repubs who are against our President and country

[Guest]

Listen to this song, Merle Haggard The Fighting Side Of Me

Merle Haggard - The Fightin Side Of Me (Live) - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIxBmyRQlwQ)

[Guest]

You have it wrong. We are against the traitorous poser in the White House, not against the country. Liberals have done everything they can to destroy America with their insistence on European socialism and gun control. The tyrant in the WH makes his own laws by E.O. Don't blame Republicans for wishing to stick to the Constitution. Liberals are a needy bunch and will never be happy, even with the keys to the car. Not only do they want the keys, but want us to supply the gas so they can go joy riding.

[Guest]

Listen to this song, Merle Haggard The Fighting Side Of Me

Merle Haggard - The Fightin Side Of Me (Live) - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIxBmyRQlwQ)

I don't understand why it comes as such a surprise to Liberals that Republicans do not support President Obama. Republicans represent only at small percentage of the 71% who think the country is on the wrong track. Why would anyone support a President that is "leading" the country in the wrong direction?

Referenced source:
kernel (20) - Rasmussen Reports™ (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/.../right_direction_or_wrong_track)
Rasmussen Reports
3 days ago - Twenty-nine percent (29%) of Likely U.S. Voters think the country is heading in the right direction, according to a new Rasmussen Reports ...

[Guest]

I don't understand why it comes as such a surprise to Liberals that Republicans do not support President Obama. Republicans represent only at small percentage of the 71% who think the country is on the wrong track. Why would anyone support a President that is "leading" the country in the wrong direction?

Referenced source:
kernel (20) - Rasmussen Reports™ (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/.../right_direction_or_wrong_track)
Rasmussen Reports
3 days ago - Twenty-nine percent (29%) of Likely U.S. Voters think the country is heading in the right direction, according to a new Rasmussen Reports ...

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Obama Job Approval (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html)

[Guest]

You have it wrong. We are against the traitorous poser in the White House, not against the country. Liberals have done everything they can to destroy America with their insistence on European socialism and gun control. The tyrant in the WH makes his own laws by E.O. Don't blame Republicans for wishing to stick to the Constitution. Liberals are a needy bunch and will never be happy, even with the keys to the car. Not only do they want the keys, but want us to supply the gas so they can go joy riding.

of ignorance that has come to represent the Republicans. Most thoughtful people reject these attacks, but not in The Villages.

[Guest]

of ignorance that has come to represent the Republicans. Most thoughtful people reject these attacks, but not in The Villages.

You're right, MOST as in the ignorant liberal majority, reject the truth. But not in The Villages, where the majority is still conservative and refuse to listen to socialist, anti-Christian and anti-American rhetoric. But, you libtards just keep on FOLLOWING the Piper that promises you that false Utopia. Remember, if it sounds too good to be true, then .............

I feel so sorry for you that refuse to rid yourself of the chains that make you slaves of the government. It is so ugly to see you liberals that are so jealous of the wealthy or even those that are a little better than you. You will never be happy, even when you get what you ask for.

[Guest]

You're right, MOST as in the ignorant liberal majority, reject the truth. But not in The Villages, where the majority is still conservative and refuse to listen to socialist, anti-Christian and anti-American rhetoric. But, you libtards just keep on FOLLOWING the Piper that promises you that false Utopia. Remember, if it sounds too good to be true, then .............

I feel so sorry for you that refuse to rid yourself of the chains that make you slaves of the government. It is so ugly to see you liberals that are so jealous of the wealthy or even those that are a little better than you. You will never be happy, even when you get what you ask for.

As long as the Ds and Rs are running things, we ALL are chained. We have less freedom now than BEFORE the Revolution with king George.

[Guest]

That Merle Haggard speaks for so many "patriots " and not liberal criminals is a bit ironic if you look into his past.

