PDA

View Full Version : NY Times endorses CLINTON!!!


Guest
09-24-2016, 11:47 AM
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/25/opinion/sunday/hillary-clinton-for-president.html

Guest
09-24-2016, 11:53 AM
I don't believe there is one single newspaper in our country.

Fact is....

"Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson made headlines last week after infamously asking, "What is Aleppo?" but he still has the support of more daily newspapers that Republican nominee Donald Trump, The Washington Post reports.

Trump has received no endorsements from daily papers in the general election."


Breaking News at Newsmax.com Trump Has Fewer Newspaper Endorsements Than Gary Johnson (http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/Newspaper-Endorsements-Gary-Johnson/2016/09/13/id/748002/#ixzz4LC1tTq3V)

Guest
09-24-2016, 11:59 AM
I don't believe there is one single newspaper in our country.

Fact is....

"Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson made headlines last week after infamously asking, "What is Aleppo?" but he still has the support of more daily newspapers that Republican nominee Donald Trump, The Washington Post reports.

Trump has received no endorsements from daily papers in the general election."


Breaking News at Newsmax.com Trump Has Fewer Newspaper Endorsements Than Gary Johnson (http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/Newspaper-Endorsements-Gary-Johnson/2016/09/13/id/748002/#ixzz4LC1tTq3V)

No big surprise here at all . So what ? Do you trust that some Libs who majored in English Lit or Journalism to make your decisions for you ?
When is the last time if ever that the press has ever endorsed a Republican candidate for President .

Guest
09-24-2016, 12:03 PM
Wow, the second most liberal news rag in America is endorsing Hellary? Wow, oh wow, that's really something. Maybe they can be a character reference at her criminal trial.

Guest
09-24-2016, 12:10 PM
Wow, the second most liberal news rag in America is endorsing Hellary? Wow, oh wow, that's really something. Maybe they can be a character reference at her criminal trial.

What criminal trial? You repugs have been not been able to find anything against Hillary Clinton that sticks in 30 years.

Guest
09-24-2016, 12:20 PM
What criminal trial? You repugs have been not been able to find anything against Hillary Clinton that sticks in 30 years.

That ain't it at all. Criminals protect their own. And the corruption starts at the top in D.C. I could get a conviction just with what I can find on the Internet and her own quotes to put her in jail for the rest of her life, but not when the country is run by the corrupt left. She will get hers eventually. She is a criminal and she will pay. I just hope it is after the election.

Guest
09-24-2016, 12:55 PM
That ain't it at all. Criminals protect their own. And the corruption starts at the top in D.C. I could get a conviction just with what I can find on the Internet and her own quotes to put her in jail for the rest of her life, but not when the country is run by the corrupt left. She will get hers eventually. She is a criminal and she will pay. I just hope it is after the election.

A REPUBLICAN committee in congress could find nothing criminal, but you could using GOOGLE ?

You must be a Trump supporter.

Has everyone fell on their freakin head.

Clinton is old and washed up, and not trustworthy, BUT Trump insures she looks better.

Guest
09-24-2016, 01:07 PM
A REPUBLICAN committee in congress could find nothing criminal, but you could using GOOGLE ?

You must be a Trump supporter.

Has everyone fell on their freakin head.

Clinton is old and washed up, and not trustworthy, BUT Trump insures she looks better.
"There have been seven investigations (of Benghazi) led mostly by Republicans in the Congress" that concluded "nobody did anything wrong, but there were changes we could make."

Is anyone keeping score on how many other investigations she has been in throughout the years?

Guest
09-24-2016, 02:13 PM
Wow, the second most liberal news rag in America is endorsing Hellary? Wow, oh wow, that's really something. Maybe they can be a character reference at her criminal trial.
The Cincinnati Enquirer endorsed Clinton. First time in 100 years the paper endorsed a Democrat.

Guest
09-24-2016, 02:18 PM
Ohio is for Trump with John Kasich, newspapers and magazines endorsements are worthless. In a couple weeks we will see traitor John come begging with his tail between his legs.

