I want you trump backers to do this

[Guest]

I want you to get your children and grandchildren and play trumps "speeches" of hate, vile language, calling woman pigs, Mexicans rapists, all Muslims criminals and all the other ramblings. Then tell them this how you should talk and you will be a fine American and the constitution means nothing. Also that god will be proud of you if you do.

[Guest]

I want you to get your children and grandchildren and play trumps "speeches" of hate, vile language, calling woman pigs, Mexicans rapists, all Muslims criminals and all the other ramblings. Then tell them this how you should talk and you will be a fine American and the constitution means nothing. Also that god will be proud of you if you do.

I want you to grow a brain, but I have found that we seldom get what we want. So, don't be too disappointed when no one takes you up on your offer.

[Guest]

I want you to grow a brain, but I have found that we seldom get what we want. So, don't be too disappointed when no one takes you up on your offer.

Good one! :BigApplause:

[Guest]

I want you to get your children and grandchildren and play trumps "speeches" of hate, vile language, calling woman pigs, Mexicans rapists, all Muslims criminals and all the other ramblings. Then tell them this how you should talk and you will be a fine American and the constitution means nothing. Also that god will be proud of you if you do.

Trump is a big meanie! Libtards think it is "hate" when someone speaks the truth. Only a libtard hears "hate." I guess they have been coddled so much in their lifetime that words really do hurt them. But, apparently sticks and stones are OK to use against those that do not agree with you. Violence is justified if they don't get their way, freebies from the government.

So, I guess you are suggesting that I should use the Clintons as examples to my family. Examples of how to get away with felonies, to lie and to cheat the IRS, and how to be disloyal to people that count on you and get them killed, making excuses and blaming an innocent for their deaths. Teach them how to lie under oath. To be honest with you, I actually thought that America dug a hole in the bottom of the barrel to get the worst president America has ever had, when they elected Obambie. It turns out that the left really can do worst.

[Guest]

I want you to grow a brain, but I have found that we seldom get what we want. So, don't be too disappointed when no one takes you up on your offer.

That hit in an area you don't want to deal with. Your reply in nonsensical.

[Guest]

Trump is a big meanie! Libtards think it is "hate" when someone speaks the truth. Only a libtard hears "hate." I guess they have been coddled so much in their lifetime that words really do hurt them. But, apparently sticks and stones are OK to use against those that do not agree with you. Violence is justified if they don't get their way, freebies from the government.

So, I guess you are suggesting that I should use the Clintons as examples to my family. Examples of how to get away with felonies, to lie and to cheat the IRS, and how to be disloyal to people that count on you and get them killed, making excuses and blaming an innocent for their deaths. Teach them how to lie under oath. To be honest with you, I actually thought that America dug a hole in the bottom of the barrel to get the worst president America has ever had, when they elected Obambie. It turns out that the left really can do worst.

My post hit home with you also and you can't deal with it. I'm talking about trump here, lets hear your answer about when you will be having your family in for the showing. Your only answer is to go out on a tangent. Pathetic!

[Guest]

Trump is a big meanie! Libtards think it is "hate" when someone speaks the truth. Only a libtard hears "hate." I guess they have been coddled so much in their lifetime that words really do hurt them. But, apparently sticks and stones are OK to use against those that do not agree with you. Violence is justified if they don't get their way, freebies from the government.

So, I guess you are suggesting that I should use the Clintons as examples to my family. Examples of how to get away with felonies, to lie and to cheat the IRS, and how to be disloyal to people that count on you and get them killed, making excuses and blaming an innocent for their deaths. Teach them how to lie under oath. To be honest with you, I actually thought that America dug a hole in the bottom of the barrel to get the worst president America has ever had, when they elected Obambie. It turns out that the left really can do worst.

trump is more than a 'meanie", his type of thinking is a cancer in this country and your a poor example of an American. You shouldn't even be called an American.

[Guest]

trump is more than a 'meanie", his type of thinking is a cancer in this country and your a poor example of an American. You shouldn't even be called an American.

Actually, the "cancerous" thinking is the liberal thinking that through affirmative action, quotas, and "forced diversity" is actively destroying this country. We've never been lower and we've never had a minority population as large. It's NOT coincidence. It's the cause. ALL the BAD statistics are up and all the GOOD statistics are down. Because we're moving from "white" to "brown". It happens EVERY time! STOP diversity before it destroys here too...like it has EVERYWHERE else.

[Guest]

My post hit home with you also and you can't deal with it. I'm talking about trump here, lets hear your answer about when you will be having your family in for the showing. Your only answer is to go out on a tangent. Pathetic!

Your post was ridiculous and stupid, but you are too ignorant to realize that. You simple minded liberals believe that anyone that doesn't agree with you is full of "hate." You accuse Trump of "hate" but have yet to give an example. You parrot liberal talking points, mindlessly.

As far as my kids are concerned, THEY voted for Trump in the primary. I didn't. I do not talk politics with their children. It's none of my business how they raise their children. Maybe, some day when you have children, you will understand. If you already DO have children, I can see why they sent you away. They DON'T want you around their children.

[Guest]

Trump is toxic.

[Guest]

Your post was ridiculous and stupid, but you are too ignorant to realize that. You simple minded liberals believe that anyone that doesn't agree with you is full of "hate." You accuse Trump of "hate" but have yet to give an example. You parrot liberal talking points, mindlessly.

As far as my kids are concerned, THEY voted for Trump in the primary. I didn't. I do not talk politics with their children. It's none of my business how they raise their children. Maybe, some day when you have children, you will understand. If you already DO have children, I can see why they sent you away. They DON'T want you around their children.

It IS your business. That's what's wrong with this country now, NOBODY takes responsibility and nobody is willing/able to SAY anything when others are screwing up. We just "let it go" and the country slides farther and farther towards the 3rd world. Sometime you have to be "hateful" to save people from themselves.

Blah blah blah...talk a lot with nothing to say...just the typical personal attacks. I don't agree, so I'm a bad person. Well, at least I'm not aiding and abetting in the destruction of my country, I'm trying to save it from people like you who want to diversify it into oblivion.

Trump is toxic.

The D and R parties are toxic.

[Guest]

Trump is toxic.

Yes, he is. To liberals, to socialism, to Anti-American scumbags, to criminal invaders also known as illegal aliens, to establishment politicians. Yep, he has is manner, his way. Obviously, America needs him right now. I don't like him, but he is right so personality doesn't matter. I didn't like Bush either, but voted for him and I am glad.

So, if you don't like "toxic" then don't vote for him. Vote for the scumbag felon. Vote for a criminal that will lie to your face and then laugh about it. I thought that it would be impossible to find someone worst than Obama. I was wrong, Killary even has him beat. And that is a big deal.

[Guest]

It IS your business. That's what's wrong with this country now, NOBODY takes responsibility and nobody is willing/able to SAY anything when others are screwing up. We just "let it go" and the country slides farther and farther towards the 3rd world. Sometime you have to be "hateful" to save people from themselves.

Blah blah blah...talk a lot with nothing to say...just the typical personal attacks. I don't agree, so I'm a bad person. Well, at least I'm not aiding and abetting in the destruction of my country, I'm trying to save it from people like you who want to diversify it into oblivion.



The D and R parties are toxic.

I read an article in today's paper about the heat affecting medications. You are proof that there is some substance to the idea.

[Guest]

I want you to get your children and grandchildren and play trumps "speeches" of hate, vile language, calling woman pigs, Mexicans rapists, all Muslims criminals and all the other ramblings. Then tell them this how you should talk and you will be a fine American and the constitution means nothing. Also that god will be proud of you if you do.

I want you to get your children and grandchildren and play Hillary's testimonies, where she lies. I want you to explain why you support her jeopordizing national security by giving highly classified information to uncleared personnel and by storing it on an open Internet system, instead of in a guarded safe. I want you to explain why you voted for someone that had an innocent person arrested for lies she made about the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi. Also tell them why you feel it is OK to cheat on your taxes as well as your wife and that had no effect on your vote for her.

I doubt you believe in GOD, so I won't suggest that the real GOD would be proud of you.

But, I would not be lecturing my grandkids anyway. Their upbringing is not my business, it's their parent's.

[Guest]

I read an article in today's paper about the heat affecting medications. You are proof that there is some substance to the idea.

There you go AGAIN...personal attack...a retort.

If you disagree with ANYTHING I write, please point it out with a fact. "Racist" is a fact I've already admitted to. I do believe there are differences in the races. Now, can we move on?

WHY do you disagree? WHAT did I write that was false? I'm pretty careful to only write what I can back up. If I'm racist, there's a damn good reason I am. If I'm against diversity, you can be sure there's a reason for it. If I'm ALWAYS harping on the "we're being bred out of our own country/culture" it's because we ARE, we're the MINORITY from age 6 and under...and the trend is NOT reversing, it's growing. Mathematics says we'll be an Hispanic country in 30 years or less. As places diversify, they ALWAYS get worse...always. As we "diversify" and as the standards drop, and affirmative action and quotas increase, our standard of living and world rankings are falling.

What do you disagree with? It IS racial.

[Guest]

I'm still waiting for trump supporters to do this, my guess is you are ashamed to tell your children and grandchildren you are un-American and a racist. But that is okay if I were you I wouldn't admit it also.

[Guest]

I want you to grow a brain, but I have found that we seldom get what we want. So, don't be too disappointed when no one takes you up on your offer.

Maybe try this for the kids and grand-kids regarding the election.
Well youngsters, you can make up your mind to vote for which candidate.
1. One of them a woman is a pathological liar she hads been a leech sucking on the government all her life, she has never done a real job of any kind, just flies the world on taxpayers money and entertains her friends and her kid.
2. An accomplished developer who has designed, developed and built multi million dollar projects has made his own wealth, has not leeched off of the government, has a poor vocabulary but has done a lot for charity and helping others in need, is financing millions of his own money to be elected. A real dedicated American.
TAKE YOUR OWN CHOICE KIDS AND LET ME KNOW.

bbbbbb chilout

[Guest]

Correction: She has been.. However, she cannot be called a Has Been because in reality, she is a NEVER WAS.

[Guest]

I want you to grow a brain, but I have found that we seldom get what we want. So, don't be too disappointed when no one takes you up on your offer.

