Trump won debate?? your kidding

[Guest]

I'm seriously concerned about sanity of Trump and his supporters!

[Guest]

I'm seriously concerned about sanity of Trump and his supporters!

He and they are trying to lie their way to the White House. And they are getting close to doing it.

We need to get out and vote.:posting::read::BigApplause::welcome:

[Guest]

She and they are trying to lie their way to the White House. And they are getting close to doing it.

We need to get out and vote.:posting::read::BigApplause::welcome:

We were talking about Trump not Clinton!!!

[Guest]

I'm seriously concerned about sanity of Trump and his supporters!

:1rotfl::1rotfl:

[Guest]

He and they are trying to lie their way to the White House. And they are getting close to doing it.

We need to get out and vote.:posting::read::BigApplause::welcome:

It takes more than two votes to win........:BigApplause:

[Guest]

It takes more than two votes to win........:BigApplause:

Hillary is hardly working for votes. She is fund raising, and prepping for the debate, but she cares little for gathering voters. How much smaller is her groups of supporters going to get before she realizes that it takes votes, not money to win?

[Guest]

I'm seriously concerned about sanity of Trump and his supporters!

You need to be concerned.......how many folks have you met in your entire life that do not care if their President lies or not or about what.

"During the first 2016 presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, the Huffington Post kept a tally of the lies that each candidate told in their responses to Lester Holt’s questions. The final HuffPo tally? Donald Trump: 16; Hillary Clinton: 0.

Although the media have made much of Clinton’s “trust problem,” data even beyond this debate tally suggest that Trump has a solid pattern of lying pretty much all the time, about any situation, especially those that might cast him in what he perceives as a negative light.

His reputation is such that this debate, like no debate before it, had every news media outlet promising intensive fact-checking of every assertion. Fact-checkers have probably never before been this employable and may be the true winners in this election."

Forbes Welcome (http://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywillingham/2016/09/27/why-does-donald-trump-lie-so-much/#1ae1ad106d24)

I suppose if you relied on the extreme conspiracy type web sites or you tube for your news and could care less about the facts, you would suck up what he is selling. THAT is a tactic used by all con men and he is good at it.

Now we learn just a hint about his Russian friends and business associates and their involvement of some sort in the bombing of the flight in 2014. Trump loves these guys because he is in debt to them up to his ears.

Some want this person to be President and do not care about our safety or future..

Trust me, his is a threat....you can resume talking about Hillary all you want if that is what makes you feel good in the little world of conspiracies and the like, but HE IS A THREAT.

So your concern for their sanity is valid. When places like Breitbart, owned by his campaign manager or even more radical places are what people depend on for news then there is a reason to worry.

[Guest]

O'Reilly nailed it. Now that you have seen the debate as you read and listen to his talking points ask yourself if your candidate rose to the occasion. Examine the demeanor factor. Were there any one-liners? Did either one get their facts wrong? It's the first 8 minutes.
v=MiEsdeF6utk

[Guest]

I also wonder about his followers, especially on here, when they continue to fill this space with these stupid links that have absolutely nothing to do with electing a president.

They are all diversions of a sort.

We should be concerned but the concern about Trump followers not caring is stupifying. They are more interested in the carnival activities.

Todays news is rife with talk of Trump and his campaign and their closeness to Russia. His lack of visibility on taxes adds another mystery to his debt to Russia. Today we also learn that Russia may have been directly involved in bringing down a plane with innocent people on it.

But we are more interested in what Bill OReilly had to say and polls taken on the internet.

Yeah we should worry that these people can actually vote.

Trump campaign faces new questions about Russian ties | MSNBC (http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/trump-campaign-faces-new-questions-about-russian-ties)

"When Donald Trump’s presidential campaign parted ways with campaign chairman Paul Manafort last month, there was no real mystery surrounding the shake-up. Manafort’s connections to pro-Putin forces made his position untenable.

Of course, the ties between Trump and the Russian autocrat’s government go further than just Manafort. The candidate himself has repeatedly praised Putin and given contradictory statements about his relationship with the foreign president, and Trump’s team includes other advisers with Russian connections.