[Guest]

You have it wrong. We are against the traitorous poser in the White House, not against the country. Liberals have done everything they can to destroy America with their insistence on European socialism and gun control. The tyrant in the WH makes his own laws by E.O. Don't blame Republicans for wishing to stick to the Constitution. Liberals are a needy bunch and will never be happy, even with the keys to the car. Not only do they want the keys, but want us to supply the gas so they can go joy riding.

I guess not allowing the President to appoint a Supreme Court Justice is "stick to the Constitution". Just one example of the repub congress of "NO".

[Guest]

I guess not allowing the President to appoint a Supreme Court Justice is "stick to the Constitution". Just one example of the repub congress of "NO".

It's legal. I don't hear you complaining about the illegal vote to pass ObamaCare. I believe you are just a bit biased.

[Guest]

I guess not allowing the President to appoint a Supreme Court Justice is "stick to the Constitution". Just one example of the repub congress of "NO".

He doesn't "appoint", he nominates and the Senate has to approve.

But what difference does it make? It's a VERY political position and ONLY those who will "play ball" with the true rulers of the country will get in. It's more theater than a court. I mean really, how can there be THAT MUCH discord between the members? Any ruling that isn't 100% should be sent back to be reworked. Come on, an almost 50/50 split changes what 90% of the people believe? Like gay marriage. Or Obamacare. Or corporations are people.

Your "government" is almost 100% corrupt.

[Guest]

Post anything you want questioning why so many do not support, do not like Obama.

He has proven what he was and is over the past 8 years.

A black radical racist, islamic terrorism sympathizer.

The only reason he has not been removed is because he is black.

He was and remains unqualified for the job.

He is unable to sort his personal beliefs from the responsibilities and duties to America.

As stated before if he were to spontaneously combust he is not worth the effort of a 911 call!! Like it or not!

[Guest]

And by the way your title for the thread is incorrect.....typical wordsmithing.

We dislike and disapprove of Obama because of our love of America.

You should be ashamed to infer he represents we the people....we the majority.....

He is a disgrace to the office of president. January 2017 cannot come fast enough.

[Guest]

And by the way your title for the thread is incorrect.....typical wordsmithing.

We dislike and disapprove of Obama because of our love of America.

You should be ashamed to infer he represents we the people....we the majority.....

He is a disgrace to the office of president. January 2017 cannot come fast enough.

Many titles of threads on this forum are misleading. And your post is one of the reasons why.

[Guest]

Many titles of threads on this forum are misleading. And your post is one of the reasons why.

BS!

[Guest]

BS!

I think you misinterpreted my post. Misleading titles draw responses from posters being goaded. Which you obviously were.

[Guest]

We dislike and disapprove of Obama because of our love of America.

You should be ashamed to infer he represents we the people....we the majority.....


I dislike and disapproved of Bush but I would never say the things I've read here about Obama. You are lucky no one takes you seriously.

Obama's approval rating is 51%.
Presidential Approval Ratings -- Barack Obama | Gallup Historical Data & Trends (http://www.gallup.com/poll/116479/barack-obama-presidential-job-approval.aspx)

[Guest]

And by the way your title for the thread is incorrect.....typical wordsmithing.

We dislike and disapprove of Obama because of our love of America.

You should be ashamed to infer he represents we the people....we the majority.....

He is a disgrace to the office of president. January 2017 cannot come fast enough.


Obama's approval rating has been hovering around 56%, so apparently you are part of the minority.

Watch how quickly Senator Mitch McConnell calls for a vote on Obama's Supreme Court nominee when Clinton wins the election. Obama's pick is much more moderate than anyone Clinton would nominate.

[Guest]

You're right, MOST as in the ignorant liberal majority, reject the truth. But not in The Villages, where the majority is still conservative and refuse to listen to socialist, anti-Christian and anti-American rhetoric. But, you libtards just keep on FOLLOWING the Piper that promises you that false Utopia. Remember, if it sounds too good to be true, then .............

I feel so sorry for you that refuse to rid yourself of the chains that make you slaves of the government. It is so ugly to see you liberals that are so jealous of the wealthy or even those that are a little better than you. You will never be happy, even when you get what you ask for.