Maybe try this for the kids and grand-kids regarding the election.
Well youngsters, you can make up your mind to vote for which candidate.
1. One of them a woman is a pathological liar she has been a leech sucking on the government all her life, she has never done a real job of any kind, just flies the world on taxpayers money and entertains her friends and her kid.
2. An accomplished developer who has designed, developed and built multi million dollar projects has made his own wealth, has not leeched off of the government, has a poor vocabulary but has done a lot for charity and helping others in need, is financing millions of his own money to be elected. A real dedicated American.
TAKE YOUR OWN CHOICE KIDS AND LET ME KNOW.

bbbbbb chilout

[Guest]

If you raise sheep they will be slaughtered. Why Teaching Kids That 'Winning Doesn't Matter' Is A Huge Disservice For Their Futures (http://elitedaily.com/life/culture/why-you-must-teach-your-kids-to-win/793466/)

Career politicians love sheep. The media and big business love sheep.

Teach your children reality.

Signed, Not a guest.

[Guest]

If you raise sheep they will be slaughtered. Why Teaching Kids That 'Winning Doesn't Matter' Is A Huge Disservice For Their Futures (http://elitedaily.com/life/culture/why-you-must-teach-your-kids-to-win/793466/)

Career politicians love sheep. The media and big business love sheep.

Teach your children reality.

Signed, Not a guest.

You got that right...we've literally let the LOSERS take over...we let them win. We stepped aside a let women and minorities take our spot. We've allowed them to tell us how things will be. We've been feminized.

Men, once the wolves, have become sheep too.

[Guest]

If you raise sheep they will be slaughtered. Why Teaching Kids That 'Winning Doesn't Matter' Is A Huge Disservice For Their Futures (http://elitedaily.com/life/culture/why-you-must-teach-your-kids-to-win/793466/)

Career politicians love sheep. The media and big business love sheep.

Teach your children reality.

Signed, Not a guest.Reality is you teach your kids to keep trying and not be afraid to fail.

Read the biographies of any great person, they all say that they learned just as much, if not more from failure then success.

You turned a story about what it takes to be successful into something about sheep and you failed at it. sorry

[Guest]

I want you to get your children and grandchildren and play trumps "speeches" of hate, vile language, calling woman pigs, Mexicans rapists, all Muslims criminals and all the other ramblings. Then tell them this how you should talk and you will be a fine American and the constitution means nothing. Also that god will be proud of you if you do.

They will never do that, because if they did they would have to take a hard look at themselves.

A large % of Chump supporters, if given a magic truth serum....would say that they think the guy is a scumbag too.

It is their utter and deep-seated hatred for Hillary though, that keeps them making excuses for Chump's low-class statements, behavior and character.

And for a lot of them, it is simply because she is a very intelligent, accomplished and competent female.

At this point, Charley Manson could be running against Hillary...and they would still vote for him. :oops:




:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

Right on cue to make my point...is this Yahoo headline. :D

GOP congressman: I’m voting for Clinton (https://www.yahoo.com/news/richard-hanna-vote-clinton-trump-000000778.html)

“While I disagree with her on many issues, I will vote for Mrs. Clinton,” he wrote in an op-ed on Syracuse.com.

There have been several high-profile critics of Donald Trump among Republican members of Congress, including some who said they would not vote for their own party’s nominee in the general election. However, Hanna is the first to say he would cast his ballot for Trump’s Democratic opponent.

In a separate interview with Syracuse.com, Hanna said his decision was motivated by Trump’s recent comments about a Muslim American family whose son heroically died in the Iraq War in 2004. The soldier’s father, Khizr Khan, passionately criticized Trump during last week’s Democratic National Convention. Trump pushed back in interviews and on Twitter, questioning why Khan’s wife was silent during the speech.

“I saw that and felt incensed,” Hanna told the outlet of Trump’s response. “I was stunned by the callousness of his comments.”

He added: “I think Trump is a national embarrassment. Is he really the guy you want to have the nuclear codes?”


:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

Right on cue to make my point...is this Yahoo headline. :D

GOP congressman: I’m voting for Clinton (https://www.yahoo.com/news/richard-hanna-vote-clinton-trump-000000778.html)




:wave:

CNM

What I find to be funny is that the left actually thinks that most Republicans care whether establishment Rebublicans back Trump or not. Here's a news flash, WE DON'T. Republicans voted Trump in, not because he is necessarily the best candidate for the job as that is yet to be determined, but because he is NOT the status quo. Unfortunately, the Democrats didn't have the guts to do the same and chose to keep the corruption going. Most of my family who are Democrats and Independents (I'm the outsider) are more excited about Trump than I am. They would NEVER vote for Hillary.

[Guest]

I wonder how these libtards will teach their grandchildren about the first female president and explain that it is NOT ok to lie, steal, cheat and be disloyal when they will have a felon in the White House as an example. The talk about Trump's language, but they forget about Hillary's criminality. Are they going to tell their kids that stay with your husband, no matter how many women he sleeps with, and you too might be able to rise to a high gov position? Are they going to tell the kids that it's ok to lie as long as you can cover it up. It's ok to take some property that doesn't belong to you when you stay at someone else's home? After all, how will you explain Hillary to the kids?

[Guest]

I want you to get your children and grandchildren and play trumps "speeches" of hate, vile language, calling woman pigs, Mexicans rapists, all Muslims criminals and all the other ramblings. Then tell them this how you should talk and you will be a fine American and the constitution means nothing. Also that god will be proud of you if you do.

And we are sure you will play all the interrogations and wrong doings of Clinton and ssure your family what a great :censored: role model she is.

Be sure to show them how a black unknown that has :censored: up and degenerated our great America.

And that the felon role model Clinton has sworn to contue Obama's work.

Wait a minute here it comes again....barf.

One can only handle so much crap at once.

Good luck with the BS ing of your loved ones!!

[Guest]

My post hit home with you also and you can't deal with it. I'm talking about trump here, lets hear your answer about when you will be having your family in for the showing. Your only answer is to go out on a tangent. Pathetic!

I think a video of Hillary's lies one after
another that goes on and on would be informative!
But maybe it would run too long!:highfive:

[Guest]

I want you to get your children and grandchildren and play trumps "speeches" of hate, vile language, calling woman pigs, Mexicans rapists, all Muslims criminals and all the other ramblings. Then tell them this how you should talk and you will be a fine American and the constitution means nothing. Also that god will be proud of you if you do.

Now that you repubs have tried to change the subject, I'm asking again did you do what I wanted. Of course, you didn't, you would never show your Jekyll and Hyde side to your family. Shame on you.

[Guest]

Now that you repubs have tried to change the subject, I'm asking again did you do what I wanted. Of course, you didn't, you would never show your Jekyll and Hyde side to your family. Shame on you.

Oh, YES, I did. Do I get some kind of award?:eclipsee_gold_cup:

[Guest]

They will never do that, because if they did they would have to take a hard look at themselves.

A large % of Chump supporters, if given a magic truth serum....would say that they think the guy is a scumbag too.

It is their utter and deep-seated hatred for Hillary though, that keeps them making excuses for Chump's low-class statements, behavior and character.

And for a lot of them, it is simply because she is a very intelligent, accomplished and competent female.

At this point, Charley Manson could be running against Hillary...and they would still vote for him. :oops:




:wave:

CNM

Nice copy job. I used the same statement only with Charles Manson running against Trump and liberals would still vote for him. Personally, I see little difference between him and Hillary.

[Guest]

Now that you repubs have tried to change the subject, I'm asking again did you do what I wanted. Of course, you didn't, you would never show your Jekyll and Hyde side to your family. Shame on you.

Typical libtard.

[Guest]

Typical libtard.

Is that all you have, I hit on the truth didn't I? You should be ashamed of yourself. If you are for the crazy, trump, you back un-American values.

[Guest]

Is that all you have, I hit on the truth didn't I? You should be ashamed of yourself. If you are for the crazy, trump, you back un-American values.

I would be ashamed it I was voting for the felon on the left. But, when comparing I find a loud mouthed successful businessman billionaire preferable to a criminal, pathological liar that left the White House dirt poor and in debt, that is now a multi-millionaire with no job or business income. I find it a useless exercise to elect a future president that will shortly be indicted on multiple felonies, not to mention her investigation by the IRS on tax fraud.

[Guest]

Is that all you have, I hit on the truth didn't I? You should be ashamed of yourself. If you are for the crazy, trump, you back un-American values.

Un-American values?

And you compare him with a socialist? Since when did socialism become American? You are a bit skewed in your thought process.

[Guest]

:wave:

CNM

Cvnt Never Mind??

[Guest]

did you do what I wanted. Of course, you didn't.

Why would we do what you wanted? Do you feel you are in a supervisory role here? Go boss around your spouse (or partner, whatever...) and stop making demands of others on here! Geeze, learn how to ask something of someone, and realize just because you asked, does not mean they have to do it.

[Guest]

Why would we do what you wanted? Do you feel you are in a supervisory role here? Go boss around your spouse (or partner, whatever...) and stop making demands of others on here! Geeze, learn how to ask something of someone, and realize just because you asked, does not mean they have to do it.

Double :thumbup:..:thumbup:

[Guest]

Cvnt Never Mind??
Cnm = Clinton never more

Signed, not a guest!

[Guest]

Cvnt Never Mind??

Such a nasty, putrid and telling word. :ohdear:

Real men (like myself)...would never think of uttering it

Let me guess though, you're one of the misogynists here that are completely intimidated by and feel inferior to women...am I right. ;)



:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

Cnm = Clinton never more

Signed, not a guest!

That works very well. We should all use it, but that would just encourage her to continue to act up to get our attention.

[Guest]

Such a nasty, putrid and telling word. :ohdear:

Real men (like myself)...would never think of uttering it

Let me guess though, you're one of the misogynists here that are completely intimidated by and feel inferior to women...am I right. ;)



:wave:

CNM

You may be talking about a she or her ....you kmow another female!!!

[Guest]

I want you to get your children and grandchildren and play trumps "speeches" of hate, vile language, calling woman pigs, Mexicans rapists, all Muslims criminals and all the other ramblings. Then tell them this how you should talk and you will be a fine American and the constitution means nothing. Also that god will be proud of you if you do.

And after that, you could show them the hacked e-mails from the DNC using ethnic slurs against Jews, referring to women as "Bimbos" and using the "N word" to describe African Americans. So which is the TRUE party of hate? We already know the Dems are the party of Hypocrisy, and now Hate---can we add a third "H word" to describe them (Other than Hilary)? I would submit "Hell bent to destroy America"

[Guest]

And after that, you could show them the hacked e-mails from the DNC using ethnic slurs against Jews, referring to women as "Bimbos" and using the "N word" to describe African Americans. So which is the TRUE party of hate? We already know the Dems are the party of Hypocrisy, and now Hate---can we add a third "H word" to describe them (Other than Hilary)? I would submit "Hell bent to destroy America"

Did you do as I say? Ashamed to do it aren't you?

[Guest]

Un-American values?

