Hillary Understands

[Guest]

I'm watching a speech by Hillary broadcasting live. She was explaining how she understood the economic inequalities in America. Although I'm not surprised a lot of Americans are hanging on every word. Someone who earns a quarter of a million dollars for a :45 speech, an amount some working people in this country would take 10 years to earn, shouldn't be even entering this discussion. Just for record I am not a Trump supporter, I'm writing in Mitch Daniels from Indiana.

[Guest]

I'm watching a speech by Hillary broadcasting live. She was explaining how she understood the economic inequalities in America. Although I'm not surprised a lot of Americans are hanging on every word. Someone who earns a quarter of a million dollars for a :45 speech, an amount some working people in this country would take 10 years to earn, shouldn't be even entering this discussion. Just for record I am not a Trump supporter, I'm writing in Mitch Daniels from Indiana.

Won't that take a vote away from trump?

[Guest]

I'm watching a speech by Hillary broadcasting live. She was explaining how she understood the economic inequalities in America. Although I'm not surprised a lot of Americans are hanging on every word. Someone who earns a quarter of a million dollars for a :45 speech, an amount some working people in this country would take 10 years to earn, shouldn't be even entering this discussion. Just for record I am not a Trump supporter, I'm writing in Mitch Daniels from Indiana.

What does that have to do with anything? A baseball player paid $55 million a year can still understand what it is like to bat at a baseball thrown by a college player paid nothing.


She sounded a lot better than Donald Trump whose hate filled rhetoric has already done a lot of damage to this country.

[Guest]

I'm watching a speech by Hillary broadcasting live. She was explaining how she understood the economic inequalities in America. Although I'm not surprised a lot of Americans are hanging on every word. Someone who earns a quarter of a million dollars for a :45 speech, an amount some working people in this country would take 10 years to earn, shouldn't be even entering this discussion. Just for record I am not a Trump supporter, I'm writing in Mitch Daniels from Indiana.

The Clintons only become interested in income inequality during election season. In all her years of public service, what has she done to solve the income inequality problem - NOTHING! She even pays her female staff less than her male staff.

[Guest]

The Clintons only become interested in income inequality during election season. In all her years of public service, what has she done to solve the income inequality problem - NOTHING! She even pays her female staff less than her male staff.

Source for this???

[Guest]

What does that have to do with anything? A baseball player paid $55 million a year can still understand what it is like to bat at a baseball thrown by a college player paid nothing.


She sounded a lot better than Donald Trump whose hate filled rhetoric has already done a lot of damage to this country.

You are either brain washed.
Or a partisan, party first, no matter who or what?
You just don't care?
Or you may be full of something that is impairing rational thinking.

ANYBODY who thinks Clinton is out for anybody but Clinton is in fact unconscious.

Why else would ANYBODY thinkk a felon, negligent, careless, liar, unsophisticated in security,crony, politics as usual, haggard old broad is better than bird crap on a rail?

[Guest]

Source for this???

I know you are a lazy liberal, but you could answer your own question if you would just put forth a little effort and educated yourself.

Hillary Clinton Demands Equal Pay But Doesn't Put Her Money Where ...
ijr.com/2015/02/257200-hillary-clinton-paid-female-staff-28-percent-less-men/
During her time in the U.S. Senate, Clinton paid women in her office 72 cents for ... for female staffers was $15,708.38 less than the median salary for men, ... To be fair, some of this gap might have more to do with job selection and hours worked. ... compensation between men and women on her own staff — especially since ...

[Guest]

Why else would ANYBODY thinkk a felon, negligent, careless, liar, unsophisticated in security,crony, politics as usual, haggard old broad is better than bird crap on a rail?

Yes, you called it right!

Donald Trump IS "Bird crap on a rail". Yes, Hillary ISbetter than Trump!

[Guest]

the title of the thread;

Clinton understands.....is an oxymoron!!!

Clinton is not merely just bird $hit on a rail. She is bird$hit on the rail that has fermented and aged in the sun before hatching. Hence she is above other non fermented and AGED bird$****!!

[Guest]

Yes, you called it right!

Donald Trump IS "Bird crap on a rail". Yes, Hillary ISbetter than Trump!

you grammar is distorted.