I hope all the villagers that think like you, will give up voluntarily all the socialist programs that you are living off of. Social security, tax deductions, medicare, ect. We liberals would not want to see you compromise your values.

[Guest]

I hope all the villagers that think like you, will give up voluntarily all the socialist programs that you are living off of. Social security, tax deductions, medicare, ect. We liberals would not want to see you compromise your values.Do you think the public school system is a form of democratic socialism? We all pay into it--at least in communities that have schools. Is TV completely unique in that regard. I'm not complaining.

[Guest]

He doesn't "appoint", he nominates and the Senate has to approve.

But what difference does it make? It's a VERY political position and ONLY those who will "play ball" with the true rulers of the country will get in. It's more theater than a court. I mean really, how can there be THAT MUCH discord between the members? Any ruling that isn't 100% should be sent back to be reworked. Come on, an almost 50/50 split changes what 90% of the people believe? Like gay marriage. Or Obamacare. Or corporations are people.

Your "government" is almost 100% corrupt.

Congressional Research Service
̃The Library of Congress
CRS Report for Congress
.Received through the CRS Web
Order Code RL31989
Supreme Court Appointment Process: Roles of
the President, Judiciary Committee, and Senate

The appointment of a Supreme Court Justice is an infrequent event of major
significance in American politics. Each appointment is important because of the
enormous judicial power the Supreme Court exercises as the highest appellate court
in the federal judiciary. Appointments are infrequent, as a vacancy on the nine-
member Court may occur only once or twice,or never at all, during a particular
President’s years in office. Under the Constitution, Justices on the Supreme Court
receive lifetime appointments. Such job security in the government has been
conferred solely on judges and, by constitutional design,
helps insure the Court’sindependence from the President and Congress.
The procedure for appointing a Justice is provided for by the Constitution inonly a few words.
The “Appointments Clause” (Article II, Section 2, clause 2) states
that the President “shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the
Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the supreme Court.” The process of appointing
Justices has undergone changes over two centuries, but its most basic feature — the
sharing of power between the President and Senate — has remained unchanged: To
receive lifetime appointment to the Court, a candidate must first be nominated by the
President and then confirmed by the Senate.

[Guest]

He doesn't "appoint", he nominates and the Senate has to approve.

But what difference does it make? It's a VERY political position and ONLY those who will "play ball" with the true rulers of the country will get in. It's more theater than a court. I mean really, how can there be THAT MUCH discord between the members? Any ruling that isn't 100% should be sent back to be reworked. Come on, an almost 50/50 split changes what 90% of the people believe? Like gay marriage. Or Obamacare. Or corporations are people.

Your "government" is almost 100% corrupt. I think the split vote is an indication of a healthy government. That's why there are usually 9. What you want is a government more like Germany during World War II. Everybody agreed with the Fuhrer.
Who wouldn't? You're are lucky you live in a place where you can have a dissident opinion. You just don't know it or forgot.

[Guest]

I found it absolutely hilarious when the strict constructionist, John Roberts, decided the mandate on Affordable Care Act was a tax and therefore it was constitutional. You could hear the Regressives yelping from Washington to Florida!

He also was one of the majority who decided the Texas law on abortions was not constitutional and had to be scrapped.

[Guest]

I found it absolutely hilarious when the strict constructionist, John Roberts, decided the mandate on Affordable Care Act was a tax and therefore it was constitutional. You could hear the Regressives yelping from Washington to Florida!

He also was one of the majority who decided the Texas law on abortions was not constitutional and had to be scrapped.

What does this have to do with the subject, or are you just attempting to bait and troll AGAIN?

Isn't it interesting that people like you, ignorant and can't keep up a debate on the subject, attempt to divert or shut down the forum when they are losing or lost?

[Guest]

What does this have to do with the subject, or are you just attempting to bait and troll AGAIN?