And you compare him with a socialist? Since when did socialism become American? You are a bit skewed in your thought process.

so·cial·ism
[ˈsōSHəˌlizəm]
NOUN

"a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole."

You think it should all be owned by the 1%, you are braindead.

[Guest]

And after that, you could show them the hacked e-mails from the DNC using ethnic slurs against Jews, referring to women as "Bimbos" and using the "N word" to describe African Americans. So which is the TRUE party of hate? We already know the Dems are the party of Hypocrisy, and now Hate---can we add a third "H word" to describe them (Other than Hilary)? I would submit "Hell bent to destroy America"Link us to the emails. They would be fun to read.

[Guest]

Such a nasty, putrid and telling word. :ohdear:

Real men (like myself)...would never think of uttering it

Let me guess though, you're one of the misogynists here that are completely intimidated by and feel inferior to women...am I right. ;)



:wave:

CNM

It is a telling and descriptive word that suits you perfectly!

"Real men" do not have a strapped on rubber *****, "real men" do not find anything about Hillary attractive or justified (she really struggles in that demographic), "real men" do not cringe at the word Cvnt. It is women, especially bull dike lesbians, that have a problem with the word Cvnt.

Appears you are wrong, again!

[Guest]

It is a telling and descriptive word that suits you perfectly!

"Real men" do not have a strapped on rubber *****, "real men" do not find anything about Hillary attractive or justified (she really struggles in that demographic), "real men" do not cringe at the word Cvnt. It is women, especially bull dike lesbians, that have a problem with the word Cvnt.

Appears you are wrong, again!

YOU are the one who is wrong again. ;)

Gentleman and real men...don't use that putrid word.

Only those who have been eviscerated, on an intellectual level, by females all of their lives...use it.

Nice try though. :thumbup:


:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

It is a telling and descriptive word that suits you perfectly!

"Real men" do not have a strapped on rubber *****, "real men" do not find anything about Hillary attractive or justified (she really struggles in that demographic), "real men" do not cringe at the word Cvnt. It is women, especially bull dike lesbians, that have a problem with the word Cvnt.

Appears you are wrong, again!

:bigbow:

[Guest]

Did you do as I say? Ashamed to do it aren't you?

Did you do as I say? Ashamed to do it aren't you?

Works both ways

[Guest]

It is a telling and descriptive word that suits you perfectly!

"Real men" do not have a strapped on rubber *****, "real men" do not find anything about Hillary attractive or justified (she really struggles in that demographic), "real men" do not cringe at the word Cvnt. It is women, especially bull dike lesbians, that have a problem with the word Cvnt.

Appears you are wrong, again!You seem to know a little too much on these subjects.

[Guest]

You seem to know a little too much on these subjects.Not that there's anything wrong with that.

[Guest]

so·cial·ism
[ˈsōSHəˌlizəm]
NOUN

"a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole."

You think it should all be owned by the 1%, you are braindead.

I think it should be owned proportionately to what YOU EARNED. If you do NOTHING, you "deserve" NOTHING. You should get to "keep what you kill" If that work ethic is down to 1%, we are in deep trouble. Bad enough it is down to 53%. And I'm not talking about the disabled or those who have a mental or physical challenge. I'm talking about the able bodied leeches that at first were glad to get something, then expected it, and now DEMAND it. It's really sad. We should remember the words of Gov. William Bradford of the Massachusetts Bay colony: "He who does not work, does not eat"

[Guest]

I think it should be owned proportionately to what YOU EARNED. If you do NOTHING, you "deserve" NOTHING. You should get to "keep what you kill" If that work ethic is down to 1%, we are in deep trouble. Bad enough it is down to 53%. And I'm not talking about the disabled or those who have a mental or physical challenge. I'm talking about the able bodied leeches that at first were glad to get something, then expected it, and now DEMAND it. It's really sad. We should remember the words of Gov. William Bradford of the Massachusetts Bay colony: "He who does not work, does not eat"

:agree:

[Guest]

Hillary needs to put her pants suits to good use and get out in the fields on her knees and get to work. She would starve if she had to depend on working from her knees elsewhere.

[Guest]

Hillary needs to put her pants suits to good use and get out in the fields on her knees and get to work. She would starve if she had to depend on working from her knees elsewhere.You have quite an imagination.

[Guest]

I think it should be owned proportionately to what YOU EARNED. If you do NOTHING, you "deserve" NOTHING. You should get to "keep what you kill" If that work ethic is down to 1%, we are in deep trouble. Bad enough it is down to 53%. And I'm not talking about the disabled or those who have a mental or physical challenge. I'm talking about the able bodied leeches that at first were glad to get something, then expected it, and now DEMAND it. It's really sad. We should remember the words of Gov. William Bradford of the Massachusetts Bay colony: "He who does not work, does not eat"

We should do what a Pilgrim governor did back in 1620? When I call Republicans "Regressives", I had no idea they wanted to regress back to 1620.
Don't forget that Gov. William Bradford was also the one who got rid of Native Americans by giving them smallpox infected blankets.

[Guest]

Hillary needs to put her pants suits to good use and get out in the fields on her knees and get to work. She would starve if she had to depend on working from her knees elsewhere.Are you the kid the big kids would stuff in the locker when the coach wasn't around and just get to listen to the locker room talk?

[Guest]

I think it should be owned proportionately to what YOU EARNED. If you do NOTHING, you "deserve" NOTHING. You should get to "keep what you kill" If that work ethic is down to 1%, we are in deep trouble. Bad enough it is down to 53%. And I'm not talking about the disabled or those who have a mental or physical challenge. I'm talking about the able bodied leeches that at first were glad to get something, then expected it, and now DEMAND it. It's really sad. We should remember the words of Gov. William Bradford of the Massachusetts Bay colony: "He who does not work, does not eat"

Once again the right peddles the false notion that the poor 'pay no taxes.' :oops:

When in fact, they pay a much higher % of their pay in taxes (ie: sales/gas/etc)...than higher wage earners.


Or did you forget that there are many other types of taxes... besides just 'personal income taxes?"

Poor Pay a Higher Percentage of Income in Taxes (http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2015/1/15/the-poor-pay-a-higher-percentage-of-income-in-taxes)

According to the report, the lower one’s income, the higher the effective state and local tax rate.

Combining all state and local income, property, sales and excise taxes that Americans pay, the nationwide average effective state and local tax rates by income group are 10.9 percent for the poorest 20 percent, 9.4 percent for the middle 20 percent and 5.4 percent for the top 1 percent, the report said.

In the 10 states with the most regressive tax structures, the bottom 20 percent pay up to seven times as much of their income in combined taxes as their wealthy counterparts.


And then of course there are the 'working poor,' who get paid so little that they qualify for welfare.

So let me get this straight, you have this hatred/haughty attitude toward the working poor getting help, but have no problem with the billions of dollars in profits companies make by paying low wages...knowing that the American Citizen will subsidize them when their workers qualify for welfare?

Why is that?



:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

And who is the idiot that thought slavery was such a good idea?

I do know that the first slave owner in America was a black man from Virginia. And the first slaves he owned were WHITE.

Anthony Johnson (colonist - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Johnson_(colonist))

[Guest]

Such a nasty, putrid and telling word. :ohdear:

Real men (like myself)...would never think of uttering it

Let me guess though, you're one of the misogynists here that are completely intimidated by and feel inferior to women...am I right. ;)



:wave:

CNM

It is a telling and descriptive word that suits you perfectly!

"Real men" do not have a strapped on rubber *****, "real men" do not find anything about Hillary attractive or justified (she really struggles in that demographic), "real men" do not cringe at the word Cvnt. It is women, especially bull dike lesbians, that have a problem with the word Cvnt.

Appears you are wrong, again!

Real men don't give a sh!t what you think...

I lost points just for lowering myself to replying to you ladies.

And who is the idiot that thought slavery was such a good idea?

I do know that the first slave owner in America was a black man from Virginia. And the first slaves he owned were WHITE.

Anthony Johnson (colonist - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Johnson_(colonist))

If I'd known it would end like this, I'd have picked my own cotton.

Cheap a$$ Congress SCREWED us, they voted NO repatriation because it was...get this...TOO EXPENSIVE! What have those people cost us since? Untold $trillions.

We need a REAL solution to the "minority problem", not "equality", not diversity insanity. A REAL solution that doesn't drag everyone else down with them.

[Guest]

Are you the kid the big kids would stuff in the locker when the coach wasn't around and just get to listen to the locker room talk?

Did the girls laugh at you in the locker room when you put your training bra on? Do they still do that today? :clap2:

[Guest]

Once again the right peddles the false notion that the poor 'pay no taxes.' :oops:

When in fact, they pay a much higher % of their pay in taxes (ie: sales/gas/etc)...than higher wage earners.


Or did you forget that there are many other types of taxes... besides just 'personal income taxes?"

Poor Pay a Higher Percentage of Income in Taxes (http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2015/1/15/the-poor-pay-a-higher-percentage-of-income-in-taxes)



And then of course there are the 'working poor,' who get paid so little that they qualify for welfare.

So let me get this straight, you have this hatred/haughty attitude toward the working poor getting help, but have no problem with the billions of dollars in profits companies make by paying low wages...knowing that the American Citizen will subsidize them when their workers qualify for welfare?

Why is that?



:wave:

CNM

Wow, you really need to go back to Economics 101.
Any flat sales tax represents a higher percentage of income to those with less money, BUT ONLY IF THEY PURCHASE THE SAME AMOUNT OF GOODS AND SERVICES. They can't and they don't, it is simply a matter of lifestyle. Is your argument that "the poor" "deserve" the same lifestyle as "the rich"? If so, YOU ARE A SOCIALIST!!!. Do you subscribe to the theory that you can make the poor rich by making the rich poorer? That's a fallacy. Remember, "the rich" are rich for a reason---

They may have been born into money: In that case I agree with you, they don't "deserve" that any more than anyone "deserves" a government handout. Other than a few million that we would like to hand down to our kids, I wouldn't object to a heavy tax on anything over that. Better yet, I would like to see a mandatory contribution to legitimate charities.

They may have been "lucky". There are 2 types of luck. The first is the guy who left his garbage can lid at the curb, so flung it back to his house---hence inventing the Frisbee. Good for him. The second is the guy who buys a fistful of lottery tickets instead of milk for his baby. No sympathy there, I would make him give 80% of the winnings to a children's and orphan's fund.

But the overwhelming majority EARNED it, through hard work, reasonably frugal lifestyle, and wise savings and investments. They are the one's who "deserve" what they have, and the concept of taking it away to give it to a bunch of do-nothing couch sitters is ridiculous.

