Clinton presidency caused 9/11?

[Guest]

What was Hillarys input?


Forbes Welcome (http://www.forbes.com/sites/henrymiller/2011/05/05/bin-laden-lived-to-fight-another-day-thanks-to-bill-clinton/#8e5519a1da48)

[Guest]

When Bill Clinton had multiple opportunities to get Osama bin Laden, HE FAILED TO ACT (https://m.facebook.com/notes/joe-kidd/when-bill-clinton-had-multiple-opportunities-to-get-osama-bin-laden-he-failed-to/797651746914049/)

[Guest]

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160904/85ad196d122cbf99522741c6f2cd76d8.jpg

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160904/3a874d6a567bc9b1d9f2dcf17ca3e566.jpg


Look for this to be an issue as we get close to 9/11/16

[Guest]

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160904/85ad196d122cbf99522741c6f2cd76d8.jpg

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160904/3a874d6a567bc9b1d9f2dcf17ca3e566.jpg


Look for this to be an issue as we get close to 9/11/16

Good post! "thumbup:

[Guest]

Funny how history repeats itself again and again.

Essay - Blizzard of Lies - NYTimes.com (http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/08/opinion/essay-blizzard-of-lies.html)

[Guest]

https://m.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv% 3D9IOpbj8ajZs%26t%3D1h2m15s&h=dAQHdnJXQ&s=1

[Guest]

Muslims were responsible for 9/11. Could it have been avoided? Maybe, but we cannot know now. Clinton had a chance of killing Bin Ladin, but would that have kept it from happening? I don't know. It's too late to do anything about it now, but we can start thinking like a profiler instead of a sympathizer. The Muslim religion is totally alien to our Judeo-Christian majority. Personally, I do not believe that the founding fathers had these radical religions such as Islam in mind when they wrote the Constitution and Bill of Rights. That is my opinion. I do not believe that AMERICANS should have to be subject of condescending to any radical religion, even radical Christian religions. I still believe that our country is ruled by the majority, not minority groups. Putting governors on issues, views that are radical to American standards as dictated by the majority should not be an issue in itself. Common sense indicates that American justice and values should be inclusive but not require us to modify our lifestyles to accommodate. Sorry if my opinion rubs some the wrong way, but my way is more inclusive of the majority not crippling our way of life to make a minority religion or practice feel like we are condoning them. Tolerance does not require one to condone. And tolerance can only be stretched so far before snapping back. I can tolerate that which I do not condone just as long as it does not demand that I modify my beliefs to accommodate it.

We have terrorism in today's world only because of our insane tolerance of that we do not condone, to the point of justifying bad behavior. Bad behavior should not be tolerate and it should be corrected immediately and harshly, regardless of liberal attitudes of pacifism. Only quick and powerful force can stymie the spread of a bullying culture and prevent wars. And wars overseas are preferred to terrorism and war at home. Our children join the military NOT to build nations, but to fight for our country. We do not ever wish our children to die in conflict, but they made their decision to serve fully knowing that they could die. Just as we did when it was our time to serve.

[Guest]

Muslims were responsible for 9/11. Could it have been avoided? Maybe, but we cannot know now. Clinton had a chance of killing Bin Ladin, but would that have kept it from happening? I don't know. It's too late to do anything about it now, but we can start thinking like a profiler instead of a sympathizer. The Muslim religion is totally alien to our Judeo-Christian majority. Personally, I do not believe that the founding fathers had these radical religions such as Islam in mind when they wrote the Constitution and Bill of Rights. That is my opinion. I do not believe that AMERICANS should have to be subject of condescending to any radical religion, even radical Christian religions. I still believe that our country is ruled by the majority, not minority groups. Putting governors on issues, views that are radical to American standards as dictated by the majority should not be an issue in itself. Common sense indicates that American justice and values should be inclusive but not require us to modify our lifestyles to accommodate. Sorry if my opinion rubs some the wrong way, but my way is more inclusive of the majority not crippling our way of life to make a minority religion or practice feel like we are condoning them. Tolerance does not require one to condone. And tolerance can only be stretched so far before snapping back. I can tolerate that which I do not condone just as long as it does not demand that I modify my beliefs to accommodate it.

We have terrorism in today's world only because of our insane tolerance of that we do not condone, to the point of justifying bad behavior. Bad behavior should not be tolerate and it should be corrected immediately and harshly, regardless of liberal attitudes of pacifism. Only quick and powerful force can stymie the spread of a bullying culture and prevent wars. And wars overseas are preferred to terrorism and war at home. Our children join the military NOT to build nations, but to fight for our country. We do not ever wish our children to die in conflict, but they made their decision to serve fully knowing that they could die. Just as we did when it was our time to serve.

How about the behavior of blacks and Hispanics? If we corrected everything they did, they'd ALL be locked up. I'm sure they'd call it "racist".

[Guest]

How about the behavior of blacks and Hispanics? If we corrected everything they did, they'd ALL be locked up. I'm sure they'd call it "racist".

They can call it what they wish. It only matters what someone calls it, if it is true. If it is not true then it is just making excuses or whining. Crime is crime and there is no excuse for it. There can be extenuating circumstances that might cause leniency in certain cases, but that does that change the fact that someone still broke the law. You can be a racist and still enforce the law appropriately. As long as racism does not interfere with the proper execution of your duties. There is no separate laws according to race or gender. If a criminal commits a crime and is arrested, he has no right to claim racism. He still broke the law.