Guest
09-24-2016, 03:00 PM
The Cincinnati Enquirer endorsed Clinton. First time in 100 years the paper endorsed a Democrat.

And we all know, how well Democrats run things, don't we?
Do you really believe our military, economy, job creation,
foreign relations, healthcare costs, and race relations will all
improve with Hillary as President.
Just look what has transpired under Obama two terms!

Guest
09-24-2016, 03:06 PM
And we all know, how well Democrats run things, don't we?
Do you really believe our military, economy, job creation,
foreign relations, healthcare costs, and race relations will all
improve with Hillary as President.
Just look what has transpired under Obama two terms!

Actually, and factually, ALL of them except maybe race relations DID IN FACT IMPROVE.

Race relations will never be solved by any Presidents.

Check facts before you post....economy is now back after two recessions...unemployment at record low..stocks up to record highs...healthcare costs are high but because mostly if the drug companies, foreign relations are fine..tense but fine.

Guest
09-24-2016, 03:26 PM
Actually, and factually, ALL of them except maybe race relations DID IN FACT IMPROVE.

Race relations will never be solved by any Presidents.

Check facts before you post....economy is now back after two recessions...unemployment at record low..stocks up to record highs...healthcare costs are high but because mostly if the drug companies, foreign relations are fine..tense but fine.
Stop. I feel heads exploding. [emoji1]

Guest
09-24-2016, 03:29 PM
Stop. I feel heads exploding. [emoji1]
I hear Bruce singing "Not Born in the USA."

Guest
09-24-2016, 03:31 PM
Stop. I feel heads exploding. [emoji1]

The only explosions are those of laughter when reading the pure BS that diehard Dems continue to believe despite the facts of reality!
:1rotfl: :1rotfl: :1rotfl: :1rotfl: :1rotfl:

Guest
09-24-2016, 03:34 PM
The only explosions are those of laughter when reading the pure BS that diehard Dems continue to believe despite the facts of reality!
:1rotfl: :1rotfl: :1rotfl: :1rotfl: :1rotfl:

FOR EXAMPLE ?

Please.....tell us, and I am not a dem as you say...I am a life long conservative Republucan who fears for my country because of what my party has put forward.

I enjoy discussing facts, so please enlighten us all instead of jus making general comments.

Guest
09-24-2016, 03:35 PM
Actually, and factually, ALL of them except maybe race relations DID IN FACT IMPROVE.

Race relations will never be solved by any Presidents.

Check facts before you post....economy is now back after two recessions...unemployment at record low..stocks up to record highs...healthcare costs are high but because mostly if the drug companies, foreign relations are fine..tense but fine.

Economy is not back, workforce participation lower than ever, stocks up because of
phony fed $$$ infusion, healthcare costs up for millions,
and you say foreign relations tense...now that is truly funny!

Guest
09-24-2016, 03:42 PM
FOR EXAMPLE ?

Please.....tell us, and I am not a dem as you say...I am a life long conservative Republucan who fears for my country because of what my party has put forward.

I enjoy discussing facts, so please enlighten us all instead of jus making general comments.

There are plenty of specific comments that have been made, and if you are a life long Republican you are part of the problem, since both establishment parties are responsible for the many problems our country has, such as immigration, massive debt, lack of meaningful jobs, millions dependent on welfare and a loss of military strength.

Guest
09-24-2016, 03:42 PM
Economy is not back, workforce participation lower than ever, stocks up because of
phony fed $$$ infusion, healthcare costs up for millions,
and you say foreign relations tense...now that is truly funny!

Are we at war with anyone ? Are American soldiers dying ?

Yep...we assist in fighting ISIS. Is that not what Trump wants ?

On the economy, do you comprehend how bad our economy was ?

In any case, I will be noxious to hear the Trump proposals on Monday for even more peace...how he will raise the employment rate that you say is low.