[Guest]

I'm watching a speech by Hillary broadcasting live. She was explaining how she understood the economic inequalities in America. Although I'm not surprised a lot of Americans are hanging on every word. Someone who earns a quarter of a million dollars for a :45 speech, an amount some working people in this country would take 10 years to earn, shouldn't be even entering this discussion. Just for record I am not a Trump supporter, I'm writing in Mitch Daniels from Indiana.
It's supply and demand. If no one is willing to pay that fee then there is no work.

Have you seen the prices of broadway tickets?
Hamilton tickets
StubHub! (http://www.stubhub.com/hamilton-new-york-tickets-new-york-richard-rodgers-theatre-7-20-2016/event/9394746/?mbox=1&rS=6&abbyo=true&sliderpos=true&qtyq=false&sType=DEFAULT&sort=quality+desc)'

What is the price of admission to see a Stones Concert?
2016 Desert Trip - 3 Day Pass (10/7 - 10/9) (Rolling Stones, Paul McCartney, Roger Waters) Indio Tickets - 10/7/2016 5:59 PM | Vivid Seats (http://www.vividseats.com/concerts/desert-trip-tickets/desert-trip-empire-polo-field-10-7-2054595.html)

I would rather see Hamilton or the Stones but if I was one of the 580 billionaires I could see them all and so could all of my ancestors for all times.

While i was writing you probably got a few wealth envy remarks.

[Guest]

The Clintons only become interested in income inequality during election season. In all her years of public service, what has she done to solve the income inequality problem - NOTHING! She even pays her female staff less than her male staff.

And you know this how? I call bull****.

[Guest]

What doe Drumph know about income inequality? He was born with a silver spoon.

[Guest]

What doe Drumph know about income inequality? He was born with a silver spoon.
I don't think his dad was in the top 1% let alone the top 1/10th of 1%. Trumps in the top 1%.

[Guest]

And you know this how? I call bull****.

Hillary Clinton Demands Equal Pay But Doesn’t Put Her Money Where Her Mouth Is (http://ijr.com/2015/02/257200-hillary-clinton-paid-female-staff-28-percent-less-men/)

[Guest]

And you know this how? I call bull****.

You call BS. I call you an Idiot. Learn to use the Google search engine. And, please stop with the "And you know this how?" questions! It really makes you look stupid.

[Guest]

You are either brain washed.
Or a partisan, party first, no matter who or what?
You just don't care?
Or you may be full of something that is impairing rational thinking.

ANYBODY who thinks Clinton is out for anybody but Clinton is in fact unconscious.

Why else would ANYBODY thinkk a felon, negligent, careless, liar, unsophisticated in security,crony, politics as usual, haggard old broad is better than bird crap on a rail?

your off your medication again aren't you!

[Guest]

Hillary Clinton Demands Equal Pay But Doesn’t Put Her Money Where Her Mouth Is (http://ijr.com/2015/02/257200-hillary-clinton-paid-female-staff-28-percent-less-men/)from your source


"During her time in the U.S. Senate, Clinton paid women in her office 72 cents for each dollar paid to men, according to a report by Washington Free Beacon."

Who is the Washington Beacon?

"The Washington Free Beacon is an American politically conservative political journalism website that publishes news and opinion commentary."

There is another site with different results and a different opinion.

Gender Pay Gap in Clinton’s Senate Office? (http://www.factcheck.org/2015/04/gender-pay-gap-in-clintons-senate-office/)

[Guest]

I don't think his dad was in the top 1% let alone the top 1/10th of 1%. Trumps in the top 1%.


Or so he says. The public has not seen one iota of proof what Donald Trump's true wealth is.

[Guest]

from your source


"During her time in the U.S. Senate, Clinton paid women in her office 72 cents for each dollar paid to men, according to a report by Washington Free Beacon."

Who is the Washington Beacon?

"The Washington Free Beacon is an American politically conservative political journalism website that publishes news and opinion commentary."

There is another site with different results and a different opinion.

Gender Pay Gap in Clinton’s Senate Office? (http://www.factcheck.org/2015/04/gender-pay-gap-in-clintons-senate-office/)

From your source:

"But annual salary data provided by the Clinton campaign show median salaries for men and women in Clinton’s office were virtually identical."

The bold underlined print says it all. Who would take the word of a known lair as being fact?