Isn't it interesting that people like you, ignorant and can't keep up a debate on the subject, attempt to divert or shut down the forum when they are losing or lost?
Loosing? Where is the scoreboard?

Someone brings up an interesting point or subject about the supreme court and the thought police call it inflammatory. All types of hate speech smears these threads and that's on point and acceptable or we are told to ignore it.

Do you want to police the threads? Bring back Screen Names. The hate speech will go away. The thought police cannot speak in public.

[Guest]

I hope all the villagers that think like you, will give up voluntarily all the socialist programs that you are living off of. Social security, tax deductions, medicare, ect. We liberals would not want to see you compromise your values.

We PAIN in advance for SS and medicare. The LEECHES also get SS and medicaid...for free.

I think the split vote is an indication of a healthy government. That's why there are usually 9. What you want is a government more like Germany during World War II. Everybody agreed with the Fuhrer.
Who wouldn't? You're are lucky you live in a place where you can have a dissident opinion. You just don't know it or forgot.

No, it means that there is a split so close that whatever they were deciding on should go back to be re-crafted so the majority agrees.

I found it absolutely hilarious when the strict constructionist, John Roberts, decided the mandate on Affordable Care Act was a tax and therefore it was constitutional. You could hear the Regressives yelping from Washington to Florida!

He also was one of the majority who decided the Texas law on abortions was not constitutional and had to be scrapped.

The SCOTUS is a political organization who also do as they're told.

[Guest]

Loosing? Where is the scoreboard?

Someone brings up an interesting point or subject about the supreme court and the thought police call it inflammatory. All types of hate speech smears these threads and that's on point and acceptable or we are told to ignore it.

Do you want to police the threads? Bring back Screen Names. The hate speech will go away. The thought police cannot speak in public.

What "hate speech?" Anything that you don't agree with? What a baby!

[Guest]

What "hate speech?" Anything that you don't agree with? What a baby!
Hate speech is speech that offends, threatens, or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits.

You have never seen any hate speech on these boards. Is that correct?

You have never seen anyone recommend "just ignore it." Is that correct?

[Guest]

Hate speech is speech that offends, threatens, or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits.

You have never seen any hate speech on these boards. Is that correct?

You have never seen anyone recommend "just ignore it." Is that correct?

Your AG has not yet banned "hate speech" in public. Get over it , if you can't take controversial verbiage. Try growing up and stop being such a wuss.

Funny how your "hate speech" is very similar by definition as your P.C. Will you liberals ever cease to amaze me with your false indignity?

[Guest]

Hate speech is speech that offends, threatens, or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits.

You have never seen any hate speech on these boards. Is that correct?

You have never seen anyone recommend "just ignore it." Is that correct?

Sorry, but I am NOT your momma, but if I was I would tell you to ignore the meanie and quit crying.

[Guest]

Your AG has not yet banned "hate speech" in public. Get over it , if you can't take controversial verbiage. Try growing up and stop being such a wuss.

Funny how your "hate speech" is very similar by definition as your P.C. Will you liberals ever cease to amaze me with your false indignity?

You're dealing with women here...they're "sensitive".

[Guest]

You're dealing with women here...they're "sensitive".You're dealing with adults. That's why it's entertaining for you. When and if the screen names come back that's when your proud opinions will go underground.

[Guest]

Loosing? Where is the scoreboard?

Someone brings up an interesting point or subject about the supreme court and the thought police call it inflammatory. All types of hate speech smears these threads and that's on point and acceptable or we are told to ignore it.

Do you want to police the threads? Bring back Screen Names. The hate speech will go away. The thought police cannot speak in public.
The point about the time when screen names were shown is a fact. The posts became much more intelligent, and the racist and slimeball posters virtually disappeared. But like any scavenger they only had to wait it out.

[Guest]

The point about the time when screen names were shown is a fact. The posts became much more intelligent, and the racist and slimeball posters virtually disappeared. But like any scavenger they only had to wait it out.