Take Carter Page, a Trump foreign policy adviser, for example. On Friday, Yahoo News published a report, which has not yet been independently verified by MSNBC or NBC News, that said U.S. intelligence officials are “seeking to determine whether [Page] has opened up private communications with senior Russian officials – including talks about the possible lifting of economic sanctions if the Republican nominee becomes president.”

Pointing to the report, Tommy Vietor, a former National Security spokesman for President Obama, suggested Trump may very well be “an unwitting Russian agent.”

[Guest]

"International prosecutors investigating the downing of flight MH17 over eastern Ukraine in 2014 say the Buk missile that hit the plane was from Russia.
They also narrowed down the area it was fired from to a field in territory controlled by Russian-backed rebels.
All 298 people on board the Boeing 777 died when it broke apart in mid-air flying from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur.
Russia says the conclusions are "extremely political" and its Buk missiles "never shot down" the plane.
"Based on the criminal investigation, we have concluded that flight MH17 was downed by a Buk missile of the series 9M83 that came from the territory of the Russian Federation," chief Dutch police investigator Wilbert Paulissen said in a news conference on Thursday.
The missile launcher was later taken back to Russia, he said.
Wilbert Paulissen of the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) speaks on the preliminary results of the investigation into the shooting-down of Malaysia Airlines jetliner flight MH17 during a press conference in Nieuwegein, Netherlands, Wednesday, 28 September 2016.

MH17 missile 'came from Russia', Dutch-led investigators say - BBC News (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37495067)

[Guest]

Evidence that Trump is working with the Russians?

We already do have evidence that Hillary works with foreigners not friendly to America. For instance, she approved the sale of 20% of the world's uranium to be sold to Russia. Funny how she also made some money out of the deal. If anyone would be a risk, it would be Hillary. You know, the one that can't keep national security secrets. The one that found it more convenient to transmit classified information on the unsecured Internet than to use the encrypted gov system. The one that got people killed because she is so lazy. The one that posted classified Ambassador Steven's travel itinerary on the Internet, which may have gotten him killed. Is this the person that should be trusted with the nuclear codes? Maybe it will be too much trouble to have a separate briefcase with them, so she will put them on her blackberry. Maybe she will leave them in her car or in a hotel room, like before.

Nope, Hillary is out. She belongs in jail or executed for her treachery.

[Guest]

This is BOTH parties concerns. Not just one.


"WASHINGTON—U.S. officials are increasingly confident that the hacker Guccifer 2.0 is part of a network of individuals and groups kept at arm’s length by Russia to mask its involvement in cyberintrusions such as the theft of thousands of Democratic Party documents, according to people familiar with the matter.

While the hacker denies working on behalf of the Russian government, U.S. officials and independent security experts say the syndicate is one of the most striking elements of what looks like an intensifying Russian campaign to target prominent American athletes, party officials and military leaders."


U.S. Believes Hackers Are Shielded by Russia to Hide Its Role in Cyberintrusions - WSJ (http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-believes-russia-steered-hacked-documents-to-websites-1475058781)

[Guest]

Evidence that Trump is working with the Russians?

We already do have evidence that Hillary works with foreigners not friendly to America. For instance, she approved the sale of 20% of the world's uranium to be sold to Russia. Funny how she also made some money out of the deal. If anyone would be a risk, it would be Hillary. You know, the one that can't keep national security secrets. The one that found it more convenient to transmit classified information on the unsecured Internet than to use the encrypted gov system. The one that got people killed because she is so lazy. The one that posted classified Ambassador Steven's travel itinerary on the Internet, which may have gotten him killed. Is this the person that should be trusted with the nuclear codes? Maybe it will be too much trouble to have a separate briefcase with them, so she will put them on her blackberry. Maybe she will leave them in her car or in a hotel room, like before.

Nope, Hillary is out. She belongs in jail or executed for her treachery.

My only response to you is to widen your scope of what you read. So much is simply the conspiracy theory website talk...has no relation to truth.

[Guest]

Evidence that Trump is working with the Russians?

