tell me

[Guest]

Tell me what legislation the repubs have past that benefits the average American.

[Guest]

What legislation has either side passed that has benefited the AVERAGE American?

[Guest]

Yes the more accurate and fair question is what has congress done for America?

They do, or not that which benfits them first and a distant second the party and not even on page one of priorities is we the people.

Their single digit rating portrays how they are viewed.

As an aside they are for the most part, in unison against Trump as he is a threat to their crony, politics as usual mode.

[Guest]

Yes the more accurate and fair question is what has congress done for America?

They do, or not that which benfits them first and a distant second the party and not even on page one of priorities is we the people.

Their single digit rating portrays how they are viewed.

As an aside they are for the most part, in unison against Trump as he is a threat to their crony, politics as usual mode.

:thumbup:

If they (either side) are against Trump, he is probably the best one to vote for. He has my vote. Of course, just about anyone would get my vote over Hillary, the criminal, tax fraud, national security threat, and pathological liar. But hey, if that's what the liberals find to be within their ethical standards, oh well. The entitled ones outnumber the rest of us, so I imagine it will be an interesting election. Even though only half of Bernie's supporters said they will vote for her, and the overall voter turnout has been down 20% for the Dems compared to a record high voter turnout on the other side.

[Guest]

:thumbup:



If they (either side) are against Trump, he is probably the best one to vote for. He has my vote. Of course, just about anyone would get my vote over Hillary, the criminal, tax fraud, national security threat, and pathological liar. But hey, if that's what the liberals find to be within their ethical standards, oh well. The entitled ones outnumber the rest of us, so I imagine it will be an interesting election. Even though only half of Bernie's supporters said they will vote for her, and the overall voter turnout has been down 20% for the Dems compared to a record high voter turnout on the other side.



5 facts about Social Security | Pew Research Center (http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/08/18/5-facts-about-social-security/)

[Guest]

Hey repubs, I'm still waiting. Gotcha

[Guest]

https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/ClintonFacts.pdf

Anyone wish to fact check these?

[Guest]

The repubs are for the fat cats and care nothing about the average people. They do not have an answer to this post.

[Guest]

The repubs are for the fat cats and care nothing about the average people. They do not have an answer to this post.

What answer do you wish? Neither side has done anything to benefit Americans. Although, with all the gov give-aways that the left does, I can see why they want to steal more and more from the builders of the American dream. Because they left are takers, not producers. They want higher taxes, to pay for their generosity from others' earnings. They know that if someone is dependent then they control them, therefore they enslave the minorities. They also control the school system by threatening to take away their funding if they don't toe the line, the liberal left line.

Just remember, you liberals need us, but we do not need you. REMEMBER that.

And to answer your question in another way, is congress doing more for America when they are recessed than when they are in session? I believe they do more harm and cost Americans more when they are proactive. Our congress should take a hint from Texas and only go into session every two years. That way, they would do less damage.

[Guest]

What answer do you wish? Neither side has done anything to benefit Americans. Although, with all the gov give-aways that the left does, I can see why they want to steal more and more from the builders of the American dream. Because they left are takers, not producers. They want higher taxes, to pay for their generosity from others' earnings. They know that if someone is dependent then they control them, therefore they enslave the minorities. They also control the school system by threatening to take away their funding if they don't toe the line, the liberal left line.

Just remember, you liberals need us, but we do not need you. REMEMBER that.

And to answer your question in another way, is congress doing more for America when they are recessed than when they are in session? I believe they do more harm and cost Americans more when they are proactive. Our congress should take a hint from Texas and only go into session every two years. That way, they would do less damage.

Democrats/liberals are mostly women, women who are inferior and need others for their safety/survival. That's why the party is full of women and they want a woman president. They want a world of peace and harmony where everyone gets an equal share. And they don't want the white men who created the civilization that allows them the luxury of these high ideals to exist, around any more, getting in their way.

[Guest]

What legislation has either side passed that has benefited the AVERAGE American?

Your not serious with this statement, are you?

[Guest]

You seem to forget that men have created all the problems in the world. You must be very unhappy with your wife, if you have one, to make such statement about women.

[Guest]

You seem to forget that men have created all the problems in the world. You must be very unhappy with your wife, if you have one, to make such statement about women.

Are you replying to the air, or did you have a particular post that you are answering? It helps if you reference a post.

[Guest]

Democrats/liberals are mostly women, women who are inferior and need others for their safety/survival. That's why the party is full of women and they want a woman president. They want a world of peace and harmony where everyone gets an equal share. And they don't want the white men who created the civilization that allows them the luxury of these high ideals to exist, around any more, getting in their way.


Amazons - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazons)

[Guest]

You seem to forget that men have created all the problems in the world. You must be very unhappy with your wife, if you have one, to make such statement about women.

Men also created all the good you see in the world. All the inventions (99.9% anyway), the civilizations. There may be queens, but men do the "heavy lifting". Always have, always will. Women have a false sense of worth because we live in a technological society, take that away and their worth goes down. You may not like it, but facts are facts. The less technology, mechanization, the less women are worth.

Amazons - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazons)

Nothing but a myth. Like the stories the Bible is based on.

[Guest]

Tell me.........

Over and over again, my friend.
Oh, you don't believe we're on the eve of destruction
You don't believe we're on the eve of destruction.......................

[Guest]

Tell me.........

Over and over again, my friend.
Oh, you don't believe we're on the eve of destruction
You don't believe we're on the eve of destruction.......................

We are... It took Rome 300 years of slow decay to finally collapse. We'll do it in 30 or less. Why? We're "diversifying", we're diluting our population faster.

[Guest]

We are... It took Rome 300 years of slow decay to finally collapse. We'll do it in 30 or less. Why? We're "diversifying", we're diluting our population faster.

Do you mind if I quote you on this? I've never heard that before, especially on this forum.

Just remember liberals, this guy does not claim to be affiliated with the GOP so don't blame the Republicans for his radical behavior.

[Guest]

Amazons - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazons)


Must of had some good drugs back then. You know the kind that makes you hallucinate.

