Guest
03-26-2009, 08:21 AM
gets to view of any of his shortcomings (real, perceived or other wise....ya know very Bush-like!!).
Here is a none too favorable article, regarding at least one view of the POTUS achievements or not in foreign affairs. More on the job training....no, assume for a moment the reporting is unbiased and 100% true (which never mattered for Bush reviews either!!)...I would call it on the job testing.
It is a two page article:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/03252009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/os_foreign_failures_161154.htm?&page=1
There have been other inuendo articles of this type, but never comprehensive on one aspect of the job of POTUS.
It's the first time I have read this reporter, who no doubt many know more about his style.
BTK
Here is a none too favorable article, regarding at least one view of the POTUS achievements or not in foreign affairs. More on the job training....no, assume for a moment the reporting is unbiased and 100% true (which never mattered for Bush reviews either!!)...I would call it on the job testing.
It is a two page article:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/03252009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/os_foreign_failures_161154.htm?&page=1
There have been other inuendo articles of this type, but never comprehensive on one aspect of the job of POTUS.
It's the first time I have read this reporter, who no doubt many know more about his style.
BTK