Log in

View Full Version : Hillary Clinton stands by her email claims despite the evidence


Guest
08-08-2016, 12:32 AM
She really can't accept the facts of what she did. :cus:

Despite being thoroughly rebuked by fact-checkers and the FBI, Hillary Clinton continues to give her critics fresh ammunition by claiming she never sent or received any information marked classified in her private email account, keeping alive a controversy that’s dogged her throughout her presidential bid.

Mrs. Clinton again defended her email server during a press conference Friday 8/5, directly contradicting FBI Director James B. Comey in saying no messages bearing “classified” markings passed through her account during her four years as secretary of state.

She has apologized for her email habits but simultaneously has maintained she did nothing wrong, :shrug: also admitted that she may have “short-circuited” when she claimed last week that Mr. Comey agreed that she’d fully told the truth to the American people.

Mr. Comey, however, did no such thing, and in congressional testimony earlier this year, he explicitly said Mrs. Clinton was wrong when she said she’d never sent or received any classified material in her private account.

The ongoing email scandal, along with the Democratic presidential nominee’s admission that her brain briefly “short-circuited,” has given the GOP an opening to launch a new line of attack against her.
Top Republicans say Mrs. Clinton merely has found a new way to avoid admitting that she’s lied repeatedly to the public.

“She now has a fundamental way of saying to people, ‘It wasn’t that I lied to you. I just didn’t quite remember what it is I was going to say,’” former House Speaker Newt Gingrich told “Fox News Sunday.”

By appearing to stretch the truth, at best, Mrs. Clinton also is fueling the notion that the Justice Department may have decided not to press charges against her solely for political reasons.

The FBI conducted a lengthy investigation but ultimately recommended against filing charges, saying there had been no intent of wrongdoing.

But GOP critics say that decision was deeply flawed.

“Many reasonable prosecutors have come to the conclusion that they would have brought such a case. I would have brought such a case. I would have won such a case,” former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, a former federal prosecutor, told ABC’s “This Week” program on Sunday. “I’ve prosecuted cases like that in my years at the Justice Department. Hillary Clinton skated because she’s running for president. She clearly violated the law.”

Mr. Giuliani called Mrs. Clinton’s claim of short-circuiting a “euphemism for lying.”

She made the comments during a question-and-answer session at a joint conference of the National Association of Black Journalists and the National Association of Hispanic Journalists last Friday.

While she apologized for her private email account, she doubled down on her central defense.

“What we have here is pretty much what I have been saying throughout this whole year, and that is that I never sent or received anything that was marked classified,” she said. “If, in retrospect, some different agency said it should have been [classified] that’s what this debate is about. But Director Comey said there was absolutely no intention on my part to either ignore or in any way dismiss the importance of those documents.”

In congressional testimony last month, Mr. Comey said more than 100 emails sent or received through Mrs. Clinton’s private account contained classified information.

Guest
08-08-2016, 12:42 AM
http://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Hillary-Clinton-ugly-768x432.jpg
New York, NY -(Ammoland.com)- “Exaggeration of every kind is as essential to journalism as it is to dramatic art, for the object of journalism is to make events go as far as possible.” Arthur Schopenhauer, German Philosopher

The mainstream media continues to make flamboyant, exaggerated claims about Hillary Clinton, all the while smearing Donald Trump.

The mainstream media insinuates opinion into news stories, and forsakes any pretense of balanced reporting. If Hillary Rodham Clinton–a person who lied to the F.B.I., and whose violation of federal law, involving the handling of classified data, is clear beyond rational disputation–should become the 45th President of the United States, ,,the American People will have the major news organizations to thank for it.

The mainstream news media remains curiously silent on one critical fact. It is one you would think the mainstream media would find worth mentioning. It is critical fact that distinguishes Hillary Clinton from Donald Trump. It is a fact that needs mentioning. But, the mainstream media refuses to mention it.
It is this: the Department of Justice spent millions of dollars and thousands of man hours investigating Hillary Clinton for violations of federal law—serious breaches of federal law—felonies.

This would not have been necessary if Hillary Clinton, who served as Secretary of State, a Cabinet Level position in the Obama Administration—had complied with federal law as one would minimally expect of a high level Government official.

The Department of Justice certainly didn’t investigate Donald Trump. It didn’t have to. It never had to. Donald Trump isn’t a criminal.

The Department of Justice never suspected he was. The Department of Justice had never thought or insinuated that Trump had ever violated federal law. The Department of Justice never had reason to suspect Trump had violated federal law. Moreover, the mainstream media itself never suggested that Donald Trump had violated federal law. It would like to. It can’t. Any mainstream news source that said or intimated that Trump had violated federal law would face a lawsuit for libel. The mainstream media cannot make the same claim of Hillary Rodham Clinton. So it chooses to remain silent on the issue of Clinton’s likely criminality, glossing over her likely criminality as if it never happened.

The mainstream media continues its scurrilous attacks against Trump. Not a day goes by that the mainstream media doesn’t attack Trump, repeatedly, repeating ad nauseam the same tired, vacuous remarks and leveling ridiculous, dubious accusation upon accusation upon him.

All the while, the mainstream media ignores the serious criminal charges the Justice Department had leveled against Hillary Rodham Clinton—charges immeasurably more serious than anything the media can throw and does incessantly throw at Trump.

News commentators complain Donald Trump showed “bad taste,” having brought up the Clinton email server scandal during his acceptance speech. Really? The mainstream media suggests that electing the U.S. President is akin to attending an elegant dinner party, where invitees are expected to adhere to proper rules of etiquette and decorum. Yet, most distasteful is the prospect of electing a criminal to serve as President of the United States.