[Guest]

From your source:

"But annual salary data provided by the Clinton campaign show median salaries for men and women in Clinton’s office were virtually identical."

The bold underlined print says it all. Who would take the word of a known lair as being fact?"A comparison of both data sets shows that those who only worked part of the year represent a little over half of the men and women who worked in Clinton’s Senate office that year. Among those who only worked part of the fiscal year, and would not have counted in the Free Beacon analysis, the average and median salaries were higher for women. The median annual salary for women who worked only part of the year was $38,000, compared with $35,000 for men, our analysis of the Clinton salary database showed. The Clinton campaign argues that including those who only worked part of the year makes more sense, because it shows that women and men were offered comparable salaries."

[Guest]

"A comparison of both data sets shows that those who only worked part of the year represent a little over half of the men and women who worked in Clinton’s Senate office that year. Among those who only worked part of the fiscal year, and would not have counted in the Free Beacon analysis, the average and median salaries were higher for women. The median annual salary for women who worked only part of the year was $38,000, compared with $35,000 for men, our analysis of the Clinton salary database showed. The Clinton campaign argues that including those who only worked part of the year makes more sense, because it shows that women and men were offered comparable salaries."

So, women were actually getting paid MORE than men, how is that pay equality? Seems to me that the men who worked for Hillary were treated unfairly in terms of monetary compensation. Don't you agree?

[Guest]

So, women were actually getting paid MORE than men, how is that pay equality? Seems to me that the men who worked for Hillary were treated unfairly in terms of monetary compensation. Don't you agree?The Pew "Research Center, for example, did estimates based on hourly earnings of both full- and part-time workers and found that women earn 84 percent of what men earn. Why? According to Pew’s surveys, women were more likely to take career interruptions to care for their family, which can hurt long-term earnings. In addition, Pew noted, “women as a whole continue to work in lower-paying occupations than men do.” And last, Pew noted “some part of the pay gap may also be due to gender discrimination.” Women were nearly twice as likely as men to report that they had been discriminated against at work because of their gender."

I think it is unrealistic to think that in all cases the salaries will be equal for many different reasons.

[Guest]

Hillary is just blowing smoke up everyone's posterior when she promises to make women's wages equal. They already are equal. If a woman is doing the same job, she gets paid the same. It's federal law. So, if anyone wishes to listen to her, they need to keep this in mind when she is moving her lips. SHE IS A LIAR, ALWAYS HAS BEEN AND ALWAYS WILL BE.......until she drops dead...hopefully sooner, rather than later.

[Guest]

SHE IS A LIAR, ALWAYS HAS BEEN AND ALWAYS WILL BE.......until she drops dead...hopefully sooner, rather than later.
I knew you weren't human but you certainly had me fooled for a little while.

[Guest]

I knew you weren't human but you certainly had me fooled for a little while.

Liberals have always been easy to fool.:D

[Guest]

Liberals have always been easy to fool.:DThe downside of being open minded is that you expect everyone has a moral compass.

[Guest]

The downside of being open minded is that you expect everyone has a moral compass.

Well said.

[Guest]

The downside of being open minded is that you expect everyone has a moral compass.

Naive is perhaps a better description of liberals than "open minded". I have also found that while liberals claim to be open minded, they are not open minded when it comes to dissenting opinions, ideas, views and ideology.

[Guest]

Gender Pay Gap in Clinton’s Senate Office? (http://www.factcheck.org/2015/04/gender-pay-gap-in-clintons-senate-office/)

I would vote for Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump no matter who Trump puts in as his Vice President. I have no trust in that con man who will probably be impeached quite soon if he for some strange reason becomes President of the United States.

I just hope they move on the Trump University case and I have some option other than Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton.

[Guest]

Naive is perhaps a better description of liberals than "open minded". I have also found that while liberals claim to be open minded, they are not open minded when it comes to dissenting opinions, ideas, views and ideology.

Very good response. Short and concise.

[Guest]

Liberals have always been easy to fool.:D

:thumbup:

[Guest]

I knew you weren't human but you certainly had me fooled for a little while.

What part did you not agree with? Or, are you a typical female and just don't like hearing the truth? Does it injure your PC sensitivities?

[Guest]

What does that have to do with anything? A baseball player paid $55 million a year can still understand what it is like to bat at a baseball thrown by a college player paid nothing.