Your second post is economically idiotic. If a "greedy company" is paying lower wages than it's competitors, they will have no workers. If the general economy orchestrated by Obama supports low wages for medium income workers across the board, well, "elections have consequences". I also strongly object to the term "haughty/hatred", I have no problem helping the WORKING POOR, I have a problem supporting the LAZY POOR, THE CRIMINAL POOR, THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT POOR, and the MOTHER OF 8 CHILDREN BY 8 DIFFERENT FATHERS POOR. Choices should have consequences too. Unfortunately, it seems the concept of individual accountability is rapidly fading from the American scene

[Guest]

Wow, you really need to go back to Economics 101.
Any flat sales tax represents a higher percentage of income to those with less money, BUT ONLY IF THEY PURCHASE THE SAME AMOUNT OF GOODS AND SERVICES. They can't and they don't, it is simply a matter of lifestyle. Is your argument that "the poor" "deserve" the same lifestyle as "the rich"? If so, YOU ARE A SOCIALIST!!!. Do you subscribe to the theory that you can make the poor rich by making the rich poorer? That's a fallacy. Remember, "the rich" are rich for a reason---

They may have been born into money: In that case I agree with you, they don't "deserve" that any more than anyone "deserves" a government handout. Other than a few million that we would like to hand down to our kids, I wouldn't object to a heavy tax on anything over that. Better yet, I would like to see a mandatory contribution to legitimate charities.

They may have been "lucky". There are 2 types of luck. The first is the guy who left his garbage can lid at the curb, so flung it back to his house---hence inventing the Frisbee. Good for him. The second is the guy who buys a fistful of lottery tickets instead of milk for his baby. No sympathy there, I would make him give 80% of the winnings to a children's and orphan's fund.

But the overwhelming majority EARNED it, through hard work, reasonably frugal lifestyle, and wise savings and investments. They are the one's who "deserve" what they have, and the concept of taking it away to give it to a bunch of do-nothing couch sitters is ridiculous.

Your second post is economically idiotic. If a "greedy company" is paying lower wages than it's competitors, they will have no workers. If the general economy orchestrated by Obama supports low wages for medium income workers across the board, well, "elections have consequences". I also strongly object to the term "haughty/hatred", I have no problem helping the WORKING POOR, I have a problem supporting the LAZY POOR, THE CRIMINAL POOR, THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT POOR, and the MOTHER OF 8 CHILDREN BY 8 DIFFERENT FATHERS POOR. Choices should have consequences too. Unfortunately, it seems the concept of individual accountability is rapidly fading from the American scene

I have nothing more to add to this post except thank you for the informative, thought provoking post. It's posts like yours that gives me renewed hope that there IS intelligent conversation to be had out there besides the usual mudslinging with absolutely no substance to add to the conversation. Thanks for taking the time to post.

[Guest]

Wow, you really need to go back to Economics 101.
Any flat sales tax represents a higher percentage of income to those with less money, BUT ONLY IF THEY PURCHASE THE SAME AMOUNT OF GOODS AND SERVICES. They can't and they don't, it is simply a matter of lifestyle. Is your argument that "the poor" "deserve" the same lifestyle as "the rich"? If so, YOU ARE A SOCIALIST!!!. Do you subscribe to the theory that you can make the poor rich by making the rich poorer? That's a fallacy. Remember, "the rich" are rich for a reason---

They may have been born into money: In that case I agree with you, they don't "deserve" that any more than anyone "deserves" a government handout. Other than a few million that we would like to hand down to our kids, I wouldn't object to a heavy tax on anything over that. Better yet, I would like to see a mandatory contribution to legitimate charities.

They may have been "lucky". There are 2 types of luck. The first is the guy who left his garbage can lid at the curb, so flung it back to his house---hence inventing the Frisbee. Good for him. The second is the guy who buys a fistful of lottery tickets instead of milk for his baby. No sympathy there, I would make him give 80% of the winnings to a children's and orphan's fund.

But the overwhelming majority EARNED it, through hard work, reasonably frugal lifestyle, and wise savings and investments. They are the one's who "deserve" what they have, and the concept of taking it away to give it to a bunch of do-nothing couch sitters is ridiculous.

Your second post is economically idiotic. If a "greedy company" is paying lower wages than it's competitors, they will have no workers. If the general economy orchestrated by Obama supports low wages for medium income workers across the board, well, "elections have consequences". I also strongly object to the term "haughty/hatred", I have no problem helping the WORKING POOR, I have a problem supporting the LAZY POOR, THE CRIMINAL POOR, THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT POOR, and the MOTHER OF 8 CHILDREN BY 8 DIFFERENT FATHERS POOR. Choices should have consequences too. Unfortunately, it seems the concept of individual accountability is rapidly fading from the American scene

Most of what you said is correct except one item, FLAT TAX. I think you meant FAIR TAX. Flat tax is income tax that is the same percentage for everyone, whether you make one buck or a million. Fair tax is a sales tax.

To me, the fair tax is the most equal tax, as it all depends on consumption, not income. A senior that saves money or has non-liquid assets shouldn't have to pay tax on it until they spend it for products. A rich person spends tons of money and they would pay tons of taxes. What could be more fair than that?

[Guest]

Most of what you said is correct except one item, FLAT TAX. I think you meant FAIR TAX. Flat tax is income tax that is the same percentage for everyone, whether you make one buck or a million. Fair tax is a sales tax.

To me, the fair tax is the most equal tax, as it all depends on consumption, not income. A senior that saves money or has non-liquid assets shouldn't have to pay tax on it until they spend it for products. A rich person spends tons of money and they would pay tons of taxes. What could be more fair than that?

No argument with that

[Guest]

Did the girls laugh at you in the locker room when you put your training bra on? Do they still do that today? :clap2:You have quite an imagination. Although it is a bit creepy.

[Guest]

Wow, you really need to go back to Economics 101.
Actually, I've done pretty well for myself by ensuring that I DO understand economics.

That I also understand the excessive burden put on the working poor, simply makes me one of those 'trolls' that some of those on the right just love to bandy about. :D



Any flat sales tax represents a higher percentage of income to those with less money, BUT ONLY IF THEY PURCHASE THE SAME AMOUNT OF GOODS AND SERVICES. They can't and they don't, it is simply a matter of lifestyle. Is your argument that "the poor" "deserve" the same lifestyle as "the rich"? If so, YOU ARE A SOCIALIST!!!. Do you subscribe to the theory that you can make the poor rich by making the rich poorer? That's a fallacy. Remember, "the rich" are rich for a reason---

Ummm, your attempt at diversion to a subject that isn't even being discussed (progressive vs. flat vs. fair tax) is simply a red herring.

My point that the poor already pay a higher % of their income to 'taxes' is not only true...but I even provided proof of it.

It's always easy to refute those who focus solely on 'personal income tax,' because they have it in their heads that it's the only tax that applies/matters.

It's not.

Local/state sales tax, taxes on fuel, SS/Medicare, ETC. are also paid by the working poor....reducing their actual income even further.

Are you aware that a family of 4 making around $50K in earned income (not investment income, which is treated much differently) after most deductions, actually pay little, if any...personal income tax?

Recognizing of course, they are also paying those 'other' taxes, albeit it is a much smaller % of their actual income.

Are those the 'sucking on the government teat' types you're referring to...and want to ensure they start paying 'their fair share?'

Or do you prefer to hang on to that stereotype of the welfare queen (typically a minority, with a large number of children) getting food stamps and other 'welfare' ....to fuel your prejudice?

Sure, those types do exist. But all too many focus solely on that small group to help stoke the flames of their outrage, anger and prejudice....when the actual facts are much different.


They may have been born into money: In that case I agree with you, they don't "deserve" that any more than anyone "deserves" a government handout. Other than a few million that we would like to hand down to our kids, I wouldn't object to a heavy tax on anything over that. Better yet, I would like to see a mandatory contribution to legitimate charities.

They may have been "lucky". There are 2 types of luck. The first is the guy who left his garbage can lid at the curb, so flung it back to his house---hence inventing the Frisbee. Good for him. The second is the guy who buys a fistful of lottery tickets instead of milk for his baby. No sympathy there, I would make him give 80% of the winnings to a children's and orphan's fund.
So, it sounds like you are all for 'Big Brother' and would like to dictate how others live?

I thought you righties were repulsed about that kind of thing?

Silly me, I guess that only applies to when it's you...not the OTHER person.

While I too believe it is sickening that someone would buy lottery tickets instead of food for their family, without absolute and total control of the populace...how else would it be stopped?

Who/what exactly, are going to be the person/entity that gets to make the decision on whether or not your lifestyle fits with what is proper?

Would you be OK if it were me making that determination? :1rotfl:



But the overwhelming majority EARNED it, through hard work, reasonably frugal lifestyle, and wise savings and investments. They are the one's who "deserve" what they have, and the concept of taking it away to give it to a bunch of do-nothing couch sitters is ridiculous.
Once again, you're back to that stereotype that you're myopically focused on...to fuel your outrage.



Your second post is economically idiotic. If a "greedy company" is paying lower wages than it's competitors, they will have no workers.

Sorry Bubba, but it is YOU...who are obviously economically stupid.

Or didn't you understand what I said above?

Even someone making $15 an hour (almost twice the minimum wage), are still be eligible for public assistance.

And yet, you have also totally avoided my point about how 'multi-billion dollar a year in profit' companies have multitudes of employees who qualify for public assistance.

Apparently, you have no qualms of subsidizing these companies (who can certainly afford to raise their employees past the need of public assistance, paid for by yours and my taxes)...but would rather focus on just individuals?

The High Public Cost of Low Wages | Center for Labor Research and Education (http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/the-high-public-cost-of-low-wages/)

Low Wages Cost U.S. Taxpayers $152.8 Billion Each Year in Public Support for Working Families.

What in your past has made you so bitter, angry and prejudiced against the working poor?



If the general economy orchestrated by Obama supports low wages for medium income workers across the board, well, "elections have consequences". I also strongly object to the term "haughty/hatred", I have no problem helping the WORKING POOR, I have a problem supporting the LAZY POOR, THE CRIMINAL POOR, THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT POOR, and the MOTHER OF 8 CHILDREN BY 8 DIFFERENT FATHERS POOR. Choices should have consequences too. Unfortunately, it seems the concept of individual accountability is rapidly fading from the American scene

AHA!!

I guess I should have noticed this first, before I posted my comments above.

I obviously hit the nail on the head, when I guessed what was fueling your prejudice and hatred.

Thanks for making me look so prescient. :thumbup:


Just a thought, but might I be so presumptuous as to suggest you do a little more research before coming on here screaming about subjects that you have little knowledge?

Jes saying. :ho:




:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

Actually, I've done pretty well for myself by ensuring that I DO understand economics.

