Chris Wallace asked Clinton......

[Guest]

Now we all know thw Washington post is pro Hellery.

she REALLY is A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR!

Appearing on Fox News Sunday, Hillary Clinton was asked about the truthfulness of her answers about her private email server. Clinton once again claimed she had never sent or received any material that was classified at the time, but the Washington Post’s fact-checker looked over Clinton’s answer and awarded it four Pinocchios.

Host Chris Wallace asked Clinton about some of her prior statements which, according to FBI Director Comey, were not true. In response, Clinton said, “Director Comey said my answers were truthful and what I’ve said is consistent with what I have told the American people, that there were decisions discussed and made to classify retroactively certain of the emails.”

“I was communicating with over 300 people in my emailing. They certainly did not believe, and had no reason to believe, that what they were sending was classified. Now in retrospect, different agencies come in and say ‘well it should have been’ but that’s not what was happening in real time,” Clinton continued.

Wallace played a clip of FBI Director Comey at a congressional hearing disputing Clinton’s account, but Clinton refused to acknowledge having sent and received classified material. She once again blamed the people who had mistakenly sent her the information (as she’s done several times since Comey announced his findings).

Here’s what the Washington Post concluded about Hillary’s latest explanation:

As we have seen repeatedly in Clinton’s explanations of the email controversy, she relies on excessively technical and legalistic answers to explain her actions. While Comey did say there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American public–which was the point of Wallace’s question. Comey has repeatedly not taken a stand on her public statements.

And although Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified, he also said that there were some emails that were already classified that should not have been sent on an unclassified, private server. That’s the uncomfortable truth that Clinton has trouble admitting.

This is far from the first time Clinton has been caught lying about this issue. Nearly everything she said in her first press conference was a lie and she continues to lie egregiously about this to this day. The question about the emails begins about 3:30 into this clip:

Clinton responds to criticism over Benghazi, private server - YouTube (https://youtu.be/KPUT_84_70M)



-----------

This women lies like no one else in the world, look at her face not a nano second of an an expression.


http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1842902!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_1200/hillary-clinton.jpg

[Guest]

The Washington Post gave Clinton four Pinocchios for that statement, its worst ranking for truthfulness in its Fact Checker, saying "Clinton is cherry-picking statements by Comey to preserve her narrative about the unusual setup of a private email server. This allows her to skate past the more disturbing findings of the FBI investigation."

"While Comey did say [to Congress] there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American public — which was the point of Wallace's question," the Post noted.

The newspaper also ripped Clinton apart for claiming that the information was not classified at the time.

"As for retroactive classification of emails, Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified. But he also said that some emails were classified at the time — and Clinton and her aides should have been aware of that."

There were plenty of other public figures who also took Clinton to task for the statements.
One such example was Sen. Ben Sasse, who posted on his Twitter account a repudiation of Clinton and gave a link to a YouTube posting that shows his address to the Senate in which he posted Clinton's statements alongside those of Comey's to illustrate that she lied about many features of the scandal.

[Guest]

Now we all know thw Washington post is pro Hellery.

she REALLY is A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR!

Appearing on Fox News Sunday, Hillary Clinton was asked about the truthfulness of her answers about her private email server. Clinton once again claimed she had never sent or received any material that was classified at the time, but the Washington Post’s fact-checker looked over Clinton’s answer and awarded it four Pinocchios.

Host Chris Wallace asked Clinton about some of her prior statements which, according to FBI Director Comey, were not true. In response, Clinton said, “Director Comey said my answers were truthful and what I’ve said is consistent with what I have told the American people, that there were decisions discussed and made to classify retroactively certain of the emails.”

“I was communicating with over 300 people in my emailing. They certainly did not believe, and had no reason to believe, that what they were sending was classified. Now in retrospect, different agencies come in and say ‘well it should have been’ but that’s not what was happening in real time,” Clinton continued.

Wallace played a clip of FBI Director Comey at a congressional hearing disputing Clinton’s account, but Clinton refused to acknowledge having sent and received classified material. She once again blamed the people who had mistakenly sent her the information (as she’s done several times since Comey announced his findings).

Here’s what the Washington Post concluded about Hillary’s latest explanation:

As we have seen repeatedly in Clinton’s explanations of the email controversy, she relies on excessively technical and legalistic answers to explain her actions. While Comey did say there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American public–which was the point of Wallace’s question. Comey has repeatedly not taken a stand on her public statements.

And although Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified, he also said that there were some emails that were already classified that should not have been sent on an unclassified, private server. That’s the uncomfortable truth that Clinton has trouble admitting.

This is far from the first time Clinton has been caught lying about this issue. Nearly everything she said in her first press conference was a lie and she continues to lie egregiously about this to this day. The question about the emails begins about 3:30 into this clip:

-----------

This women lies like no one else in the world, look at her face not a nano second of an an expression.




