning!
Isn't it true in every socialist country, there are just more people at the bottom, and a few elitists at the top!

If ANY D or R wins, we ALL lose.

It's true in ANY society, some are on top and some on the bottom.

Guest
06-16-2016, 09:21 AM
If ANY D or R wins, we ALL lose.

It's true in ANY society, some are on top and some on the bottom.

Dude, add some more foil to your tin hat. I think the aliens are getting to you.

Guest
06-19-2016, 02:46 PM
Oblundbutt sounded like a petulant child on TV. He is always lowering his position to the local level and just has to micromanage. What a fool!

Didn't I hear one of the losers in the GOP primaries use this phrase? Now another loser is parroting it! You.

Guest
06-19-2016, 03:25 PM
Didn't I hear one of the losers in the GOP primaries use this phrase? Now another loser is parroting it! You.

These Regressives are not very inventive among themselves. :beer3:

Guest
06-19-2016, 06:11 PM
These Regressives are not very inventive among themselves. :beer3:

I get a chuckle every time a libtard calls conservatives, Regressives. Liberals are pushing socialism, which is very, very old. Maybe even regressive.

Here's how it adds up today. Liberals want to ban Christianity from all public places, but endorse and welcome the religion of Islam and even allow traffic to be stopped so that they can pray in the streets. Liberals welcome their comrade Muslims and their sharia law, and even allowed a judge to be sworn in on the Koran, which only recognizes sharia law. Muslims hate gays and treat women like dirt and have no problem raping them, as well as children. Liberals welcome Muslims. Mohammad was a pedophile rapist and liberals welcome Mohammad's religion. The Muslim religion of Islam demands the death of all infidels. But, after seeing all the violence associated with the liberal protesters, I can see how they do have a lot in common with radical Islamic terrorists.

But, this is a free country and liberals are free to be stupid.

Guest
06-19-2016, 07:52 PM
I get a chuckle every time a libtard calls conservatives, Regressives. Liberals are pushing socialism, which is very, very old. Maybe even regressive.

Here's how it adds up today. Liberals want to ban Christianity from all public places, but endorse and welcome the religion of Islam and even allow traffic to be stopped so that they can pray in the streets. Liberals welcome their comrade Muslims and their sharia law, and even allowed a judge to be sworn in on the Koran, which only recognizes sharia law. Muslims hate gays and treat women like dirt and have no problem raping them, as well as children. Liberals welcome Muslims. Mohammad was a pedophile rapist and liberals welcome Mohammad's religion. The Muslim religion of Islam demands the death of all infidels. But, after seeing all the violence associated with the liberal protesters, I can see how they do have a lot in common with radical Islamic terrorists.

But, this is a free country and liberals are free to be stupid.Did you appoint yourself a spokesperson for liberals or is this conjecture?

Guest
06-19-2016, 08:17 PM
But, this is a free country and liberals are free to be stupid.Liberals are free to think what they want is an American response. That's guaranteed, isn't it?

Free to be stupid dismisses your opinion. I won't even review it.
I expected more.

Guest
06-20-2016, 03:37 AM
Liberals are free to think what they want is an American response. That's guaranteed, isn't it?

Free to be stupid dismisses your opinion. I won't even review it.
I expected more.

Of course you did. That is expected from liberals.....expecting more......give me......do it for me.....why do I have to work...............is it free?...............you must share with me...........the wealthy owe us.........

Guest
06-20-2016, 03:39 AM
Just remember one important fact:

The liberals/left NEEDS us. We don't need them.

Liberals= dependent
Conservatives= self-reliant

Guest
06-20-2016, 06:45 AM
Of course you did. That is expected from liberals.....expecting more......give me......do it for me.....why do I have to work...............is it free?...............you must share with me...........the wealthy owe us.........

Replace "liberals" with blacks, hispanics, women...it also applies.

Just remember one important fact:

The liberals/left NEEDS us. We don't need them.

Liberals= dependent
Conservatives= self-reliant

Because liberals are blacks, hispanics, and women, all incapable of "building things on their own". They ALL take take take, and give very little. Women are getting as bad as the other minorities expecting free stuff and someone to take care of them and their needs. Women are the only ones we "need" and it isn't for their ideas.

Guest
06-20-2016, 07:14 AM
Replace "liberals" with blacks, hispanics, women...it also applies.



Because liberals are blacks, hispanics, and women, all incapable of "building things on their own". They ALL take take take, and give very little. Women are getting as bad as the other minorities expecting free stuff and someone to take care of them and their needs. Women are the only ones we "need" and it isn't for their ideas.