We already do have evidence that Hillary works with foreigners not friendly to America. For instance, she approved the sale of 20% of the world's uranium to be sold to Russia. Funny how she also made some money out of the deal. If anyone would be a risk, it would be Hillary. You know, the one that can't keep national security secrets. The one that found it more convenient to transmit classified information on the unsecured Internet than to use the encrypted gov system. The one that got people killed because she is so lazy. The one that posted classified Ambassador Steven's travel itinerary on the Internet, which may have gotten him killed. Is this the person that should be trusted with the nuclear codes? Maybe it will be too much trouble to have a separate briefcase with them, so she will put them on her blackberry. Maybe she will leave them in her car or in a hotel room, like before.

Nope, Hillary is out. She belongs in jail or executed for her treachery.

Nobody at anytime anywhere, EVER said Trump was working with Russia.

That was never said or implied either on here or anywhere (exception might be one of the far left crazy websites but I ignore them as much as the Breitbart, etc on the right)

Point is.....that thought process of going to the extreme...the National Enquirer headline kind of thing seems to be typical of those who support Trump.

[Guest]

The question is and should be important to every American us...to whom does he owe billions as far as countries are concerned.

But you accept he does not need to tell you...that is not very thoughtful, or safe

[Guest]

The question is and should be important to every American us...to whom does he owe billions as far as countries are concerned.

But you accept he does not need to tell you...that is not very thoughtful, or safeYou need to trust him.

[Guest]

I'm seriously concerned about sanity of Trump and his supporters!

I too, at first....was concerned about their sanity.

In the last few months however, it has become abundantly clear that they're beyond rational and decent thinking and are now simply feeling the freedom to spew their deplorably racist/bigoted/misogynist/xenophobic/homophobic/sexist emotions...that have heretofore been thinly hidden just below the surface.

In other words, it's impossible to change (especially at their age)...the raging hatred that has been built up over a lifetime. :ohdear:

The worst part being, is that since Trump has opened these 'Gates to He11' ...the genie will not go easily back in the bottle. :(


:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

My only response to you is to widen your scope of what you read. So much is simply the conspiracy theory website talk...has no relation to truth.

I know that fact check sites, have some bias, but you have got to take charge and do your own research, and please, do not assume that donald even knows what the truth is, if he thinks he won the last debate.

[Guest]

I too, at first....was concerned about their sanity.

In the last few months however, it has become abundantly clear that they're beyond rational and decent thinking and are now simply feeling the freedom to spew their deplorably racist/bigoted/misogynist/xenophobic/homophobic/sexist emotions...that have heretofore been thinly hidden just below the surface.

In other words, it's impossible to change (especially at their age)...the raging hatred that has been built up over a lifetime. :ohdear:

The worst part being, is that since Trump has opened these 'Gates to He11' ...the genie will not go easily back in the bottle. :(


:wave:

CNMI don't know how to find out if conversations or posts that are taking place all over the country are very similar to the ones that take place here.

I don't think the rants and raves of teenagers pretending to be adults count. But since you never know who is who, how can you tell?

[Guest]

My only response to you is to widen your scope of what you read. So much is simply the conspiracy theory website talk...has no relation to truth.

Ah, so if it's facts against Hillary, it's considered conspiracy theory. If it is nothing but some idiotic verbiage about Trump, it must be true. Got it. You should have said that to begin with.

If you believe that, you are not very bright. It is not conspiracy that Hillary jeopardized national security. It is not conspiracy when she used the video as the cause of those four being killed. It is not conspiracy that Huma left classified documents in an empty car and in a hotel room. It is not conspiracy about all the money that is donated through foreign countries, not friendly to America, to her supposed charity.

So, please feel free to produce all that conspiracy theory stuff you claim has been used against crooked Hillary.

[Guest]

I too, at first....was concerned about their sanity.

In the last few months however, it has become abundantly clear that they're beyond rational and decent thinking and are now simply feeling the freedom to spew their deplorably racist/bigoted/misogynist/xenophobic/homophobic/sexist emotions...that have heretofore been thinly hidden just below the surface.