[Guest]

Do you mind if I quote you on this? I've never heard that before, especially on this forum.

Just remember liberals, this guy does not claim to be affiliated with the GOP so don't blame the Republicans for his radical behavior.

Radical? It's a mathematical certainty. Already they are the majority below the age of 6. What part of that don't you understand? They keep having anchor/welfare babies and we keep aborting or letting Lawanda raise our kids...and you wonder why we've dropped from #1 in everything? You're being obtuse.

[Guest]

repealing Obamacare

[Guest]

Radical? It's a mathematical certainty. Already they are the majority below the age of 6. What part of that don't you understand? They keep having anchor/welfare babies and we keep aborting or letting Lawanda raise our kids...and you wonder why we've dropped from #1 in everything? You're being obtuse.

And you either need to take your meds properly, or seek help.

[Guest]

The simply truth is that our government is much too large and hence as such is tripping over itself. Like newly hired supervisors the first thing they do is devise new forms then they create policy that has already been creating means nothing and stays on the books collecting people's taxes forever. the whole thing plays out like a keystone kops routine....................................

What's a politician to do trying to work in this labyrinth but save him/herself . so they lie and lie some more to get re-elected and along the way grab as much of the peoples booty that they can carry

worse yet too many of the electorate have no idea how government is suppose to run, who was elected to run it...when you don't know what you don't know... well ignorance is bliss but this same electorate can repeat verse by verse every line Kim Kardashian and her moron husband speak .

Yet, something like Hillary's troubled Benghazi failure, her personal e-mail server with its breached security and selling America to foreigners via Clinton Charitable Trust doesn't even penetrate their little bird brains. If you said to this segment Hillary placed us in great danger with her personal server the reply would be "awesome"

Personal Best Regards

[Guest]

The simply truth is that our government is much too large and hence as such is tripping over itself. Like newly hired supervisors the first thing they do is devise new forms then they create policy that has already been creating means nothing and stays on the books collecting people's taxes forever. the whole thing plays out like a keystone kops routine....................................

What's a politician to do trying to work in this labyrinth but save him/herself . so they lie and lie some more to get re-elected and along the way grab as much of the peoples booty that they can carry

worse yet too many of the electorate have no idea how government is suppose to run, who was elected to run it...when you don't know what you don't know... well ignorance is bliss but this same electorate can repeat verse by verse every line Kim Kardashian and her moron husband speak .

Yet, something like Hillary's troubled Benghazi failure, her personal e-mail server with its breached security and selling America to foreigners via Clinton Charitable Trust doesn't even penetrate their little bird brains. If you said to this segment Hillary placed us in great danger with her personal server the reply would be "awesome"

Personal Best Regards

Most people are too ignorant to vote...they have no clue...so they vote for their party, hoping they'll "take care of us".

[Guest]

repealing Obamacare

I must have missed something, the repubs repealed Obamacare.

[Guest]

I must have missed something, the repubs repealed Obamacare.

Yeah, you missed something. You might want to brush up on your reading skills. He said "repealing" NOT "repealed".

[Guest]

Democrats/liberals are mostly women, women who are inferior and need others for their safety/survival. That's why the party is full of women and they want a woman president. They want a world of peace and harmony where everyone gets an equal share. And they don't want the white men who created the civilization that allows them the luxury of these high ideals to exist, around any more, getting in their way.

So very very true ! The older women get the less their need for a man in their life .
They have their children and grandchildren and all they need from a man is unlimited access to his lifetime savings .

[Guest]

We are... It took Rome 300 years of slow decay to finally collapse. We'll do it in 30 or less. Why? We're "diversifying", we're diluting our population faster.
Your 30 year doomsaying is 50 years old.

Barry McGuire - Eve Of Destruction - YouTube (https://youtu.be/qfZVu0alU0I)

[Guest]

So very very true ! The older women get the less their need for a man in their life .
They have their children and grandchildren and all they need from a man is unlimited access to his lifetime savings .

So true...divorce rates for 60 year old's is skyrocketing. After a lifetime, the men are taken to the cleaners while the wife lives a life of luxury.

The pendulum will swing back and they'll get theirs. Wait until Hispanic and black men are in charge. There won't be many women in positions of power, they won't have it.

You'll be back to where you were, where you SHOULD be, raising and teaching your children. Not competition in the workforce.

Your 30 year doomsaying is 50 years old.

Barry McGuire - Eve Of Destruction - YouTube (https://youtu.be/qfZVu0alU0I)

That's Barry's forecast. Mine is 30 years. The "minority majority" that is 6 years running will be 36, in their prime. Their influence will be overwhelming. The difference between Barry and me is I waited until it already started. The decline, the demise, has already begun. We're no longer #1 in anything, closer to the teens in most things. ALL due to lowering the standards to get minorities artificially in the game. It's a mathematical certainty that enough "dilution" of the dominant people results in the destruction of that society. It morphs into the "invading" peoples society. Which is mostly Mexico. In 30 years we will be Mexico II.

Here, take a look a counties that have a Hispanic majority right now. They're slowly invading, like we did to the Indians.

This Is Where Whites In America Are A Minority | Zero Hedge (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-28/where-whites-america-are-minority)

I'm not crying wolf, look what happens when places "diversify", they don't get better...ever.

[Guest]

NEWS FLASH to retirees and others; If you do not celebrate diversity, do not move to a diversified state. Florida is one of the most diversified states in the US.

If you want to live only among your ilk, try Montana, Idaho, SD, ND, Utah.

Moving to Florida and complaining about diversity is like moving to Florida and complaining about the heat.

[Guest]

NEWS FLASH to retirees and others; If you do not celebrate diversity, do not move to a diversified state. Florida is one of the most diversified states in the US.

If you want to live only among your ilk, try Montana, Idaho, SD, ND, Utah.

Moving to Florida and complaining about diversity is like moving to Florida and complaining about the heat.It's not diverse if you stay in the house 24 hours a day.

[Guest]

It's not diverse if you stay in the house 24 hours a day.