She sounded a lot better than Donald Trump whose hate filled rhetoric has already done a lot of damage to this country.

I have not heard Trump say he "hates" anyone. I guess your liberal talking points need to be updated. Are you sure you are not using 2008 campaign talking points?

I have heard Trump say that he loves the Military, the Police, the firefighters, etc. I have heard him say that he wants to make America great again, after Obama goes on his "apology" tours and disparages America. I have heard Trump say he wishes to protect our manufacturing industry. I have heard him say he wishes to reduce crime in America. I have heard him mention that he wants to protect national security (unlike Hillary's disregard for the same). So, say again where you heard him say he "hates" anyone?

[Guest]

My focus has always been about "we the people". I would not and have never supported anyone irrespective of label that did not have this nation's interest at heart. Despite the 24/7 spin if a voter looks objectively s/he will be able to see the real person behind the mask.

I am saddened that our trusted leaders thought so little of "we the little people" that they concocted a weak accounting of why Hillary should not be charged. This sort of corruption is natural to Russia, /China, /cuba or other Latin American countries but America.

People are out in the streets protesting Trump, cops etc but not one protest surrounding the inside cover up job conducted by our president, attorney general and top cop...where is the outrage :mad:

[Guest]

Naive is perhaps a better description of liberals than "open minded". I have also found that while liberals claim to be open minded, they are not open minded when it comes to dissenting opinions, ideas, views and ideology.
I'll put it this way. If I was at work and I didn't like the philosophy or decision of the boss at that time, I could discuss that with my friends at lunch. Some friends would agree and some would disagree, but none of us wanted him dead.

There were others who wanted him dead but they weren't my friends. They had no moral compass.

[Guest]

My focus has always been about "we the people". I would not and have never supported anyone irrespective of label that did not have this nation's interest at heart. Despite the 24/7 spin if a voter looks objectively s/he will be able to see the real person behind the mask.

I am saddened that our trusted leaders thought so little of "we the little people" that they concocted a weak accounting of why Hillary should not be charged. This sort of corruption is natural to Russia, /China, /cuba or other Latin American countries but America.

People are out in the streets protesting Trump, cops etc but not one protest surrounding the inside cover up job conducted by our president, attorney general and top cop...where is the outrage :mad:

Ditto....:thumbup:

[Guest]

I'll put it this way. If I was at work and I didn't like the philosophy or decision of the boss at that time, I could discuss that with my friends at lunch. Some friends would agree and some would disagree, but none of us wanted him dead.

There were others who wanted him dead but they weren't my friends. They had no moral compass.

BLM line the streets and demand death to police. Which of the two do you think they will be voting for? These are supposed liberals and will vote for Hillary. Hillary tells us in her speeches that "whites" need to understand blacks." She sympathizes with BLM and she endorses their violent behavior.

[Guest]

Hillary understands................

how to manipulate the weak minded for their vote.

[Guest]

Yes, you called it right!

Donald Trump IS "Bird crap on a rail". Yes, Hillary ISbetter than Trump!

Now that is a convincing argument !

I am certain that you have changed the vote of many on this site !

[Guest]

I'm watching a speech by Hillary broadcasting live. She was explaining how she understood the economic inequalities in America. Although I'm not surprised a lot of Americans are hanging on every word. Someone who earns a quarter of a million dollars for a :45 speech, an amount some working people in this country would take 10 years to earn, shouldn't be even entering this discussion. Just for record I am not a Trump supporter, I'm writing in Mitch Daniels from Indiana.

Vote for a real candidate...one of the 3rd party, someone you'd like to see win.

What does that have to do with anything? A baseball player paid $55 million a year can still understand what it is like to bat at a baseball thrown by a college player paid nothing.


She sounded a lot better than Donald Trump whose hate filled rhetoric has already done a lot of damage to this country.

The parties, both D and R are what did the damage, and you'll vote for ANOTHER crook.

The Clintons only become interested in income inequality during election season. In all her years of public service, what has she done to solve the income inequality problem - NOTHING! She even pays her female staff less than her male staff.

They probably do less work. Very rarely are men and women's jobs "identical". Even in an office, the men usually do the "hard or dirty work". We're more valuable to have around, we're more versatile, broken nails and messed hair doesn't preclude doing what is necessary.

the title of the thread;

Clinton understands.....is an oxymoron!!!