Donald Trump does not face, never faced, and never had to face charges of criminal misconduct—misconduct that jeopardizes the security of this Nation. Hillary Clinton has faced charges of serious misconduct while serving as a Cabinet Level Officer in the Obama Administration. Her misbehavior as Secretary of State is of an order of magnitude far outstripping anything that one might claim of Donald Trump. Indeed, The Bill and Hillary Clinton Foundation continues to operate defiantly, most likely, illegally. The mainstream media remains oblivious to the seriousness of Hillary Clinton’s obvious criminal conduct–contemptible conduct she will undoubtedly carry with her to the White House.

Would President Hillary Clinton promulgate U.S. foreign and domestic policy benefitting foreign governments to the detriment of the U.S. because of money pouring into the Foundation? Has the Bill and Hillary Clinton Foundation influenced Obama’s foreign policies? Would Hillary Clinton conduct U.S. Government business on private servers? Is Hillary Clinton above the law?

Why isn’t the mainstream media asking these questions and delving into these serious matters? What has become of investigative reporting in this Country? What can Congress do to demand accountability by the Executive Branch of Government?

The Director of the F.B.I., James B. Comey, should have recommended indictment of Hillary Clinton. A recommendation of indictment follows consistently and decisively from Comey’s recitation of Clinton’s crimes under the United States Code. But, Comey, mysteriously and oddly, did not indict her.

The Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, should have indicted Hillary Clinton, even absent a recommendation of indictment. For, the Attorney General need not adhere to the Director’s recommendation. But, the Attorney General did not indict Clinton.

Miscarriages of justice happen, true. When they do, that is regrettable, more so if avoidable. The Nation adjusts to miscarriages of justice, although reluctantly. But the American people cannot cavalierly dismiss or ignore some miscarriages of justice. We cannot do so because some criminal conduct of high ranking public officials, if not corrected, can fracture the fabric of a free Republic. These are serious miscarriages of justice. Serious miscarriages of justice cry out for redress. The Hillary Clinton email and Bill and Hillary Clinton foundation scandals are among those miscarriages of justice that this Nation ought not and cannot ignore. They are too large in scale, too many, too serious to shrug off.

Had Clinton to slink off the campaign stage, before the Democratic Party convention, she must still answer for her misdeeds. For Clinton to accept her Party’s nomination is difficult to fathom, too absurd to imagine, singularly bizarre to ponder.

You may like Hillary Clinton or loathe her. You may agree with her or not—inveterate liar as she is. In either case, a likely criminal cannot serve as United States President. The American People cannot allow this to happen. For, the sake of the Republic and the preservation of our Bill of Rights, this must not happen.

The Nation’s Executive Branch will do nothing to stop Clinton’s nomination. This, we have learned. This we know. Indeed, the Executive Branch, under Barack Obama, has a vested interest in a Clinton Presidency. This, too, we know. The mainstream media has acknowledged this. Through a Hillary Clinton Presidency Obama’s legacy will be ensured and enshrined and furthered.

The Nation’s Legislative and Judicial Branches of Government can stop the ensuing travesty. The Nation’s Legislative and Judicial Branches can prevent a serious miscarriage of justice. But, if the Legislative and Judicial Branches act, they must act now, not after Hillary Clinton secures the White House.

Guest
08-08-2016, 01:28 AM
“I don’t know,” Giuliani continued. “Did she short-circuit when she didn’t protect the Benghazi compound, when she got 20 requests for more help? Did she short-circuit during the Benghazi situation when, if we had gotten people there, we might have been able to save Sean Smith and the other CIA gentleman’s life? … Did she short-circuit when she advocated for the overthrow of Gadhafi, and Libya is now an Islamic State stranglehold? Did she short-circuit when she said she’s going to raise taxes on the middle class?”

Guest
08-08-2016, 04:08 AM
It was reported on Face The Nation by Senator Tom Cotton that Hillary and her staff were discussing Shahram Amxri iranian nuclear scientist who ended up being executed for treason. to my way of thinking information such as this is highly classified and Clinton and her people violated that man's protections.

The more she lies denies deflects the deeper she sinks. what sort of person can commit acts such as this and react without conscience but with entitlements she has no shame she has no self respect

Personal Best Regards:

Guest
08-08-2016, 06:07 AM
It was reported on Face The Nation by Senator Tom Cotton that Hillary and her staff were discussing Shahram Amxri iranian nuclear scientist who ended up being executed for treason. to my way of thinking information such as this is highly classified and Clinton and her people violated that man's protections.

The more she lies denies deflects the deeper she sinks. what sort of person can commit acts such as this and react without conscience but with entitlements she has no shame she has no self respect

Personal Best Regards:

:agree:

Guest
08-08-2016, 06:38 AM
Ammoland.com?


:1rotfl:



:wave:

CNM

Guest
08-08-2016, 08:07 AM
Just when we think we have seen the ugliest close up of Clinton we get a post like the one above.

That is one very scary person....OMG!!!

Guest
08-08-2016, 08:14 AM
Just when we think we have seen the ugliest close up of Clinton we get a post like the one above.

That is one very scary person....OMG!!!

That was a photo of her when she was younger. Now, she looks like an extra on The Walking Dead. She really ought to hook up with Nancy Pelogrosi and find out who the mortician is that does her makeup.

Guest
08-08-2016, 09:21 AM
[QUOTE=Guest;1268279


:1rotfl:



:wave:

CNM[/QUOTE]

If this is the reaction by the majority of our country to such serious allegations as are being discussed, God help us all. This is not a laughing matter no matter what side of the political spectrum you are on. I'm thankful that the Democrats and Independents in my family do not view this situation as the above poster does.