[Guest]

Just as there is law and order in the villages, that level of order will be brought to America, with Trump.

If Trump were in charge locally, people would think twice about not picking up after their dog.

Maybe even end chair saving......etc

[Guest]

Just as there is law and order in the villages, that level of order will be brought to America, with Trump.

If Trump were in charge locally, people would think twice about not picking up after their dog.

Maybe even end chair saving......etc

be serious.

[Guest]

What was Hillarys input?


Forbes Welcome (http://www.forbes.com/sites/henrymiller/2011/05/05/bin-laden-lived-to-fight-another-day-thanks-to-bill-clinton/#8e5519a1da48)

to act?

George W. Bush's White House ignored these extremely dramatic pre-9/11 warnings, George Tenet and Cofer Black reveal. (http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/11/13/george_w_bush_s_white_house_ignored_these_extremel y_dramatic_pre_9_11_warnings.html)

[Guest]

be serious.
Yes, very serious my amigo. As a "native new yorker", I am very much in tune to what trump has done and said in New York over the last 50 years and what Hillary has failed to do as a NY senator.

[Guest]

Yes, very serious my amigo. As a "native new yorker", I am very much in tune to what trump has done and said in New York over the last 50 years and what Hillary has failed to do as a NY senator.

Bloomberg says about Trump over your opinion any day.

[Guest]

They can call it what they wish. It only matters what someone calls it, if it is true. If it is not true then it is just making excuses or whining. Crime is crime and there is no excuse for it. There can be extenuating circumstances that might cause leniency in certain cases, but that does that change the fact that someone still broke the law. You can be a racist and still enforce the law appropriately. As long as racism does not interfere with the proper execution of your duties. There is no separate laws according to race or gender. If a criminal commits a crime and is arrested, he has no right to claim racism. He still broke the law.

RE: BREAK THE LAW AND GO TO JAIL
There is NO ONE that has not broken a law. THAT INCLUDES YOU.
Even YOU see that you ARE A RACIST.
I plan on voting Republican. It makes me proud that Ben Carson was a republican candidate and unlike OBAMA race was not the issue. FOR YOU-it embarrasses me that you too will vote republican.

[Guest]

Carson has claimed that homosexuality is a choice, evolution is an idea encouraged by the devil and, most famously, Obamacare is “the worst thing that has happened in this nation since slavery.”

But to claim that the pyramids, which American kids learn about in grade school, were not tombs for pharaohs but grain silos built by a Joseph a biblical hero appeared to rise to another level.

[Guest]

Carson has claimed that homosexuality is a choice, evolution is an idea encouraged by the devil and, most famously, Obamacare is “the worst thing that has happened in this nation since slavery.”

But to claim that the pyramids, which American kids learn about in grade school, were not tombs for pharaohs but grain silos built by a Joseph a biblical hero appeared to rise to another level.
Let's attack ben, not discuss the actual nominees, or better yet, let's all be like the ny times and ignore the fbi holiday weekend data dump.

[Guest]

Bloomberg says about Trump over your opinion any day.
Hablar ingles mi amigo!

[Guest]

Stock market Bloomberg does not want any changes in financial market taxing/regulation until his buddy Jeb bush gets in the office in 2020.

[Guest]

Just as there is law and order in the villages, that level of order will be brought to America, with Trump.

If Trump were in charge locally, people would think twice about not picking up after their dog.

Maybe even end chair saving......etc

What armed brownshirts making sure we pick up the poop? Hitler , Stalin and Chairman Mao could have made this work but we still have the US Constitution and its balance of powers.

We do not need a dictator, thanks.

[Guest]

What armed brownshirts making sure we pick up the poop? Hitler , Stalin and Chairman Mao could have made this work but we still have the US Constitution and its balance of powers.

We do not need a dictator, thanks.
Those that do not like rules or law and order, there are santuary cities...... for now.

[Guest]

Those that do not like rules or law and order, there are santuary cities...... for now.

Like cleaning up poop in the Villages and maintaining the rules for chair sitting?

[Guest]

Like cleaning up poop in the Villages and maintaining the rules for chair sitting?
I assume there is a "leash gutter and pick up after your dog" Law.

If so, and one person were fined, after word got out, ... no more public poop, or on your lawn.

I don't think there is a rule on chair saving. If someone leaves for more than a bathroom break, give them like 30 minutes, if it really irks you, put their belongings in a bag marked "lost and found" put the bag along side the chair you are now sitting in. Let me know how it goes.

[Guest]

I assume there is a "leash gutter and pick up after your dog" Law.

If so, and one person were fined, after word got out, ... no more public poop, or on your lawn.

I don't think there is a rule on chair saving. If someone leaves for more than a bathroom break, give them like 30 minutes, if it really irks you, put their belongings in a bag marked "lost and found" put the bag along side the chair you are now sitting in. Let me know how it goes.

I remember when folks brought their own chairs to the square. That works for me, IF I was to frequent the square at all anymore. It's no longer a novelty and I only go when we have visitors.