:thumbup:

[Guest]

The Washington Post gave Clinton four Pinocchios for that statement, its worst ranking for truthfulness in its Fact Checker, saying "Clinton is cherry-picking statements by Comey to preserve her narrative about the unusual setup of a private email server. This allows her to skate past the more disturbing findings of the FBI investigation."

"While Comey did say [to Congress] there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American public — which was the point of Wallace's question," the Post noted.

The newspaper also ripped Clinton apart for claiming that the information was not classified at the time.

"As for retroactive classification of emails, Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified. But he also said that some emails were classified at the time — and Clinton and her aides should have been aware of that."

There were plenty of other public figures who also took Clinton to task for the statements.
One such example was Sen. Ben Sasse, who posted on his Twitter account a repudiation of Clinton and gave a link to a YouTube posting that shows his address to the Senate in which he posted Clinton's statements alongside those of Comey's to illustrate that she lied about many features of the scandal.

:thumbup:

[Guest]

Time-out:

You know what I think Putin watches House of Cards and figures he's got a shot at Mailania. Choosing between Malinia or Robin Wright is not easy.

Anyway, back to our regularly scheduled Hillary is a Liar broadcast.

[Guest]

Time-out:

You know what I think Putin watches House of Cards and figures he's got a shot at Mailania. Choosing between Malinia or Robin Wright is not easy.

Anyway, back to our regularly scheduled Hillary is a Liar broadcast.

Not even a nice try. Just as ridiculous as a felon, Clinton running for president. America just won't learn. Well, liberals won't learn. Look at what's in the white, I mean rainbow house now.

[Guest]

Not even a nice try. Just as ridiculous as a felon, Clinton running for president. America just won't learn. Well, liberals won't learn. Look at what's in the white, I mean rainbow house now.Is that all you got?

[Guest]

Chris did a great job of revealing the true witch, I mean Clinton. Now, the Democrats and Independents that make up half of the FOX viewership will get a little of the truth behind her pathological lying.

[Guest]

Chris did a great job of revealing the true witch, I mean Clinton. Now, the Democrats and Independents that make up half of the FOX viewership will get a little of the truth behind her pathological lying.
And this Witch Hunt is throwing us in Moral panic.
Moral panic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_panic)

[Guest]

And this Witch Hunt is throwing us in Moral panic.
Moral panic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_panic)

What witch hunt? Hillary lied, period. She lied blatantly on nationwide TV and was called out on it by Chris. Not even the strongest liberal supporters can deny that. It's not like she can use the old Billy trick of saying "it depends on how you define what Classified IS."

[Guest]

What witch hunt? Hillary lied, period. She lied blatantly on nationwide TV and was called out on it by Chris. Not even the strongest liberal supporters can deny that. It's not like she can use the old Billy trick of saying "it depends on how you define what Classified IS."The witch hunt is rigged.

[Guest]

The witch hunt is rigged.

That will probably go right over the heads of most righties here...but was actually quite brilliant. :D



:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

To bad the deleted emails don't show up, then we would know for sure, but when your team had over 9 months to delete thousands of them. Looks like they missed few, what bunch of losers. Basically the FBI or should be renamed to the federal democrat pass, the FDP (pledge: we don't eat or own) let all of them off the hook.

[Guest]

Wiki will find them

[Guest]

Chris was so smooth that he was able to steal Hillary's lunch and eat it while she watched, and she didn't even realize it. For once, we were privileged to a brilliant performance.

[Guest]

Chris was so smooth that he was able to steal Hillary's lunch and eat it while she watched, and she didn't even realize it. For once, we were privileged to a brilliant performance.

:bigbow:

[Guest]

She got shown up for what she is but no one seems to have noticed .

[Guest]

She got shown up for what she is but no one seems to have noticed .

Actually, the libtards noticed it, but refuse to believe it. After all, celebrities are their royalty, no matter how hosed up they are.

[Guest]

That will probably go right over the heads of most righties here...but was actually quite brilliant. :D



:wave:

CNM

High 5'n yourself...

[Guest]

High 5'n yourself...

What did you expect from her??

[Guest]

High 5'n yourself...

What did you expect from her??

I didn't write it (wish I had), but can still admire wittiness. :thumbup:


Whereas I feel really sorry for you two, because in a war of wits...y'all don't even have a butter knife. :1rotfl:


:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

I didn't write it (wish I had), but can still admire wittiness. :thumbup:


Whereas I feel really sorry for you two, because in a war of wits...y'all don't even have a butter knife. :1rotfl:


:wave:

CNM

Well, at least you have the half-wit down pat.

[Guest]

Well, at least you have the half-wit down pat.

Put the butter knife down and step back away from the keyboard.