If you stay in the bubble... We're a bastion of 99% whiteness. Please God, let us keep this ONE little piece of heaven. Don't let them turn it into another diversified hell hole.

[Guest]

If you stay in the bubble... We're a bastion of 99% whiteness. Please God, let us keep this ONE little piece of heaven. Don't let them turn it into another diversified hell hole.

If you elect Team Hillary, that is exactly what will happen.

[Guest]

If you elect Team Hillary, that is exactly what will happen.

Obama wants to force landlords...ALL landlords...to accept section 8. The rent is $3000 a month? Take the $1000 the government offers and a $2000 tax credit.

Can you imagine when their "immediate family" starts coming over? All 4 children, all 10 grandchildren, all 20 great grandchildren. Yes, I think the character, the greatness, of the villages is nearing an end. At least I got to enjoy it for a while.

This IS in the works, this IS their plan.

These are the things to fight.

[Guest]

Obama wants to force landlords...ALL landlords...to accept section 8. The rent is $3000 a month? Take the $1000 the government offers and a $2000 tax credit.

Can you imagine when their "immediate family" starts coming over? All 4 children, all 10 grandchildren, all 20 great grandchildren. Yes, I think the character, the greatness, of the villages is nearing an end. At least I got to enjoy it for a while.

This IS in the works, this IS their plan.

These are the things to fight.


All ten grandchildren and all 20 great grandchildren would not be allowed to live in The Villages for any extended period of time, unless the rules are changed.

[Guest]

All ten grandchildren and all 20 great grandchildren would not be allowed to live in The Villages for any extended period of time, unless the rules are changed.

They VISIT from the projects that grandma USED to live in before she got a free ride here to diversify the place. They'll all drive up from Wildwood and have a merry old time. Bringing the hood to a family pool near you.

[Guest]

All ten grandchildren and all 20 great grandchildren would not be allowed to live in The Villages for any extended period of time, unless the rules are changed.

And, that can be done with the stroke of a pen, Obama Care style.

[Guest]

Yeah, you missed something. You might want to brush up on your reading skills. He said "repealing" NOT "repealed".

From the Free Dictionary

re·peal (rĭ-pēl′)
tr.v. re·pealed, re·peal·ing, re·peals
1. To revoke or rescind, especially by the action of a legislature.

I think you should brush up on your English definitions. No need to apologize. LOL

[Guest]

From the Free Dictionary

re·peal (rĭ-pēl′)
tr.v. re·pealed, re·peal·ing, re·peals
1. To revoke or rescind, especially by the action of a legislature.

I think you should brush up on your English definitions. No need to apologize. LOL

They have DIFFERENT meanings. You know, extra letters or different letters in the beginning and end of words, change the meaning.

Just thank me.

[Guest]

They have DIFFERENT meanings. You know, extra letters or different letters in the beginning and end of words, change the meaning.

Just thank me.

I have documentation, you have BS.

[Guest]

I have documentation, you have BS.

Are YOU really stupid? REPEALING and REPEALED have two different meanings. REPEALING is the present tense - as in something that is currently taking place. REPEALED is past tense - something that has already taken place. How can you possibly not realize the difference?

[Guest]

Are YOU really stupid? REPEALING and REPEALED have two different meanings. REPEALING is the present tense - as in something that is currently taking place. REPEALED is past tense - something that has already taken place. How can you possibly not realize the difference?
This might help.
English
verb
repeal
conjugated in all tenses. (http://www.verbix.com/webverbix/English/repeal.html)

[Guest]

Are YOU really stupid? REPEALING and REPEALED have two different meanings. REPEALING is the present tense - as in something that is currently taking place. REPEALED is past tense - something that has already taken place. How can you possibly not realize the difference?


Why is the ACA still the law when it was voted to repeal it 57 times?

[Guest]

Why is the ACA still the law when it was voted to repeal it 57 times?

What does this have to do with post you quoted? Nowhere in that post does it reference the ACA. That post only addresses the difference between the terms REPEALING and REPEAL, nothing more. When will you stop the troll baiting?

[Guest]

Are YOU really stupid? REPEALING and REPEALED have two different meanings. REPEALING is the pr esent tense - as in something that is currently taking place. REPEALED is past tense - something that has already taken place. How can you possibly not realize the difference?

More BS Now take your meds and calm down.

[Guest]

More BS Now take your meds and calm down.

Too bad there are no meds for you...no "smart pills" to raise your IQ to 100. We could put it in the water of the inner cities and we could solve poverty. Unfortunately there's no such thing. They'll stay poor violent idiots, and we'll keep paying for them.

[Guest]

Too bad there are no meds for you...no "smart pills" to raise your IQ to 100. We could put it in the water of the inner cities and we could solve poverty. Unfortunately there's no such thing. They'll stay poor violent idiots, and we'll keep paying for them.
There are smart pills and everyone knows about them.

[Guest]

More BS Now take your meds and calm down.

Your posts clearly demonstrate that your ignorance has no limit.

[Guest]

Typical of some repubs, put documentation in front of them and they call it untrue. Pathetic You can't reason with their stupidity.

[Guest]

Typical of some repubs, put documentation in front of them and they call it untrue. Pathetic You can't reason with their stupidity.

You neglected to quote the post where you claim someone called the documentation you presented untrue. Specifically, what documentation are you referring to?

[Guest]

Typical of some repubs, put documentation in front of them and they call it untrue. Pathetic You can't reason with their stupidity.

Much "documentation" is false. Don't believe what you see, read, or hear, if it's from a "mainstream" source. It's a world full of manipulation and propaganda.

[Guest]

You neglected to quote the post where you claim someone called the documentation you presented untrue. Specifically, what documentation are you referring to?

Still waiting! Where is the documentation? Put up or shut up.

[Guest]

Too bad there are no meds for you...no "smart pills" to raise your IQ to 100. We could put it in the water of the inner cities and we could solve poverty. Unfortunately there's no such thing. They'll stay poor violent idiots, and we'll keep paying for them.

Couldn't use smart pills. So, they used the next best alternative "lead".