In other words, it's impossible to change (especially at their age)...the raging hatred that has been built up over a lifetime. :ohdear:

The worst part being, is that since Trump has opened these 'Gates to He11' ...the genie will not go easily back in the bottle. :(


:wave:

CNM

You have NO room to talk. Out of all that post on here, you are the weirdest and most radical and aggressive on here. You are even above the racist on here as far as being more aggressive and belittling. And you are paranoid. More paranoid than anyone on here. And your ego is above all others, which is obvious by your insistence of your childish and gay rants. But, that is OK because there is always at least one in every forum that seeks attention above all others. Not only are you paranoid, but also in denial. You do not believe that there is such thing as crime. You totally excuse Hillary's felonies and ethics violations. That suggests a person in denial. :ohdear:
But, it's been fun playing your immature little game. I have always been one to sympathize with the mentally challenged. You're welcome. :wave:
Not a C-tard

[Guest]

The question is and should be important to every American us...to whom does he owe billions as far as countries are concerned.

But you accept he does not need to tell you...that is not very thoughtful, or safe

How much do the Clintons owe to other countries in return for their donations?

[Guest]

The question is and should be important to every American us...to whom does he owe billions as far as countries are concerned.

But you accept he does not need to tell you...that is not very thoughtful, or safe

Before accusing him of something that you made up in your mind, with no evidence, why don't you consider this. Maybe they owe him money.

Why is it important to you? Are you not concerned about how much the Clintons owe our enemies? Are you not worried that George Soros being a major Clinton donor?

I think you are full of sh*t, but that doesn't make it fact, right?

[Guest]

You have NO room to talk. Out of all that post on here, you are the weirdest and most radical and aggressive on here. You are even above the racist on here as far as being more aggressive and belittling. And you are paranoid. More paranoid than anyone on here. And your ego is above all others, which is obvious by your insistence of your childish and gay rants. But, that is OK because there is always at least one in every forum that seeks attention above all others. Not only are you paranoid, but also in denial. You do not believe that there is such thing as crime. You totally excuse Hillary's felonies and ethics violations. That suggests a person in denial.
But, it's been fun playing your immature little game. I have always been one to sympathize with the mentally challenged. You're welcome.
Not a C-tard

:1rotfl: Cut a little too close to the bone for you...did I? :1rotfl:


Kewl. :coolsmiley:





:wave:

CNM

[Guest]

:1rotfl: Cut a little too close to the bone for you...did I? :1rotfl:
Kewl. :coolsmiley:
:wave:

CNM

Didn't I tell you to stay away from my bone. I keep telling you that I do not fly with your rainbow flag group. :boom:

[Guest]

Before accusing him of something that you made up in your mind, with no evidence, why don't you consider this. Maybe they owe him money.

Why is it important to you? Are you not concerned about how much the Clintons owe our enemies? Are you not worried that George Soros being a major Clinton donor?

I think you are full of sh*t, but that doesn't make it fact, right?

Well, you will not find that evidence at Breitbart, however this particular article which is in fact an exhaustive investigation report previously linked here has much.

How the Trump Organization's Foreign Business Ties Could Upend U.S. National Security (http://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/donald-trump-foreign-business-deals-national-security-498081.html)

If this does not satisfy you, there is much more, as you call "evidence"

[Guest]

You should look and see just who he has been doing business with overseas and how much money he owes them

[Guest]

You should look and see just who he has been doing business with overseas and how much money he owes them

Well, he has one over Hitlery. He hasn't killed anyone yet. And he isn't lazy like that cow.

[Guest]

Well, he has one over Hitlery. He hasn't killed anyone yet. And he isn't lazy like that cow.

Your ability to speak to the issues; your ability to make wild claims just for sake of doing it, and your curt, immature use of the English language certainly identifies you as a Trump follower.

Clinton is not my choice, but we only have two and he is, in a word..dispicable. He is the ONLY person who makes her look good

[Guest]

Your ability to speak to the issues; your ability to make wild claims just for sake of doing it, and your curt, immature use of the English language certainly identifies you as a Trump follower.

Clinton is not my choice, but we only have two and he is, in a word..dispicable. He is the ONLY person who makes her look good

Don't blame me for your ignorance. If you are too lazy to know her like we do, then that is your problem not mine. But, lazy is a trait that you both have in common.

It is hard to believe that after all this time, you do not know anything about Hillary Clinton. Have you been without the Internet or TV in the past couple years, or are you just a liberal in denial?