Wikileaks getting ready to release

[Guest]

WikiLeaks Founder: Here's The Evidence That Hillary Clinton Knew 'C' Stands For ‘Classified'


}
60 days | 9 hours | 28 minutes | 10 seconds

Home Articles Election WikiLeaks Founder: Here's The Evidence That Hillary Clinton Knew...

WikiLeaks Founder: Here's The Evidence That Hillary Clinton Knew 'C' Stands For 'Classified'

Jullian Assange, the fugitive founder of Wikileaks, claims his organization has released thousands of documents that prove the Hillary Clinton lied to the Federal Bureau of Investigations when she told them that she didn't recognize classification markings in emails she received during her time as Secretary of State.

According to recently released FBI notes on their investigation into her use of a private email server, Clinton made the somewhat brazen claim during her three hour interview with investigators.

"When asked what the parenthetical ‘C’ meant before a paragraph within the captioned email, [Clinton] stated she did not know and could only speculate it was referencing paragraphs marked in alphabetical order," read the FBI’s notes from their interview.

On Tuesday's Hannity, Julian Assange revealed that Clinton's claim of ignorance is contradicted by evidence that has already been released by WikiLeaks.

"Hillary Clinton says she can't remember what a 'C' in brackets stands for, everyone in positions of government and at WikiLeaks knows it stands for 'classified confidential'," Assange told Sean.

"In fact, we have already released thousands of cables by Hillary Clinton...thousands of examples where she herself has used the 'C' in brackets and signed it off," Assange said, holding up an example of such a cable and indicating Clinton's signature. In addition, Assange said that Clinton received more than 22 thousand cables from others in which the 'C' in brackets appears.


https://o.twimg.com/2/proxy.jpg?t=HBikAWh0dHA6Ly9pLmloZWFydC5jb20vdjMvdX JsL2FIUjBjRG92TDJsdFp5NWpZM0prTG1Oc1pXRnlZMmhoYm01 bGJDNWpiMjB2YldWa2FXRXZiV3hwWWk4eE5URTNNaTh5TURFMk x6QTVMMlJsWm1GMWJIUXZhblZzYVdGdVgyRnpjMkZ1WjJWZk1G OHhORGN6TWpRd056Z3hMbXB3Wnc9PT9vcHM9FNgMFNAGHBSEBh SUAwAAFgASAA&s=rrqHBRtttxsConHbn7OzibVOPJQvOKVMzy-qkqeGzFk

[Guest]

WikiLeaks Founder: Here's The Evidence That Hillary Clinton Knew 'C' Stands For ‘Classified'


}
60 days | 9 hours | 28 minutes | 10 seconds

Home Articles Election WikiLeaks Founder: Here's The Evidence That Hillary Clinton Knew...

WikiLeaks Founder: Here's The Evidence That Hillary Clinton Knew 'C' Stands For 'Classified'

Jullian Assange, the fugitive founder of Wikileaks, claims his organization has released thousands of documents that prove the Hillary Clinton lied to the Federal Bureau of Investigations when she told them that she didn't recognize classification markings in emails she received during her time as Secretary of State.

According to recently released FBI notes on their investigation into her use of a private email server, Clinton made the somewhat brazen claim during her three hour interview with investigators.

"When asked what the parenthetical ‘C’ meant before a paragraph within the captioned email, [Clinton] stated she did not know and could only speculate it was referencing paragraphs marked in alphabetical order," read the FBI’s notes from their interview.

On Tuesday's Hannity, Julian Assange revealed that Clinton's claim of ignorance is contradicted by evidence that has already been released by WikiLeaks.

"Hillary Clinton says she can't remember what a 'C' in brackets stands for, everyone in positions of government and at WikiLeaks knows it stands for 'classified confidential'," Assange told Sean.

"In fact, we have already released thousands of cables by Hillary Clinton...thousands of examples where she herself has used the 'C' in brackets and signed it off," Assange said, holding up an example of such a cable and indicating Clinton's signature. In addition, Assange said that Clinton received more than 22 thousand cables from others in which the 'C' in brackets appears.


https://o.twimg.com/2/proxy.jpg?t=HBikAWh0dHA6Ly9pLmloZWFydC5jb20vdjMvdX JsL2FIUjBjRG92TDJsdFp5NWpZM0prTG1Oc1pXRnlZMmhoYm01 bGJDNWpiMjB2YldWa2FXRXZiV3hwWWk4eE5URTNNaTh5TURFMk x6QTVMMlJsWm1GMWJIUXZhblZzYVdGdVgyRnpjMkZ1WjJWZk1G OHhORGN6TWpRd056Z3hMbXB3Wnc9PT9vcHM9FNgMFNAGHBSEBh SUAwAAFgASAA&s=rrqHBRtttxsConHbn7OzibVOPJQvOKVMzy-qkqeGzFk
Are you saying Hillary could not have forgotten about 22,000 {C} emails?

Are you sure it's not just political slander?