And what has been your contribution to the discussion, other than one liners and rock music links?

No one is being bullied on here. Just telling it like it is, minus the PC. It is kind of childish to be sensitive about a heated subject. Adults don't hold one's opinion against each other. They argue heatedly, and then either walk away or have a cold one together. Nothing resolved, but maybe a bit more information learned.

[Guest]

Post anything you want questioning why so many do not support, do not like Obama.

He has proven what he was and is over the past 8 years.

A black radical racist, islamic terrorism sympathizer.

The only reason he has not been removed is because he is black.

He was and remains unqualified for the job.

He is unable to sort his personal beliefs from the responsibilities and duties to America.

As stated before if he were to spontaneously combust he is not worth the effort of a 911 call!! Like it or not!
Let's see how our friends up north feel about this.....

Canadian Parliament chants "four more years" at President Obama. - YouTube (https://youtu.be/AHRkLmTkj6k)

[Guest]

Let's see how our friends up north feel about this.....

Canadian Parliament chants "four more years" at President Obama. - YouTube (https://youtu.be/AHRkLmTkj6k)
I heard a Canadian joke on the Rick Steve's travel show.
How do you get 250 Canadians out of a pool?
You make an announcement "Would all the Canadians please get out of the pool."

They have a reputation for being one of the nicest people in the world.

[Guest]

The point about the time when screen names were shown is a fact. The posts became much more intelligent, and the racist and slimeball posters virtually disappeared. But like any scavenger they only had to wait it out.

No, it turned into a woman's social talking about other people. Gossip.

And what has been your contribution to the discussion, other than one liners and rock music links?

No one is being bullied on here. Just telling it like it is, minus the PC. It is kind of childish to be sensitive about a heated subject. Adults don't hold one's opinion against each other. They argue heatedly, and then either walk away or have a cold one together. Nothing resolved, but maybe a bit more information learned.

Information is their cryptonite...

[Guest]

" the racist and slimeball posters virtually disappeared. But like any scavenger they only had to wait it out"

Well, what is wrong with having racist and slimeball posters disappearing from the Political Postings? Absolutely nothing!

Kick them off and keep them off!

[Guest]

" the racist and slimeball posters virtually disappeared. But like any scavenger they only had to wait it out"

Well, what is wrong with having racist and slimeball posters disappearing from the Political Postings? Absolutely nothing!

Kick them off and keep them off!

OR, you can ignore them and they will eventually either tone it down or go find a different forum for their rant. OR, you can leave if you can't tolerate a non-PC format.

[Guest]

It's legal. I don't hear you complaining about the illegal vote to pass ObamaCare. I believe you are just a bit biased.

"In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court saved the controversial health care law that will define President Barack Obama's administration for generations to come.

The ruling holds that the Affordable Care Act authorized federal tax credits for eligible Americans living not only in states with their own exchanges but also in the 34 states with federal marketplaces. It staved off a major political showdown and a mad scramble in states that would have needed to act to prevent millions from losing health care coverage."

Maybe you better read up on things before you call them illegal, typical of a repub, shout out anything true or false.

[Guest]

"In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court saved the controversial health care law that will define President Barack Obama's administration for generations to come.

The ruling holds that the Affordable Care Act authorized federal tax credits for eligible Americans living not only in states with their own exchanges but also in the 34 states with federal marketplaces. It staved off a major political showdown and a mad scramble in states that would have needed to act to prevent millions from losing health care coverage."

Maybe you better read up on things before you call them illegal, typical of a repub, shout out anything true or false.

The vote was illegal regardless of what the Supreme Court says. I never said anything about the tax that wasn't a tax according to Obambie. And he DID say it wasn't a tax. It was the supremes that deemed it a tax.

[Guest]

The vote was illegal regardless of what the Supreme Court says. I never said anything about the tax that wasn't a tax according to Obambie. And he DID say it wasn't a tax. It was the supremes that deemed it a tax.

The "justices" are as corrupt as all the rest.