[Guest]

Much "documentation" is false. Don't believe what you see, read, or hear, if it's from a "mainstream" source. It's a world full of manipulation and propaganda.

So makeup your own. LOL The repubs do. Just check out trump's.

[Guest]

So makeup your own. LOL The repubs do. Just check out trump's.

They ALL do, the Ds the Rs, the government in general, corporations, people, parents, kids...ALL lie...a lot. They all "just make stuff up".

[Guest]

Men also created all the good you see in the world. All the inventions (99.9% anyway), the civilizations. There may be queens, but men do the "heavy lifting". Always have, always will. Women have a false sense of worth because we live in a technological society, take that away and their worth goes down. You may not like it, but facts are facts. The less technology, mechanization, the less women are worth.



Nothing but a myth. Like the stories the Bible is based on.

If there were no women there would be no men! What's that worth?

[Guest]

To the OP - how about the Civil Rights Act of 1964 despite Dem Sen Robert Byrd's filibuster! Dems could not have passed it without Republicans.
A Deeper Look at the Politicians Who Passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964
|
History | Smithsonian (http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/deep-look-politicians-passed-civil-rights-act-1964-180951799/?no-ist)

[Guest]

To the OP - how about the Civil Rights Act of 1964 despite Dem Sen Robert Byrd's filibuster! Dems could not have passed it without Republicans.
A Deeper Look at the Politicians Who Passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964
|
History | Smithsonian (http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/deep-look-politicians-passed-civil-rights-act-1964-180951799/?no-ist)

Quite right. None of the civil rights laws would have been passed without Republicans. It was the Dems that attempted to block ALL of them, including the abolishment of slavery. Democrats are the party of the KKK. But, that is the past. Now, the Dems are attempting to enslave more than just the blacks. And they want to abolish the Constitution, liberty and freedom in favor of tyranny and socialism. After all, it is the so-called European way.

[Guest]

If there were no women there would be no men! What's that worth?

And there we have the rub. Can't live with them, can't live without them.

[Guest]

And there we have the rub. Can't live with them, can't live without them.

Gays do,,,,,:a20:

[Guest]

Quite right. None of the civil rights laws would have been passed without Republicans. It was the Dems that attempted to block ALL of them, including the abolishment of slavery. Democrats are the party of the KKK. But, that is the past. Now, the Dems are attempting to enslave more than just the blacks. And they want to abolish the Constitution, liberty and freedom in favor of tyranny and socialism. After all, it is the so-called European way.

Who introduced the legislation? It wasn't the repubs. And for your information, did you ever hear of the Dixiecrats?

"Democrats are the party of the KKK" Then why are they backing trump and why is trump quoting them.

[Guest]

Who introduced the legislation? It wasn't the repubs. And for your information, did you ever hear of the Dixiecrats?

"Democrats are the party of the KKK" Then why are they backing trump and why is trump quoting them.This is well worth reading: How LBJ Saved the Civil Rights Act - The Atlantic (http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/04/what-the-hells-the-presidency-for/358630/)

"And the entire Republican caucus in the House was wilting under Johnson’s relentless and very public campaign to portray “the party of Lincoln” as obstructing civil rights by opposing the discharge petition."

[Guest]

Who introduced the legislation? It wasn't the repubs. And for your information, did you ever hear of the Dixiecrats?

"Democrats are the party of the KKK" Then why are they backing trump and why is trump quoting them.

I do not know the clan's motivation for supporting Trump. Why is George Soros supporting and funding Hillary? Why has Hillary's campaign funds come from many Middle East countries that utilize Sharia law, hate women and homos? As a matter of fact, why do Democrats support Hillary KNOWING what they know about her now? I guess people are just stupid. Are you stupid?

But the fact is that you can attempt to change history all you wish but in every instance of civil right legislation, it has been predominantly the left that has blocked the changes. So, why are they trying to take credit for it now? Do they think that ALL Americans are stupid or only the majority on the left?

[Guest]

This is well worth reading: How LBJ Saved the Civil Rights Act - The Atlantic (http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/04/what-the-hells-the-presidency-for/358630/)

"And the entire Republican caucus in the House was wilting under Johnson’s relentless and very public campaign to portray “the party of Lincoln” as obstructing civil rights by opposing the discharge petition."

Should have obstructed "civil rights" even more...look what we've become...look what we're becoming. From #1 to #17...civil rights did that to us. Affirmative action and quotas did that to us.

I do not know the clan's motivation for supporting Trump. Why is George Soros supporting and funding Hillary? Why has Hillary's campaign funds come from many Middle East countries that utilize Sharia law, hate women and homos? As a matter of fact, why do Democrats support Hillary KNOWING what they know about her now? I guess people are just stupid. Are you stupid?

But the fact is that you can attempt to change history all you wish but in every instance of civil right legislation, it has been predominantly the left that has blocked the changes. So, why are they trying to take credit for it now? Do they think that ALL Americans are stupid or only the majority on the left?

The clan has been trying to save you from yourself. They knew the minorities were worthless and had no place with civilized people. As you try to INCREASE their influence and numbers, the clan is trying to keep their numbers down. You should have listened...in 30 years THEY will be in control and your grand children will curse your name. They bred you out of your own country.

[Guest]

I do not know the clan's motivation for supporting Trump. Why is George Soros supporting and funding Hillary? Why has Hillary's campaign funds come from many Middle East countries that utilize Sharia law, hate women and homos? As a matter of fact, why do Democrats support Hillary KNOWING what they know about her now? I guess people are just stupid. Are you stupid?

But the fact is that you can attempt to change history all you wish but in every instance of civil right legislation, it has been predominantly the left that has blocked the changes. So, why are they trying to take credit for it now? Do they think that ALL Americans are stupid or only the majority on the left?

You are not serious, your post is a joke right? Address trump quoting the klan.

[Guest]

Should have obstructed "civil rights" even more...look what we've become...look what we're becoming. From #1 to #17...civil rights did that to us. Affirmative action and quotas did that to us.