That I also understand the excessive burden put on the working poor, simply makes me one of those 'trolls' that some of those on the right just love to bandy about. :D





Ummm, your attempt at diversion to a subject that isn't even being discussed (progressive vs. flat vs. fair tax) is simply a red herring.

My point that the poor already pay a higher % of their income to 'taxes' is not only true...but I even provided proof of it.

It's always easy to refute those who focus solely on 'personal income tax,' because they have it in their heads that it's the only tax that applies/matters.

It's not.

Local/state sales tax, taxes on fuel, SS/Medicare, ETC. are also paid by the working poor....reducing their actual income even further.

Are you aware that a family of 4 making around $50K in earned income (not investment income, which is treated much differently) after most deductions, actually pay little, if any...personal income tax?

Recognizing of course, they are also paying those 'other' taxes, albeit it is a much smaller % of their actual income.

Are those the 'sucking on the government teat' types you're referring to...and want to ensure they start paying 'their fair share?'

Or do you prefer to hang on to that stereotype of the welfare queen (typically a minority, with a large number of children) getting food stamps and other 'welfare' ....to fuel your prejudice?

Sure, those types do exist. But all too many focus solely on that small group to help stoke the flames of their outrage, anger and prejudice....when the actual facts are much different.



So, it sounds like you are all for 'Big Brother' and would like to dictate how others live?

I thought you righties were repulsed about that kind of thing?

Silly me, I guess that only applies to when it's you...not the OTHER person.

While I too believe it is sickening that someone would buy lottery tickets instead of food for their family, without absolute and total control of the populace...how else would it be stopped?

Who/what exactly, are going to be the person/entity that gets to make the decision on whether or not your lifestyle fits with what is proper?

Would you be OK if it were me making that determination? :1rotfl:



Once again, you're back to that stereotype that you're myopically focused on...to fuel your outrage.





Sorry Bubba, but it is YOU...who are obviously economically stupid.

Or didn't you understand what I said above?

Even someone making $15 an hour (almost twice the minimum wage), are still be eligible for public assistance.

And yet, you have also totally avoided my point about how 'multi-billion dollar a year in profit' companies have multitudes of employees who qualify for public assistance.

Apparently, you have no qualms of subsidizing these companies (who can certainly afford to raise their employees past the need of public assistance, paid for by yours and my taxes)...but would rather focus on just individuals?

The High Public Cost of Low Wages | Center for Labor Research and Education (http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/the-high-public-cost-of-low-wages/)


What in your past has made you so bitter, angry and prejudiced against the working poor?





AHA!!

I guess I should have noticed this first, before I posted my comments above.

I obviously hit the nail on the head, when I guessed what was fueling your prejudice and hatred.

Thanks for making me look so prescient. :thumbup:


Just a thought, but might I be so presumptuous as to suggest you do a little more research before coming on here screaming about subjects that you have little knowledge?

Jes saying. :ho:




:wave:

CNM

I congratulate you on your left leaning incoherent rant. I wish you had even the slightest idea of what you are talking about, but like most "lefties", you are blinded by ideology and cannot deal with reality. I guess you think the CEO of IBM, responsible for tens of thousands of workers and billions of dollars should get the same pay as the guy who screws part A into slot B.? You glossed over my agreement with you about the WORKING poor. My point deals with the LAZY POOR, THE CRIMINAL POOR, THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT POOR, and the MOTHER OF 8 CHILDREN BY 8 DIFFERENT FATHERS POOR. I suppose you think it is "social justice" that millions of "Joe the Plumbers" work their butts off to just scrape by and yet have to support those losers?

BTW, the way you stop the beer, cigarettes and lottery tickets is by eliminating ALL CASH from the hands of public assistance recipients. No EBT cards. You go back to food stamps, except this time at 100% face value, and only good for the categories of food stamped on the coupon. You make it a class B felony to possess food stamps that you are not entitled to, so the resale market dries up. Yes, yes, the left thinks this was "demeaning" that people in the grocery line could see you were using food stamps. Well, too bad, skip the pity party. Those in line are paying for them anyway. What you, economically speaking don't realize, is that it is IMPERATIVE, repeat IMPERATIVE that those on public assistance occupy the very lowest rung of the economic ladder. Otherwise there is no incentive to work, get educated, or better yourself. Who would work if they could enjoy the same lifestyle for free? That's human nature. When FDR started "the dole" in the 30's, it was a SUBSISTANCE living----cold water flat, government surplus cheese and bread line. People would take any, repeat ANY job to get off "the dole". Now , with large screen TVs, computer systems with high speed internet, free cell phones, cars, and a magic EBT card that can even be used in casinos and strip clubs, there is little incentive to change.

Sorry to burst your ideological bubble, but the rest of us live in the real world. (That's planet Earth, in case you were confused)

[Guest]

I congratulate you on your left leaning incoherent rant. I wish you had even the slightest idea of what you are talking about, but like most "lefties", you are blinded by ideology and cannot deal with reality. I guess you think the CEO of IBM, responsible for tens of thousands of workers and billions of dollars should get the same pay as the guy who screws part A into slot B.? You glossed over my agreement with you about the WORKING poor. My point deals with the LAZY POOR, THE CRIMINAL POOR, THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT POOR, and the MOTHER OF 8 CHILDREN BY 8 DIFFERENT FATHERS POOR. I suppose you think it is "social justice" that millions of "Joe the Plumbers" work their butts off to just scrape by and yet have to support those losers?

BTW, the way you stop the beer, cigarettes and lottery tickets is by eliminating ALL CASH from the hands of public assistance recipients. No EBT cards. You go back to food stamps, except this time at 100% face value, and only good for the categories of food stamped on the coupon. You make it a class B felony to possess food stamps that you are not entitled to, so the resale market dries up. Yes, yes, the left thinks this was "demeaning" that people in the grocery line could see you were using food stamps. Well, too bad, skip the pity party. Those in line are paying for them anyway. What you, economically speaking don't realize, is that it is IMPERATIVE, repeat IMPERATIVE that those on public assistance occupy the very lowest rung of the economic ladder. Otherwise there is no incentive to work, get educated, or better yourself. Who would work if they could enjoy the same lifestyle for free? That's human nature. When FDR started "the dole" in the 30's, it was a SUBSISTANCE living----cold water flat, government surplus cheese and bread line. People would take any, repeat ANY job to get off "the dole". Now , with large screen TVs, computer systems with high speed internet, free cell phones, cars, and a magic EBT card that can even be used in casinos and strip clubs, there is little incentive to change.

Sorry to burst your ideological bubble, but the rest of us live in the real world. (That's planet Earth, in case you were confused):a040::boom::agree::agree:

[Guest]

Trump is a big meanie! Libtards think it is "hate" when someone speaks the truth. Only a libtard hears "hate." I guess they have been coddled so much in their lifetime that words really do hurt them. But, apparently sticks and stones are OK to use against those that do not agree with you. Violence is justified if they don't get their way, freebies from the government.

So, I guess you are suggesting that I should use the Clintons as examples to my family. Examples of how to get away with felonies, to lie and to cheat the IRS, and how to be disloyal to people that count on you and get them killed, making excuses and blaming an innocent for their deaths. Teach them how to lie under oath. To be honest with you, I actually thought that America dug a hole in the bottom of the barrel to get the worst president America has ever had, when they elected Obambie. It turns out that the left really can do worst.

Thanks for the bons mots,, Lee.z.a

[Guest]

Actually, the "cancerous" thinking is the liberal thinking that through affirmative action, quotas, and "forced diversity" is actively destroying this country. We've never been lower and we've never had a minority population as large. It's NOT coincidence. It's the cause. ALL the BAD statistics are up and all the GOOD statistics are down. Because we're moving from "white" to "brown". It happens EVERY time! STOP diversity before it destroys here too...like it has EVERYWHERE else.

GET OVER YOURSELF, A>S>S>H>O>L>E! It's done. Your type will soon be obsolete, thank goddess.

[Guest]

Typical libtard.

Typical Le.eza.

[Guest]

It IS your business. That's what's wrong with this country now, NOBODY takes responsibility and nobody is willing/able to SAY anything when others are screwing up. We just "let it go" and the country slides farther and farther towards the 3rd world. Sometime you have to be "hateful" to save people from themselves.

Blah blah blah...talk a lot with nothing to say...just the typical personal attacks. I don't agree, so I'm a bad person. Well, at least I'm not aiding and abetting in the destruction of my country, I'm trying to save it from people like you who want to diversify it into oblivion.
The D and R parties are toxic.

thank you. the first 10 posts have nothing of substance to offer a waste of space and people's time

Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

I wonder how these libtards will teach their grandchildren about the first female president and explain that it is NOT ok to lie, steal, cheat and be disloyal when they will have a felon in the White House as an example. The talk about Trump's language, but they forget about Hillary's criminality. Are they going to tell their kids that stay with your husband, no matter how many women he sleeps with, and you too might be able to rise to a high gov position? Are they going to tell the kids that it's ok to lie as long as you can cover it up. It's ok to take some property that doesn't belong to you when you stay at someone else's home? After all, how will you explain Hillary to the kids?

L.e.ez, ae you serious? Trump sleeps with anything that breathes.
LOL!

[Guest]

I think I'll go check outht eh poop thread they have more substance than most of what is being posted on this thread

Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

Maybe try this for the kids and grand-kids regarding the election.
Well youngsters, you can make up your mind to vote for which candidate.
1. One of them a woman is a pathological liar she hads been a leech sucking on the government all her life, she has never done a real job of any kind, just flies the world on taxpayers money and entertains her friends and her kid.
2. An accomplished developer who has designed, developed and built multi million dollar projects has made his own wealth, has not leeched off of the government, has a poor vocabulary but has done a lot for charity and helping others in need, is financing millions of his own money to be elected. A real dedicated American.
TAKE YOUR OWN CHOICE KIDS AND LET ME KNOW.

bbbbbb chilout


I often agree with you. However Trump has done NOTHING for ANYONE who is not named TRUMP. Charity and helping those in need? Named Trump? No way.

[Guest]

I congratulate you on your left leaning incoherent rant.

:1rotfl:

Only 'incoherent,' because you once again dodged the question of your prejudice...and obvious acceptance of subsidizing corporations that pay low wages.

Either that, or because you're too busy yelling with caps...you aren't smart enough to comprehend.

So which is it? :ohdear:




I wish you had even the slightest idea of what you are talking about, but like most "lefties", you are blinded by ideology and cannot deal with reality. I guess you think the CEO of IBM, responsible for tens of thousands of workers and billions of dollars should get the same pay as the guy who screws part A into slot B.? You glossed over my agreement with you about the WORKING poor. My point deals with the LAZY POOR, THE CRIMINAL POOR, THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT POOR, and the MOTHER OF 8 CHILDREN BY 8 DIFFERENT FATHERS POOR. I suppose you think it is "social justice" that millions of "Joe the Plumbers" work their butts off to just scrape by and yet have to support those losers?