Give the lady the benefit of the doubt, brain damage from concussion can be severe.

[Guest]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/08/us/politics/trump-clinton-fact-check.html

This goes on-and-on.

[Guest]

The FBI would know all about all this by now. Get over it.

[Guest]

The FBI would know all about all this by now. Get over it.
So if there was a literal smoking gun of Hillary shooting someone in an obvious murder and the fbi had already seen the evidence no crime was committed.

I understand your logic.

[Guest]

But is the FBI covering it up or not disclosing all of it?

if so, this may bring to light facts we as tax payers don't now know

[Guest]

The FBI would know all about all this by now. Get over it.

Yes, but they're political association and early release to the DOJ along with the secret meeting with Bill slick Willie Clinton the fix was in so any important information is irrelevant

[Guest]

So if there was a literal smoking gun of Hillary shooting someone in an obvious murder and the fbi had already seen the evidence no crime was committed.

I understand your logic.

tax return?

[Guest]

tax return?
Remember capital T.

[Guest]

Just more proof that Hillary is incredibly lazy. I don't fall for her being ignorant trick that she attempts to pull over on us. If she was so ignorant, she would not have graduated from Yale and become a lawyer. Nope, she is too lazy to care about the law as it pertains to her.

Trump becomes more and more a better selection of the two.

[Guest]

Just more proof that Hillary is incredibly lazy. I don't fall for her being ignorant trick that she attempts to pull over on us. If she was so ignorant, she would not have graduated from Yale and become a lawyer. Nope, she is too lazy to care about the law as it pertains to her.

Trump becomes more and more a better selection of the two.

I wouldn't call it lazy. Sinister seems more like it. However, I do agree with your last statement wholeheartedly, even though I wasn't necessarily a fan in the beginning.

What gets me is that Julian Assange can hold up a copy of a signed email (one marked with a "c" no less) by Hilliary and yet they still want to say her email accounts were not proven to be hacked.......what am I missing here?!? Or do the powers that be really think we are ALL that stupid?

[Guest]

I wouldn't call it lazy. Sinister seems more like it. However, I do agree with your last statement wholeheartedly, even though I wasn't necessarily a fan in the beginning.

What gets me is that Julian Assange can hold up a copy of a signed email (one marked with a "c" no less) by Hilliary and yet they still want to say her email accounts were not proven to be hacked.......what am I missing here?!? Or do the powers that be really think we are ALL that stupid?

WikiLeaks publishes more than 1,000 Hillary Clinton war emails | The Independent (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/wikileaks-publishes-more-than-1000-hillary-clinton-war-emails-a7120011.html)

Freedom of Information Act got those. Not a hacker.

[Guest]

I don't believe he hacks anything he receives hacked info organizes and re-publishes them

[Guest]

WikiLeaks publishes more than 1,000 Hillary Clinton war emails | The Independent (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/wikileaks-publishes-more-than-1000-hillary-clinton-war-emails-a7120011.html)

Freedom of Information Act got those. Not a hacker.

Thank you for that. Having a hard time keeping up with all of this in the midst of a busy schedule and some big life changes going on, but I do think it's an important time for all of us to stay as informed as possible, so again, thanks.

[Guest]

Thank you for that. Having a hard time keeping up with all of this in the midst of a busy schedule and some big life changes going on, but I do think it's an important time for all of us to stay as informed as possible, so again, thanks.

"Informed"? How? The "news"? Ha ha ha...

It's propaganda...what they WANT you the hear and think.

[Guest]

WikiLeaks publishes more than 1,000 Hillary Clinton war emails | The Independent (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/wikileaks-publishes-more-than-1000-hillary-clinton-war-emails-a7120011.html)

Freedom of Information Act got those. Not a hacker.

FOIA CANNOT get classified documents, period. If there is a (C) on them, then anyone that packages the documents up for release would have seen the markings and would not have released them. That (C) stands for CONFIDENTIAL. I say again, FOIA does not release classified information.

[Guest]

"Informed"? How? The "news"? Ha ha ha...

It's propaganda...what they WANT you the hear and think.

"THEY?" Maybe aliens? You had better go check your tin foil hat for leaks.

[Guest]

I think the almighty saviour, Jullian Assange, should just release them all. Why wait? So he can see his face on more Internet postings and newspapers. And don't release only the paper copies but the electronic versions as well so we can see all the routing to ensure they haven't been doctored by anyone. I can reproduce a doctored (or totally fake) email with no problem at all - I suspect so can he. I know lots of people are salivating like rabid dogs to get hold of them. I couldn't care less about any more emails, messages, books, papers, or videos from yesterday or from 20 years ago or more. The country needs to knock off all this BS of trying to get more "Ah Has" about the other guy and just get this stupid election of equally obnoxious candidates over with. If the Repub is elected, I fear for our country. If the Democ is elected, there will just be more of the same old crap-talk about past, current, or future lawbreaking without anyone actually doing something about it besides flapping their jaws in worthless hate-filled diatribes.
:0000000000luvmyhors :0000000000luvmyhors :0000000000luvmyhors