However, pig, you have to remember that all these minorities banded together make up more than your old male white guys. Their banded together votes out do your votes!

No woman would choose to be with a pig like you. Chances are your story has been told on Law and Order - Special Victims Unit and you were the perp.

Guest
06-20-2016, 08:56 AM
However, pig, you have to remember that all these minorities banded together make up more than your old male white guys. Their banded together votes out do your votes!

No woman would choose to be with a pig like you. Chances are your story has been told on Law and Order - Special Victims Unit and you were the perp.

Yes they do...and the country has never been worse.

Congratulations...you destroyed the former greatest country to ever exist.

3rd world in 30 years or less as the dregs continue to breed.

Rather be a pig than a pussy.

Guest
06-20-2016, 09:26 AM
Just remember one important fact:

The liberals/left NEEDS us. We don't need them.

Liberals= dependent
Conservatives= self-reliantI thought we agreed that equality does not exist? Let's bring it up at the meeting.

Guest
06-20-2016, 10:14 AM
This guy and a lot of his crew are a complete loss and may soon destroy the American way of life.

How about Mrs. Extavagant, jetting around the world with her kids and all the folks who kiss their As,,,,,,,,?

Guest
06-20-2016, 10:21 AM
Let's see. A 10 letter word that begins with AS. Off the top of my head is it asbestosis, ascariasis, ascendable, ascendance, ascendancy, ascendence, ascendency, ascendible, ascensions, ascertains, ascessancy, asceticism, ascidiform, ascigerous, ascococcus, ascribable, ascription, asexuality, asiaticism, asiphonata, asiphonate, asiphonida, aspalathus, asparagine, aspectable, asperating, asperation, asperities, aspersions, aspersoria, asphalting, asphaltite, asphyxiant, asphyxiate, aspidistra, aspirating, aspiration, aspirators, aspiratory, aspirement, aspiringly, assailable, assailants, assailment, assaulters, assaulting, assaultive, assecution, assemblage, assemblers, assemblies, assembling, assentator, assentient, assentment, assertions, assessable, assessment, asseverate, assibilate, assientist, assignable, assignment, assimilate, assimulate, assistance, assistants, assistless, assithment, associable, associated, associates, associator, assoilment, assonances, assonantal, assonantly, assortment, assuagable, assumption, assumptive, assurances, assurgency, assythment, astarboard, astaticism, astatizing, asteriated, asteridian, asteriscus, asterisked, asteroidal, asthenopia, asthmatics, astigmatic, astipulate, astomatous, astonished, astonishes, astounding, astragalar, astragalus, astricting, astriction, astrictive, astrictory, astringent, astringing, astrognosy, astrolabes, astrolater, astrolatry, astrologer, astrologic, astrometer, astrometry, astronauts, astronomer, astronomic, astroscope, astroscopy, astructive, astuteness, asymmetral, asymmetric, asymptotes, asymptotic, asynartet or asystolism.

Guest
06-20-2016, 10:37 AM
This guy and a lot of his crew are a complete loss and may soon destroy the American way of life.

How about Mrs. Extavagant, jetting around the world with her kids and all the folks who kiss their As,,,,,,,,?

What did the First Lady do besides screw up public school lunches?

Guest
06-20-2016, 10:48 AM
Bring back hamburgers, hot dogs, french fries, mac, cheese and obesity.

Guest
06-20-2016, 10:58 AM
Bring back hamburgers, hot dogs, french fries, mac, cheese and obesity.

Bring back obesity? What do you mean, it never left?

Guest
06-20-2016, 11:21 AM
Bring back hamburgers, hot dogs, french fries, mac, cheese and obesity.

Bring back obesity? What do you mean, it never left?

Exactly.


Childhood Obesity Facts

Childhood obesity has more than doubled in children and quadrupled in adolescents in the past 30 years.

The percentage of children aged 6–11 years in the United States who were obese increased from 7% in 1980 to nearly 18% in 2012.

Similarly, the percentage of adolescents aged 12–19 years who were obese increased from 5% to nearly 21% over the same period.

In 2012, more than one third of children and adolescents were overweight or obese.

Obesity Prevention | Healthy Schools | CDC (https://www.cdc.gov/healthyschools/obesity/facts.htm)

The problem is Air Conditioning. For most people, 90% of your metabolism is used in "internal activities", only 10% is used in "exercise" and other activities. Temperature regulation uses a LOT of calories, calories not used when the temperature is a constant...perfect. Calories that were burned while cold or hot are now turned into fat. Shivering burns calories. Sweating burns calories. Being OUTSIDE is the best thing you can do to fight obesity. Of course, if you eat like a pig, you'll get fat, regardless.