Clinton is not merely just bird $hit on a rail. She is bird$hit on the rail that has fermented and aged in the sun before hatching. Hence she is above other non fermented and AGED bird$****!!

She is VERY cleaver, cleaver enough to fool you.

from your source


"During her time in the U.S. Senate, Clinton paid women in her office 72 cents for each dollar paid to men, according to a report by Washington Free Beacon."

Who is the Washington Beacon?

"The Washington Free Beacon is an American politically conservative political journalism website that publishes news and opinion commentary."

There is another site with different results and a different opinion.

Gender Pay Gap in Clinton’s Senate Office? (http://www.factcheck.org/2015/04/gender-pay-gap-in-clintons-senate-office/)

Again, do the SAME work men do and you'll get paid the same. Besides, if you have children, why are you working and having your children "raised" by 3rd world, ESL, Lawanda?

The Pew "Research Center, for example, did estimates based on hourly earnings of both full- and part-time workers and found that women earn 84 percent of what men earn. Why? According to Pew’s surveys, women were more likely to take career interruptions to care for their family, which can hurt long-term earnings. In addition, Pew noted, “women as a whole continue to work in lower-paying occupations than men do.” And last, Pew noted “some part of the pay gap may also be due to gender discrimination.” Women were nearly twice as likely as men to report that they had been discriminated against at work because of their gender."

I think it is unrealistic to think that in all cases the salaries will be equal for many different reasons.

But were they really? Were their nails and hair more important than the work?

Men and women's interpretation of "equality" are usually very different.

Hillary is just blowing smoke up everyone's posterior when she promises to make women's wages equal. They already are equal. If a woman is doing the same job, she gets paid the same. It's federal law. So, if anyone wishes to listen to her, they need to keep this in mind when she is moving her lips. SHE IS A LIAR, ALWAYS HAS BEEN AND ALWAYS WILL BE.......until she drops dead...hopefully sooner, rather than later.

She blows smoke up EVERYONE'S butt...

Liberals have always been easy to fool.:D

Conservatives too...you're both suckers to "your party", mindlessly voting them in...to our destruction.

The downside of being open minded is that you expect everyone has a moral compass.

Actually, you expect nobody has one, you expect ALL possibilities.

Naive is perhaps a better description of liberals than "open minded". I have also found that while liberals claim to be open minded, they are not open minded when it comes to dissenting opinions, ideas, views and ideology.

Yes, naive IS the better descriptor. The conservatives are the same way, very UNopen minded. Abortion and religion come to mind.

What part did you not agree with? Or, are you a typical female and just don't like hearing the truth? Does it injure your PC sensitivities?

They NEVER say, because they have no leg to stand on.

My focus has always been about "we the people". I would not and have never supported anyone irrespective of label that did not have this nation's interest at heart. Despite the 24/7 spin if a voter looks objectively s/he will be able to see the real person behind the mask.

I am saddened that our trusted leaders thought so little of "we the little people" that they concocted a weak accounting of why Hillary should not be charged. This sort of corruption is natural to Russia, /China, /cuba or other Latin American countries but America.

People are out in the streets protesting Trump, cops etc but not one protest surrounding the inside cover up job conducted by our president, attorney general and top cop...where is the outrage :mad:

You're a source of funds...that is ALL you are to the D or R party, get that through your head and leave the party, stop voting for their corrupt crooks.

I'll put it this way. If I was at work and I didn't like the philosophy or decision of the boss at that time, I could discuss that with my friends at lunch. Some friends would agree and some would disagree, but none of us wanted him dead.

There were others who wanted him dead but they weren't my friends. They had no moral compass.

Depend on what the boss was going to do...take possession of your first born? Then maybe he should be dead. Sorry, just a stupid comment to show maybe death is justified in certain cases.

BLM line the streets and demand death to police. Which of the two do you think they will be voting for? These are supposed liberals and will vote for Hillary. Hillary tells us in her speeches that "whites" need to understand blacks." She sympathizes with BLM and she endorses their violent behavior.

She KNOWS that THEY will be the new majority, from age 6 down thay ARE already the majority. God help us!

WHY are you LETTING it happen?

Now that is a convincing argument !

I am certain that you have changed the vote of many on this site !

May have, there's unlimited stupidity and ignorance.