The clan has been trying to save you from yourself. They knew the minorities were worthless and had no place with civilized people. As you try to INCREASE their influence and numbers, the clan is trying to keep their numbers down. You should have listened...in 30 years THEY will be in control and your grand children will curse your name. They bred you out of your own country.

I pray for people like you!

[Guest]

You are not serious, your post is a joke right? Address trump quoting the klan.

I replied to a post. What are you looking for? I bet it is really tough to come up with dirt on Trump comparable to Hillary's felonies. Don't be embarrassed. If you wish to vote for a felon and become an accessory after the fact, then go for it. Go ahead and vote for criminal Hillary. Since when did crime ever mean anything to immoral and unethical liberals?

[Guest]

I replied to a post. What are you looking for? I bet it is really tough to come up with dirt on Trump comparable to Hillary's felonies. Don't be embarrassed. If you wish to vote for a felon and become an accessory after the fact, then go for it. Go ahead and vote for criminal Hillary. Since when did crime ever mean anything to immoral and unethical liberals?

Address trump quoting the klan. That's a fair request.
Don't feel free to change the subject.

[Guest]

Address trump quoting the klan. That's a fair request.
Don't feel free to change the subject.

Why change the policy now? Do liberals on here have the franchise on subject matter, or direction?

[Guest]

I replied to a post. What are you looking for? I bet it is really tough to come up with dirt on Trump comparable to Hillary's felonies. Don't be embarrassed. If you wish to vote for a felon and become an accessory after the fact, then go for it. Go ahead and vote for criminal Hillary. Since when did crime ever mean anything to immoral and unethical liberals?

When the donald goes on trial for the "trump university" fraud I hope you go and testify to his integrity, you will be perjuring yourself. LOL

[Guest]

Why change the policy now? Do liberals on here have the franchise on subject matter, or direction?

"Address trump quoting the klan. That's a fair request.
Don't feel free to change the subject."

No answer, typical of repubs, dodge the question and change the subject.

[Guest]

"Address trump quoting the klan. That's a fair request.
Don't feel free to change the subject."

No answer, typical of repubs, dodge the question and change the subject.

Why do you feel that your questions are fair requests? You never answer anyone else's questions and you demand??? Get over yourself. No one cares about what he said about 'the Klan." You are the one that has changed the subject. As a matter of fact, you NEVER stay within the scope of the subject. So, like I said before, get over yourself. No one cares. Typical liberal troll.

[Guest]

When the donald goes on trial for the "trump university" fraud I hope you go and testify to his integrity, you will be perjuring yourself. LOL

With Clinton getting away with PERJURY, no one has to worry about being charged. And Trump University is a civil matter. Hillary's investigations are felony crimes. Nice try though.

[Guest]

"Address trump quoting the klan. That's a fair request.
Don't feel free to change the subject."

No answer, typical of repubs, dodge the question and change the subject.

From CNN:

"David Duke is a bad person, who I disavowed on numerous occasions over the years," Trump said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."

"I disavowed him. I disavowed the KKK," Trump added. "Do you want me to do it again for the 12th time? I disavowed him in the past, I disavow him now."
===================

So, now that we have that out of the way, you can get over yourself.

How about Hillary and the KKK?
"on June 28, 2010, Clinton commemorated late Sen. Byrd by saying, “Today our country has lost a true American original, my friend and mentor Robert C. Byrd."

“Senator Byrd was a man of surpassing eloquence and nobility.”

[Guest]

From CNN:

"David Duke is a bad person, who I disavowed on numerous occasions over the years," Trump said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."

"I disavowed him. I disavowed the KKK," Trump added. "Do you want me to do it again for the 12th time? I disavowed him in the past, I disavow him now."
===================

So, now that we have that out of the way, you can get over yourself.

How about Hillary and the KKK?
"on June 28, 2010, Clinton commemorated late Sen. Byrd by saying, “Today our country has lost a true American original, my friend and mentor Robert C. Byrd."

“Senator Byrd was a man of surpassing eloquence and nobility.”

It's ALL talk and theater...at the end of the day, they golf and have dinner together. You're being played..we're all being played.

[Guest]

Why do you feel that your questions are fair requests? You never answer anyone else's questions and you demand??? Get over yourself. No one cares about what he said about 'the Klan." You are the one that has changed the subject. As a matter of fact, you NEVER stay within the scope of the subject. So, like I said before, get over yourself. No one cares. Typical liberal troll.

How do you know I don't answer "everyone else's questions"?
Tell me how you can tell that I haven't? Just say anything right or wrong, sounds like your hero trump.

[Guest]

How do you know I don't answer "everyone else's questions"?
Tell me how you can tell that I haven't? Just say anything right or wrong, sounds like your hero trump.

Get over yourself. It is easy to see your writing style. You are just a disgruntled liberal baiter, a very miserable one at that.

[Guest]

Do you think that's the same person you called miserable yesterday?

[Guest]

From CNN:

"David Duke is a bad person, who I disavowed on numerous occasions over the years," Trump said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."

"I disavowed him. I disavowed the KKK," Trump added. "Do you want me to do it again for the 12th time? I disavowed him in the past, I disavow him now."
===================

So, now that we have that out of the way, you can get over yourself.

How about Hillary and the KKK?
"on June 28, 2010, Clinton commemorated late Sen. Byrd by saying, “Today our country has lost a true American original, my friend and mentor Robert C. Byrd."

“Senator Byrd was a man of surpassing eloquence and nobility.”


Morning Joe Scarborough kicked Trump off his show months ago when he started his 'ban Muslims' crap. Joe said he would not allow someone to judge anyone based on the God they worship. Good for Joe. At one time Trump would call in and ramble on for 30/40 minutes getting free air time. No more.

[Guest]

Do you think that's the same person you called miserable yesterday?

Who cares? Are you miserable? You are definitely boring.

[Guest]

From CNN:

"David Duke is a bad person, who I disavowed on numerous occasions over the years," Trump said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."

"I disavowed him. I disavowed the KKK," Trump added. "Do you want me to do it again for the 12th time? I disavowed him in the past, I disavow him now."
===================

So, now that we have that out of the way, you can get over yourself.