BTW, the way you stop the beer, cigarettes and lottery tickets is by eliminating ALL CASH from the hands of public assistance recipients. No EBT cards. You go back to food stamps, except this time at 100% face value, and only good for the categories of food stamped on the coupon. You make it a class B felony to possess food stamps that you are not entitled to, so the resale market dries up. Yes, yes, the left thinks this was "demeaning" that people in the grocery line could see you were using food stamps. Well, too bad, skip the pity party. Those in line are paying for them anyway. What you, economically speaking don't realize, is that it is IMPERATIVE, repeat IMPERATIVE that those on public assistance occupy the very lowest rung of the economic ladder. Otherwise there is no incentive to work, get educated, or better yourself. Who would work if they could enjoy the same lifestyle for free? That's human nature. When FDR started "the dole" in the 30's, it was a SUBSISTANCE living----cold water flat, government surplus cheese and bread line. People would take any, repeat ANY job to get off "the dole". Now , with large screen TVs, computer systems with high speed internet, free cell phones, cars, and a magic EBT card that can even be used in casinos and strip clubs, there is little incentive to change.
While your suggestions on reducing using those cards for things that they shouldn't be used makes sense in some ways (I admit that I am not that familiar with what they can/cannot use them for), you have once again only addressed your stereotype of what you think is the average 'welfare recipient.'

So why don't you show us (with some type of legitimate statistical, not opinion, link) what % of those receiving public assistance, fits into that stereotypical 'lazy/shiftless/mother of 8/etc.' category of yours?

Is it 75%?

50%?

25%?

Less than 10%?

And then what % of those getting that assistance, are actually part of the working poor?

Or are you afraid that it might burst YOUR little bubble of ignorance and prejudice? ;)


Sorry to burst your ideological bubble, but the rest of us live in the real world. (That's planet Earth, in case you were confused)

LOL :D

You haven't 'busted' anything of mine, you've simply reinforced my viewpoint that ignorant and nasty people like you and your ilk will develop whatever prejudices necessary...to reinforce your own anger and hatred.

BTW - Aren't you the same (hard to tell, since all you 'guests' sound alike...LOL) jerk who tried to lecture me about leveling 'personal attacks?'

And yet, you were the first to do it in your other post.

Like I've said many times, you flaming hypocrites...crack me the hell up. :1rotfl:

Thanks for the guffaws. :thumbup:


:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

:1rotfl:

Only 'incoherent,' because you once again dodged the question of your prejudice...and obvious acceptance of subsidizing corporations that pay low wages.

Either that, or because you're too busy yelling with caps...you aren't smart enough to comprehend.

So which is it? :ohdear:

While your suggestions on reducing using those cards for things that they shouldn't be used makes sense in some ways (I admit that I am not that familiar with what they can/cannot use them for), you have once again only addressed your stereotype of what you think is the average 'welfare recipient.'

So why don't you show us (with some type of legitimate statistical, not opinion, link) what % of those receiving public assistance, fits into that stereotypical 'lazy/shiftless/mother of 8/etc.' category of yours?

Is it 75%?

50%?

25%?

Less than 10%?

And then what % of those getting that assistance, are actually part of the working poor?

Or are you afraid that it might burst YOUR little bubble of ignorance and prejudice? ;)




LOL :D

You haven't 'busted' anything of mine, you've simply reinforced my viewpoint that ignorant and nasty people like you and your ilk will develop whatever prejudices necessary...to reinforce your own anger and hatred.

BTW - Aren't you the same (hard to tell, since all you 'guests' sound alike...LOL) jerk who tried to lecture me about leveling 'personal attacks?'

And yet, you were the first to do it in your other post.

Like I've said many times, you flaming hypocrites...crack me the hell up. :1rotfl:

Thanks for the guffaws. :thumbup:


:wave:

CNM

I didn't think it was possible, but you've outdone yourself this time.

First of all, I am hardly prejudiced. Let me walk that back, I have a "work ethic" prejudice. I have no use for anyone who feels they are "entitled" to sit on their a$$ and reap the benefit of other people efforts.

As far as "subsidizing corporations that pay low wages", employers will pay a wage that gets them the workers they need, driven by market forces. Again, go back to economics 101. If buying their product is a "subsidy", it is what it is. If your argument is that low wage workers still qualify for welfare and I subsidize that by taxes, that is a construct of the government YOU elected, not the corporation.

And I would love to know, and share with you statistics on the demographics of welfare recipients, but they do not publish how many "'lazy/shiftless/mother of 8/etc." are getting taxpayer funds. It doesn't matter, because one is one too many. Again, I have no problem with those who work hard but still need help.

And, no, I am not the one who lectured about personal attacks. There is no need, since I long ago acknowledged that all the "flaming" hypocrites reside on the left, and when confronted with facts and logic all they can do is resort to name calling. As proof, see the post that referred to a "big meanie". Has anyone ever used that term past 3rd grade? Well, I guess at least one person has, assuming they are not a 3rd grader.

Lastly, is the term "flaming" some sort of slur against homosexuals? Given the DNC e-mails, that would be completely in line with liberal thinking.

[Guest]

I didn't think it was possible, but you've outdone yourself this time.

First of all, I am hardly prejudiced. Let me walk that back, I have a "work ethic" prejudice. I have no use for anyone who feels they are "entitled" to sit on their a$$ and reap the benefit of other people efforts.

As far as "subsidizing corporations that pay low wages", employers will pay a wage that gets them the workers they need, driven by market forces. Again, go back to economics 101. If buying their product is a "subsidy", it is what it is. If your argument is that low wage workers still qualify for welfare and I subsidize that by taxes, that is a construct of the government YOU elected, not the corporation.

And I would love to know, and share with you statistics on the demographics of welfare recipients, but they do not publish how many "'lazy/shiftless/mother of 8/etc." are getting taxpayer funds. It doesn't matter, because one is one too many. Again, I have no problem with those who work hard but still need help.

And, no, I am not the one who lectured about personal attacks. There is no need, since I long ago acknowledged that all the "flaming" hypocrites reside on the left, and when confronted with facts and logic all they can do is resort to name calling. As proof, see the post that referred to a "big meanie". Has anyone ever used that term past 3rd grade? Well, I guess at least one person has, assuming they are not a 3rd grader.

Lastly, is the term "flaming" some sort of slur against homosexuals? Given the DNC e-mails, that would be completely in line with liberal thinking.

Actually, your posts prove that you are quite prejudiced.

What they also show, is a complete lack of honesty in admitting it.

But hey, continuing to justify that prejudice by saying "one is one too many"...isn't fooling anyone with even average intelligence.

Conversely, I can see where "one ignorant, right-wing, intolerant racist is one too many"...so I at least see your point.

The problem of course, is the latter is much more prevalent than the former...and will never go away. :ohdear:

And your full acceptance of billion dollar companies being subsidized by American taxpayers, because they pay their workers so little that they qualify for public assistance...simply epitomizes the flaming hypocrisy of the right.

Speaking of being a 'flaming hypocrite,' only a homophobe would connote 'flaming' with solely applying to gays.

As I'm sure you have been told many times in your life.... that you are a 'flaming azzhole.' (not a gay reference) :1rotfl:

So it looks like you outed yourself there too. ;)


:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

Actually, your posts prove that you are quite prejudiced.

What they also show, is a complete lack of honesty in admitting it.

But hey, continuing to justify that prejudice by saying "one is one too many"...isn't fooling anyone with even average intelligence.

Conversely, I can see where "one ignorant, right-wing, intolerant racist is one too many"...so I at least see your point.

The problem of course, is the latter is much more prevalent than the former...and will never go away. :ohdear:

And your full acceptance of billion dollar companies being subsidized by American taxpayers, because they pay their workers so little that they qualify for public assistance...simply epitomizes the flaming hypocrisy of the right.

Speaking of being a 'flaming hypocrite,' only a homophobe would connote 'flaming' with solely applying to gays.

As I'm sure you have been told many times in your life.... that you are a 'flaming azzhole.' (not a gay reference) :1rotfl:

So it looks like you outed yourself there too. ;)


:wave:

CNM

Here's the good news. I don't even have to bother to reply to this latest post, because res ipsa loquitur---it speaks for itself. I was being kind in stating previously that you may be blinded by ideology. Clearly, you just suffer from sub-normal intelligence----extremely sub-normal.

[Guest]

Actually, your posts prove that you are quite prejudiced.

What they also show, is a complete lack of honesty in admitting it.

But hey, continuing to justify that prejudice by saying "one is one too many"...isn't fooling anyone with even average intelligence.

Conversely, I can see where "one ignorant, right-wing, intolerant racist is one too many"...so I at least see your point.

The problem of course, is the latter is much more prevalent than the former...and will never go away. :ohdear:

And your full acceptance of billion dollar companies being subsidized by American taxpayers, because they pay their workers so little that they qualify for public assistance...simply epitomizes the flaming hypocrisy of the right.

Speaking of being a 'flaming hypocrite,' only a homophobe would connote 'flaming' with solely applying to gays.

As I'm sure you have been told many times in your life.... that you are a 'flaming azzhole.' (not a gay reference) :1rotfl:

So it looks like you outed yourself there too. ;)


:wave:

CNM

Wow, you are one sick dude! :ohdear:

[Guest]

Wow, you are one sick dude! :ohdear:

That is not a dude, it is Cvnt Never Mind...

[Guest]

Wow, you really need to go back to Economics 101.
Any flat sales tax represents a higher percentage of income to those with less money, BUT ONLY IF THEY PURCHASE THE SAME AMOUNT OF GOODS AND SERVICES. They can't and they don't, it is simply a matter of lifestyle. Is your argument that "the poor" "deserve" the same lifestyle as "the rich"? If so, YOU ARE A SOCIALIST!!!. Do you subscribe to the theory that you can make the poor rich by making the rich poorer? That's a fallacy. Remember, "the rich" are rich for a reason---

They may have been born into money: In that case I agree with you, they don't "deserve" that any more than anyone "deserves" a government handout. Other than a few million that we would like to hand down to our kids, I wouldn't object to a heavy tax on anything over that. Better yet, I would like to see a mandatory contribution to legitimate charities.

They may have been "lucky". There are 2 types of luck. The first is the guy who left his garbage can lid at the curb, so flung it back to his house---hence inventing the Frisbee. Good for him. The second is the guy who buys a fistful of lottery tickets instead of milk for his baby. No sympathy there, I would make him give 80% of the winnings to a children's and orphan's fund.