You're obviously not qualified to use either. :1rotfl:


:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

Play nice boys &

[Guest]

Play nice boys & girls

[Guest]

Play nice boys & girls

She does seem to like that butter. She probably just watched a rerun of the old movie, Last Tango in Paris. Like that butter, right C?

[Guest]

Now she says that she " short- circuited " when she responded to the specific question .

Must be that she did the same when the Benghazi Phone Call came to her !

[Guest]

I didn't write it (wish I had), but can still admire wittiness. :thumbup:


Whereas I feel really sorry for you two, because in a war of wits...y'all don't even have a butter knife. :1rotfl:


:wave:

CNMI wrote it. Until CNM started to leave initials I was accused of being Sybil. Having the ability to talk in many different voices and genders. I didn't care but sometimes there would be 4 different liberals, each with their own opinions and style and I was supposed to be each one.

[Guest]

I wrote it.

Easily guessed that it was from someone that wasn't a right-wingnut...as it was way too intelligent and witty for one of them. :thumbup:


Until CNM started to leave initials I was accused of being Sybil. Having the ability to talk in many different voices and genders. I didn't care but sometimes there would be 4 different liberals, each with their own opinions and style and I was supposed to be each one.

It's always easier for a gang/mob to pretend there aren't but one (maybe two)...that disagree with them.

That's called a 'mob mentality.'

Given the vast number of posts by those on the right (and the 3 or 4 whose head I live in rent free :D ), it's obvious they prefer to gang up on anyone disagreeing with them.

I feel sorry for anyone that is that intimidated, or feels that inferior...as life must be a living he11 for them. :ho:


:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

Easily guessed that it was from someone that wasn't a right-wingnut...as it was way too intelligent and witty for one of them. :thumbup:




It's always easier for a gang/mob to pretend there aren't but one (maybe two)...that disagree with them.

That's called a 'mob mentality.'

Given the vast number of posts by those on the right (and the 3 or 4 whose head I live in rent free :D ), it's obvious they prefer to gang up on anyone disagreeing with them.

I feel sorry for anyone that is that intimidated, or feels that inferior...as life must be a living he11 for them. :ho:


:wave:

CNMThey gang up because there is strength in numbers, e pluribus unum., out of many-we are one.
Hillery taught them that. It was an inspirational speech for me too.

[Guest]

Hillary is a pathological liar and as such she actually believes what-ever comes out of her mouth .

[Guest]

Hillary is a pathological liar and as such she actually believes what-ever comes out of her mouth .There are 5 types of liars.
Sociopathic Liars

Sociopaths are defined as someone who lies continuously in an attempt to get their own way, without showing care or concern for others. These individuals are goal-oriented.

Even though it might seem hard to believe, lying is focused – they are focused on getting their own way. Sociopaths don’t have a lot of respect or regard for the feelings and rights of others. They tend to be charismatic and charming, but they will use their exceptional social skills in a self-centered and manipulative manner.

Compulsive Liars

Compulsive liars are defined as someone who continually lies from sheer habit. Lying tends to be their normal manner of responding to any questions from others.

These individuals will always bend the truth, regardless of how small or large the question is. For these individuals, telling the truth doesn’t feel right. They are uncomfortable whenever they tell the truth, while lying makes them feel right.

Compulsive lying is often thought to manifest during childhood, due to being put into situations and environments where lying became a necessity. Most of the time, compulsive liars aren’t cunning or manipulative, rather they only lie because it has become such a habit for them.

This automatic response is more difficult to break. It can end up taking its toll on being able to maintain a relationship. Many people also call these individuals pathological liars or habitual liars, but they all mean the same thing.

Occasional Liars

Occasional liars are those who seldom tell a lie. When they do, they are so blown away by what they said that their guilt overcomes them. These individuals are quick to ask for forgiveness from the individual that they lied to.

Occasional liars might not be perfect, but they are often respected for their attempts at being truthful and humble enough to admit when they are wrong.

Careless Liars

Careless liars will go about their normal lives and lie every way they can. This individual isn’t concerned about trying to hide their lies or making sure they make sense. Everyone knows that the person isn’t being honest because they tend to be sloppy with their lies. They don’t have a lot of friends because most people get tired of hearing their twisted stories.

White Liars
People who tell white lies don’t usually think of themselves as true “liars”. They justify their white lies as harmless, or even beneficial, in the long term. They will sometimes tell only part of the truth, and not be suspected of lying at all. White liars may use their lies to to shield someone from what they believe is a hurtful or damaging truth.

Sadly, lying is a common denominator in many of our lives and recognizing some of the different types might just help us in dealing with the liar in our lives.

[Guest]

Chris Wallace did not try to catch Hillary in a lie ---- He tried to catch her telling the truth !

[Guest]

Chris Wallace did not try to catch Hillary in a lie ---- He tried to catch her telling the truth !

A Clinton tell the truth, when?