How about Hillary and the KKK?
"on June 28, 2010, Clinton commemorated late Sen. Byrd by saying, “Today our country has lost a true American original, my friend and mentor Robert C. Byrd."

“Senator Byrd was a man of surpassing eloquence and nobility.”Asked if he would publicly reject the support of former Ku Klux Klan grand wizard David Duke, Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump said, “I just don’t know anything about him.” That’s nonsense:
Duke ran for governor of Louisiana in 1991 as a Republican, and Trump said at the time that President George H.W. Bush was right “to come out against” Duke’s campaign. Duke lost but he won a majority of the white vote — which Trump found troubling. “I hate seeing what it represents,” Trump said, referring to what he called the “anger vote.”
In 2000, Trump considered running for the Reform Party presidential nomination but did not run because he said he did not want to be associated with Pat Buchanan, who had left the Republican Party to seek the Reform Party nomination, and David Duke, who supported Buchanan. Trump at the time called Duke “a bigot, a racist, a problem.”

Apparently he did know something about him. He just didn't know how handle the situation so he denied it. Later he realized it was in his best interest to disavow him. So now we have that out of the way.


In 1997, Byrd told an interviewer he would encourage young people to become involved in politics but also warned, "Be sure you avoid the Ku Klux Klan. Don't get that albatross around your neck. Once you've made that mistake, you inhibit your operations in the political arena."[22] In his last autobiography, Byrd explained that he was a KKK member because he "was sorely afflicted with tunnel vision — a jejune and immature outlook — seeing only what I wanted to see because I thought the Klan could provide an outlet for my talents and ambitions."[23] Byrd also said, in 2005, "I know now I was wrong. Intolerance had no place in America. I apologized a thousand times ... and I don't mind apologizing over and over again. I can't erase what happened."[13]

I'm sure HRC knew his past and accepted that he sincerely meant when he said intolerance has no place in America.

David Duke still feels that intolerance is justifiable.

All the information came from Wikipedia who also has references.

[Guest]

I am quite sure NEITHER Trump or Clinton approve of the KKK.

[Guest]

The repubs are for the fat cats and care nothing about the average people. They do not have an answer to this post.

The Clintons, Pelosi, Kerry, Reid are all fat cats.
The big fact is, almost all Democrat fat cats got
fat, at tax payer expense, while feeding at the public trough!!

[Guest]

The Clintons, Pelosi, Kerry, Reid are all fat cats.
The big fact is, almost all Democrat fat cats got
fat, at tax payer expense, while feeding at the public trough!!

True

[Guest]

With Clinton getting away with PERJURY, no one has to worry about being charged. And Trump University is a civil matter. Hillary's investigations are felony crimes. Nice try though.

trump university is a criminal matter, or don't you know what fraud is?

[Guest]

The repubs are for the fat cats and care nothing about the average people. They do not have an answer to this post.


You are denial if you think democrats and not lining there pockets. Remember old joe " came to Washington in Dodge Dart and now multi-million while all the time working in the senate. Must had some lobbist friends he been doing favor for.? ? Then there the crook from Nevada, Dirty Harry who's entire family Lobbists getting inside information paying off there serpents in the party for votes.

[Guest]

You are denial if you think democrats and not lining there pockets. Remember old joe " came to Washington in Dodge Dart and now multi-million while all the time working in the senate. Must had some lobbist friends he been doing favor for.? ? Then there the crook from Nevada, Dirty Harry who's entire family Lobbists getting inside information paying off there serpents in the party for votes.No I don't. How about using real names.

[Guest]

Asked if he would publicly reject the support of former Ku Klux Klan grand wizard David Duke, Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump said, “I just don’t know anything about him.” That’s nonsense:
Duke ran for governor of Louisiana in 1991 as a Republican, and Trump said at the time that President George H.W. Bush was right “to come out against” Duke’s campaign. Duke lost but he won a majority of the white vote — which Trump found troubling. “I hate seeing what it represents,” Trump said, referring to what he called the “anger vote.”
In 2000, Trump considered running for the Reform Party presidential nomination but did not run because he said he did not want to be associated with Pat Buchanan, who had left the Republican Party to seek the Reform Party nomination, and David Duke, who supported Buchanan. Trump at the time called Duke “a bigot, a racist, a problem.”

Apparently he did know something about him. He just didn't know how handle the situation so he denied it. Later he realized it was in his best interest to disavow him. So now we have that out of the way.


In 1997, Byrd told an interviewer he would encourage young people to become involved in politics but also warned, "Be sure you avoid the Ku Klux Klan. Don't get that albatross around your neck. Once you've made that mistake, you inhibit your operations in the political arena."[22] In his last autobiography, Byrd explained that he was a KKK member because he "was sorely afflicted with tunnel vision — a jejune and immature outlook — seeing only what I wanted to see because I thought the Klan could provide an outlet for my talents and ambitions."[23] Byrd also said, in 2005, "I know now I was wrong. Intolerance had no place in America. I apologized a thousand times ... and I don't mind apologizing over and over again. I can't erase what happened."[13]

I'm sure HRC knew his past and accepted that he sincerely meant when he said intolerance has no place in America.

David Duke still feels that intolerance is justifiable.

All the information came from Wikipedia who also has references.


What I've read Radical Democrats own the kkk they started it had over 800 known members from the democrat party. Less that 1% switch to republician party. Liberals lie when they say those democrats switch. Byrd was one of these radicals should of been kicked out aloooong time ago, but beings he's a democrat he survived due to his party not kicking him out and his district kept voting him in. I don't like trump or Hillary but atleast they don't have the background that Byrd does. Reguardless of his crying and crawling he should of been kicked out!

[Guest]

How a post can go out on a tangent.

[Guest]

How a post can go out on a tangent.
by naming it "tell me"

[Guest]

by naming it "tell me"

There was a post involved, or do you just :gc:title?

[Guest]

I'm still waiting for legitimate answers from my repub friends!