[Guest]

I think the almighty saviour, Jullian Assange, should just release them all. Why wait? So he can see his face on more Internet postings and newspapers. And don't release only the paper copies but the electronic versions as well so we can see all the routing to ensure they haven't been doctored by anyone. I can reproduce a doctored (or totally fake) email with no problem at all - I suspect so can he. I know lots of people are salivating like rabid dogs to get hold of them. I couldn't care less about any more emails, messages, books, papers, or videos from yesterday or from 20 years ago or more. The country needs to knock off all this BS of trying to get more "Ah Has" about the other guy and just get this stupid election of equally obnoxious candidates over with. If the Repub is elected, I fear for our country. If the Democ is elected, there will just be more of the same old crap-talk about past, current, or future lawbreaking without anyone actually doing something about it besides flapping their jaws in worthless hate-filled diatribes.
:0000000000luvmyhors :0000000000luvmyhors :0000000000luvmyhors

I feared for our country when Obama was elected also. But, we still stand if not tall but still upright. I never expect to elect a god as president, but I do expect the one I vote for to be eligible for a security clearance. I used to do background investigations and special investigations for DOD and I have held clearances with DIA, CIA and State Dept, and I know that knowing how Hillary mishandled classified information would not only revoke any security clearance she might hold, but also qualify her for a long stay in a very secure cell where her visitors would be closely monitored if she were eligible for any at all. I am amazed at how she has been given a pass instead of a jail cell. Nope, even if I was the Democrat my father was, I would not be able to ever vote for someone like Hillary to lead our great nation.

Trump may not have all the attributes I wish in a president, but he was nominated by more Republican votes than any other candidate in history. Therefore, he is the peoples' choice. I'll be voting for him in this election. I will reevaluate my future vote in the next general election after I see how well he functions as president for the next four years.

Yes, Trump will be our next president. America is not ready for another Chicago mob style criminal leading our nation. I have faith in my fellow American to see how dangerous and corrupt Hillary is and then NOT vote for her.

There is NO perfect individual for president, but America can and will do better than elect a criminal that has no regard for her fellow American and no regard for national security. They'll vote for Trump.

I'll be voting for Trump. I don't even need to watch any debates. Hillary has disqualified herself with her criminal activities.

[Guest]

Assange: Hillary Clinton Whipping Up 'Neo-McCarthyist Hysteria' To Suppress The 1st Amendment

Julian Assange, the fugitive founder of WikiLeaks, is accusing Hillary Clinton and her presidential campaign of "trying to whip up a neo-McCarthyist hysteria" in an attempt to silence her political and media opposition. Assange made the accusation during his Thursday interview on The Sean Hannity Show.

In an earlier interview with The New York Times, Assange had accused the "American liberal press" of "erecting a demon that is going to put nooses around everyone’s necks as soon as she wins the election" by defending Clinton and failing to thoroughly cover the mountains of evidence of the Democratic nominee's corruption.

During Thursday's interview with Sean Hannity, Assange clarified his somewhat cryptic remark.

"The Democrats are always speaking about how terrible McCarthyism was, and it was in many ways," Assange told Hannity. "But at least the USSR actually existed then and there were actually Russian-influence campaigns which were serious. What we're seeing now is Hillary Clinton and her campaign trying to whip up a neo-McCarthyist hysteria."

Assange went on to say that Clinton's new McCarthyism is based around the spurious notion that her political opponents, both left and right, are all in league with Russia.

"She claims Donald Trump is effectively an agent of the Russians," Assange continued. "That WikiLeaks is an agent of the Russians. And where her campaign has also implied that Jill Stein, the Greens' leader, is a Russian agent. And the Intercept, which is an American publication, are effectively Russian agents."

In recent days, Democrats have indeed tried to paint Trump as a Russian sympathizer, if not an outright agent of Vladimir Putin. Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon has gone as far as to claim a "direct link" between Trump and the recent hacks of the DCCC and other high profile Democratic organizations.

One could be forgiven for seeing irony in Democrats' fear of a vast Russian conspiracy considering their chortling at Mitt Romney's 2012 insistence that Russia was the United States' chief geo-political threat.

Assange went on to explain that the Clinton campaign's end-game is a chilling of free speech and criticism should she ascend to the presidency.

"What kind of press climate is going to exist afterwards, especially if Hillary Clinton is elected?" Assange asked. "It will be perceived to be a validation of that hysteria, and so the press afterwards will be cracked down upon and online publishers and people on social media, you know, it will lead to a very harsh climate where the first amendment will be very significantly eroded."

Listen to Julian Assange claim that Hillary Clinton is whipping up "neo-McCarthyist" hysteria on The Sean Hannity Show:


<iframe width="610" height="377" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KhkmKXX3LTw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[Guest]

Trump may know Putin, but Hillary is a recipient of donations from Soros, the destroyer of countries. The man that is working toward a one world order.