But the overwhelming majority EARNED it, through hard work, reasonably frugal lifestyle, and wise savings and investments. They are the one's who "deserve" what they have, and the concept of taking it away to give it to a bunch of do-nothing couch sitters is ridiculous.

Your second post is economically idiotic. If a "greedy company" is paying lower wages than it's competitors, they will have no workers. If the general economy orchestrated by Obama supports low wages for medium income workers across the board, well, "elections have consequences". I also strongly object to the term "haughty/hatred", I have no problem helping the WORKING POOR, I have a problem supporting the LAZY POOR, THE CRIMINAL POOR, THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT POOR, and the MOTHER OF 8 CHILDREN BY 8 DIFFERENT FATHERS POOR. Choices should have consequences too. Unfortunately, it seems the concept of individual accountability is rapidly fading from the American scene

Damn Straight!

Who is the CNM queer?

STOCK UP ON AMMO!

[Guest]

Here's the good news. I don't even have to bother to reply to this latest post, because res ipsa loquitur---it speaks for itself. I was being kind in stating previously that you may be blinded by ideology. Clearly, you just suffer from sub-normal intelligence----extremely sub-normal.

Totally agree.........:bigbow:

[Guest]

Wow, you are one sick dude! :ohdear:

Are you sure that's a "dude?" I'm not convinced. But, he may be light in the loafers type of dude.

[Guest]

Damn Straight!

Who is the CNM queer?

STOCK UP ON AMMO!

I doubt that he is "queer"

However, he may have been released from the asylum prematurely.

[Guest]

Oh, YES, I did. Do I get some kind of award?:eclipsee_gold_cup:

Yes the ahole award, did the children and grandchildren get up and cheer at every bigoted statement he made? You should be very proud of them.

[Guest]

Yes the ahole award, did the children and grandchildren get up and cheer at every bigoted statement he made? You should be very proud of them.

Sorry to disappoint you, but I don't have any children or grandchildren - A-hole!

[Guest]

Bill and her are over 50 now with the dead bodies...

12 of which were their own body guards. Think about that... 12 of their body guards died mysteriously.

[Guest]

I want you to get your children and grandchildren and play trumps "speeches" of hate, vile language, calling woman pigs, Mexicans rapists, all Muslims criminals and all the other ramblings. Then tell them this how you should talk and you will be a fine American and the constitution means nothing. Also that god will be proud of you if you do.


I don't suppose you are including all those children aborted by Planned parenthood because they never had a chance at life. Did you explain the abortion process to your children? Did you tell them that they could have more friends across the road but they were killed before and after they were born?

[Guest]

I don't suppose you are including all those children aborted by Planned parenthood because they never had a chance at life. Did you explain the abortion process to your children? Did you tell them that they could have more friends across the road but they were killed before and after they were born?
You're quite a role model yourself.

[Guest]

I want you to get your children and grandchildren and play trumps "speeches" of hate, vile language, calling woman pigs, Mexicans rapists, all Muslims criminals and all the other ramblings. Then tell them this how you should talk and you will be a fine American and the constitution means nothing. Also that god will be proud of you if you do.

Will you show these fully documented comments made by Hillary to YOUR KIDS?


The real Hillary.... Her actual words:

1) "Where is the God damn flag? I want the God damn f**king flag up every morning at f***king sunrise". Hillary to staff at the Arkansas Governor's mansion on Labor Day 1991. From the book "Inside the White House" by Ronald Kessler, p. 244

(2) "F**k off! It's enough I have to see you sh*t kickers every day! I'm not going to talk to you, too! Just do your Goddamn job and keep your mouth shut." Hillary to her State Trooper bodyguards after one of them greeted her with "Good Morning." From the book "America Evita" by Christopher Anderson, p.90

(3) "If you want to remain on this detail, get your f***ing a*s over here and grab those bags!" Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident. From the book "The First Partner" p. 25

(4) "Stay the f**k back, stay the f**k back away from me! Don't come within ten yards of me, or else! Just f***ing do as I say, Okay!!?" Hillary screaming at her Secret Service detail. From the book "Unlimited Access" by Clinton 's FBI Agent-in-Charge, Gary Aldridge, p.139

(5) "Where's the miserable c**k sucker?" (otherwise known as "Bill Clinton") Hillary shouting at a Secret Service officer. From the book "The Truth about Hillary" by Edward Klein, p. 5

(6) "You f***ing idiot" Hillary to a State Trooper who was driving her to an event. From the book "Crossfire" ~pg. 84

(7) "Put this on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo. I need those f***ing sunglasses! We need to go back! Hillary to Marine One helicopter pilot to turn back while in route to Air Force One. From the book " Dereliction of Duty" p. 71-72

(8) "Come on Bill, put your d**k up! You can't f**k her here!!" Hillary to Gov. Bill Clinton when she spots him talking with an attractive female. From the book "Inside the White House" by Ronald Kessler, p. 243

There it is ........book, chapter and page.......the real Hillary Rotten Clinton!

Additionally, when she walked around the White House, NO ONE was permitted to look her in the eye, they all had to lower their heads with their eyes towards the ground whenever she walked by. Clearly she is a class act!

This ill-tempered, violent, loud-mouth, hateful and abusive woman wants to be your next President, and have total control as Commander-in-Chief of our Military, the very Military for which she has shown incredible disdain throughout her public life .

Remember her most vile comment about Benghazi: "What difference at this point does it make?"

Now it will be clear why the crew of "Marine One" helicopter nick-named the craft, "Broomstick ONE " -

[Guest]

You're quite a role model yourself.

Typical lib comment ..no answers. I guess you can live with yourself stabbing born babies in the back of the neck, killing them ,. Well, I can't. And I suspect, neither can God, which I spell with a capital G. How many babies will YOU support being killed?

[Guest]

Hillary

Does Hillary Clinton have a single accomplishment in over 30 years in politics?

There are no bigger LIARS than both Clintons. She destroyed the Middle East.

SHE DESTROYED THE WOMEN HER HUSBAND RAPED AND MOLESTED.

She defended the rapist of a 12 year old girl and then laughed about it. Her life was ruined. She had to have internal vagina stitches and could not have children. Hillary never apologized.,

She lied to the gold star mothers and fathers of the heroes at Benghazi,

More important is Hillary's income or better still the source of Hillary's income how did she get to be worth over $100 million without having a real job?

Hillary passed 3 bills in 6 years in the Senate, one named a Post Office and the other named a Highway. The other 357 bills she sponsored FAILED. Hillary's Senate years were a complete failure.

When Hillary was running for New York Senator ( I live in NY ) she promised to create 200,000 jobs for New York State. The number of jobs actually declined by 9,000 during all the time she was in office

Just another lie for Hollerin' Hillary.

BUT.,,I will listen. Please list s few of her accomplishments.

[Guest]

Will you show these fully documented comments made by Hillary to YOUR KIDS?


The real Hillary.... Her actual words:

1) "Where is the God damn flag? I want the God damn f**king flag up every morning at f***king sunrise". Hillary to staff at the Arkansas Governor's mansion on Labor Day 1991. From the book "Inside the White House" by Ronald Kessler, p. 244

(2) "F**k off! It's enough I have to see you sh*t kickers every day! I'm not going to talk to you, too! Just do your Goddamn job and keep your mouth shut." Hillary to her State Trooper bodyguards after one of them greeted her with "Good Morning." From the book "America Evita" by Christopher Anderson, p.90

(3) "If you want to remain on this detail, get your f***ing a*s over here and grab those bags!" Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident. From the book "The First Partner" p. 25

(4) "Stay the f**k back, stay the f**k back away from me! Don't come within ten yards of me, or else! Just f***ing do as I say, Okay!!?" Hillary screaming at her Secret Service detail. From the book "Unlimited Access" by Clinton 's FBI Agent-in-Charge, Gary Aldridge, p.139

(5) "Where's the miserable c**k sucker?" (otherwise known as "Bill Clinton") Hillary shouting at a Secret Service officer. From the book "The Truth about Hillary" by Edward Klein, p. 5

(6) "You f***ing idiot" Hillary to a State Trooper who was driving her to an event. From the book "Crossfire" ~pg. 84

(7) "Put this on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo. I need those f***ing sunglasses! We need to go back! Hillary to Marine One helicopter pilot to turn back while in route to Air Force One. From the book " Dereliction of Duty" p. 71-72

(8) "Come on Bill, put your d**k up! You can't f**k her here!!" Hillary to Gov. Bill Clinton when she spots him talking with an attractive female. From the book "Inside the White House" by Ronald Kessler, p. 243

There it is ........book, chapter and page.......the real Hillary Rotten Clinton!

Additionally, when she walked around the White House, NO ONE was permitted to look her in the eye, they all had to lower their heads with their eyes towards the ground whenever she walked by. Clearly she is a class act!

This ill-tempered, violent, loud-mouth, hateful and abusive woman wants to be your next President, and have total control as Commander-in-Chief of our Military, the very Military for which she has shown incredible disdain throughout her public life .

Remember her most vile comment about Benghazi: "What difference at this point does it make?"

Now it will be clear why the crew of "Marine One" helicopter nick-named the craft, "Broomstick ONE " -
Have these words been recorded and played on national tv. Benghazi has been explained. Just decide for yourself.

[Guest]

Typical lib comment ..no answers. I guess you can live with yourself stabbing born babies in the back of the neck, killing them ,. Well, I can't. And I suspect, neither can God, which I spell with a capital G. How many babies will YOU support being killed?

Trump is toxic.

Hillary supports killing babies. Can't get more disgusting than that

[Guest]

Benghazi has not been explained to Pat Smith whose heroes on was killed. In fact Hillaru said she (the mother) had no right to an answer because she was not a member of the immediate family. How do you feel about that?

[Guest]

Typical lib comment ..no answers. I guess you can live with yourself stabbing born babies in the back of the neck, killing them ,. Well, I can't. And I suspect, neither can God, which I spell with a capital G. How many babies will YOU support being killed?How can you explain to children all of Trump's public statements that are recorded and played on TV? That was the question and instead of answering the question you twist it into an abortion discussion. That's how your mind works.

I feel sorry for anyone that has or had to live with you. I'm joking. I'm just being sarcastic. Get it?

[Guest]

Benghazi has not been explained to Pat Smith whose heroes on was killed. In fact Hillaru said she (the mother) had no right to an answer because she was not a member of the immediate family. How do you feel about that?

It is impossible to know with certainty what Clinton told these families in brief conversations at a private reception only three days after Benghazi. Some, but not all, family members who have spoken to the media said Clinton mentioned a video or protests in their meeting. Some said she didn’t mention a video. Clinton says she did not.