[Guest]

Hey repubs, I'm still waiting. Gotcha

Yep, you sure did. :thumbup:


Given that the stated goal of most Republicans was...

1. Stopping Obama from being a two-term POTUS

(how did that work out for y'all? :1rotfl:)


Then...

2. Stopping any legislation that Obama approved.


And of course....

3. Overturning ACA.

- After 50 attempts of actually overturning, defunding, gutting or otherwise weakening ACA have been defeated, a reasonable person would have expected the right to actually address legislation that helped American citizens.

- But no, they are actually really slow learners...as well as their minions still screaming about Obamacare. :oops:



Consequently, intelligent folks can easily see where the right-wingnuts real priorities truly lie.

And it's NOT promulgating legislation that benefits American citizens. :(



:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

If you stay in the bubble... We're a bastion of 99% whiteness. Please God, let us keep this ONE little piece of heaven. Don't let them turn it into another diversified hell hole.

Please tell the class again what it is that you did, to earn the luck of the biggest head start in this country...that being born a white male?

Given your mentality, had you been born black...you would be leading the Black Panther party.



:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

Yep, you sure did. :thumbup:


Given that the stated goal of most Republicans was...

1. Stopping Obama from being a two-term POTUS

(how did that work out for y'all? :1rotfl:)


Then...

2. Stopping any legislation that Obama approved.


And of course....

3. Overturning ACA.

- After 50 attempts of actually overturning, defunding, gutting or otherwise weakening ACA have been defeated, a reasonable person would have expected the right to actually address legislation that helped American citizens.

- But no, they are actually really slow learners...as well as their minions still screaming about Obamacare. :oops:



Consequently, intelligent folks can easily see where the right-wingnuts real priorities truly lie.

And it's NOT promulgating legislation that benefits American citizens. :(



:wave:

CNM

So, you figure that two terms of failure is a good thing? Something to brag about?
And ObieCare? Do you REALLY want to go there? I do not know anyone that was affected in a positive way. As a matter of fact, the cost went WAY up and we have less coverage than before. And the bad part hasn't even kicked in yet. Wait until Obie is out of office and see what happens. If you can laugh that off, there is something drastically wrong with you.

But, you are not here to discuss issues. You are here to bait, to troll.

[Guest]

Quite right. None of the civil rights laws would have been passed without Republicans. It was the Dems that attempted to block ALL of them, including the abolishment of slavery. Democrats are the party of the KKK. But, that is the past. Now, the Dems are attempting to enslave more than just the blacks. And they want to abolish the Constitution, liberty and freedom in favor of tyranny and socialism. After all, it is the so-called European way.

The Democrats that you're referring to, were the southern Dem's who in this day and age...would be called 'Republicans and/or Tea B@ggers.'

Conversely, the Republicans who truly believed a need for civil rights reforms was needed, would be called 'Blue Dog/Conservative Democrats' these days.


Context and facts...really does matter. ;)



:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

I'm still waiting for legitimate answers from my repub friends!

Why should anyone answer you? When you are answered, you run off somewhere because you can't discuss an issue, and have no answers other than talking points you were provided. No one can accuse you of having your own thoughts.

[Guest]

trump university is a criminal matter, or don't you know what fraud is?

NO, it is not being investigated as a fraud. It (not Trump) is being sued civilly.

Do we know what fraud is? Lets see.............could that be what the Clinton foundation is being investigated for by the IRS. Oh yes, that's what fraud is.

[Guest]

So, you figure that two terms of failure is a good thing? Something to brag about?
And ObieCare? Do you REALLY want to go there? I do not know anyone that was affected in a positive way. As a matter of fact, the cost went WAY up and we have less coverage than before. And the bad part hasn't even kicked in yet. Wait until Obie is out of office and see what happens. If you can laugh that off, there is something drastically wrong with you.
I know a number of people who were positively affected by the passing of ACA.

Some who couldn't even get insurance because they weren't part of a group plan....and some who were denied because of pre-existing conditions.

What continually amazes me though, are those that refuse to acknowledge that health insurance premiums have risen at a SLOWER rate since ACA.

For those that aren't too bright, it's as if health insurance premium increases never existed prior to ACA. :oops:

Not to mention, the reason for continued premium rises are almost always deflected by the health insurance companies...as being caused by Obamacare.

After all, they know that there are a plethora of ignorant, uninformed and myopic folks who will swallow that...so I guess it is a good business practice from the health insurance company viewpoint.

Those that swallow hey conveniently ignore facts, because it gets in the way of their hatred.





But, you are not here to discuss issues. You are here to bait, to troll.
:1rotfl:

Yep, you're definitely one of the Queen B's bully clique. :D

Anyone who calls you on your lies or doesn't agree with you, must be a 'troll' or here to 'bait.'

And yet, you don't even have the intelligence to look at the headings of the vast majority of threads in this forum...that are obviously 'bait threads' perpetuated by the right?

I started a thread whereby I put some effort and thought into what I see as the problem with campaign laws and yet... after 11 pages NOT A SINGLE right-wingnut has bothered to counter with a cogent reply on topic.

https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/enough-bitching-moaning-whining-202211/

So tell me again, who is the troll and baiter? :1rotfl:

I would try to explain further, but debating with a rock...is basically a waste of time. ;)




:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

NO, it is not being investigated as a fraud. It (not Trump) is being sued civilly.

Do we know what fraud is? Lets see.............could that be what the Clinton foundation is being investigated for by the IRS. Oh yes, that's what fraud is.

So is Trump.

[Guest]

I know a number of people who were positively affected by the passing of ACA.

Some who couldn't even get insurance because they weren't part of a group plan....and some who were denied because of pre-existing conditions.

What continually amazes me though, are those that refuse to acknowledge that health insurance premiums have risen at a SLOWER rate since ACA.

For those that aren't too bright, it's as if health insurance premium increases never existed prior to ACA. :oops:

Not to mention, the reason for continued premium rises are almost always deflected by the health insurance companies...as being caused by Obamacare.

After all, they know that there are a plethora of ignorant, uninformed and myopic folks who will swallow that...so I guess it is a good business practice from the health insurance company viewpoint.