Not sure what "phoney fed infusion" means. Can you explain. I just know that finally IPOs are returning and market is up. I also know the unemployment rate is down, and it is measure exactly how it always has been.

If you look at age statistics, you might get a better understanding of workforce participation. Not one or two stories, but actual facts.

Guest
09-24-2016, 03:47 PM
There are plenty of specific comments that have been made, and if you are a life long Republican you are part of the problem, since both establishment parties are responsible for the many problems our country has, such as immigration, massive debt, lack of meaningful jobs, millions dependent on welfare and a loss of military strength.

I certainly agree both parties share any blame. My participation on this forum today is the misrepresentation of Trump as a savior, when he is in fact, the single biggest threat to our country.

I mean that, and while I would have supported ANYONE against Clinton, I consider it un American to allow any person such as Trump to even visit the WH.

I would be speaking against Clinton loudly except the alternative sickens me on a personal level as well as on any policy issue you can mention. He is so entwined with Russia, Turkey, Iran, etc...he lies so easily...he extols hate that he is simply a real threat to our country.

Guest
09-24-2016, 03:48 PM
The life long Republican and Chi-Town seem to be the
type of folks that probably feel they are very patriotic,
but yet they will vote for a party, rather than what may be good for the country!

Guest
09-24-2016, 03:50 PM
It's not Trump. It's the supreme court. If Trump doesn't work out, he can always be impeached.
If Hillary appoints her super liberal/progressive justices, the the country will be ruined for many generations.

The next president will likely appoint up to three justices.

Guest
09-24-2016, 03:52 PM
The life long Republican and Chi-Town seem to be the
type of folks that probably feel they are very patriotic,
but yet they will vote for a party, rather than what may be good for the country!

You may not speak for me.

Now, I am thinking voting the down ticket and skipping the presidential race.

I do not, nor ever have voted straight party

Guest
09-24-2016, 03:53 PM
It's not Trump. It's the supreme court. If Trump doesn't work out, he can always be impeached.
If Hillary appoints her super liberal/progressive justices, the the country will be ruined for many generations.

The next president will likely appoint up to three justices.

On what planet should you believe Trump on anything, including appt of justices ?

Guest
09-24-2016, 03:55 PM
Lot of Lib Dem trolling today, they must be getting nervous!

Guest
09-24-2016, 03:56 PM
On what planet should you believe Trump on anything, including appt of justices ?

And you believe Hillary.
Please give us a break!

Guest
09-24-2016, 06:53 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/25/opinion/sunday/hillary-clinton-for-president.html

Gee I am just so stunned . However I always vote for the candidates the NY Times tells me to doesn`t everyone .

Guest
09-25-2016, 04:23 AM
The life long Republican and Chi-Town seem to be the
type of folks that probably feel they are very patriotic,
but yet they will vote for a party, rather than what may be good for the country!

I have tried voting candidate regardless of party once. I went down the list of candidates, checking each one's ideology and how I thought they might vote on issues. After doing extensive research, and choosing the candidates according to my view, I ended up with a straight party ballot. Anyone that criticizes someone for voting straight party line, is being stupid. People vote according to their ideology, not according to personality, gender or race. At least, that is what they should be doing. And I do vote according to what I believe is best for the country. The problem with many of you is your definition of what you believe is good for the country.

I have traveled to many different types of countries, having many different political and economic systems. WE have the best and I do not appreciate an idiot, inexperienced elected telling me that the European socialist system is better than what we currently have. We have fought wars against socialism in the form of communism and I am not about to give all this up for some liberal know it all to throw it away.

If you folks don't like the idea of me voting straight party, that's your opinion. But, I have yet to see a liberal vote according to my ideology. It may be hard to believe a conservative's promises, but I do believe it when a Democrat states that they are liberal or even socialist.

Yes, I vote straight party line Republican on a chance that they might be conservative. The choice I have is a Democrat that promises to be liberal. Why in the world would I think that liberal might be a conservative?