If she did say something about the video, would it have been an intentional lie? It’s very possible that this is one of the many conflicting pieces of intelligence that the administration was working with at the time.

There simply is not enough concrete information in the public domain for anyone to claim as fact that Clinton did or did not lie to the Benghazi families.

you asked, i answered
Checking Patricia Smith's claims about Clinton and Benghazi | PolitiFact (http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/18/checking-patricia-smiths-claims-about-clinton-and-/)

How long has Clinton been in public service and tried to help the less fortunate? How about you? Remember "ask not what you.........................

[Guest]

It is impossible to know with certainty what Clinton told these families in brief conversations at a private reception only three days after Benghazi. Some, but not all, family members who have spoken to the media said Clinton mentioned a video or protests in their meeting. Some said she didn’t mention a video. Clinton says she did not.

If she did say something about the video, would it have been an intentional lie? It’s very possible that this is one of the many conflicting pieces of intelligence that the administration was working with at the time.

There simply is not enough concrete information in the public domain for anyone to claim as fact that Clinton did or did not lie to the Benghazi families.

you asked, i answered
Checking Patricia Smith's claims about Clinton and Benghazi | PolitiFact (http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/18/checking-patricia-smiths-claims-about-clinton-and-/)

How long has Clinton been in public service and tried to help the less fortunate? How about you? Remember "ask not what you.........................

Two Gold Star parents said she blamed it on a video. Are you calling them liars like Hillary? Pat Smith a mother was refused ANY INFORMATION about HER SON because Hillary said she was not a member of the immediate family.,

Hillary has done zilch for anyone. Her Senate record was putrid. Except for naming a road and Pist office 353 bills out of 360 FAILED!

NAME A FEW OF HER ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR ME WILL YOU ?

[Guest]

Two Gold Star parents said she blamed it on a video. Are you calling them liars like Hillary? Pat Smith a mother was refused ANY INFORMATION about HER SON because Hillary said she was not a member of the immediate family.,

Hillary has done zilch for anyone. Her Senate record was putrid. Except for naming a road and Pist office 353 bills out of 360 FAILED!

NAME A FEW OF HER ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR ME WILL YOU ?
1. Fought for children and families for 40 years and counting.
2. Helped provide millions of children with health care.
3. Helped get 9/11 first responders the health care they needed.
4. Told the world that “women’s rights are human rights.”
5. Stood up for LGBT rights at home and abroad.
6. Helped expand health care and family leave for military families.

7. Negotiated a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas.


And what have you done?

[Guest]

1. Fought for children and families for 40 years and counting.
2. Helped provide millions of children with health care.
3. Helped get 9/11 first responders the health care they needed.
4. Told the world that “women’s rights are human rights.”
5. Stood up for LGBT rights at home and abroad.
6. Helped expand health care and family leave for military families.

7. Negotiated a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas.


And what have you done?

You should look up that list. You will find out that they are all lies. I have done more for this country than she has and I didn't hold any political office. She is a fraud and many people that have perpetrated less crimes are in jail for life.

[Guest]

You should look up that list. You will find out that they are all lies. I have done more for this country than she has and I didn't hold any political office. She is a fraud and many people that have perpetrated less crimes are in jail for life.What did you do?

[Guest]

1. Fought for children and families for 40 years and counting.
2. Helped provide millions of children with health care.
3. Helped get 9/11 first responders the health care they needed.
4. Told the world that “women’s rights are human rights.”
5. Stood up for LGBT rights at home and abroad.
6. Helped expand health care and family leave for military families.

7. Negotiated a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas.


And what have you done?

1. Stupid statement

2. children's health care? B.S.! She had nothing to do with writing the bill and she was first lady when it was passed.

3. 9/11 ??? "She was a Senator for New York at the time, performing her most basic job responsibilities. The bill she supported ran out last year, prompting Jon Stuart (formerly of the Daily Show) to initiate protests for its return. Did she join Jon Stuart in his efforts? Aside from a campaign blog and a twitter message supporting Jon Stuart… No!"

4. Women's rights? Sorry, but women make the same for the same job as men. That is a gov mandate. She had nothing to do with it and she is claiming something that just isn't there.

5. LBGTQ? When? The Clinton administration stated publicly they were against same-sex marriages. Hillary only came out for marriage equality in 2013.

6. Health Care and family leave for the Military? Read: Hillary Clinton is out of touch when it comes to veterans' issues (https://www.military1.com/health-care/article/1554797014-hillary-clinton-is-out-of-touch-when-it-comes-to-veterans-issues/)

7. Cease fire? That was a total failure, and she is bragging? Read: Mideast crisis strains Clinton legacy - POLITICO (http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/hillary-clinton-legacy-mideast-biggest-accomplishment-108924#ixzz410VoNX4R)

And what have I done? I could give you plenty of examples of REAL service to the country, but it would sound like bragging and you wouldn't believe me. I will say that I have been shot at in SouthEast Asia, the Middle East and even in the U.S.A. serving my country. Although, I have not received sniper fire in Bosnia when getting off a chopper, like Hillary claims she did. :throwtomatoes:

[Guest]

1. Stupid statement

2. children's health care? B.S.! She had nothing to do with writing the bill and she was first lady when it was passed.

3. 9/11 ??? "She was a Senator for New York at the time, performing her most basic job responsibilities. The bill she supported ran out last year, prompting Jon Stuart (formerly of the Daily Show) to initiate protests for its return. Did she join Jon Stuart in his efforts? Aside from a campaign blog and a twitter message supporting Jon Stuart… No!"

4. Women's rights? Sorry, but women make the same for the same job as men. That is a gov mandate. She had nothing to do with it and she is claiming something that just isn't there.

5. LBGTQ? When? The Clinton administration stated publicly they were against same-sex marriages. Hillary only came out for marriage equality in 2013.

6. Health Care and family leave for the Military? Read: Hillary Clinton is out of touch when it comes to veterans' issues (https://www.military1.com/health-care/article/1554797014-hillary-clinton-is-out-of-touch-when-it-comes-to-veterans-issues/)

7. Cease fire? That was a total failure, and she is bragging? Read: Mideast crisis strains Clinton legacy - POLITICO (http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/hillary-clinton-legacy-mideast-biggest-accomplishment-108924#ixzz410VoNX4R)

And what have I done? I could give you plenty of examples of REAL service to the country, but it would sound like bragging and you wouldn't believe me. I will say that I have been shot at in SouthEast Asia, the Middle East and even in the U.S.A. serving my country. Although, I have not received sniper fire in Bosnia when getting off a chopper, like Hillary claims she did. :throwtomatoes:Thank-you for your service. And Trump is a better fit with your idea of patriotism and what service means? I won't argue with you. You lived it, I didn't.

[Guest]

Thank-you for your service. And Trump is a better fit with your idea of patriotism and what service means? I won't argue with you. You lived it, I didn't.

I am not claiming that Trump is a better patriot by my criteria. I am claiming that Hillary is not up to my standard for anyone that I would hire as a gov civil servant. If working for me, she would not qualify for a security clearance. I am just disputing her claims to fame that were listed above. I have only seen failure on her record. As someone that has interviewed and hired employees before, she would not even make it to the interview process after reading her resume.

[Guest]

I am not claiming that Trump is a better patriot by my criteria. I am claiming that Hillary is not up to my standard for anyone that I would hire as a gov civil servant. If working for me, she would not qualify for a security clearance. I am just disputing her claims to fame that were listed above. I have only seen failure on her record. As someone that has interviewed and hired employees before, she would not even make it to the interview process after reading her resume.

Then don't "hire" either of them! There are non-corrupt choices available. You've been convinced by THEM that nobody else is "viable".

[Guest]

Then don't "hire" either of them! There are non-corrupt choices available. You've been convinced by THEM that nobody else is "viable".

Your idea is ludicrous. If the ONLY candidate that has a chance to beat her is Alfred E. Newman (mad mag) I would vote for him. YOU do not get it. This year is not a year of playing games with the future of America. Johnson can't even garner ten percent of the vote. Why in the world would I vote for him and let Hillary, the felonious criminal win the election? Are you REALLY that thick skulled?

[Guest]

1. Stupid statement

2. children's health care? B.S.! She had nothing to do with writing the bill and she was first lady when it was passed.

3. 9/11 ??? "She was a Senator for New York at the time, performing her most basic job responsibilities. The bill she supported ran out last year, prompting Jon Stuart (formerly of the Daily Show) to initiate protests for its return. Did she join Jon Stuart in his efforts? Aside from a campaign blog and a twitter message supporting Jon Stuart… No!"

4. Women's rights? Sorry, but women make the same for the same job as men. That is a gov mandate. She had nothing to do with it and she is claiming something that just isn't there.

5. LBGTQ? When? The Clinton administration stated publicly they were against same-sex marriages. Hillary only came out for marriage equality in 2013.

6. Health Care and family leave for the Military? Read: Hillary Clinton is out of touch when it comes to veterans' issues (https://www.military1.com/health-care/article/1554797014-hillary-clinton-is-out-of-touch-when-it-comes-to-veterans-issues/)

7. Cease fire? That was a total failure, and she is bragging? Read: Mideast crisis strains Clinton legacy - POLITICO (http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/hillary-clinton-legacy-mideast-biggest-accomplishment-108924#ixzz410VoNX4R)

And what have I done? I could give you plenty of examples of REAL service to the country, but it would sound like bragging and you wouldn't believe me. I will say that I have been shot at in SouthEast Asia, the Middle East and even in the U.S.A. serving my country. Although, I have not received sniper fire in Bosnia when getting off a chopper, like Hillary claims she did. :throwtomatoes:
Applause

[Guest]

Two Gold Star parents said she blamed it on a video. Are you calling them liars like Hillary? Pat Smith a mother was refused ANY INFORMATION about HER SON because Hillary said she was not a member of the immediate family.,

Hillary has done zilch for anyone. Her Senate record was putrid. Except for naming a road and Pist office 353 bills out of 360 FAILED!

NAME A FEW OF HER ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR ME WILL YOU ?

"NAME A FEW OF HER ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR ME WILL YOU ? "

Do yo know how to Google? Or are you that dumb?

[Guest]

And we are sure you will play all the interrogations and wrong doings of Clinton and ssure your family what a great :censored: role model she is.

Be sure to show them how a black unknown that has :censored: up and degenerated our great America.

And that the felon role model Clinton has sworn to contue Obama's work.

Wait a minute here it comes again....barf.

One can only handle so much crap at once.

Good luck with the BS ing of your loved ones!!


It has been a long eight years, right? Well, get ready for another long four or eight more years