Those that swallow hey conveniently ignore facts, because it gets in the way of their hatred.






:1rotfl:

Yep, you're definitely one of the Queen B's bully clique. :D

Anyone who calls you on your lies or doesn't agree with you, must be a 'troll' or here to 'bait.'

And yet, you don't even have the intelligence to look at the headings of the vast majority of threads in this forum...that are obviously 'bait threads' perpetuated by the right?

I started a thread whereby I put some effort and thought into what I see as the problem with campaign laws and yet... after 11 pages NOT A SINGLE right-wingnut has bothered to counter with a cogent reply on topic.

https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/enough-bitching-moaning-whining-202211/

So tell me again, who is the troll and baiter? :1rotfl:

I would try to explain further, but debating with a rock...is basically a waste of time. ;)




:wave:

CNM

Wow, turn up the A/C quick! All that hot air. I wonder how much of it you really believe.
Nice trick, trying to deny being part of the party of slavery. That's like joining the Black Panthers and saying, it used to be radical but it's now a church group. They've changed. Sorry, but I am not a liberal. I don't believe propaganda when the truth is right in your face.

Yes, you are a baiter and a troll. Otherwise, you would discuss issues like an adult, not like a petulant teenager, with your little cuties. Of course, you can't get anyone to converse with you unless you bait.

[Guest]

Wow, turn up the A/C quick! All that hot air. I wonder how much of it you really believe.
Nice trick, trying to deny being part of the party of slavery. That's like joining the Black Panthers and saying, it used to be radical but it's now a church group. They've changed. Sorry, but I am not a liberal. I don't believe propaganda when the truth is right in your face.

Yes, you are a baiter and a troll. Otherwise, you would discuss issues like an adult, not like a petulant teenager, with your little cuties. Of course, you can't get anyone to converse with you unless you bait.

Are you really that slow of a thinker...or do you just play one here? ;)

Trying to deflect from actual facts or intelligent responses, by calling someone a 'troll' or 'baiter'...only works with one of your own ilk.

So why don't YOU stay on topic...instead of being such a flaming hypocrite? :oops:


:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

Are you really that slow of a thinker...or do you just play one here? ;)

Trying to deflect from actual facts or intelligent responses, by calling someone a 'troll' or 'baiter'...only works with one of your own ilk.

So why don't YOU stay on topic...instead of being such a flaming hypocrite? :oops:


:wave:

CNM

Sure. The baiter strikes again. I bet you considered that a real zinger, right?

Obamacare was and still is a disaster and will be worst next year If you don't understand that by now, you are the idiot that Obama was counting on when he ran for president. NO matter the details I give you to prove that I am right, you always either divert or bait, so you are not worth the effort of explaining.

Obamacare was never, ever what it was advertised to be. It was a shame that the left got away with and now they are blaming the right for not supporting it. Well, you own it and now you will live with it until enough voters see how bad it is going to cost them in the future. Many already see it as the failure it is. Almost any program that anyone could have come up with could have done more with less. But the idea was for it to be a failure in order to get universal health care, commonly known as socialized medicine. That's not hard to see and many have already seen it. More will see it next year when the real kick in the butt, kicks in.

So, bait or switch if you wish. I don't care. Send me some more little cutesy little waving gay cartoons, or what not. Don't forget, like it would happen, to include your little initials to mark your spot like a squatting female dog. Do you resemble that comment?

[Guest]

Sure. The baiter strikes again. I bet you considered that a real zinger, right?

Obamacare was and still is a disaster and will be worst next year If you don't understand that by now, you are the idiot that Obama was counting on when he ran for president. NO matter the details I give you to prove that I am right, you always either divert or bait, so you are not worth the effort of explaining.

Obamacare was never, ever what it was advertised to be. It was a shame that the left got away with and now they are blaming the right for not supporting it. Well, you own it and now you will live with it until enough voters see how bad it is going to cost them in the future. Many already see it as the failure it is. Almost any program that anyone could have come up with could have done more with less. But the idea was for it to be a failure in order to get universal health care, commonly known as socialized medicine. That's not hard to see and many have already seen it. More will see it next year when the real kick in the butt, kicks in.

So, bait or switch if you wish. I don't care. Send me some more little cutesy little waving gay cartoons, or what not. Don't forget, like it would happen, to include your little initials to mark your spot like a squatting female dog. Do you resemble that comment?Is this how you get off?

[Guest]

Is this how you get off?

Isn't that a bit personal?

[Guest]

So, you figure that two terms of failure is a good thing? Something to brag about?
And ObieCare? Do you REALLY want to go there? I do not know anyone that was affected in a positive way. As a matter of fact, the cost went WAY up and we have less coverage than before. And the bad part hasn't even kicked in yet. Wait until Obie is out of office and see what happens. If you can laugh that off, there is something drastically wrong with you.

But, you are not here to discuss issues. You are here to bait, to troll.

"I do not know anyone that was affected in a positive way."

I guess you do not know "anybody"

Insurance with NO PRE-EXISTING CONDITION. Insurer not being able to CANCEL your insurance, many people are affected! Do some research before you show your dismal nature.

[Guest]

"I do not know anyone that was affected in a positive way."

I guess you do not know "anybody"

Insurance with NO PRE-EXISTING CONDITION. Insurer not being able to CANCEL your insurance, many people are affected! Do some research before you show your dismal nature.

That would be difficult for him/her to expend that type of intellectual energy (even if he/she had it), given that he's/she's too busy screaming about trolls and baiting...toward those that eviscerate his ignorant outlook and comments. :D



:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

NO, it is not being investigated as a fraud. It (not Trump) is being sued civilly.

Do we know what fraud is? Lets see.............could that be what the Clinton foundation is being investigated for by the IRS. Oh yes, that's what fraud is.

That's right since you can't defend your position go off subject.

Go here and read about the fraud, the civil case will go to trial then he will be charged with fraud.

New York AG: Trump U 'really a fraud from beginning to end' - POLITICO (http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/eric-schneiderman-trump-university-fraud-223812)